Citations

ABSTRACT We report on the 2025 International ICU Diary Conference that provided a comprehensive update on current knowledge, innovations and global practices related to ICU diaries. Held in a 6‐week online format, the event featured 23 speakers and was attended by mean 69.7 (SD 20.5) participants per session. Topics included development of ICU diaries, use in special settings, digital diaries, survivors' and families' experiences, Post‐Intensive‐Care Syndrome and follow‐up and implementation projects. Highlights were innovative solutions for digital diaries and the report of persons with lived and living experiences with diaries, changing the focus on humanising critical care. Relevance for Practice ICU diaries support patient‐ and family‐centred care and should be implemented more widely across healthcare systems. Their successful adoption requires contextual adaptation and policy support, with future development likely to be shaped by the increasing use of digital ICU diaries.

Disclaimer: These guidelines are intended for educational use to build the knowledge of physicians and other health professionals in assessing the conditions and managing the treatment of patients undergoing extracorporeal life support (ECLS)/ECMO and describe what are believed to be useful and safe practice for ECLS and ECMO. The aim of clinical guidelines was to help clinicians to make informed decisions about their patients. However, adherence to a guideline does not guarantee a successful outcome. Healthcare professionals must make their own treatment decisions about care on a case-by-case basis, after consultation with their patients, using their clinical judgment, knowledge, and expertise. These guidelines do not take the place of physicians’ and other health professionals’ judgment in diagnosing and treatment of patients. These guidelines are not intended to and should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or being deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods of care directed at obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment must be made by the physician and other health professionals and the patient considering all the circumstances presented by the individual patient, and the known variability and biologic behavior of the clinical condition. These guidelines reflect the data at the time the guidelines were prepared; the results of subsequent studies or other information may cause revisions to the recommendations in these guidelines to be prudent to reflect new data, but ELSO is under no obligation to provide updates. In no event will ELSO be liable for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided through these guidelines.

Introduction: Upper limb spasticity can result from a variety of insults to the central nervous system. Disruption of the closely regulated spinal reflex arc, owing to loss of brain inhibition, results in an imbalance between antagonist and agonist muscle groups, leading to a loss of fluid coordination of motion across joints. Management strategies: A detailed, individualized assessment of each patient is mandatory in a multidisciplinary setting. Although there are objective parameters which guide treatment, variation and customization of strategies are needed for each patient, including defining a functional vs. a non-functional hand, and whether mobility or stability is the primary goal for surgery. Challenging areas in spasticity management: Surgical options include bony, tendon and nerve procedures. These aim to reduce tone, release contractures or reanimate paralysed muscles. This article examines four challenging areas in decision making for choosing these options: lengthening vs. hyperselective neurectomy for tone management, stability vs. mobility in wrist spasticity, grasp and release recovery through finger flexion and extension, and dystonia. Evidence-based treatments are discussed where available, along with key unresolved issues and future research directions. Conclusion: Restoring balance in the spastic upper limb, especially when voluntary control is lost, remains one of the most complex challenges in hand surgery. A thorough understanding of biomechanical principles and neurological pathways is necessary for the hand surgeon. Furthermore, working within a multidisciplinary team is essential to utilize a comprehensive array of assessment tools, ensuring accurate diagnosis and individualized patient care.

Abstract Increased absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) may predict risk of treatment-related mortality and atypical neurologic events among patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. In this study, we analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients receiving ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) at the Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, from September 2023 to January 2025. Baseline data were collected pre/post-CAR T-cell therapy. Patients were stratified into preintervention (treated September 2023 to July 2024) and intervention (treated August 2024 to January 2025; those with ALC >5 × 103/μL received 3 days of dexamethasone prophylaxis on first identification of elevated ALC). In the preintervention group, 9 of 30 patients had peak ALC >5 × 103/μL; 5 of 9 (55.6%) experienced atypical neurologic events and all 5 died (cilta-cel therapy-related complications). In the intervention group, 7 of 23 patients had peak ALC >5 × 103/μL and received dexamethasone; 1 of 7 had an atypical neurologic event; and 1 death occured (infectious complication, 9 months posttreatment). Dexamethasone prophylaxis in patients with ALC of >5 × 103/μL resulted in rapid ALC reduction. Overall survival (OS) was significantly lower in preintervention patients with ALC of >5 × 103/μL vs intervention patients with ALC of >5 × 103/μL and patients with ALC of ≤5 × 103/μL (P = .0013). ALC >5 × 103/μL (vs ALC ≤ 5 × 103/μL) was significantly associated with atypical neurologic events (odds ratio, 6.8; P = .0157) and lower OS (hazard ratio, 6.2; P = .0106). In conclusion, ALC >5 × 103/μL after cilta-cel treatment predicted severe early neurologic events and high mortality risk. Dexamethasone prophylaxis demonstrated promise for risk mitigation.

Abstract Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Out-of-specification (OOS) CAR T cells not meeting criteria for commercial release are considered an investigational product; the expanded access protocol (EAP) allows release of OOS product for administration. The manufacturing analysis of capability, reliability, and timely delivery of ide-cel in the United States over >3 years since its approval included patients with RRMM who underwent leukapheresis for ide-cel treatment after ≥2 prior lines of therapy between 23 February 2021 and 1 November 2024. Additionally, the BB2121-EAP-001 study evaluated safety and efficacy of OOS ide-cel and included patients who had undergone leukapheresis for commercial ide-cel treatment not meeting commercial release specifications, most commonly due to high CD137 activation or low-infused dose. Primary end point was safety. Secondary end points were overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR). At data cutoff (1 November 2024), the manufacturing success rate of ide-cel improved from 95.3% in 2021 to 96.8% in 2024. Turnaround time also improved from 31 days in 2021 to 24 days in 2024. In BB2121-EAP-001, 68 (72.3%) patients experienced ≥1 cytokine release syndrome event (mostly grade 1/2) and 15 (16.0%) had neurological toxicities (2 grade 3, 13 grade 1/2). ORR was 75.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.1-85.2), and CRR was 35.4% (95% CI, 23.9-48.2). The manufacturing success of ide-cel is reliable and consistently high, and when OOS ide-cel products emerged, they demonstrated consistent clinical efficacy and safety. The BB2121-EAP-001 study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04771078.

Importance Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens may be administered after pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (A-IPMNs), although the evidence supporting their use is limited. Objective To evaluate the survival benefit associated with contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after resection in A-IPMNs between 2017 and 2023. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was an international, multicenter study with 69 participating centers across Europe, North America, South America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients undergoing resection for A-IPMNs were included. Data were analyzed from May to August 2025. Intervention Contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, such as gemcitabine-capecitabine (GemCap); 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX), modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX), and S-1. Main Outcome and Measure Overall survival (months). Results Among 1321 patients (median [IQR] age 70 [63 to 76] years; 713 males [54.0%] and 608 females [46.0%]), 781 patients (59.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, while in 181 patients (13.7%) it was omitted due to poor patient fitness. Of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, 568 patients (72.6%) received contemporary regimens, including GemCap (232 patients [29.7%]), FOLFIRINOX (176 patients [22.5%]), mFOLFIRINOX (71 patients [9.1%]), and S-1 (70 patients [9.0%]). The median (IQR) follow-up for the cohort was 64.2 (40.4 to 85.0) months, and the median overall survival was 73.8 months (95% CI, 66.4 to 81.9 months). After 90-day landmark analysis and exclusion of patients ineligible for chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 243:243 patients) was not associated with improved overall survival (median, 82.3 months; 95% CI, 78.2 months to not applicable [NA] vs not reached; 95% CI, 75.3 months to NA; P = .58). Contemporary regimens vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 309:309 patients) was not associated with longer survival, and a mean survival benefit greater than 4.2 months over 5 years was excluded (difference in restricted mean survival, 1.26 months; 95%, −1.72 to 4.24 months). Treatment outcomes did not vary by chemotherapy regimen or disease characteristic (eg, N stage or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival in A-IPMNs, and a randomized clinical trial is indicated.

ABSTRACT Purpose Malignant rhabdoid tumor of the kidney (MRTK) is a rare, aggressive tumor seen in young children. The optimal timing of resection for locally advanced tumors is not well‐defined. The purpose of this study is to evaluate modern oncologic outcomes and the impact of surgical timing. Methods A multicenter retrospective review was performed by institutions participating in the Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative. Children younger than 21 years old with MRTK diagnosed between 2000 and 2022 were included. Results Sixty‐nine patients were identified with MRTK and met the inclusion criteria. Median age of diagnosis was 10.1 months. Overall survival (OS) at 1, 5, and 10 years was 49%, 32%, and 19%, respectively. Patients with local Stage III disease who underwent upfront resection ( n = 18) compared to those who had delayed resection after NAT ( n = 15) had a similar OS, median OS greater than 60 months versus 14.6 months, respectively; p = 0.396. The surgical timing groups were balanced in terms of the presence of metastasis, length of follow‐up, and tumor characteristics. There was one occurrence of primary intraoperative tumor spill and two occurrences of organ injury in the upfront resection group compared to none in the delayed resection group. Conclusion MRTK carries a poor prognosis despite multimodal treatment. Histologic diagnosis may not be confirmed at presentation, and MRTK cannot be reliably distinguished from Wilms tumor on imaging alone. As overall survival is similar, the decision regarding surgical timing in locally advanced tumors should be individualized based on perceived resectability, balancing the risk of intraoperative complications against the possibility of tumor progression during neoadjuvant therapy.

Background: Sinonasal malignancies (SNM) are rare cancers associated with poor prognosis and impaired quality of life (QOL). The 22-question Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) has been used to assess QOL in patients with SNM. Objective: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the SNOT-22 in patients with SNM. Methods: About 264 patients with SNM were drawn from a prospective, longitudinal, multi-institutional study. SNOT-22 scores were collected at pre-treatment baseline and follow-up through 5 years post-treatment. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the internal consistency of the SNOT-22. Distribution-based approaches were used to estimate the MCID. Multivariable regression identified factors associated with SNOT-22 improvement exceeding the determined MCID. Results: Cronbach’s alpha was >.85. The estimated MCIDs were: 1.44 (Cohen’s effect size), 1.32 (standard error of the mean), 10.45 (1/2 of baseline standard deviation), and 3.67 (minimum detectable change). The mean MCID across methods was 4.22. Multivariable regression demonstrated higher odds of clinically meaningful improvement from baseline in patients with early-stage disease (odds ratio (OR) 3.510, P = .035), no neck irradiation (OR 11.050, P = .014), and neoadjuvant therapy (OR 16.667, P = .047). Conclusions: The SNOT-22 MCID was estimated as 4.22 in a large multi-center cohort of patients with SNM, suggesting that relatively small QOL changes are clinically relevant. When applying the MCID to the current cohort, advanced stage, treatment of neck disease, and not requiring neoadjuvant therapy were predictive of worse QOL.

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) adoption for donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation in the United States has been growing, but there remains a higher rate of non-utilization of NRP DCD liver grafts as compared with donation after brain death liver grafts. Six transplant centers and 1 organ procurement organization (OPO) with substantial NRP liver procurement experience performed retrospective reviews of all NRP procurement attempts from September 1, 2021, until March 1, 2024, identifying opportunities for utilization. Five of the 6 transplant centers had prospectively collected data on all accepted livers with NRP intent. The transplant center's intention to utilize DCD donors included 329 livers accepted for transplantation before withdrawal, 252 (76.6%) potential donors expired within the hospital timeframe for donation, and 168 (66.7%) livers were transplanted. Fifty-seven opportunities for utilization were identified by transplant centers, plus 11 from the OPO: most were due to exceeding a functional warm ischemic time limit (n=26), other reasons (n=17), and functional assessment (n=16). The lessons learned by centers in this study provide guidance for newer NRP centers and for OPOs in identifying opportunities for utilization of NRP DCD grafts that have historically been declined.

Abstract Reported prevalence estimates of Lewy body pathology (LBP) vary widely, often without considering brain regional distributions or demographic influences. Large, population-representative autopsy cohorts are needed to provide estimates and clarify the distribution and clinical implications of LBP. Neuropathological, genetic, and clinical data were pooled from nine community- or population-based brain autopsy cohorts in the USA (n=6), Brazil, Austria, and Finland (n=7309 total; 59% women; mean age of death 84.2 years). Cognitive status was available for 6166 participants: dementia (38.5%), mild cognitive impairment (14.8%), and cognitively unimpaired (47.0%). Frequency of LBP was examined by anatomical distribution (neocortical, limbic, brainstem, amygdala, olfactory) and stratified by covariates. Prevalence was calculated in meta-analysis, and mixed-effect logistic regression examined associations with sex, cognitive status, Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological change (ADNC), and limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE-NC) co-pathology. Overall, 27.3% of participants had LBP: neocortical 8.4%, limbic 6.8%, brainstem 4.8%, amygdala 3.7%, and olfactory 3.6%. Neocortical LBP was associated with dementia (present in 15%; OR=4.06 [95%CI 3.24-5.10]) and with increased odds of ADNC (OR=2.30 [95%CI 1.88–2.81]) and LATE-NC (OR=2.03 [95%CI 1.69-2.44]). Sex differences were not observed in the frequencies of neocortical or limbic LBP. However, amygdala-predominant LBP was more frequent in women (OR=1.53 [95%CI 1.06-2.21]) whereas brainstem-predominant LBP was more common in men (OR=0.64 [95%CI 0.49-0.84]). Additionally, amygdala-predominant LBP was associated with increased odds of comorbid ADNC (OR=12.7 [95%CI 5.30–30.6]) while brainstem-predominant LBP was not associated with greater odds of ADNC co-pathology (OR=0.88 [95%CI 0.67–1.16]). Pooling data from large, international community-based autopsy cohorts allows for more robust estimates of region-specific LBP prevalence and their associations with cognitive status. The observed sex- and co-pathology–specific differences in brainstem and amygdala-predominant LBP highlight potential biological heterogeneity and suggest that distinct disease pathways may underlie these patterns.