Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy in adults. Standard of care (SOC) for suspected GBM begins with maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and temozolomide, and maintenance temozolomide. Imvax has utilized its Goldspire™ platform to create IGV-001, an autologous biologic-device combination product for the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM). IGV-001 consists of autologous GBM tumor cells and an antisense oligonucleotide against IGF-1R mRNA (IMV-001), irradiated and administered via biodiffusion chambers implanted in the abdomen. Together, these components stimulate immunogenic cell death and antigen release. In a phase 1b study in patients with ndGBM, IGV-001 was well tolerated without unexpected adverse events. Multiple efficacy signals were also observed, including significant improvements in progression-free survival, overall survival, radiographic evidence of tumor response, and changes in immune response biomarkers. A phase 2b randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and efficacy of IGV-001 in patients with ndGBM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04485949) is ongoing. Here, we present the first safety data from the study. MATERIAL AND METHODS After surgical resection, patients are treated with IGV-001 or placebo followed by SOC. The study will enroll approximately 93 patients at 20 sites in the United States, with a 2:1 randomization favoring IGV-001. The primary outcome is progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomization to first progression, as determined by blinded central radiology review, or death. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, and safety. RESULTS As of February 2, 2024, a total of 72 patients have been randomized and 69 have been implanted with IGV-001 or placebo plus SOC. The median age was 60.0 years (range, 24-70 years). Most randomized patients (76.4%) were 51-70 years of age, and the male:female ratio was 2.27. A total of 39/45 (86.7%) patients with enough follow-up time, initiated treatment with concurrent radiation and temozolomide. A total of 9/72 (12.5%) randomized patients discontinued treatment, including 7 patients who discontinued during the SOC treatment period. No patients discontinued treatment for adverse events, protocol deviations, or death. A total of 11/72 (15.3%) randomized patients discontinued the study after randomization. CONCLUSION To date, the review of blinded safety data did not show any emerging risk and supports that there is no change to the benefit-risk profile of treatment with IGV-001 versus placebo. The data will be updated before presentation.

Bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis lead to a 4-fold increase in mortality. Immune dysfunction in cirrhosis further increases the risk of bacterial infections, in addition to alterations in the gut microbiome, which increase the risk of pathogenic bacteria. High rates of empiric antibiotic use contribute to increased incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms and further increases in mortality. Despite continous advances in the field, major unknowns regarding interactions between the immune system and the gut microbiome and strategies to reduce infection risk and improve mortality deserve further investigation. Here, we highlight the unknowns in these major research areas and make a proposal for a research agenda to move toward improving disease progression and outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and infections.

ImportancePatients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have ischemic stroke despite taking oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) have a very high risk of recurrence. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a mechanical stroke prevention strategy that may provide additional protection in patients with thromboembolic events under OAT.ObjectiveTo compare percutaneous LAAO with continuing OAT alone regarding stroke prevention in patients with AF who had a thromboembolic event despite taking OAT.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study was a propensity score–matched comparison of the STR-OAC LAAO cohort, an international collaboration of 21 sites combining patients from multiple prospective registries of patients who underwent LAAO between 2010 and 2022. STR-OAC LAAO cohort patients who had follow-up longer than 3 months were propensity score–matched to a previously published control cohort comprising patients from an established international collaboration of investigator-initiated prospective studies. This control cohort included patients with nonvalvular AF, recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, and follow-up longer than 3 months who were taking OAT before the index event. Analyses were adjusted for imbalances in gender, age, hypertension, diabetes, and CHA2 DS2-VASc score.ExposureLeft atrial appendage occlusion vs continuation of oral anticoagulation therapy alone (control group).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was time to first ischemic stroke.ResultsFour hundred thirty-three patients from the STR-OAC LAAO cohort (mean [SD] age, 72 [9] years; 171 [39%] females and 262 [61%] males; mean [SD] CHA2 DS2-VASc score, 5.0 [1.6]) were matched to 433 of 1140 patients (38%) from the control group. During 2-year follow-up, 50 patients experienced ischemic stroke: an annualized event rate of 2.8% per patient-year in the STR-OAC LAAO group vs 8.9% per patient-year in the control group. Left atrial appendage occlusion was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19-0.58; P < .001) compared with the control group. After LAAO, OAT was discontinued in 290 patients (67%), and the remaining 143 patients (33%) continued OAT after LAAO as an adjunctive therapy.Conclusions and RelevanceIn patients with nonvalvular AF and a prior thromboembolic event despite taking OAT, LAAO was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke compared with continued OAT alone. Randomized clinical trial data are needed to confirm that LAAO may be a promising treatment option for this population with a very high risk of stroke.

Piezo2 is a mechanically gated ion channel most commonly expressed by specialized mechanoreceptors, such as the enteroendocrine cells (EECs) of the gastrointestinal epithelium. A subpopulation of EECs expresses Piezo2 and functionally resembles the skin’s touch sensors, called Merkel cells. Low-magnitude mechanical stimuli delivered to the mucosal layer are primarily sensed by mechanosensitive EECs in a process we term “gut touch.” Piezo2 transduces cellular forces into ionic currents, a process that is sensitive to bilayer tension and cytoskeletal depolymerization. E-cadherin is a widely expressed protein that mediates cell–cell adhesion in epithelia and interacts with scaffold proteins that anchor it to actin fibers. E-cadherin was shown to interact with Piezo2 in immortalized cell models. We hypothesized that the Piezo2–E-cadherin interaction is important for EEC mechanosensitivity. To test this, we used super-resolution imaging, co-immunoprecipitation, and functional assays in primary tissues from mice and gut organoids. In tissue EECs and intestinal organoids, we observed multiple Piezo2 cellular pools, including one that overlaps with actin and E-cadherin at the cells’ lateral walls. Further, E-cadherin co-immunoprecipitated with Piezo2 in the primary colonic epithelium. We found that E-cadherin knockdown decreases mechanosensitive calcium responses in mechanically stimulated primary EECs. In all, our results demonstrate that Piezo2 localizes to the lateral wall of EECs, where it physically interacts with E-cadherin and actin. They suggest that the Piezo2–E-cadherin–actin interaction is important for mechanosensitivity in the gut epithelium and possibly in tissues where E-cadherin and Piezo2 are co-expressed in epithelial mechanoreceptors, such as skin, lung, and bladder.

Introduction Skull infarction is an uncommonly reported complication of sickle cell disease. We aimed to characterize the clinical and imaging features of skull infarction in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease. Methods We searched the PubMed database for case reports on skull bone infarction in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease. Out of 67 records retrieved, 15 met inclusion criteria, and a 16th case reported by the senior author was included. We extracted and analyzed clinical and imaging data. Results The most common symptom at onset was headache (88%). Bilateral skull infarction (50%) and parietal bone involvement (82%) were frequent imaging findings. Epidural hematoma developed in 65% of the cases, 30% of patients required drainage, and exchange infusion was reported in 18%. No fatal outcomes were reported. Conclusions Skull infarction is a potentially severe complication of sickle cell disease presenting unique clinical challenges. Acute headaches should raise suspicion for this condition and may require additional investigation.