Citations

Clear

526 citation(s) found for "To, Harrison".

S198: BET INHIBITOR PELABRESIB (CPI-0610) COMBINED WITH RUXOLITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH MYELOFIBROSIS — JAK INHIBITOR-NAÏVE OR WITH SUBOPTIMAL RESPONSE TO RUXOLITINIB — PRELIMINARY DATA FROM THE MANIFEST STUDY
Kremyanskaya, Marina , Harrison, Claire , Rampal, Raajit K. , Hobbs, Gabriella, Salama, Mohamed E. , Taverna, Pietro, Chang, A., Colak, Gozde , Klein, Sandra, Mascarenhas, John , Patriarca, Andrea , Bose, Prithviraj , Palandri, Francesca , Devos, Timothy , Passamonti, Francesco , Talpaz, Moshe , Vannucchi, Alessandro M. , Kiladjian, Jean‐Jacques , Verstovšek, Srđan , Hoffman, Ronald , Chen, Dong , Gupta, Vikas

Mayo Clinic

HemaSphere | June 23, 2022 | Volume: 6 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 99-100

10.1097/01.hs9.0000843684.97625.7e Get It

eQTL Set–Based Association Analysis Identifies Novel Susceptibility Loci for Barrett Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Wang, Xiaoyu , Gharahkhani, Puya , Levine, David , Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. , Corley, Douglas A. , Risch, Harvey A. , Bernstein, Leslie , Chow, Wong‐Ho , Onstad, Lynn , Shaheen, Nicholas J. , Lagergren, Jesper , Hardie, Laura J. , Wu, Anna H. , Liu, Geoffrey , Anderson, Lesley , Iyer, Prasad G. , Gammon, Marilie D. , Caldas, Carlos , Ye, Weimin , Barr, Hugh , Harrison, Rebecca , Watson, R.G. Peter , Attwood, Stephen , Chegwidden, Laura , Love, Sharon , MacDonald, David , Prenen, Hans , Ott, Katja , Lang, Hauke , Mayershofer, Rupert , Knapp, Michael , Veits, Lothar , Gerges, Christian , Weismüller, Josef , Reeh, Matthias , Nöthen, Markus M. , Izbicki, Jakob R. , Manner, Hendrik , Neuhaus, Horst , Böhmer, Anne C. , Hölscher, Arnulf H. , Anders, Mario , Pech, Oliver , Schumacher, Brigitte , Schmidt, Claudia , Noder, Tania , Lorenz, Dietmar , Vieth, Michael , May, Andrea , Kreuser, Nicole , Becker, Jessica , Ell, Christian , Tomlinson, Ian , Palles, Claire , Whiteman, David C. , MacGregor, Stuart , Schumacher, Johannes , Vaughan, Thomas L. , Buas, Matthew F. , Dai, James Y. , Levine, David M , Gockel, Ines , Corley, Douglas A , Risch, Harvey A , Bernstein, Leslie , Chow, Wong-Ho , Onstad, Lynn , Shaheen, Nicholas J , Lagergren, Jesper , Hardie, Laura J , Wu, Anna H. , Pharoah, Paul D P , Liu, Geoffrey , Anderson, Lesley A , Iyer, P G , Caldas, Carlos , Ye, Weimin , Barr, Hugh , Moayyedi, Paul , Harrison, Rebecca , Watson, R G Peter , Attwood, Stephen , Chegwidden, Laura , Love, Sharon B , MacDonald, David , deCaestecker, John , Prenen, Hans , Ott, Katja , Moebus, Susanne , Venerito, Marino , Lang, Hauke , Mayershofer, Rupert , Knapp, Michael , Veits, Lothar , Gerges, Christian , Weismüller, Josef , Reeh, Matthias , Nöthen, Markus M , Izbicki, Jakob R , Manner, Hendrik , Neuhaus, Horst , Rösch, Thomas , Böhmer, Anne C , Hölscher, Arnulf H , Anders, Mario , Pech, Oliver , Schumacher, Brigitte , Schmidt, Claudia , Schmidt, Thomas , Noder, Tania , Lorenz, Dietmar , Vieth, Michael , May, Andrea , Hess, Timo , Kreuser, Nicole , Becker, Jessica , Ell, Christian , Tomlinson, Ian , Palles, Claire , Jankowski, Janusz A , Whiteman, David C , MacGregor, Stuart , Schumacher, Johannes , Vaughan, Thomas L , Buas, Matthew F , Dai, James Y , Gharahkhani, Puya , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Moayyedi, Paul , Caestecker, John de , Moebus, Susanne , Hess, Timo , Jankowski, Janusz

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | June 16, 2022 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1735-1745

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0096 | PMID 35709760 Get It

Abstract Background: Over 20 susceptibility single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) have been identified for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and its precursor, Barrett esophagus (BE), explaining a small portion of heritability. Methods: Using genetic data from 4,323 BE and 4,116 EAC patients aggregated by international consortia including the Barrett's and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Consortium (BEACON), we conducted a comprehensive transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) for BE/EAC, leveraging Genotype Tissue Expression (GTEx) gene-expression data from six tissue types of plausible relevance to EAC etiology: mucosa and muscularis from the esophagus, gastroesophageal (GE) junction, stomach, whole blood, and visceral adipose. Two analytical approaches were taken: standard TWAS using the predicted gene expression from local expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL), and set-based SKAT association using selected eQTLs that predict the gene expression. Results: Although the standard approach did not identify significant signals, the eQTL set–based approach identified eight novel associations, three of which were validated in independent external data (eQTL SNP sets for EXOC3, ZNF641, and HSP90AA1). Conclusions: This study identified novel genetic susceptibility loci for EAC and BE using an eQTL set–based genetic association approach. Impact: This study expanded the pool of genetic susceptibility loci for EAC and BE, suggesting the potential of the eQTL set–based genetic association approach as an alternative method for TWAS analysis.
Abstract 631: Validation of a panel of methylated DNA and protein markers for multi-cancer detection in plasma
Allawi, Hatim T. , Katerov, Slava, Vaccaro, Abram, Fleming, Harrison L., Rugowski, Debra E., Otto, Brittany, Heilberger, Justin, Cassel, Jillian, Hennek, Jacquelyn, Lidgard, Graham P. , Rugowski, Debra E., Taylor, William R.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | June 15, 2022 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 12_Supplement | Pages: 631-631

10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-631 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Many cancer deaths could be avoided, and survival could be improved with detection of cancer at an earlier stage. Screening programs for breast, colon, and cervical cancer as well as the NLST trial for lung cancer screening demonstrated significant improvement in survival rates with screening. However, for 2021, the American Cancer Society estimates these screened cancers represent less than ~40% of cancer incidence and deaths. The remainder of cancer deaths occur because of tumors in unscreened organs and, therefore, a multicancer test that detects cancer in these organs can increase survival rates. By focusing on detection of unscreened cancers, this type of multicancer test would be complementary to current screening procedures. Here we describe the validation of a combined panel of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) and proteins for multicancer detection through testing an independent set of case/control samples. Experimental Procedures: In this study, we further evaluate the performance of our previously identified panel of 15 MDMs and 5 proteins for multicancer detection (Allawi et al., 2021 AACR Annual Meeting) by testing 315 controls and 160 cases encompassing 6 cancer types (liver, esophageal, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, and stomach). All samples used in the study were case-control collections with smoking status, age, and gender matching between cases and asymptomatic controls. Testing was performed in blinded fashion using multiplex PCR followed by LQAS (Long probe Quantitative Amplified Signal) assay on bisulfite converted DNA extracted from 3 mL of plasma collected in LB Gard® blood tubes. Protein concentrations were determined from paired serum aliquots and combined with MDMs for a multi-analyte analysis. The subjects were divided into training and validation with equal representation of cancer type, staging, gender, and age. Two thirds of the cases and controls were used to train with a logistic prediction algorithm, and the remaining 1/3 were used to validate the model. Results: Using stepwise logistic regression, a training model of MDMs and protein markers resulted in an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.97 and cancer sensitivity of 89% at 98% specificity. The same model predicted the validation set with an AUC of 0.96 and cancer sensitivity of 85% at a specificity of 95%. Applying the algorithm to the combined training and validation sets resulted in sensitivities and specificities of 88% and 97%, respectively. The sensitivities per cancer type ranged from 73% for pancreatic cancer to 97% for lung cancer. Conclusion and Next Steps: This study demonstrates the performance of our MDMs and protein markers and their importance as components in our multi-omics strategy for multicancer detection. The next steps would be to expand the testing to include additional cancer types and combine with NGS-based methods to improve performance and optimize workflow. Citation Format: Hatim T. Allawi, Slava Katerov, Abram Vaccaro, Harrison L. Fleming, Debra E. Rugowski, Brittany Otto, Justin Heilberger, Jillian Cassel, Jacquelyn Hennek, William Taylor, Graham Lidgard. Validation of a panel of methylated DNA and protein markers for multi-cancer detection in plasma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 631.
ARST2031: A study to compare early use of vinorelbine and maintenance therapy for patients with high risk rhabdomyosarcoma.
Shern, John, Rudzinski, Erin R. , Skapek, Stephen X. , Rodeberg, David A. , Shenoy, Archana , Maianski, Irit, Maxa, Kim, Fricke, Lindsey, Su, Zhong, Harrison, Douglas J. , Venkatramani, Rajkumar , Allen‐Rhoades, Wendy , Mascarenhas, Leo , Xue, Wei, Donaldson, Sarah S. , Casey, Dana L. , Lautz, Timothy B. , Yedururi, Sireesha , Crompton, Brian D.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 6, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: TPS11591-TPS11591

10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps11591 Get It

TPS11591 Background: Patients with high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (HR-RMS) continue to have poor outcomes with 3-year event free survival (EFS) rates of 30% or less despite chemotherapy dose intensification on recent cooperative group RMS trials. Vinorelbine (VINO) has demonstrated clinical activity in RMS patients with relapsed/refractory disease and shown to provide a survival benefit when given with oral cyclophosphamide as maintenance chemotherapy for a select group of patients that achieved first complete remission. Methods: ARST2031 is a randomized Phase 3 trial with the primary aim to compare event-free survival (EFS) of patients with HR-RMS treated with vincristine, dactinomycin and cyclophosphamide (VAC) followed by maintenance with vinorelbine and oral cyclophosphamide (VINO-CPO) or vinorelbine, dactinomycin and cyclophosphamide (VINO-AC) followed by maintenance with VINO-CPO. Patients are stratified by histology and randomly assigned to VAC followed by VINO-CPO maintenance or VINO-AC followed by VINO-CPO maintenance. To be eligible, patients must be ≤ 50 years of age at the time of enrollment with newly diagnosed RMS except adult-type pleomorphic, based upon institutional histopathologic classification. All patients must have Stage 4 disease and patients diagnosed with embryonal RMS (ERMS) must be ≥ 10 years of age. Patients with malignant cytology in cerebrospinal fluid, intra-parenchymal brain metastases, or diffuse leptomeningeal disease are excluded. The study was activated on September 13, 2021 and is anticipated to enroll approximately 4 patients per month. The planned sample size is 100 patients, with approximately 50 patients randomized to each arm. Safety and feasibility of VINO-AC will be assessed in the first 8 patients prior to randomization. The study will have power of 0.8 to detect a hazard ratio of 0.61 (74 events in total) when the one-sided Type I error rate is 0.10, with 30 months of accrual and 2 years of follow-up. The hazard ratio of 0.61 was determined by assuming piecewise exponential distributions and specifying the 2-year EFS of 46% vs. 28% and long-term EFS of 32% vs. 16%, based on prior outcome data. Biospecimens will be collected and banked for future use. Clinical trial information: NCT04994132.
Women’s Experience With Screening Mammography During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multi-Institutional Prospective Survey Study
Carnahan, Molly B. , Parra, Laura , Hippe, Daniel S. , Lorans, Roxanne, Perry, Hannah , Moey, Tammy Hui Lin , Bagadiya, Neeti, Lee, Janie M. , Sharpe, Richard E. , Hippe, Daniel S , Moey, Tammy Hui Lin , Harrison, Molly , Oluyemi, Eniola T.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Breast Imaging | May 13, 2022 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 253-262

10.1093/jbi/wbac022 | PMID 38416975 Get It

Abstract Objective Evaluate women’s anxiety and experience undergoing screening mammography during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods An IRB-approved anonymous survey was administered to women receiving screening mammography across six sites in the U.S. and Singapore from October 7, 2020, to March 11, 2021. Using a 1–5 Likert scale, women rated their pre- and post-visit anxiety regarding having their mammogram during the COVID-19 pandemic, importance of observed COVID-19 precautions, and personal risk factors for breast cancer and severe COVID-19 illness. Post-visit change in anxiety was evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test associations of pre-visit anxiety with breast cancer and COVID-19 risk factors. Results In total, 1086 women completed the survey. Of these, 59% (630/1061) had >1 breast cancer risk factor; 27% (282/1060) had >1 COVID-19 risk factors. Forty-two percent (445/1065) experienced pre-visit anxiety. Pre-visit anxiety was independently associated with risk factors for severe COVID-19 (OR for >2 vs 0 risk factors: 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11–3.76) and breast cancer (OR for >2 vs 0 risk factors: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.17–2.50), after adjusting for age and site. Twenty-six percent (272/1065) of women reported post-visit anxiety, an absolute 16% decrease from pre-visit anxiety (95% CI: 14%–19%, P < 0.001). Provider masking (941/1075, 88%) and physical distancing (861/1085, 79%) were rated as the most important precautions. Conclusion Pre-visit anxiety was associated with COVID-19 or breast cancer risk factors and declined significantly after screening mammography. Provider masking and physical distancing were rated the most important precautions implemented by imaging clinics.
Predictive Modeling of New-Onset Postoperative Diplopia Following Orbital Decompression for Thyroid Eye Disease
Nair, Archana , Ediriwickrema, Lilangi S. , Dolman, Peter J. , Law, Geoffrey , Harrison, Andrew R. , Mokhtarzadeh, Ali , Stewart, Krista J., Men, Clara J. , Lucarelli, Mark J., Landingham, Suzanne van, Wingelaar, Maxwell , Verma, Rohan , Chen, Allison , Selva, Dinesh , Garrity, James, Eckel, Laurence J. , Kazim, Michael, Godfrey, Kyle J. , Korn, Bobby S. , Kikkawa, Don O. , Eckel, Laurence, Stewart, Krista, Landingham, Suzanne W. van , Baxter, Sally L.

Mayo Clinic

Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery | May 13, 2022 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 551-557

10.1097/iop.0000000000002196 | PMID 35551414 Get It

Purpose: To identify risk factors for the development of new-onset, postoperative diplopia following orbital decompression surgery based on patient demographics, clinical exam characteristics, radiographic parameters, and surgical techniques. Methods: We conducted a multi-center retrospective chart review of patients who underwent orbital decompression for thyroid eye disease (TED). Patient demographics, including age, gender, smoking history, preoperative exophthalmometry, clinical activity score (CAS), use of peribulbar and/or systemic steroids, and type of orbital decompression were reviewed. Postoperative diplopia was determined at a minimum of 3 months postoperatively and before any further surgeries. Cross-sectional area ratios of each extraocular muscle to orbit and total fat to orbit were calculated from coronal imaging in a standard fashion. All measurements were carried out using PACS imaging software. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed using Stata 14.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Results: A total of 331 patients without preoperative diplopia were identified. At 3 months postoperatively, 249 patients had no diplopia whereas 82 patients developed diplopia. The average postoperative follow-up was 22 months (range 3–156) months. Significant preoperative clinical risk factors for postoperative diplopia included older age at surgery, proptosis, use of peribulbar or systemic steroids, elevated clinical activity score, and presence of preoperative compressive optic neuropathy. Imaging findings of enlarged cross-sectional areas of each rectus muscle to the overall orbital area also conferred a significant risk of postoperative diplopia. Regarding surgical factors, postoperative diplopia was more common among those undergoing medial wall decompression, bilateral orbital surgery, and balanced decompression, whereas endoscopic medial wall decompression was found to be relatively protective. Conclusions: This study identifies risk factors associated with the development of diplopia following orbital decompression using multivariable data. This study demonstrates that several characteristics including age, clinical activity score, the cross-sectional muscle to orbit ratios, in addition to the type of orbital decompression surgery, are predictive factors for the development of new-onset postoperative diplopia.
Genetic Regulation of DNA Methylation Yields Novel Discoveries in GWAS of Colorectal Cancer
Barfield, Richard , Huyghe, Jeroen R. , Lemire, Mathieu, Dong, Xinyuan, Su, Yu-Ru, Buchanan, Daniel D. , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Gallinger, Steven, Giannakis, Marios, Gsur, Andrea , Gunter, Marc J. , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Hopper, John L., Li, Christopher I., Newcomb, Polly A., Pai, Rish K. , Phipps, Amanda I., Qu, Conghui, Steinfelder, Robert S., Win, Aung Ko , Zaidi, Syed H., Peters, Ulrike , Brezina, Stefanie , Buchanan, Daniel D , Figueiredo, Jane C , Gsur, Andrea , Gunter, Marc J , Hampel, Heather , Harrison, Tabitha A , Hudson, Thomas J , Moreno, Victor , Pai, R K , Pharoah, Paul D P , Sun, Wei , Win, Aung K , Campbell, Peter T , Peters, Ulrike , Hsu, Li , Barfield, Richard , Huyghe, Jeroen R , Lemire, Mathieu, Dong, Xinyuan, Su, Yu-Ru, Gallinger, Steven, Giannakis, Marios, Hopper, John L., Li, Christopher I., Newcomb, Polly A., Phipps, Amanda I., Qu, Conghui, Steinfelder, Robert S., Zaidi, Syed H.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | May 4, 2022 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1068-1076

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0724 | PMID 35247911 Get It

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer has a strong epigenetic component that is accompanied by frequent DNA methylation (DNAm) alterations in addition to heritable genetic risk. It is of interest to understand the interrelationship of germline genetics, DNAm, and colorectal cancer risk. Methods: We performed a genome-wide methylation quantitative trait locus (meQTL) analysis in 1,355 people, assessing the pairwise associations between genetic variants and lymphocytes methylation data. In addition, we used penalized regression with cis-genetic variants ± 1 Mb of methylation to identify genome-wide heritable DNAm. We evaluated the association of genetically predicted methylation with colorectal cancer risk based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of over 125,000 cases and controls using the multivariate sMiST as well as univariately via examination of marginal association with colorectal cancer risk. Results: Of the 142 known colorectal cancer GWAS loci, 47 were identified as meQTLs. We identified four novel colorectal cancer–associated loci (NID2, ATXN10, KLHDC10, and CEP41) that reside over 1 Mb outside of known colorectal cancer loci and 10 secondary signals within 1 Mb of known loci. Conclusions: Leveraging information of DNAm regulation into genetic association of colorectal cancer risk reveals novel pathways in colorectal cancer tumorigenesis. Our summary statistics-based framework sMiST provides a powerful approach by combining information from the effect through methylation and residual direct effects of the meQTLs on disease risk. Further validation and functional follow-up of these novel pathways are needed. Impact: Using genotype, DNAm, and GWAS, we identified four new colorectal cancer risk loci. We studied the landscape of genetic regulation of DNAm via single-SNP and multi-SNP meQTL analyses.
Genome-Wide Interaction Analysis of Genetic Variants With Menopausal Hormone Therapy for Colorectal Cancer Risk
Tian, Yu , Kim, Andre E. , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Carreras‐Torres, Robert , Díez‐Obrero, Virginia , Drew, David A. , Huyghe, Jeroen R. , Jordahl, Kristina M. , Obón‐Santacana, Mireia , Ose, Jennifer , Duijnhoven, Fränzel J.B. van , Baurley, James W. , Berndt, Sonja I. , Bishop, D. Timothy , Brenner, Hermann , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Gallinger, Steven , Gruber, Stephen B. , Harlid, Sophia , Hoffmeister, Michael , Joshi, Amit D. , Li, Li , Nan, Hongmei , Nassir, Rami , Prentice, Ross L. , Rennert, Gad , Slattery, Martha L. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Guelpen, Bethany Van , Visvanathan, Kala , White, Emily , Woods, Michael O. , Wu, Anna H. , Casey, Graham , Kundaje, Anshul , Pardamean, Bens , Thomas, Duncan C. , Tsilidis, Konstantinos K. , Peters, Ulrike , Gauderman, W. James, Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Carreras-Torres, Robert , Drew, David A , Huyghe, Jeroen R , Jordahl, Kristina M , Murphy, Neil , Ulrich, Cornelia M , Ose, Jennifer , Peoples, Anita R , Ruiz-Narvaez, Edward , van Duijnhoven, Fränzel J B , Arndt, Volker , Bishop, D Timothy , Brenner, Hermann , Buchanan, Daniel D , Figueiredo, Jane C , Gruber, Stephen B , Harlid, Sophia , Hoffmeister, Michael , Jenkins, Mark A , Larsson, Susanna C , Marchand, Loïc Le , Li, Li , Giles, Graham G , Milne, Roger L , Nassir, Rami , Ogino, Shuji , Budiarto, Arif , Platz, Elizabeth A. , Potter, John D , Sakoda, Lori C , Schoen, Robert E , Slattery, Martha L , Van Guelpen, Bethany , Visvanathan, Kala , Wolk, Alicja , Wu, Anna H. , Kundaje, Anshul , Moreno, Victor , Pardamean, Bens , Thomas, Duncan C , Tsilidis, Konstantinos K , Chang-Claude, Jenny , Rennert, Gad , Harrison, Tabitha A , Tian, Yu , Nan, Hongmei , Obón-Santacana, Mireia , Diez-Obrero, Virginia , Bien, Stephanie A. , Lin, Yi , Qu, Conghui , Dimou, Niki , Hidaka, Akihisa , Morrison, John L. , Murphy, Neil , Ulrich, Cornelia M. , Shcherbina, Anna , Stern, Mariana Carla , Su, Yu-Ru , Arndt, Volker , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Chan, Andrew T. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Keku, Temitope O , Larsson, Susanna C. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Giles, Graham G. , Milne, Roger L. , Potter, John D. , Sakoda, Lori C. , Schoen, Robert E. , Wolk, Alicja , Campbell, Peter T. , Conti, David V. , Gunter, Marc J. , Lewinger, Juan Pablo , Moreno, Vı́ctor , Newcomb, Polly A. , Hsu, Li

Mayo Clinic

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | April 30, 2022 | Volume: 114 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1135-1148

10.1093/jnci/djac094 | PMID 35512400 Get It

Abstract Background The use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) may interact with genetic variants to influence colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Methods We conducted a genome-wide, gene-environment interaction between single nucleotide polymorphisms and the use of any MHT, estrogen only, and combined estrogen-progestogen therapy with CRC risk, among 28 486 postmenopausal women (11 519 CRC patients and 16 967 participants without CRC) from 38 studies, using logistic regression, 2-step method, and 2– or 3–degree-of-freedom joint test. A set-based score test was applied for rare genetic variants. Results The use of any MHT, estrogen only and estrogen-progestogen were associated with a reduced CRC risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64 to 0.78; OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.79; and OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.59 to 0.90, respectively). The 2-step method identified a statistically significant interaction between a GRIN2B variant rs117868593 and MHT use, whereby MHT-associated CRC risk was statistically significantly reduced in women with the GG genotype (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.72) but not within strata of GC or CC genotypes. A statistically significant interaction between a DCBLD1 intronic variant at 6q22.1 (rs10782186) and MHT use was identified by the 2–degree-of-freedom joint test. The MHT-associated CRC risk was reduced with increasing number of rs10782186-C alleles, showing odds ratios of 0.78 (95% CI = 0.70 to 0.87) for TT, 0.68 (95% CI = 0.63 to 0.73) for TC, and 0.66 (95% CI = 0.60 to 0.74) for CC genotypes. In addition, 5 genes in rare variant analysis showed suggestive interactions with MHT (2-sided P < 1.2 × 10−4). Conclusion Genetic variants that modify the association between MHT and CRC risk were identified, offering new insights into pathways of CRC carcinogenesis and potential mechanisms involved.
Beyond GWAS of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence of Interaction with Alcohol Consumption and Putative Causal Variant for the 10q24.2 Region
Jordahl, Kristina M. , Shcherbina, Anna , Kim, Andre E. , Arndt, Volker , Baurley, James W. , Berndt, Sonja I. , Bishop, D. Timothy , Bouras, Emmanouil , Brenner, Hermann , Carreras‐Torres, Robert , Casey, Graham , Conti, David V. , Díez‐Obrero, Virginia , Dimou, Niki , Drew, David A. , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Gallinger, Steven , Gruber, Stephen B. , Gsur, Andrea , Harlid, Sophia , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Hoffmeister, Michael , Huyghe, Jeroen R. , Joshi, Amit D. , Li, Li , Nan, Hongmei , Nassir, Rami , Obón‐Santacana, Mireia , Ose, Jennifer , Pai, Rish K. , Papadimitriou, Nikos , Pardamean, Bens , Prentice, Ross L. , Rennert, Gad , Scacheri, Peter C. , Schmit, Stephanie L. , Slattery, Martha L. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Thomas, Duncan C. , Tian, Yu , Tsilidis, Konstantinos K. , Duijnhoven, Fränzel J.B. van , Guelpen, Bethany Van , Visvanathan, Kala , Vodička, Pavel , White, Emily , Woods, Michael O. , Wu, Anna H. , Zemlianskaia, Natalia , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Gauderman, W. James , Kundaje, Anshul , Peters, Ulrike , Arndt, Volker , Bien, Stephanie A , Bishop, D Timothy , Brenner, Hermann , Buchanan, Daniel D , Campbell, Peter T , Carreras-Torres, Robert , Chan, Andrew T , Dampier, Christopher H , Dimou, Niki , Drew, David A , Figueiredo, Jane C , Giles, Graham G , Gruber, Stephen B , Gsur, Andrea , Gunter, Marc J , Hampel, Heather , Harlid, Sophia , Harrison, Tabitha A , Hidaka, Akihisa , Hoffmeister, Michael , Huyghe, Jeroen R , Larsson, Susanna C , Mahesworo, Bharuno , Moreno, Victor , Morrison, John L , Nassir, Rami , Ogino, Shuji , Ose, Jennifer , Pai, R K , Palmer, Julie R , Peoples, Anita R , Pharoah, Paul D P , Platz, Elizabeth A. , Potter, John D , Rennert, Gad , Ruiz-Narvaez, Edward , Sakoda, Lori C , Schmit, Stephanie L , Schoen, Robert E , Slattery, Martha L , Stern, Mariana Carla , Thomas, Duncan C , Tian, Yu , Tsilidis, Konstantinos K , Ulrich, Cornelia M , van Duijnhoven, Fränzel J B , Van Guelpen, Bethany , Visvanathan, Kala , Wolk, Alicja , Woods, Michael O , Chang-Claude, Jenny , Gauderman, W James , Hsu, Li , Kundaje, Anshul , Peters, Ulrike , Pardamean, Bens , Bouras, Emmanouil , Conti, David V , Nan, Hongmei , Obón-Santacana, Mireia , Papadimitriou, Nikos , Shcherbina, Anna , Vodicka, Pavel , Diez-Obrero, Virginia , Su, Yu-Ru , Lin, Yi , Wang, Jun , Qu, Conghui , Albanes, Demetrius , Bien, Stephanie A. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Budiarto, Arif , Campbell, Peter T. , Cenggoro, Tjeng Wawan , Chan, Andrew T. , Dampier, Christopher H. , Devall, Matthew A M , Giles, Graham G. , Gunter, Marc J. , Hampel, Heather , Hidaka, Akihisa , Jenkins, Mark A. , Keku, Temitope O , Larsson, Susanna C. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Lewinger, Juan Pablo , Moreno, Vı́ctor , Morrison, John L. , Murphy, Neil , Newcomb, Polly A. , Palmer, Julie R. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Potter, John D. , Sakoda, Lori C. , Schoen, Robert E. , Tangen, Catherine M. , Ulrich, Cornelia M. , Wolk, Alicja

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | April 19, 2022 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1077-1089

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-1003 | PMID 35438744 Get It

Abstract Background: Currently known associations between common genetic variants and colorectal cancer explain less than half of its heritability of 25%. As alcohol consumption has a J-shape association with colorectal cancer risk, nondrinking and heavy drinking are both risk factors for colorectal cancer. Methods: Individual-level data was pooled from the Colon Cancer Family Registry, Colorectal Transdisciplinary Study, and Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium to compare nondrinkers (≤1 g/day) and heavy drinkers (>28 g/day) with light-to-moderate drinkers (1–28 g/day) in GxE analyses. To improve power, we implemented joint 2df and 3df tests and a novel two-step method that modifies the weighted hypothesis testing framework. We prioritized putative causal variants by predicting allelic effects using support vector machine models. Results: For nondrinking as compared with light-to-moderate drinking, the hybrid two-step approach identified 13 significant SNPs with pairwise r2 > 0.9 in the 10q24.2/COX15 region. When stratified by alcohol intake, the A allele of lead SNP rs2300985 has a dose–response increase in risk of colorectal cancer as compared with the G allele in light-to-moderate drinkers [OR for GA genotype = 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06–1.17; OR for AA genotype = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14–1.31], but not in nondrinkers or heavy drinkers. Among the correlated candidate SNPs in the 10q24.2/COX15 region, rs1318920 was predicted to disrupt an HNF4 transcription factor binding motif. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the association with colorectal cancer in 10q24.2/COX15 observed in genome-wide association study is strongest in nondrinkers. We also identified rs1318920 as the putative causal regulatory variant for the region. Impact: The study identifies multifaceted evidence of a possible functional effect for rs1318920.
Diabetes mellitus in relation to colorectal tumor molecular subtypes: A pooled analysis of more than 9000 cases
Harlid, Sophia , Guelpen, Bethany Van , Gylling, Björn , Aglago, Elom K. , Amitay, Efrat L. , Brenner, Hermann , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Cao, Yin , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Drew, David A. , Figueiredo, Jane C. , French, Amy J. , Gallinger, Steven , Giannakis, Marios , Hoffmeister, Michael , Newton, Christina C. , Obón‐Santacana, Mireia , Song, Mingyang , Steinfelder, Robert S. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Woods, Michael O. , Phipps, Amanda I. , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Peters, Ulrike , Van Guelpen, Bethany , Amitay, Efrat L , Buchanan, Daniel D , Hoffmeister, Michael , Moreno, Victor , Murphy, Neil , Song, Mingyang , Cao, Yin , Drew, David A , Harrison, Tabitha A , Brenner, Hermann , Aglago, Elom K , Obón-Santacana, Mireia , Qu, Conghui , Campbell, Peter T. , Chan, Andrew T. , Giles, Graham G. , Gunter, Marc J. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Lin, Yi , Moreno, Vı́ctor , Murphy, Neil , Newcomb, Polly A. , Nowak, Jonathan A. , Ogino, Shuji , Potter, John D. , Sun, Wei , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Ugai, Tomotaka , Um, Caroline Y.

Mayo Clinic

International Journal of Cancer | April 6, 2022 | Volume: 151 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 348-360

10.1002/ijc.34015 | PMID 35383926 Get It

AbstractDiabetes is an established risk factor for colorectal cancer. However, colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease and it is not well understood whether diabetes is more strongly associated with some tumor molecular subtypes than others. A better understanding of the association between diabetes and colorectal cancer according to molecular subtypes could provide important insights into the biology of this association. We used data on lifestyle and clinical characteristics from the Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) and the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO), including 9756 colorectal cancer cases (with tumor marker data) and 9985 controls, to evaluate associations between reported diabetes and risk of colorectal cancer according to molecular subtypes. Tumor markers included BRAF and KRAS mutations, microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotype. In the multinomial logistic regression model, comparing colorectal cancer cases to cancer‐free controls, diabetes was positively associated with colorectal cancer regardless of subtype. The highest OR estimate was found for BRAF‐mutated colorectal cancer, n = 1086 (ORfully adj: 1.67, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.36‐2.05), with an attenuated association observed between diabetes and colorectal cancer without BRAF‐mutations, n = 7959 (ORfully adj: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.19‐1.48). In the case only analysis, BRAF‐mutation was differentially associated with diabetes (Pdifference = .03). For the other markers, associations with diabetes were similar across tumor subtypes. In conclusion, our study confirms the established association between diabetes and colorectal cancer risk, and suggests that it particularly increases the risk of BRAF‐mutated tumors.