Citations

Abstract Systemic therapy has led to a median survival time for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) almost fourfold longer than that expected with best supportive care, an outcome achieved through combining chemotherapeutic and targeted biologic agents. Although the latter can include anti–epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies, such as cetuximab and panitumumab, we now have strong evidence that patients whose tumors harbor mutated KRAS will not benefit from this class of agent. Acceptance of the reliability and importance of the KRAS data took several years to evolve, however, for a variety of reasons. The timeline from the presentation and publication of small, retrospective phase II studies to widespread acceptance of the KRAS predictive value and changes in behavior—specifically, modifications of ongoing national trials in advanced/metastatic CRC, changes in national guidelines and practice patterns, and adjustments to the labeled indications for the monoclonal antibodies—was lengthy. In this commentary, we discuss whether or not the process of data disclosure regarding KRAS status and treatment of advanced CRC patients was effective in permitting timely decisions regarding ongoing publicly funded clinical trials and whether or not such decisions were rational and ethical. The overall goals are to highlight lessons learned regarding early disclosure of clinical trial results, as well as vetting and adoption of new scientific data, and to propose modifications for handling similar situations in the future.

Abstract Learning Objectives After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Explain the difference in survival prediction between response criteria (WHO) when used as a two-level variable (CR/PR vs. other) and as a three-level variable (CR/PR vs. SD vs. PD).Describe the limited benefit of using actual tumor measurements over traditional criteria (as a three-level variable) in predicting survival in colorectal cancer. This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME.TheOncologist.com Purpose. We explored the prognostic value of actual tumor measurements (TM) versus World Health Organization (WHO) criteria as three-level (responder, stable, and progression) and two-level (responder and non-responder) variables at 12 and 24 weeks as predictors of survival in Intergroup Trial N9741, a phase III trial in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods. All patients with measurable disease (N = 1,188) were included. The percentage changes in TM from baseline to 12 and 24 weeks were calculated. The prognostic values of TM versus WHO criteria (as three- and two-level variables) at 12 and 24 weeks were compared, using Cox models for overall survival (OS) in a landmark analysis, adjusting for baseline tumor size, performance status, and treatment arm. Results. Tumor status at 12 weeks by WHO criteria (three or two levels) or actual TM were all strongly associated with OS. Actual TM provided no meaningful additional benefit compared with the three-level WHO criteria. Tumor status at 24 weeks was also strongly associated with survival, but added no additional prognostic value compared with the 12-week assessment. At 12 weeks, actual TM improved prognostic characterization of patients with WHO status of response, but provided no additional value in patients with stable disease or progression. Conclusions. In N9741, the use of actual TM, or following tumor status beyond 12 weeks, did not improve survival prediction compared with a single three-level response assessment at 12 weeks, suggesting that 12-week tumor status could be an appropriate phase II trial endpoint in metastatic CRC.

The majority of patients with gastrointestinal cancers are over the age of 65. This age group comprises the minority of the patients enrolled in clinical trials, and it is unknown whether older patients achieve similar results as younger patients in terms of survival benefit and tolerability. In addition, there are few studies specifically designed for patients over 65 years. Subset analyses of individual trials and studies using pooled patient data from multiple trials provide some understanding on outcomes in older patients with gastrointestinal cancers. This article reviews the evidence on chemotherapeutic regimens in the elderly with colorectal, pancreatic, and gastroesophageal cancers, and discusses a practical approach to provide the best outcomes for older patients.

Abstract Detection of guanylyl cyclase C mRNA in lymph nodes of resected stage II colorectal cancer is highly correlated with the risk of tumor recurrence. If validated, these results could have significant implications for the selection of patients for adjuvant therapy in this disease. Clin Cancer Res; 17(10); 3053–5. ©2011 AACR.

Abstract We have demonstrated that crosstalk between the Hedgehog-GLI-GLI and EGFR signaling pathway exists and contribute to pancreatic tumorigenesis. This interaction can be abrogated by targeting both pathways simultaneously and results in a synergistic antitumor effect in vitro and in vivo in pancreatic tumor models. Based on these results we have undertaken a phase I trial of GDC-0449 (an orally administered Hedgehog pathway inhibitor) and erlotinib (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor to: 1) determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of GDC-0449 combined with erlotinib in unresectable solid tumors; 2) describe the adverse events associated with this treatment combination; 3) describe the responses of this treatment combination; and 4) to assess the effect of the erlotinib and GDC-0449 combination on selected biomarkers in circulating tumor cells (CTCs), tumor biopsies, and FDG-PET in a cohort of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer patients treated at the MTD. During the dose escalation portion of the trial, eligible patients receive GDC-0449 150 mg p.o. daily and erlotinib 50, 75, 100, or 150 mg daily p.o. at dose levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. Eligibility criteria include: histologic proof of solid tumors that are unresectable, not amenable to any other standard therapies, or patient refused standard therapy,; ANC ≥> 1500/μL; PLT ≥> 100,000/ μL; Total bilirubin ≤< upper limit of normal (ULN); AST ≤< 3 x ULN; Creatinine ≤< 1.5 x ULN; Hemoglobin ≥> 9.0 g/dL; INR within normal limits (Cohort II [MTD Cohort] only); ECOG performance status (PS) 0, 1 or ≤ 2. For the MTD cohort, only patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas without prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease and tumor amenable to biopsies are eligible. Toxicity assessment is performed at each 28-day treatment cycles and response assessment every second treatment 28 day cycle. 12 patients have been entered-pancreas (3), colorectal (3), neuroendocrine (2), scc anus (2), gallbladder (1), thymoma (1). No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reported at dose level 4. At the MTD, up to 20 patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer will be entered to assess the biologic effect of GDC-0449+erlotinib. Pre- and post- treatment biopsies of metastases and FDG-PET will be performed. Weekly collection of CTCs will be undertaken and immunofluorescence microscopy of total & phosphoMAPK, EGFR, AKT, PATCHED1, GLI1, BCL-2, and quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) of PATCHED1, GLI1, and its target genes (BCL-2, BFL-1/A1, 4-1BB) will be performed. In addtion, total & phosphoMAPK, EGFR, and AKT, as well as PATCHED1, GLI1, BCL-2 by immunohistochemistry and Q-PCR of PATCHED1, GLI1, BCL-2, BFL-1/A1, 4-1BB will be analyzed in tumor biopsies. Supported by CA69912, CA136526 and CA102701. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1807.

Purpose Cumulative sensory neurotoxicity (sNT) is the dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin, which commonly leads to early discontinuation of oxaliplatin-based therapy in the palliative and adjuvant settings. In a nonrandomized, retrospective study, intravenous (IV) calcium/magnesium (Ca/Mg) was associated with reduced oxaliplatin-induced sNT. Methods Patients with colon cancer undergoing adjuvant therapy with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) were randomly assigned to Ca/Mg (1g calcium gluconate plus 1g magnesium sulfate pre- and post-oxaliplatin) or placebo, in a double-blinded manner. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with grade 2 or greater sNT at any time during or after oxaliplatin-based therapy by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE; version 3) criteria. An oxaliplatin-specific sNT scale and patient questionnaires were also used to assess sNT. After 104 of 300 planned patients were enrolled, the study was closed. This was due to preliminary reports from another trial that suggested that Ca/Mg decreased treatment efficacy; these data were subsequently found to be incorrect. Results Overall, 102 patients were available for analysis. Ca/Mg decreased the incidence of chronic, cumulative, grade 2 or greater sNT, as measured by NCI CTCAE (P = .038) and also by the oxaliplatin-specific sNT scale (P = .018). In addition, acute muscle spasms associated with oxaliplatin were significantly reduced (P = .01) No effect on acute, cold-induced sNT was found. No substantial differences in adverse effects were noted between Ca/Mg and placebo. Conclusion Despite early termination and decreased statistical power, this study supports IV Ca/Mg as an effective neuroprotectant against oxaliplatin-induced cumulative sNT in adjuvant colon cancer.