Citations

Clear

399 citation(s) found for "Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S".

Clinical Impact of Pathogenic Germline Variants in Pancreatic Cancer: Results From a Multicenter, Prospective, Universal Genetic Testing Study
Usón, Pedro Luiz Serrano , Samadder, N. Jewel , Riegert‐Johnson, Douglas L. , Boardman, Lisa, Ahn, Daniel H. , Faigel, Douglas O. , Pannala, Rahul , Golafshar, Michael A. , Klint, Margaret, Esplin, Edward D. , Stewart, A. Keith, Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Uson, Pedro L S , Riegert-Johnson, Douglas, Kunze, Katie, Golafshar, Michael , Esplin, Edward D , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Boardman, Lisa, Borad, Mitesh J. , Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam , Fukami, Norio , Kunze, Katie L. , Nussbaum, Robert L.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology | October 8, 2021 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 10 | Pages: e00414

10.14309/ctg.0000000000000414 | PMID 34620795 Get It

INTRODUCTION: To report the prevalence and outcomes of unselected pancreatic cancer (PC) patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) detected using a universal testing approach. METHODS: We undertook a prospective, multisite study of germline sequencing using a >80 gene next-generation sequencing platform among 250 patients with PC (not selected for age or family history of cancer) between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020. Demographic, tumor characteristics, and clinical outcomes were compared between PGV carriers and noncarriers. RESULTS: Of 250 patients, the mean age was 65 years (SD 8.7), 56% was male, 83.6% was White, and 65.6% had advanced disease (stages III and IV). PGVs were found in 15.2% (N = 38) of patients, and 2 patients had more than 1 PGV. Variants of uncertain significance were found in 44.4% (N = 111). Family history of cancer (odds ratio: 2.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.14–5.19, P = 0.025) was associated with a higher risk of PGV. In a median follow-up of 16.5 months, the median overall survival was 16.8 months in PGV carriers compared with 16.5 months in noncarriers (hazard ratio: 0.51, 95% confidence interval: 0.25–1.01, P = 0.05). Higher levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and advanced disease stages (III and IV) were associated with worse outcomes in both groups. Overall, 68% of PGV carriers had mutations in homologous recombination repair genes, including BRCA1 , BRCA2 , PALB2 , ATM , CHEK2 , NBN , and RAD51C . DISCUSSION: Universal multigene panel testing in PC reveals that 1 in 6 patients are carriers of PGV. Multigene germline testing should be used to aid in treatment selection, prognostication, and familial cancer counseling.
Genomic Profiling of Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarcinoma Reveals Genomics Similar to Either Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Cholangiocarcinoma
Murugesan, Karthikeyan , Sharaf, Radwa , Montesion, Meagan , Moore, Jay A. , Pao, James , Pavlick, Dean C. , Upadhyay, Vivek , Alexander, Brian M. , Miller, Vincent A. , Javle, Milind , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Albacker, Lee A. , Ali, Siraj M. , Bekaii Saab, Tanios S, Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Alexander, Brian M , Frampton, Garrett M. , Ross, Jeffrey S

Mayo Clinic

JCO Precision Oncology | August 19, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1285-1296

10.1200/po.20.00397 | PMID 34476330 Get It

PURPOSE Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare, aggressive primary liver carcinoma, with morphologic features of both hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and liver cholangiocarcinomas (CCA). METHODS The genomic profiles of 4,975 CCA, 1,470 HCC, and 73 cHCC-CCA cases arising from comprehensive genomic profiling in the course of clinical care were reviewed for genomic alterations (GA), tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability status, genomic loss of heterozygosity, chromosomal aneuploidy, genomic ancestry, and hepatitis B virus status. RESULTS In cHCC-CCA, GA were most common in TP53 (65.8%), TERT (49.3%), and PTEN (9.6%), and 24.6% cHCC-CCA harbored potentially targetable GA. Other GA were predominantly associated with either HCC or CCA, including, but not limited to, TERT, FGFR2, IDH1, and presence of hepatitis B virus. On the basis of these features, a machine learning (ML) model was trained to classify a cHCC-CCA case as CCA-like or HCC-like. Of cHCC-CCA cases, 16% (12/73) were ML-classified as CCA-like and 58% (42/73) cHCC-CCA were ML-classified as HCC-like. The ML model classified more than 70% of cHCC-CCA as CCA-like or HCC-like on the basis of genomic profiles, without additional clinico-pathologic input. CONCLUSION These findings demonstrate the use of ML for classification as based on a targeted exome panel used during routine clinical care. Classification of cHCC-CCA by genomic features alone creates insights into the biology of the disease and warrants further investigation for relevance to clinical care.
Association of Convalescent Plasma Therapy With Survival in Patients With Hematologic Cancers and COVID-19
Shah, Pankil , Rubinstein, Samuel M. , Joyner, Michael J. , Choueiri, Toni K. , Flora, Daniel , Gulati, Anthony P., Koshkin, Vadim S. , Papadopoulos, Esperanza B. , Robilotti, Elizabeth , Su, Christopher , Wulff‐Burchfield, Elizabeth , Xie, Zhuoer , Yu, Peter Paul , Mishra, Sanjay , Senefeld, Jonathon W. , Shah, Dimpy P. , Verma, Amit , Gartrell, Benjamin A. , Ohri, Nitin , Butt, Omar H. , Campian, Jian , Fiala, Mark A. , Monahan, Ryan, Bohachek, Pamela, Mundt, Daniel , Streckfuss, Mitrianna, Tadesse, Eyob, Lammers, Philip E. , Revankar, Sanjay G. , Khan, Hina, Prete, Salvatore A. Del , Angevine, Anne H., Bär, Michael , Lo, KM Steve, Stratton, Jamie , Weinstein, Paul L., García, Jorge A. , Nakayama, John , Gupta, Shilpa , Ahluwalia, Manmeet S. , Dawsey, Scott J. , Nizam, Amanda , Lemmon, Christopher A. , Hoppenot, Claire , Bakouny, Ziad , Bouchard, Gabrielle, Busser, Fiona, Conners, Jean M, Curran, Catherine , Demetri, George D., Kelleher, Kaitlin M. , Shaw, Grace, Nuzzo, Pier Vitale , Zon, Rebecca L. , Zhang, Tian , Grivas, Petros , Lynch, Ryan C. , Schweizer, Michael T. , Tachiki, Lisa ML, Vinayak, Shaveta , Wagner, Michael J. , Yeh, Albert C. , Goyal, Sharad , Clément, Jessica , Daher, Ahmad , Dailey, Mark E., Hsu, Emily , Menendez, Alvaro G. , Rathmann, Joerg, Serrano, Oscar K. , Jayaraj, Asha, Accordino, Melissa , Mushtaq, Sarah, Bernicker, Eric , Deeken, John F. , Shafer, Danielle , Lewis, Mark A. , Rhodes, Terence D., Gill, David , Low, Clarke A., Nagle, Sarah , Hayes‐Lattin, Brandon , Nemecek, Eneida R. , Zaren, Howard A. , Smith, Stephanie J., Akhtari, Mojtaba, Lau, Eric , Reeves, Mark E. , Elms, Destry, Altman, Jessica K. , Gurley, Michael, Mulcahy, Mary F. , Kulkarni, Amit , Shah, Surbhi, Rosovsky, Rachel , Reynolds, Kerry L. , Bardia, Aditya , Gainor, Justin F. , Zubiri, Leyre , Bonnen, Mark , Mahadevan, Daruka , Salazar, Mary, Belenkaya, Rimma , Riely, Gregory J. , Faller, Bryan A. , McKay, Rana R. , Ajmera, Archana , Cabal, Angelo , Shaya, Justin , Weissmann, Lisa B., Jani, Chinmay , Chen, James L. , Jhawar, Sachin R, Lustberg, Maryam B. , Pillainayagam, Clement, Wall, Sarah , Williams, Nicole , Karivedu, Vidhya , Addison, Daniel , Menon, Harry, Rovito, Marc A., Elshoury, Amro, Shah, Mansi , Mahmood, Sana , Mico, Vasil, Rivera, Andrea Verghese, Miller, Chaim , Cabebe, Elwyn C., Glover, Michael , Jha, Alokkumar , Schapira, Lidia , Shah, Sumit , Subbiah, Suki , Logan, Barbara, Lopes, Gilberto , Russell, Karen , Stith, Brittany, Smits, Melissa, Edwin, Natasha, Chism, David D. , Owenby, Susie, Doroshow, Deborah B. , Galsky, Matthew D. , Zhu, Huili , Fu, Julie , Patel, Kanishka G. , Riess, Jonathan W. , Kwon, Daniel H. , Islam, Jessica Y. , Ahmad, Syed A. , Grover, Punita , Kharofa, Jordan , Marcum, Michelle, Park, Cathleen, Geiger, Christopher L., Bishnoi, Rohit , Feldman, Lawrence , Hoskins, Kent , Gantt, Gerald, Khan, Mahir, Nguyen, Ryan H, Schwartz, Candice, Venepalli, Neeta K. , Kasi, Anup , Fecher, Leslie A. , Mavromatis, Blanche H., Bijjula, Ragneel R., Cheng, Alex , French, Benjamin , Gillaspie, Erin A. , Hennessy, Cassandra , Johnson, Douglas B. , Reid, Sonya , Slosky, David, Solórzano, Carmen C. , Vega-Luna, Karen, Enriquez, Kyle T. , Sun, Tianyi , Carducci, Theresa M., Puc, Matthew , Loon, Susan Van, Goldsmith, Karen J., Rice, Robert, Cabalona, Wilhelmina D., Pilar, Christine, McCollough, Briana Barrow, Peddi, Prakash , Rosen, L, Bilen, Mehmet Asım , Ravindranathan, Deepak , LoRusso, Patricia , Masters, Tyler, Choueiri, Toni K , Bakouny, Ziad , Mishra, Sanjay , Yeh, Albert C , Xie, Zhuoer , Zubiri, Leyre , Su, Christopher , Fiala, Mark A , Joyner, Michael J , Senefeld, Jonathon W , Ahluwalia, Manmeet S , Lustberg, Maryam , Thompson, Michael A. , Henderson, Jeffrey P. , Griffiths, Elizabeth A. , Hwang, Clara , Warner, Jeremy L. , Halmos, Balázs , Goel, Sanjay , Sica, Roberto Alejandro , Thakkar, Astha , Stockerl‐Goldstein, Keith , Zhou, Alice Y. , Tadesse, Eyob, Panagiotou, Orestis A. , Egan, Pamela , Farmakiotis, Dimitrios , Olszewski, Adam J. , Loaiza‐Bonilla, Arturo , Bar, Michael H, Lo, K. M. Steve, Caimi, Paolo F. , Barnholtz‐Sloan, Jill S. , Pennell, Nathan A , Li, Ang , Giordano, Antonio , Nohria, Anju , Schmidt, Andrew , Van Allen, Eliezer M , Xu, Wenxin Vincent , Halabi, Susan , Lyman, Gary H , Graber, Jerome J. , Khaki, Ali Raza , Loggers, Elizabeth T , Nakasone, Elizabeth S. , Tachiki, Lisa M, Gatson, Na Tosha , Huynh‐Le, Minh‐Phuong , Rosenstein, Lori J. , Elias, Rawad , Gadgeel, Shirish M. , Hawley, Jessica E. , Hershman, Dawn L. , Bhutani, Divaya , Schwartz, Gary K. , Reuben, Daniel Y. , McWeeney, Shannon K. , Nagaraj, Gayathri , Berg, Stephanie , Morgans, Alicia K. , Wehbe, Firas , Durbin, Eric B. , Nelson, Heather H. , Boland, Genevieve M. , Hálfdánarson, Þorvarður R. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Desai, Aakash , Mesa, Ruben A. , Ramirez, Amelie G , Philip, John , Gatti-Mays, Margaret Elena , Jhawar, Sachin R, Palmer, Joshua D. , Stover, Daniel G. , Joshi, Monika , Jabbour, Salma K , Bashir, Babar , McNair, Christopher M. , Wu, Julie , Kloecker, Goetz Hans , Fazio, Alyson, Kumar, Vaibhav , Wood, William A. , Gulati, Shuchi , Wise-Draper, Trisha Michel , Bowles, Daniel W. , Markham, Merry Jennifer , Shah, Chintan , Acoba, Jared David , Rho, Young Soo, Nguyen, Ryan H, Pasquinelli, Mary M. , Vikas, Praveen , Friese, Christopher R. , Zaman, Qamar U, Davis, Elizabeth J. , Hausrath, Daniel J. , Hsu, Chih–Yuan , Li, Xuanyi , Rini, Brian I. , Shyr, Yu , Tucker, Matthew D. , Wang, Lucy Lu , Hafez, Navid , Herbst, Roy S. , Stratton, Catherine

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Oncology | August 19, 2021 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1167

10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1799 | PMID 34137799 Get It

Synergistic combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy and cyclin‐dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in biliary tract cancers
Arora, Mansi , Abdelrahman, Amro M. , Alva‐Ruiz, Roberto, Leiting, Jennifer L. , Chen, Xianfeng , Usón, Pedro Luiz Serrano , Dumbauld, Chelsae, Baker, Alexander T. , Gamb, Scott I., Egan, Jan B. , Zhou, Yumei , Nagalo, Bolni Marius , Meurice, Nathalie , Eskelinen, Eeva‐Liisa , Braggio, Esteban , Barrett, Michael T. , Buetow, Kenneth H. , Roberts, Lewis R. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Ahn, Daniel H. , Truty, Mark J. , Bogenberger, James M. , Yonkus, Jennifer, Alva-Ruiz, Roberto, Leiting, Jennifer L , Serrano Uson Junior, Pedro Luiz, Dumbauld, Chelsae R, Salomao, Marcela A, Roberts, Lewis R , Braggio, Esteban , Uson, Pedro L S , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Nagalo, Bolni , Baker, Alexander , Abdelrahman, Amro M , Yonkus, Jennifer A. , Salomao, Marcela , Kosiorek, Heidi , Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam , Mansfield, Aaron S. , Borad, Mitesh J.

Mayo Clinic

Hepatology | August 18, 2021 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 43-58

10.1002/hep.32102 | PMID 34407567 Get It

Abstract Background and aims Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are uncommon, but highly lethal, gastrointestinal malignancies. Gemcitabine/cisplatin is a standard‐of‐care systemic therapy, but has a modest impact on survival and harbors toxicities, including myelosuppression, nephropathy, neuropathy, and ototoxicity. Whereas BTCs are characterized by aberrations activating the cyclinD1/cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK)4/6/CDK inhibitor 2a/retinoblastoma pathway, clinical use of CDK4/6 inhibitors as monotherapy is limited by lack of validated biomarkers, diffident preclinical efficacy, and development of acquired drug resistance. Emerging studies have explored therapeutic strategies to enhance the antitumor efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors by the combination with chemotherapy regimens, but their mechanism of action remains elusive. Approach and results Here, we report in vitro and in vivo synergy in BTC models, showing enhanced efficacy, reduced toxicity, and better survival with a combination comprising gemcitabine/cisplatin and CDK4/6 inhibitors. Furthermore, we demonstrated that abemaciclib monotherapy had only modest efficacy attributable to autophagy‐induced resistance. Notably, triplet therapy was able to potentiate efficacy through elimination of the autophagic flux. Correspondingly, abemaciclib potentiated ribonucleotide reductase catalytic subunit M1 reduction, resulting in sensitization to gemcitabine. Conclusions As such, these data provide robust preclinical mechanistic evidence of synergy between gemcitabine/cisplatin and CDK4/6 inhibitors and delineate a path forward for translation of these findings to preliminary clinical studies in advanced BTC patients.
Osteoclast-Like Giant Cell Tumors of the Pancreas
Ueberroth, Benjamin E. , Liu, Alex J. , Graham, Rondell P. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Truty, Mark J. , Mody, Kabir , Sonbol, M Bassam, Graham, Rondell P , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , McWilliams, Robert R. , Mahipal, Amit , Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam , Hálfdánarson, Þorvarður R.

Mayo Clinic

Pancreas | August 9, 2021 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 952-956

10.1097/mpa.0000000000001858 | PMID 34369897 Get It

Objectives This study sought to better characterize patient characteristics, treatment options, and outcomes for osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of the pancreas, a rare subtype of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods This is a retrospective study of all patients with osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of pancreatic origin treated at Mayo Clinic from 2000 to present. Baseline patient characteristics, treatment modalities utilized, and outcomes were compiled. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with a significance level of P ≤ 0.05. Results Fifteen patients met criteria for inclusion. Four patients had distant metastases at diagnosis, the remaining 11 with locoregional disease. Median OS for the entire cohort was 11 months. Metastatic disease was associated with significantly shorter OS (3.5 vs 14.1 months; P = 0.005). Three patients had no evidence of disease at time of analysis; all 3 were treated with complete resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions Osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of the pancreas is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. For patients with locoregional disease, surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiation may play a role in extended disease-free survival. Metastatic disease presents a challenging entity to treat with little data to support any effective chemotherapy regimens.
A Pilot Study of Ponatinib in Patients With FGFR-Altered Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma
Ahn, Daniel H. , Usón, Pedro Luiz Serrano , Masci, Peter, Mody, Kabir , DeLeon, Thomas, Gores, Gregory, Smoot, Rory L. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Mansfield, Aaron, Smoot, Rory L , Uson, Pedro L S , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Kosiorek, Heidi , Hálfdánarson, Þorvarður R. , Babiker, Hani M. , Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam , Mahipal, Amit , Tran, Nguyen H. , Hubbard, Joleen M. , Borad, Mitesh J.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | July 29, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-741191/v1 Get It

Abstract Background:Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare, chemo resistant and are associated with a poor prognosis. Preclinical and early clinical work had demonstrated interesting anti-tumor activity from targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway. We hypothesized that ponatinib, a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against FGFR, would be active in BTC patients with FGFR alterations.Methods:This was a multi-center, single institution pilot study of ponatinib in patients with advanced, refractory BTC with FGFR alterations. The primary end point was overall response rate, with secondary points of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessment. Results:Twelve patients were enrolled prior to early termination of the trial. Clinical benefit (defined as complete/partial response + stable disease) of 45.5% was observed. All observed toxicities were manageable and reversible. Toxicities were mild, with lymphopenia (75%), rash (63%) and fatigue (50%) being the most frequent. No significant detriment in global QoL was observed.Conclusions:Ponatinib as a single agent in FGFR altered BTC is tolerable with very modest clinical activity. This is the first report of prospective assessment of FGFR inhibition in BTC using ponatinib, and the first study to report its effect on HRQoL. Further development of ponatinib will involve correlative studies to better refine patient selection, focus on combinations with other molecular targeted agents, conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy, and studies to better understand mechanisms of treatment resistance.
FGFR Inhibitor Toxicity and Efficacy in Cholangiocarcinoma: Multicenter Single-Institution Cohort Experience
Gile, Jennifer , Ou, Fang‐Shu , Mahipal, Amit , Larson, Joseph J. , Mody, Kabir , Jin, Zhaohui , Hubbard, Joleen M. , Hálfdánarson, Þorvarður R. , Alberts, Steven R. , Jatoi, Aminah , Smoot, Rory L. , Roberts, Lewis R. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Gile, Jennifer Jane , Hubbard, Joleen , Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R , McWilliams, Robert R , Ma, Wen Wee , Ilyas, Sumera, Roberts, Lewis R , Borad, Mitesh J , Smoot, Rory L , Mahipal, Amit , Alberts, Steven R , Ou, Fang-Shu , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Jin, Zhaohui , McWilliams, Robert R. , Wee, Wen , Ilyas, Sumera I. , Gores, Gregory J. , Borad, Mitesh J. , Tran, Nguyen H.

Mayo Clinic

JCO Precision Oncology | July 28, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1228-1240

10.1200/po.21.00064 | PMID 34778691 Get It

PURPOSECholangiocarcinomas (CCA) are a group of heterogeneous tumors arising from the biliary epithelia. Significant sequencing efforts have provided further insights into the molecular mechanisms of this disease including fibroblast growth factor receptor ( FGFR) alterations, which occurs in approximately 15%-20% of intrahepatic CCAs. Herein, we describe the FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi)-associated treatment toxicity and cancer-specific outcomes from a multicenter single-institution cohort.METHODSThis is a retrospective study of patients with CCA and known FGFR alterations treated with FGFRi. We describe the toxicity and efficacy in patients treated at Mayo Clinic between January 2010 and December 2020.RESULTSOur group identified 61 patients with advanced or metastatic CCA, 19 males (31%) and 42 females (69%), harboring FGFR alterations who received FGFRi. The most common grade 1 or higher adverse events for all patients included fatigue (92%), AST elevations (78%), anemia (80%), decreased platelet count (63%), and hyperphosphatemia (74%). Median progression-free survival on FGFRi was 5.8 months for all patients (95% CI, 4.9 to 9.0). Females had significantly longer progression-free survival at 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 11.8) on FGFRi compared with males at 4.9 months (95% CI, 2.8 to not estimable; P = .038).CONCLUSIONFGFRi are well tolerated with clinical efficacy. With the recent approval of FGFRi by the US Food and Drug Administration and ongoing clinical trials for new FGFRi, understanding outcomes and toxicity associated with these medications is important for precision oncology.
Causes of Death Following Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis in the U.S.: A Population-Based Analysis
Afifi, Ahmed , Elmehrath, Ahmed O. , Ruhban, Inas A., Gad, Mohamed M. , Al‐Husseini, Muneer J. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Saad, Anas M , Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Saad, Anas M.

Mayo Clinic

The Oncologist | June 8, 2021 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 733-739

10.1002/onco.13854 | PMID 34101294 Get It

Abstract Introduction Because of the improved colorectal cancer (CRC) survival in the U.S., patients may live long enough after CRC diagnosis to the point where non–cancer-related comorbidities may considerably impact their overall survival. In this study, we perform a long-term analysis of causes of death (CODs) following nonmetastatic CRC with respect to different demographic and tumor-related criteria. Materials and Methods We gained access to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data to review patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic CRC during 2000–2015. We calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for each COD following CRC. SMRs represented the change of risk of a specific COD following CRC diagnoses when compared with the risk in the general U.S. population. Results We reviewed 302,345 patients, of whom 112,008 died during the study period. More deaths (68.3%) occurred within 5 years following nonmetastatic CRC diagnosis, with 76,486 deaths. CRC was the most common COD (51.4%) within 5 years of diagnosis followed by heart disease (15.2%) and other cancers (8.4%). As time passed after diagnosis, the number of CRC deaths decreased, and other noncancer causes increased to the point that after 10 years only 10.4% of deaths were attributed to CRC, 15.3% were attributed to other cancers, and 34.2% were secondary to heart disease. Conclusion Following nonmetastatic CRC diagnosis, most deaths remain secondary to CRC. Other causes, including other cancers and cardiovascular disease, represent a significant number of deaths, especially in the 5 years following initial CRC diagnosis. Our findings help guide counseling patients with CRC regarding future health risks. Implications for Practice Most common causes of death following nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) are heart diseases, other cancers, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cerebrovascular diseases. Physicians should counsel patients regarding survivorship with cancer screening and focus on prevention of noncancer deaths. These findings should be considered by physicians who give care for survivors of nonmetastatic CRC.
Randomized Phase II Study of PET Response–Adapted Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Mature Results of the CALGB 80803 (Alliance) Trial
Goodman, Karyn A. , Ou, Fang‐Shu , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Fruth, Briant, Twohy, Erin , Meyers, Michael O. , Boffa, Daniel J., Mitchell, Kisha A. , Frankel, Wendy L. , Niedzwiecki, Donna , Thurmes, Paul J., Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A. , Ilson, David H. , Meyers, Michael O , Boffa, Daniel J , Mitchell, Kisha , Noonan, Anne , Janjigian, Yelena Y , O'Reilly, Eileen M , Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A , Ou, Fang-Shu , Niedzwiecki, Donna , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Hall, Nathan C. , Noonan, Anne M. , Venook, Alan P. , O’Reilly, Eileen M.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 2, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 25 | Pages: 2803-2815

10.1200/jco.20.03611 | PMID 34077237 Get It

PURPOSE To evaluate the use of early assessment of chemotherapy responsiveness by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to tailor therapy in patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. METHODS After baseline PET, patients were randomly assigned to an induction chemotherapy regimen: modified oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFOX) or carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP). Repeat PET was performed after induction; change in maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) from baseline was assessed. PET nonresponders (< 35% decrease in SUV) crossed over to the alternative chemotherapy during chemoradiation (50.4 Gy/28 fractions). PET responders (≥ 35% decrease in SUV) continued on the same chemotherapy during chemoradiation. Patients underwent surgery at 6 weeks postchemoradiation. Primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in nonresponders after switching chemotherapy. RESULTS Two hundred forty-one eligible patients received Protocol treatment, of whom 225 had an evaluable repeat PET. The pCR rates for PET nonresponders after induction FOLFOX who crossed over to CP (n = 39) or after induction CP who changed to FOLFOX (n = 50) was 18.0% (95% CI, 7.5 to 33.5) and 20% (95% CI, 10 to 33.7), respectively. The pCR rate in responders who received induction FOLFOX was 40.3% (95% CI, 28.9 to 52.5) and 14.1% (95% CI, 6.6 to 25.0) in responders to CP. With a median follow-up of 5.2 years, median overall survival was 48.8 months (95% CI, 33.2 months to not estimable) for PET responders and 27.4 months (95% CI, 19.4 months to not estimable) for nonresponders. For induction FOLFOX patients who were PET responders, median survival was not reached. CONCLUSION Early response assessment using PET imaging as a biomarker to individualize therapy for patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma was effective, improving pCR rates in PET nonresponders. PET responders to induction FOLFOX who continued on FOLFOX during chemoradiation achieved a promising 5-year overall survival of 53%.
PERSPECTIVE: Tepotinib + cetuximab in patients (pts) with RAS/BRAF wild-type left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR antibody therapy due to MET amplification (METamp).
Cubillo, Antonio , Petorin-Lesens, Caroline, Rodrı́guez-Salas, Nuria, Dupuis, Olivier , López, Carlos , Tournigand, Christophe , Isambert, Nicolás , Abubaker, Khalid, Schumacher, Karl-Maria, Berghoff, Karin , Vlassak, Soetkin, Otto, Gordon, Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Cutsem, Eric Van , Raghav, Kanwal , Dupuis, Olivier, Tabernero, Josep

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 2, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: TPS3616-TPS3616

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.tps3616 Get It

TPS3616 Background: METamp is a secondary, or co-driving, genetic change in pts with mCRC and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy, which can contribute to disease progression. In EGFR-resistant pts with mCRC and METamp, MET inhibition + an anti-EGFR agent may achieve disease control by targeting emerging MET pathway activation and maintaining EGFR pathway inhibition. Tepotinib is an oral, once-daily, highly selective, potent MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), recently approved in the US for NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping. Tepotinib + gefitinib demonstrated improved outcomes in pts with EGFR-mutant METamp NSCLC and acquired EGFR TKI resistance vs chemotherapy (INSIGHT: NCT01982955). In these pts, progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.6 vs 4.2 months (HR = 0.13; 90% CI: 0.04, 0.43) and overall survival (OS) was 37.3 vs 13.1 months (HR = 0.08; 90% CI: 0.01, 0.51). In pts with mCRC and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR antibody therapy due to METamp, tepotinib + anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab may be active and provide an effective therapeutic option. Methods: This Phase II, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study will assess preliminary safety and tolerability, antitumor activity, and explore pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of tepotinib + cetuximab in pts with RAS/BRAF wild-type left-sided mCRC and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR antibody-targeted therapy due to METamp (NCT04515394). A safety run-in (6–12 pts) will evaluate the recommended Phase II dose of tepotinib to be used in combination with cetuximab (endpoint: dose-limiting toxicities). Enrollment is based on a confirmed advanced left-sided CRC diagnosis ( RAS/BRAF wild-type), documented previous anti-EGFR therapy and acquired resistance on most recent anti-EGFR antibody and METamp confirmed by liquid and/or tissue biopsy. Pts must be ≥18 years old, have ECOG PS of 0/1 and normal organ function. The study will screen sufficient pts to account for setting-specific heterogenecity in reported METamp incidence. Approximately 42 pts are planned to receive study treatment: ̃22 in Cohort A (second-line, outside US) and 20 in Cohort B (≥third-line, US only). Primary endpoint: investigator-assessed objective response (RECIST 1.1). Secondary endpoints are investigator-assessed duration of response (DoR), PFS (RECIST 1.1) and OS, tolerability and safety (NCI-CTCAE v5.0), and cetuximab immunogenicity (measured by antidrug antibody assays at the start and end of treatment). Additional endpoints include assessment of tepotinib and cetuximab PK profiles, and expression of biomarkers of resistance (from blood and/or tissue samples). Retrospective assessment of best overall response, DoR and PFS by an independent review committee may be conducted. No formal statistical hypothesis will be tested in this exploratory study. Clinical trial information: NCT04515394.