Citations

Clear

464 citation(s) found for "Josephs, Keith A".

An examination of atypical primary progressive aphasia variants
Boland, Sarah, Ali, Farwa , Martin, Peter R. , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Petersen, Ronald C. , Bigio, Eileen H. , Lowe, Val J. , Reichard, Ross R., Ertekin‐Taner, Nilüfer , Rademakers, Rosa , DeTure, Michael , Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Josephs, Keith A. , Botha, Hugo , Duffy, Joseph R. , Utianski, Rene L. , Machulda, Mary M. , Clark, Heather M. , Buciuc, Marina , Boeve, Bradley F. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Senjem, Matthew L. , Reid, Robert I. , Jones, David T. , Knopman, David S. , Jack, Clifford R. , Ross, Owen A. , Dickson, Dennis W.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 31, 2021 | Volume: 17 | Issue: S6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.055305 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThe Neurodegenerative Research Group (NRG) at Mayo clinic has followed patients with degenerative speech and/or language disorders for over a decade. In this presentation I will present data from this cohort to inform a broader discussion about the importance of apraxia of speech (AOS) and its subtypes, heterogeneity within the agrammatic PPA variant, and perils of mixed phenotypes.MethodWe reviewed the NRG database to identify patients who initially presented with isolated (PPAOS), AOS in conjunction with agrammatic aphasia (AOS‐PAA), isolated agrammatic aphasia (PAA), and patients who had PAA or AOS overlapping with another degenerative diagnosis. Data from the following clinical instruments were abstracted: WAB AQ (aphasia severity), UPDRS III (parkinsonism), WAB Praxis (ideomotor apraxia), and the MoCA (cognitive ability). We assessed the effect of baseline diagnosis and AOS subtype on these outcomes over time using Bayesian linear mixed effects models. We qualitatively reviewed longitudinal diagnostic trajectories. Preliminary analyses were done on available autopsy data.ResultPAA was associated with greater aphasia at baseline and more rapid decline; PPAOS was associated with normal language at baseline and slow decline; and PAA‐AOS with intermediate baseline aphasia and decline. However, for those with AOS longitudinal decline differed based on AOS subtype: prosodic PPAOS was associated with the slowest decline and phonetic PAA‐AOS with the fastest. Some patients met criteria for non‐PPA disorders during follow up. However, compared to patients who met criteria for these disorders at enrollment, the speech/language‐first patients remained qualitatively distinct, and neither resembled the cases that were mixed at onset. Preliminary autopsy data suggests that AOS is predictive of tau and that the specific tauopathy may be related to the initial syndrome and AOS subtype.ConclusionThe differences between PAA, PAA‐AOS and PPAOS suggest that these disorders should not be lumped. In fact, the longitudinal trajectories are sufficiently different that doing so would add noise to observational and interventional studies. Instead, more detailed phenotyping, including AOS subtype, can aid prognostication and may improve prediction of the underlying pathology. Finally, caution should be exercised when considering PPAOS and PPA patients for other FTLD diagnostic categories.
Visuospatial impairment in logopenic progressive aphasia: Why do we not “see” it?
Pudumjee, Shehroo B. , Martin, Peter R. , Bailey, Kimberly, Caves, Courtney, Sharp, Blair, Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Josephs, Keith A. , Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Duffy, Joseph R. , Clark, Heather M. , Botha, Hugo , Machulda, Mary M.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 31, 2021 | Volume: 17 | Issue: S6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.055810 Get It

AbstractBackgroundLogopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) have distinct patterns of hypometabolism and atrophy. However, these clinical syndromes overlap: visuospatial impairment has been documented in LPA and aphasia in PCA. Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure – Copy (Rey‐O Copy) performance is correlated with parietal‐occipital atrophy in LPA. We explore visuospatial impairment on the Rey‐O Copy in LPA and PCA with the Mayo Older Americans Normative Studies (MOANS; which uses Meyers & Meyers criteria) and the Boston Qualitative Scoring System (BQSS). We also examine the proportion of visuospatial impairment in LPA, an under‐appreciated phenomenon, compared to PCA wherein it is fundamental.MethodPatients with LPA (n=25) or PCA (n=23) were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group. Patients underwent comprehensive neuropsychological testing (including Rey‐O Copy) at baseline visit. Cut‐offs of T‐score=40 (BQSS) or scaled score=7 (MOANS) were used based on normative data. Proportions of patients with low performance were examined across LPA and PCA groups. Individual logistic regressions and AUROC analyses were then conducted to quantify differences in visuospatial impairment in LPA and PCA with both scoring systems. Identical analyses were conducted using raw scores corrected for age and sex, to avoid confounds of adjustments in normative data.ResultLPA and PCA groups were comparable on age, sex, and disease duration (LPA Median = 2.7 years, IQR=1.9‐3.5; PCA Median = 3.6 years, IQR=1.5‐4.9); p=.823). Surprisingly, 52‐72% of LPA participants demonstrated impaired performance across scoring systems, relative to 96% of the PCA group identified by both scoring systems. Odds ratios (OR) for the Rey‐O Copy MOANS (OR = 1.59; p=.008) and BQSS Copy Presence and Accuracy index (CPA; OR = 1.13, p=.002) were significant, persisting for age‐ and sex‐ controlled raw scores, suggesting the odds of a PCA diagnosis increased with decrement on Rey‐O Copy. AUROC values ranged from 0.77 to 0.88 across these indices.ConclusionA substantial number of LPA participants showed visuospatial impairment, despite initial primary language complaints. Differentiation of diagnostic groups by the Rey‐O is likely underscored by relatively uniform, profound, visuospatial impairment in PCA with more variability in LPA. However, the degree of visuospatial impairment overlaps remarkably across diagnoses.
Optimizing software methods for measuring flortaucipir SUVR change over time
Therneau, Terry M. , Weigand, Stephen D. , Gunter, Jeffrey L. , Lowe, Val J. , Przybelski, Scott A. , Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Josephs, Keith A. , Petersen, Ronald C. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Senjem, Matthew L. , Botha, Hugo , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Kantarci, Kejal , Boeve, Bradley F. , Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Knopman, David S. , Jack, Clifford R.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 31, 2021 | Volume: 17 | Issue: S1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.054086 Get It

AbstractBackgroundOptimizing software to measure Flortaucipir (AV‐1451) tau PET SUVR change‐over‐time is crucial for longitudinal observational studies and potential trials of anti‐tau agents. Ideal measurements should have good repeatability (low noise), and should clearly separate clinical cognitive groups.MethodWe compared 456 software methods varying in their use of: two major packages, each with cross‐sectional and longitudinal variants (FreeSurfer and an in‐house pipeline using SPM12, MCALT, and ANTs); three temporal‐lobe target regions (each with/without adjacent WM); seven reference regions; five PVC methods; and two statistics (mean vs. median). We used linear mixed‐effects models to compare methods using scans from 88 Mayo Clinic participants (46 cognitively impaired, 42 impaired, excluding those with symptoms inconsistent with the AD pathology imaged by Flortaucipir), each with three visits with PET and MRI. From these models, we calculated two criteria for each pipeline: relative measurement error (residual from the linear mixed model), and the t‐statistic for testing differences in group‐wise rates of change (which has a Cohen’s d interpretation of effect size for longitudinal data). We plotted both criteria orthogonally, then ranked methods overall according to the average of their ranks on both individual criteria.ResultMethods using the entorhinal cortex target region performed poorly in both criteria (Figure 1). The top 10 methods by the combined criteria (top‐left in Figure 2) all used the Mayo SPM12‐based pipeline with an eroded supratentorial WM (eSWM) or composite (eSWM + pons + cerebellum) reference region. Among them, 9/10 used the longitudinal variant, 8/10 used 2‐compartment PVC, and 7/10 used median. Altogether, our results favored SUVR methods with a longitudinal design (simultaneously calculating all time‐points), a temporal‐lobe meta‐ROI including adjacent WM, a composite reference region, 2‐class voxel‐based (Meltzer) PVC, and median statistics. Methods using GTM‐Tau PVC (Baker et al., Data in Brief, 2017) had the highest group separation but relatively large measurement error, giving them ranks 197 and 199 out of 456 with the joint (average rank) criteria.ConclusionCompared with popular FreeSurfer‐based methods (ranks 176, 258; Figure 2), our top‐ranked approaches approximately halved error in SUVR measurements while maintaining or improving group separation.
Brainstem Biomarkers of Clinical Variant and Pathology in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
Grijalva, Rosalie M. , Pham, Nha Trang Thu, Martin, Peter R. , Ali, Farwa , Utianski, Rene L. , Weigand, Stephen D. , Ahlskog, J. Eric , Josephs, Keith A. , Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Huang, Qiao , Utianski, Rene L , Josephs, Keith A , Whitwell, Jennifer , Clark, Heather M. , Duffy, Joseph R. , Botha, Hugo , Machulda, Mary M. , Dickson, Dennis W.

Mayo Clinic

Movement Disorders | December 31, 2021 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 702-712

10.1002/mds.28901 | PMID 34970796 Get It

AbstractBackgroundMagnetic resonance brainstem measurements are useful structural biomarkers in the Richardson's syndrome variant of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). However, it is unclear how these biomarkers differ across the phenotypic spectrum of PSP and how they relate to underlying pathology.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare brainstem imaging measures across clinical variants of PSP and determine sensitivity and specificity based on pathologically diagnosed cases.MethodsA total of 153 patients with PSP who represented eight clinical variants were recruited at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA) and underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Midbrain and pons area and superior and middle cerebellar peduncle width measurements were performed, and midbrain/pons ratio and Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index (MRPI) were calculated. Among the 43 patients who later died, PSP pathology was confirmed in 29, whereas 14 had other pathology.ResultsBrainstem measurements varied across PSP clinical variants and were most abnormal in PSP‐Richardson's syndrome and frontal variants, followed by PSP‐corticobasal, PSP‐speech/language, and PSP‐parkinsonism variants. All these variants showed abnormalities compared with controls. The PSP‐gait freezing variant and patients with prominent corticospinal tract signs showed normal brainstem measures. Among cases with confirmed PSP pathology, the midbrain area, midbrain/pons ratio, and MRPI were all more abnormal compared to those with other pathologies, with best differentiation obtained with the MRPI (sensitivity = 83%; specificity = 85%).ConclusionsMRI brainstem measures show utility as diagnostic biomarkers across PSP clinical variants and have the potential to be useful in predicting underlying pathology. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
Depression and Apathy across Different Variants of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
Bower, Sarah M., Weigand, Stephen D. , Ali, Farwa , Stierwalt, Julie A. G., Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Josephs, Keith A. , Stierwalt, Julie A, Whitwell, Jennifer , Josephs, Keith A , Clark, Heather M. , Botha, Hugo

Mayo Clinic

Movement Disorders Clinical Practice | December 17, 2021 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 212-217

10.1002/mdc3.13396 | PMID 35146060 Get It

ABSTRACTBackgroundApathy and depression commonly occur in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP)‐Richardson's syndrome variant; depression often requiring treatment. Little is known, however, about apathy and depression among other PSP variants.MethodsWe prospectively studied 97 newly diagnosed PSP patients. All were classified into a PSP variant using the 2017 Movement Disorder Society‐PSP criteria and administered the Geriatric Depression and Apathy Evaluation Scales. Differences in apathy and depression frequency and severity across six variants, and secondarily across PSP‐Richardson's syndrome, PSP‐Cortical and PSP‐Subcortical, were analyzed using ANCOVA and linear regression adjusting for disease severity.ResultsDepression (55%) was more common than apathy (12%). PSP‐Speech/Language (PSP‐SL) variant had the lowest depression frequency (13%) and lower depression scores than the other variants. No differences in apathy frequency/severity were identified.ConclusionPSP‐SL patients may have less depression compared to PSP‐Richardson's syndrome and other PSP variants.
Shared brain transcriptomic signature in TDP-43 type A FTLD patients with or without GRN mutations
Pottier, Cyril , Mateiu, Ligia , DeJesus‐Hernandez, Mariely, Vicente, Cristina T. , Finch, NiCole A., Tian, Shulan , Blitterswijk, Marka van , Ren, Yingxue , Petrucelli, Leonard , Oskarsson, Björn , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Petersen, Ronald C. , Josephs, Keith A. , Asmann, Yan W. , Rademakers, Rosa , Baker, Matthew C, DeJesus-Hernandez, Mariely, van Blitterswijk, Marka , Oskarsson, Björn , Boeve, Brad , Josephs, Keith A , Dickson, Dennis W , Murray, Melissa E , Pottier, Cyril , Baker, Matthew , Murray, Melissa E. , Biernacka, Joanna M. , Boeve, Bradley F. , Dickson, Dennis W.

Mayo Clinic

Brain | December 13, 2021 | Volume: 145 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 2472-2485

10.1093/brain/awab437 | PMID 34918030 Get It

Abstract Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions (FTLD-TDP) is a complex heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder for which mechanisms are poorly understood. To explore transcriptional changes underlying FTLD-TDP, we performed RNA-sequencing on 66 genetically unexplained FTLD-TDP patients, 24 FTLD-TDP patients with GRN mutations and 24 control participants. Using principal component analysis, hierarchical clustering, differential expression and coexpression network analyses, we showed that GRN mutation carriers and FTLD-TDP-A patients without a known mutation shared a common transcriptional signature that is independent of GRN loss-of-function. After combining both groups, differential expression as compared to the control group and coexpression analyses revealed alteration of processes related to immune response, synaptic transmission, RNA metabolism, angiogenesis and vesicle-mediated transport. Deconvolution of the data highlighted strong cellular alterations that were similar in FTLD-TDP-A and GRN mutation carriers with NSF as a potentially important player in both groups. We propose several potentially druggable pathways such as the GABAergic, GDNF and sphingolipid pathways. Our findings underline new disease mechanisms and strongly suggest that affected pathways in GRN mutation carriers extend beyond GRN and contribute to genetically unexplained forms of FTLD-TDP-A.
Dynamic Aphasia as a Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia
Chandregowda, Adithya, Clark, Heather M., Duffy, Joseph R., Machulda, Mary M., Lowe, Val J., Whitwell, Jennifer L., Josephs, Keith A., Chandregowda, Adithya , Clark, Heather M., Duffy, Joseph R., Machulda, Mary M., Lowe, Val J., Whitwell, Jennifer L., Josephs, Keith A.

Mayo Clinic

Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology | December 1, 2021 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 303-318

10.1097/wnn.0000000000000289 | PMID 34851868 Get It

We describe two individuals with progressive verbal difficulty who exhibited impairment of propositional language, with relatively well-preserved auditory comprehension, naming, and repetition—a profile that is consistent with dynamic aphasia. By providing a brief review of pertinent literature and the results from our neurologic, speech and language, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging testing, this report sheds light on the infrequently reported dynamic aphasia in the context of frontotemporal dementia. Our patients’ insights into their verbal difficulty tend to support the notion that dynamic aphasia results from interference at the stage where thoughts are converted into verbal messages—that is, the thought–verbal interface.
Word Fluency Test Performance in Primary Progressive Aphasia and Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech
Scheffel, Lucia , Josephs, Keith A. , Strand, Edythe A. , Josephs, Keith A , Duffy, Joseph R.

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology | October 22, 2021 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 2635-2642

10.1044/2021_ajslp-21-00058 | PMID 34674540 Get It

Purpose This study compared performance on three-word fluency measures among individuals with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS), and examined the relationship between word fluency and other measures of language and speech. Method This study included 106 adults with PPA and 30 adults with PPAOS. PPA participants were divided into three clinical subgroups: semantic (svPPA), logopenic (lvPPA), and nonfluent/agrammatic with or without apraxia of speech (nfPPA). Category fluency, letter fluency, and action/verb fluency tasks were administered to all participants. Results The four clinical groups performed abnormally on the word fluency measures, although not to a degree that represented high sensitivity to their PPA or PPAOS diagnosis. All PPA subgroups produced fewer words compared to individuals with PPAOS on all word fluency measures. Moderate correlations were found between word fluency and aphasia severity and naming performance in some of the clinical groups. Conclusions Word fluency measures are often challenging for individuals with PPA and PPAOS, but they are not of equal difficulty, with letter fluency being the most difficult. Differences among word fluency tests also vary to some degree as a function of the clinical group in question, with least impairment in PPAOS. However, the findings of this study do not support statistically significant differences in word fluency task performance among the PPA subgroups. Correlations suggest that word fluency performance in PPA is at least partly related to aphasia severity.
Autopsy Validation of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy‐Predominant Speech/Language Disorder Criteria
Hokelekli, Fatma Ozlem , Utianski, Rene L. , Ali, Farwa , Stierwalt, Julie A. G., Reichard, R. Ross , Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Josephs, Keith A. , Utianski, Rene L , Stierwalt, Julie A, Whitwell, Jennifer , Josephs, Keith A , Duffy, Joseph R. , Clark, Heather M. , Botha, Hugo , Machulda, Mary M. , Dickson, Dennis W.

Mayo Clinic

Movement Disorders | October 11, 2021 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 213-218

10.1002/mds.28822 | PMID 34632629 Get It

ABSTRACTBackgroundProgressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) may present as a speech/language disorder (PSP‐SL).ObjectiveWe assessed pathological correlates of patients with PSP‐SL who retained the suggestive of PSP‐SL (s.o. PSP‐SL) diagnosis versus those who progressed to possible/probable (poss./prob.) PSP.MethodsThirty‐four prospectively recruited patient with s.o. PSP‐SL completed comprehensive speech/language and neurological assessments longitudinally, died, and underwent autopsy.ResultsTwelve patients (35%) evolved to poss./prob PSP, while 22 (65%) remained as s.o. PSP‐SL. Pathological diagnoses differed across the groups (P = 0.025). Patients with s.o. PSP‐SL had four different neuropathologies (corticobasal degeneration [59%], PSP [13%], Pick's disease [14%], and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP‐43 [14%]), while all patients with poss./prob. PSP had a 4R‐tauopathy (PSP [67%] and corticobasal degeneration [33%]). Development of poss./prob. PSP increased the chance of having PSP pathology by 2.38 times.ConclusionsPSP‐SL is associated with heterogenous pathologies. Evolution of PSP‐SL into poss./prob. PSP is more predictive of underlying PSP pathology than s.o. PSP‐SL. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
Progressive Auditory Verbal Agnosia Secondary to Alzheimer Disease
Buciuc, Marina , Josephs, Keith A. , Jones, David T. , Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Josephs, Keith A , Buciuc, Marina , Jones, David T , Whitwell, Jennifer L , Graff-Radford, Jonathan

Mayo Clinic

Neurology | September 10, 2021 | Volume: 97 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 908-909

10.1212/wnl.0000000000012783 | PMID 34504027 Get It