Citations

6080 Background: Alterations in RET are targetable oncogenic drivers in TC. Pralsetinib is a highly potent, selective RET inhibitor, with demonstrated efficacy in pts with RET-altered TC. In a previous analysis of the Phase I/II ARROW trial (NCT03037385; data cutoff: 22 May 2020), overall response rates [ORR; measurable-disease population] with pralsetinib at 400 mg once daily (QD) were 60% (33/55) and 71% (15/21) in pts with RET-mutant medullary TC ( RET-mutant MTC) who had received prior multikinase inhibitors cabozantinib and/or vandetanib (C/V), and those who were treatment naïve, respectively, and 89% (8/9) in pts with previously treated RET fusion-positive TC ( RET-fp TC). Here we report an updated analysis of these cohorts in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Methods: Adult pts with RET-altered locally advanced/metastatic TC who had enrolled in ARROW and initiated pralsetinib at 400 mg QD, were included. Phase II primary endpoints: ORR (by blinded independent central review, per RECIST v1.1) and safety. Efficacy endpoints for this analysis were assessed in the ITT population. Safety was assessed in all pts with RET-altered TC who initiated pralsetinib at 400 mg QD. Enrolment cutoff: 23 August 2020 for the ITT population; data cutoff: 12 April 2021. Results: The ITT population comprised 145 pts with RET-mutant MTC (with or without prior systemic therapy, including C/V) and 22 pts with RET-fp TC, 21 of whom had received prior systemic therapy (including multikinase inhibitor[s] and/or radioactive iodine). In pts with RET-mutant MTC who had received prior C/V (n = 67), ORR was 51% (34/67; 95% CI 38–63; 2 complete responses [CR]; 32 partial responses [PR]), median duration of response (DoR) was 25.8 months (95% CI 18.0–not reached [NR]) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 24.9 months (95% CI 19.7–31.2). In treatment-naïve pts with RET-mutant MTC, ORR was 72% (48/67; 95% CI 59–82; 4 CR; 44 PR), and median DoR and median PFS were not reached. In pts with previously treated RET-fp TC, ORR was 86% (18/21; 95% CI 64–97; 3 CR; 15 PR), median DoR was 17.5 months (95% CI 16.0–NR) and median PFS was 19.4 months (95% CI 13.0–NR). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in any of the cohorts. The safety population comprised 172 pts with RET-altered TC treated at 400 mg QD. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were increased aspartate aminotransferase (n = 67; 39%), anemia (n = 60; 35%), hypertension (n = 57; 33%) and decreased white blood cell count (n = 52; 30%). Serious TRAEs were reported in 27 pts (16%); the most frequent was pneumonitis (n = 5; 3%). Nine pts (5%) discontinued pralsetinib due to a TRAE and one patient ( < 1%) died due to a TRAE ( pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia) following 44 days ( < 3 cycles) on pralsetinib. Conclusions: In this updated analysis including more pts, pralsetinib continues to be efficacious with a manageable safety profile in pts with RET-altered TC. Clinical trial information: NCT03037385.

The therapeutic options for patients with noninvasive or invasive breast cancer are complex and varied. These NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer include recommendations for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, and management of breast cancer during pregnancy. The content featured in this issue focuses on the recommendations for overall management of ductal carcinoma in situ and the workup and locoregional management of early stage invasive breast cancer. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer, visit NCCN.org .

5553 Background: In patients with high-grade ovarian cancer in first-line setting, predictive factors of bevacizumab efficacy are needed, for selecting patients. In ICON-7 trial, a poor tumor intrisic chemosensitivity (defined by unfavorable modeled CA-125 kinetic ELIMination rate constant KELIM) was a predictive biomarker. Among patients with high-risk diseases, only those with unfavorable KELIM had survival benefit from bevacizumab (mOS: 29.7 vs 20.6 months, HR = 0.78)(Colomban. JNCI CS 2020). The objective was to perform an external validation in GOG-0218 trial (NCT00262847). Methods: In GOG-0218, 1,873 patients were treated with carboplatin-paclitaxel +/- concurrent bevacizumab/placebo followed by a 15 month maintenance. Patient KELIM values were estimated with longitudinal CA-125 kinetics during the first 100 chemotherapy days. The association between KELIM score (categorized as favorable ≥ 1, or unfavorable < 1) and efficacy of bevacizumab (bevacizumab-concurrent + maintenance, vs placebo) for PFS and OS was assessed using univariate/multivariate analyses, in a Training set with 2/3 patients managed the investigators, and then a Validation set with all patients, managed by NGR-GOG. Results: KELIM was assessable in 1,662 patients with ≥ 3 CA-125 available values. In both sets, the patients with unfavorable KELIM derived benefit from bevacizumab compared to placebo (Training: PFS, HR = 0.65 [0.54-0.80]; OS, HR = 0.80 [0.65-0.99]; Validation: PFS, HR = 0.69 [0.59-0.82]; OS, HR = 0.87 [0.73-1.03]), whilst those with favorable KELIM had no benefit from bevacizumab (Training: PFS, HR = 0.96 [0.75-1.23]; OS, HR = 1.05 [0.80-1.37]; Validation, PFS, HR = 0.96 [0.79-1.17]; OS HR = 1.11 [0.89-1.84]). The highest benefit was observed in patients with high-risk diseases (stage IV or sub-optimally resected stage III) characterized by unfavorable KELIM, for PFS (Learning (n = 276): mPFS: 9.0 vs 5.2 months, HR = 0.61 [0.48-0.78]; Validation (n = 433): mPFS: 9.1 vs 5.6 months, HR = 0.64 [0.53-0.78]), and for OS (Learning (n = 278): mOS: 38.9 vs 27.9 months, HR = 0.72 [0.56-0.93], Validation set (n = 438): mOS: 35.1 vs 29.1 months, HR = 0.79 [0.65-0.97]). Conclusions: This validation analysis of GOG-0218 trial confirms the outcomes of ICON-7 trial about the association between poor tumor chemosensitivity and benefit from concurrent + maintenance bevacizumab, suggesting that bevacizumab is mainly effective in patients with poorly chemosensitive diseases. No benefit was found in patients with favorable KELIM. The patients who derived the highest benefit from bevacizumab in PFS and OS (OS absolute benefit ̃ 6 to 9 months) were those with high-risk diseases (stage IV, or incompletely resected stage III) associated with an unfavorable KELIM score (calculator on https://www.biomarker-kinetics.org/CA-125).

4146 Background: Targeting focal adhesion kinase (FAK) renders checkpoint immunotherapy effective in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) mouse models. Defactinib is a highly potent oral FAK inhibitor shown to have a tolerable safety profile. We evaluated the safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of defactinib in combination with pembrolizumab and gemcitabine for PDAC patients. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase I study with dose escalation and expansion phases. In 3x3 dose escalation, patients with refractory solid tumors were treated at five escalating dose levels of defactinib and gemcitabine to identify a RP2D. In expansion phase, patients with metastatic PDAC who progressed on frontline treatment (refractory cohort) or had treatment response or stable disease (SD) on standard gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (maintenance cohort) were treated at RP2D. Pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies were performed to evaluate changes in tumor immunity. Results: The triple drug combination was well-tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities. Among 17 treated patients with refractory PDAC, the disease control rate (DCR) was 58.8% with one partial response (PR) and nine SDs and the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.2 months and 9.1 months, respectively. Among the evaluable patients in the maintenance cohort, DCR was 63.6% with one PR and six SD. Three patients with SD came off study due to treatment- or disease-related complications. The median PFS and OS were 5.0 months and 8.3 months, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of defactinib, pembrolizumab, and gemcitabine was well-tolerated, had promising preliminary efficacy, and showed increased infiltrative T lymphocytes in post-treatment tumor biopsies. Incorporation of a more potent chemotherapy backbone should be considered to achieve better clinical response in future trial design. Clinical trial information: NCT02546531.

Abstract Background: The discovery of the driving oncogenic alterations in pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs) has shifted our focus towards management with targeted therapies, especially in relapsing or progressive disease. Limited data is available on the durability of response to targeted therapy in pLGGs once the therapy has ceased. Methods: Multi-institutional retrospective chart review of patients with pLGGs younger than 25 years, between 2010-2021, was undertaken to evaluate the durability of response to targeted therapy and determine risk factors associated with disease progression after cessation of therapy. Results: Current analysis included 18 patients from two centers. Seven (39%) had neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF-1). Diagnoses included: optic pathway glioma (OPG) (6/18, 33%), pilocytic astrocytoma (8/18, 44%), diffuse fibrillary astrocytoma (1/18), ganglioglioma (1/18), glioneural neoplasm (2/18). Sixteen patients received at least one prior line of chemotherapy (range 1-5). Targeted agents included trametinib (50%), selumetinib (5%), binimetinib (22%), vemurafenib (11%) and everolimus (11%). Median time on therapy was 351 days (range 29-979 days). All, but one patient had residual intracranial findings at the end of therapy: eight patients (44%) had stable disease, while ten required additional therapy; 50% were NF-1 patients with OPG. Median time to progression was 203 days (range 29-615 days). Of those who did not require any additional therapies, 50% had suprasellar tumors. Genomic data was available for twelve patients; BRAF-KIAA1549 fusion was the most common genomic alteration. Others included mutations in KRAS, BRAF (V600E), PTPN11, SOX6-RAF1 fusion, NF-1, and a patient with FGFR1, KMT2C, and PTPN11 alterations. Conclusion: Preliminary analysis demonstrates that despite initial response, the majority of patients required additional line of therapy. Patients with NF-1 and OPGs tend to progress after discontinuing therapy, while suprasellar non-NF1 pLGGs tend to develop sustained response to targeted therapies. Additional multi-institutional analysis is underway and will be presented at the meeting.

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommended management for patients with NSCLC, including diagnosis, primary treatment, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. Patients with metastatic lung cancer who are eligible for targeted therapies or immunotherapies are now surviving longer. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for NSCLC focuses on targeted therapies for patients with metastatic NSCLC and actionable mutations.

Objective Hypercapnia, an elevated concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the blood, is known to promote acute increases in cerebral blood flow (CBF). This pilot study aimed to investigate whether a novel training method involving repeated bouts of hypercapnia, would influence cerebrovascular reactivity response in healthy adults. Hypothesis Repeated bouts of hypercapnia (as interval training) may promote beneficial adaptation to increase cerebrovascular reactivity. Methods Adults over 40yrs old without known disease or cardiovascular risk factors, were recruited for a non‐randomized cross‐over design pilot study. Subjects completed a 2‐week control period followed by a 2‐week intervention. The intervention involved a progressive hypercapnia training program of six sessions, whereby subjects completed 4‐6 intervals of rebreathing oxygen until a target end‐tidal CO2 (up to 25mmHg above resting) was reached, separated by recovery intervals breathing room air. Cerebrovascular reactivity was measured during study testing visits at baseline, 2‐weeks (between control and intervention) and 4‐weeks (after intervention). During study visits subjects underwent a stepped CO2 protocol, involving 5‐min stages of inspired room air, 2% CO2, 4% CO2, and 6% CO2, while measuring middle cerebral artery velocity (CBFv) using transcranial doppler ultrasound, mean arterial pressure (MAP) by finger plethysmography, ventilation, and end‐tidal CO2. Cerebrovascular conductance (CVCi) was calculated as CBFv/MAP. The reactivity of CBFv (in cm/s/mmHg), CVCi (in cm/s/mmHg2), and MAP (in mmHg/mmHg) were calculated as the linear regression slope against end‐tidal CO2 during the stepped CO2 protocol. Chemosensitivity (in L/min/mmHg) is the linear regression slope of VE vs end‐tidal CO2. Results Six healthy adults (age: 56 ± 10; 2 females) completed the study. Study visit data are displayed in Table 1. Individual training data are presented in Table 2. Following the control period there was a large reduction from baseline in CBFv reactivity [2.81 ± 1.50 to 2.03 ± 1.03; effect size 0.9], CVCi reactivity [0.020 ± 0.015 to 0.015 ± 0.010; effect size 0.7], and MAP reactivity [0.95 ± 0.63 to 0.62 ± 0.42; effect size 0.6] with no change in chemosensitivity [0.99 ± 0.68 to 0.98 ± 0.51; effect size 0.0]. Following the intervention there was no change from the 2‐week study visit in CBFv reactivity [2.03 ± 1.03 to 2.01 ± 1.09; effect size 0.0], CVCi reactivity [0.015 ± 0.010 to 0.014 ± 0.010; effect size 0.1], and MAP reactivity [0.62 ± 0.42 to 0.72 ± 0.44; effect size 0.1] with a small increase in chemosensitivity [0.98 ± 0.51 to 1.04 ± 0.53; effect size 0.3]. Conclusion Preliminary findings suggest a very brief progressive hypercapnia training program does not increase or desensitize cerebrovascular reactivity in healthy adults. These data also suggest an exaggerated cerebrovascular reactivity response may occur to an initial exposure of a stepped CO2 protocol (without familiarization), which appears to be driven by blood pressure response not chemosensitivity. Further research, particularly in populations with impaired cerebrovascular reactivity, is of interest for CBF regulation.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is well known for its high death rate due to prompt cancer metastasis caused by cancer cell migration and invasion within the early stages of its development. Here, we reveal a new function of cytokine CCL15, namely the upregulation of PDAC cell migration and invasion. We showed increased levels of CCL15 transcripts and protein expressions in human PDAC tissue samples, as well as in cultured cell lines. Furthermore, PDAC cells also expressed CCL15 receptors, including CCR1 and CCR3. Murine PDAC cell lines and tissues strengthened this finding. The manipulation of CCL15 in metastatic Panc-1 cells through CCL15 knockdown or CCL15 neutralization decreased Panc-1 cell motility and invasiveness. In addition, treating non-metastatic BxPC-3 cells with recombinant CCL15 accelerated the cell migration of BxPC-3. A reduction in the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by either N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine treatment or p22phox knockdown led to a decrease in Panc-1 cell migration and a reversed effect on recombinant CCL15-promoted BxPC-3 cell movement. Importantly, the knockdown of oncogenic Kras in Panc-1 cells abolished CCL15 protein expression and impeded cell migration without affecting PDAC cell growth. Altogether, our work elucidates an additional molecular pathway of oncogenic Kras to promote PDAC metastasis through the upregulation of cell migration and invasion by the Kras downstream CCL15, a lesser-known cytokine within the cancer research field.

Human genetic studies support an inverse causal relationship between leukocyte telomere length (LTL) and coronary artery disease (CAD), but directionally mixed effects for LTL and diverse malignancies. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), characterized by expansion of hematopoietic cells bearing leukemogenic mutations, predisposes both hematologic malignancy and CAD. TERT (which encodes telomerase reverse transcriptase) is the most significantly associated germline locus for CHIP in genome-wide association studies. Here, we investigated the relationship between CHIP, LTL, and CAD in the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program ( n = 63,302) and UK Biobank ( n = 47,080). Bidirectional Mendelian randomization studies were consistent with longer genetically imputed LTL increasing propensity to develop CHIP, but CHIP then, in turn, hastens to shorten measured LTL (mLTL). We also demonstrated evidence of modest mediation between CHIP and CAD by mLTL. Our data promote an understanding of potential causal relationships across CHIP and LTL toward prevention of CAD.

AbstractDiabetes is an established risk factor for colorectal cancer. However, colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease and it is not well understood whether diabetes is more strongly associated with some tumor molecular subtypes than others. A better understanding of the association between diabetes and colorectal cancer according to molecular subtypes could provide important insights into the biology of this association. We used data on lifestyle and clinical characteristics from the Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) and the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO), including 9756 colorectal cancer cases (with tumor marker data) and 9985 controls, to evaluate associations between reported diabetes and risk of colorectal cancer according to molecular subtypes. Tumor markers included BRAF and KRAS mutations, microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotype. In the multinomial logistic regression model, comparing colorectal cancer cases to cancer‐free controls, diabetes was positively associated with colorectal cancer regardless of subtype. The highest OR estimate was found for BRAF‐mutated colorectal cancer, n = 1086 (ORfully adj: 1.67, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.36‐2.05), with an attenuated association observed between diabetes and colorectal cancer without BRAF‐mutations, n = 7959 (ORfully adj: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.19‐1.48). In the case only analysis, BRAF‐mutation was differentially associated with diabetes (Pdifference = .03). For the other markers, associations with diabetes were similar across tumor subtypes. In conclusion, our study confirms the established association between diabetes and colorectal cancer risk, and suggests that it particularly increases the risk of BRAF‐mutated tumors.