Citations

OBJECTIVE To evaluate a regimen of inhaled Technosphere insulin (TI) plus insulin degludec in adults with type 1 diabetes, who prestudy were predominately using either an automated insulin delivery (AID) system or multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) with continuous glucose monitoring. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS At 19 sites, adults with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned to TI plus insulin degludec (N = 62) or usual care (UC) with continuation of prestudy insulin delivery method (N = 61) for 17 weeks. RESULTS Prestudy, AID was used by 48% and MDI by 45%. Mean ± SD HbA1c was 7.57% ± 0.97% at baseline and 7.62% ± 1.06% at 17 weeks in the TI group and 7.59% ± 0.80% and 7.54% ± 0.77%, respectively, in the UC group (adjusted difference 0.11%, 95% CI −0.10 to 0.33, P value for noninferiority = 0.01). HbA1c improved from baseline to 17 weeks by >0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) in 12 (21%) in the TI group and in 3 (5%) in the UC group and worsened by >0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) in 15 (26%) in the TI group and in 2 (3%) in the UC group. The most common TI side effect was a brief cough; eight participants discontinued TI due to side effects. CONCLUSIONS In adults with type 1 diabetes, HbA1c after 17 weeks with a regimen of TI and degludec was noninferior to UC, which consisted predominately of either AID or MDI. TI should be considered an option for people with type 1 diabetes, particularly those who are motivated to further reduce postprandial hyperglycemia.

Abstract von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder caused by von Willebrand factor (VWF) deficiency and is an important cause of heavy menstrual bleeding in young patients. A clinical evaluation using standardized bleeding scores helps determine when screening hemostatic testing is indicated by identifying patients with a moderate or high probability of an inherited bleeding disorder. The diagnosis of VWD is made when VWF levels are under 30 IU/dL or between 30 and 50 IU/dL when there is a positive bleeding history. Activity levels above 100 IU/dL have a high negative predictive value. Multiple factors, including stress from acute bleeding and anemia, pregnancy, and medications, can affect VWF levels, hence testing for VWD is best performed when a person's health is at its baseline level, although this is not always possible in clinical practice. Variation in assay methodologies measuring VWF activity can have a significant impact on the diagnostic evaluation, and it is important for clinicians to be familiar with the limitations of the assay used by their local or reference laboratory. Genetic testing can be useful in establishing the VWD subtype and providing accurate reproductive counseling but is not required to make a diagnosis.

Introduction: CD20xCD3 bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) represent a major advance in the treatment of relapsed or refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). In their pivotal trials, epcoritamab (Epcor) and glofitamab (Glofi) showed an overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) of 52-63% and 39%, respectively, in patients (pts) with r/r LBCL after 2 or more prior lines of therapy (LOT). Data on the efficacy and safety of BsAbs in standard of care (SOC) setting is limited. Here, we report our multicenter retrospective study on SOC BsAbs for the approved indication in r/r LBCL. Methods: All pts who received SOC BsAbs for r/r LBCL at four cancer centers in Florida were included. Pts who died before the first response evaluation were considered to have disease progression. Median follow up time was calculated using reverse Kaplan Meier (KM) method. Univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) of response rates were done using logistic regression. UVA and MVA of PFS and OS were done using Cox proportional hazard model. Median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) were estimated using KM method. Results: As of June 1, 2024, a total of 69 pts received SOC BsAbs for r/r LBCL (43 epcor and 26 glofi). Forty pts (58.0%) were male; median age was 66 years (range 32-89); ECOG >= 3 in 14 (20.3%) pts; transformed indolent lymphoma in 20 (29.0%); Richter transformation in 3 (4.4%); HGBL with MYC/BCL2 rearrangements (double-hit lymphoma [DHL]) in 12 (17.4%); bulky disease>10cm in 33 (47.8%); IPI score >= 4 in 15 (21.7%). Pts received a median of 3 prior LOT (range 2-12); 46 (66.7%) had primary refractory disease; 40 (58.0%) received prior CD19 CAR-T therapy; 35 pts (50.7%) would not have met the inclusion criteria of the pivotal trials due to: ECOG>=3 (n=14), thrombocytopenia (n=11), neutropenia (n=2), CNS involvement (n=6), recent infection (n=6), prior CAR-T within 30 days (n=1), and CrCL<45 (n=2). Among the 69 pts, 65 were evaluable for response. At a median follow up of 7 months, the ORR and CRR were 52.3% and 26.2%, respectively. Median PFS was 4.2 months (m) (95%CI: 2.8-6.9). Median OS was 6.2m (95%CI: 5.9-not reached [NR]). The ORRs in pts without prior CAR-T (CART-naive), progressed after achieving CR/PR to prior CAR-T (CART-R), and not achieving CR/PR to prior CAR-T (CART-NR) were 13/25 (52.0%), 18/24 (75%), and 3/16 (18.8%), respectively, p<0.01. In the UVA of ORR, the following factors were associated with lower response: CART-NR (18.8% vs 63.3%, p<0.01) and ECOG >=3 (21.4% vs 60.8%, p=0.01). Bulky disease, IPI >=4, DHL, >=4 prior lines of therapy, DLBCL subtype or BsAb type was not associated with response. In MVA, only CART-NR was a significant predictor of lack of response to BsAb (odds ratio 5.6, 95%CI: 1.3-24). In the UVA of PFS, CART-NR and ECOG >=3 were associated with shorter mPFS (1.9m [95%CI: 0.6-3] vs 5.4m [95%CI: 4.0-NR] in CAR-T non-responders vs responders; 1.1m [95%CI: 0.4-3.2] vs 5.4m [95%CI: 3.2-NR] in ECOG>=3 vs <3). In the MVA, CART-NR and ECOG>=3 were associate with shorter PFS (HR 2.7, p<0.01 and 2.5, p<0.02, respectively). One of the 3 pts with Richter transformation had continuous PR at 5 months. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 21 pts (36.2%), including 4 (5.8%) grade (Gr) >= 3. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 12 pts (17.4%) with 6 (8.7%) Gr >= 3. Gr3-4 neutropenia was observed in 18 pts (26.1%); Gr3-4 thrombocytopenia in 10 (14.5%). Infection all grades and Gr >= 3 occurred in 26 pts (37.7%) and 19 pts (27.5%), respectively. Among them, bacterial infection was identified in 13, COVID in 5, fungal in 2, and CMV in 1 patient. Conclusion: BsAbs had comparable efficacy in SOC setting as in the pivotal trials. CRS and ICANS were mostly low-grade; however, a high incidence of serious infection was observed. Pts with no response to prior CAR-T also had poor BsAbs response. This could reflect a common mechanism of resistance to immunotherapy, either due to tumor characteristics or host T-cell exhaustion. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the durability of response.

Background: In 2015 the first B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) patient receiving CAR T-cell therapy in Europe was reported to the EBMT registry. Today, the EBMT registry counts with more than 9000 patients treated with CAR T-cell therapies across all indications. Here, on behalf of the GoCART coalition, we present the outcomes of the largest European cohort of B-ALL patients treated with autologous, second generation, CD19-targeted CAR T-cells to date. Methods: Adult and paediatric patients with B-ALL received treatment with CAR T-cell therapy using either academic or commercially available products in 40 centres across 17 different countries. Safety was retrospectively assessed as per ASCTC 2019 consensus grading and CTCAE, and efficacy as per NCCN guidelines. Relapse incidence was defined as haematological relapse or progression after CART with non-relapse mortality as competing event. Leukemia free survival (LFS) was defined as being alive without occurrence of relapse. Follow-up includes patients treated from 2016 to Dec 2023 until data cutoff in June 2024. Results: A total of 345 patients (173 adults and 172 pediatrics) received therapy from 2016 to 2023 with tisagenlecleucel (65.2%), varnimcabtagene autoleucel (25.8%), brexucabtagene autoleucel (5.5%), and others (3.5%). Median age at infusion was 18 yrs. (range, 1.1-78.2) and 41.7% were females. High-risk features were identified including cytogenetic/genomic high-risk as per ELN guidelines (33.8%), relapse after allo-HCT (57.7%), early relapse (<1 year) after prior allo-HCT (30.4%), ≥3 prior treatment lines (55.5%) including prior exposure (and refractoriness) to blinatumomab and inotuzumab in 27.3% (34%) and 28.8% (32.3%), respectively. Median time from diagnosis to CART infusion was 2.8 years (0.1-17.9). Median time from last relapse prior CART to infusion was 2 months (range, 0.9-38.4). Bridging therapy was administered in 86.4% (298) of patients based on high or low intensity chemotherapy (32.1% or 26.5%, respectively), inotuzumab-ozogamicin (13.4%), TKI (8.2%), involved-site therapy (intrathecal chemotherapy, radiotherapy, orchiectomy) (3.5%), and blinatumomab (2.6%), alone or in combination. Prior to infusion, 34.7% had more than 5% BM blast count, 16.3% had circulating blasts in PB, and 20.6% had extramedullary disease. Lymphodepletion was performed in all but one patient, based on fludarabine and cyclophosphamide regimens. The reverse Kaplan-Meier median follow-up was of 2.2 years. The incidence of any grade (and severe) CRS was 71.6% (14.5%), and for ICANS was 15.7% (7.6%). The cumulative incidence of MRD-negative CR at month +3 was 76.9% (71.9-81.1), followed by a 2-year overall survival of 64.6% (58.7-69.8), leukemia-free survival of 48% (42.1-53.7), and relapse incidence of 45.5% (39.6-51.2). Non-relapse mortality at 2 years was 6.5% (4-9.6), 2-year cumulative incidence of subsequent HSCT of 33.3% (28-38.7) and second CAR-T infusions of 12.4% (8.8-16.6). Allogeneic HSCT after CAR-T was performed in 113 cases including 67 (59.3%) HSCT-naïve patients, due to molecular or overt disease relapse (60.9%), and other non-relapse reasons including suboptimal CAR-T persistence/B-cell aplasia (19.1%), pre-CAR-T high-risk features (13.6%), second malignancies (1.8%), and others. Second CAR-T infusions were performed in 39 cases due to molecular or overt disease relapse (79.5%) or suboptimal CAR-T persistence/B-cell aplasia in the absence of relapse (20.5%). Conclusions: The results from this European study demonstrate that CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy is an effective treatment for patients with high-risk B-cell ALL, providing substantial leukemia-free survival and overall survival rates despite the high-risk nature of the patient population. The necessity for bridging therapies and subsequent consolidative approaches, such as HSCT and second CAR T infusions, underscores the complexity and tailored nature of managing R/R B-ALL. These findings support the continued use and further investigation of CAR T-cell therapy in diverse clinical settings, emphasizing the importance of post-infusion strategies to sustain long-term remission. This will provide deeper insights into the factors influencing outcomes and help refine treatment protocols to improve patient care.

Introduction: The treatment of older patients with advanced stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is challenging and outcomes remain poor compared to younger patients (pts). A subgroup analysis of older pts (aged ≥ 60 years) enrolled in the SWOG S1826 study showed the Nivolumab-AVD regimen was better tolerated and improved progression free survival (PFS) compared to concurrent brentuximab vedotin-AVD (Bv-AVD). The sequential administration of Bv before and after AVD chemotherapy (seq Bv-AVD-Bv) is a commonly used approach to minimize the toxicity of Bv-AVD in older pts based on the tolerability and efficacy shown in a phase II study (Evens, et al. J Clin Oncol 2018). There is limited data on clinical outcomes with seq Bv-AVD-Bv in the real-world setting. We report our multicenter study of sequential Bv-AVD-Bv administration in older patients with cHL. Methods: This retrospective study included a total of 40 older pts with cHL treated with sequential Bv-AVD-Bv in 6 cancer centers. Descriptive statistics were used to depict patient demographics and disease characteristics prior to treatment initiation. Responses to therapy were assessed using the Lugano criteria. Response evaluable patients were those who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy with AVD. PFS and overall survival (OS) were estimated using log-rank testing with the Kaplan Meier curves. Results: The majority (n=23, 57.2%) of patients were male; median age was 72.5 years (range, 57-86 years); 10 (25%) pts were Hispanic, and 18 (45%) pts were Caucasian; performance status by ECOG was 0-2 in 33 (82.5%) pts. In terms of disease characteristics 19 (47.5%) pts had cHL NOS, 10 (25%) had nodular sclerosing subtype; stage III/IV in 35 (87.5%), stage II in 5 (12.5%) pts; B- symptoms in 21 (52.5%); extranodal disease in 19 (47.5%), with bone marrow involvement in 10 (25%) pts. Among the 38 response-evaluable patients the ORR and CR rates were 97.4% and 71.1%, respectively. Bv dose reductions or interruptions were reported in 14 (35.9%) pts. Treatment discontinuation (Td) occurred in 16 (40%) pts. The most common any grade adverse events were hematological toxicities (HT) in 28 (70%) pts and peripheral neuropathy in 24 (60%) pts. Forty-five percent of patients experienced grade 3 or higher HT. The overall incidence of grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy was 15%. The main reasons for treatment discontinuation were toxicity (n=9) and disease progression (n=4). During treatment, 1 (2.5%) pt reported loss of basic activities of daily living (ADLs) and 5 (12.5%) had loss of instrumental ADLs (iADLs). G-CSF prophylaxis was used in most (n=33, 82.5%) pts. At a median follow up of 25.7 months (range, 2.6 - 58.9) the 2 years PFS was 62.6% (95% CI: 46.1-79.1) and the 2 years OS was 83.3% (95% CI: 67-99.6). On univariate analysis, the median PFS correlated with the depth of response (CR: not reached; PR: 11.4 months; SD/PD: 3.9 months; P=0.0001); and with treatment discontinuation (No Td: not reached; Td: 21.6 months; P=0.007). There was no correlation between age, sex, institution, B- symptoms, bone marrow involvement, ADL/iADLs, or disease stage with treatment discontinuation. Conclusion: Sequential Bv-AVD-Bv in older patients with cHL can help minimize the toxicity associated with the concurrent administration of Bv-AVD. This sequential approach has shown comparable efficacy in real-word setting as seen in clinical trials. Our findings suggest seq Bv-AVD-Bv remains a feasible option for older fit patients with cHL outside clinical trials. Further randomized studies in older cHL pts are needed.

Background: The prognosis of patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory B ALL (r/r B-ALL) treated with CAR T-cells and receive a 2nd CART infusion is unknown. Few reports with limited numbers of patients suggest that 2nd CART infusion is feasible with questionable efficacy. This GoCART coalition registry study aimed at compiling data to investigate the indications, efficacy, and toxicity of CART2 infusion in pts with r/r B-ALL. Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective registry study that included pediatric and adult patients with r/r B-ALL who received autologous CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy (CART1) and subsequently were treated with a second administration of CD19 and/or CD22-targeted CAR-T cell therapy (CART2) from 2017 to 2023. Baseline features, prior stem cell transplant (SCT), indications for CART2 and outcomes were collected. Relapse incidence (RI) was defined as overt recurrence, non-relapse mortality (NRM) as death without relapse occurrence, leukemia free survival (LFS) as being alive without occurrence of relapse and overall survival (OS) as being alive. RI and NRM were estimated using cumulative incidence function and OS and LFS Kaplan-Meier estimation. Results: Out of 345 pts who received CART1, 39 (2y cumulative incidence of second CART: 12.4% (95%CI: 8.8-16.6)) received CART2. Reasons for CART2 were overt relapse (n= 26; 66.7%), molecular relapse by measurable residual disease (MRD+) (n=5; 12.8%), and B-cell recovery (BCR) in the absence of relapse (n=8; 20.5%). Seventeen pts (43.6%) were female and median age at CART2 infusion was 19 yrs (range: 6.9-67.1), including 19 children and 20 adults. 74.4% of the pts had received a prior SCT, 25 pts (64%) before CART1, 2 (5.1%) only between CART1 and CART2, and 2 (5.1%) before CART1 and between CART1 and CART2. Among the 31 pts who received CART2 for relapse, this was CD19+ in 24 (92.3%), CD19- in 2 (7.7%), and unknown in 5. CART1 products were varnimcabtagene autoleucel (ARI-0001) (23), tisagenlecleucel (13), brexucabtagene autoleucel (1), and other experimental (2). All CART2 products targeted CD19 except 2 (1 CD22 and 1 dual CD19-CD22). Median time between CART1 and CART2 was 11.0 months. For patients who received CART2 for BCR, median time between CART1 and CART2 was shorter than for those who received it for relapse: 2.4 (IQR: 2.3-3.3) months vs. 12.4 (IQR:6.4-19.3) months. Regarding leukemic burden at the time of CART2 infusion, 19 pts (48.8%) were in overt relapse (14/19 with extramedullary disease, including 7 in CNS), 12 (30.1%) were in complete remission (CR) MRD+ and 8 (20.5%) CR MRD-. With a median follow-up time of 2.3 yrs [95% CI: 1.2-3.4], the 2-yr OS and LFS after CART2 were 47.1% [95% CI: 27.8-64.3] and 39.9% [95% CI: 24-55.3], respectively. 2-yr RI was 54.5% (95% CI: 36.5-69.4) and NRM was 5.6% (95% CI 1-16.8). 2-yr OS, LFS and RI for pts in CR at CART2 infusion irrespective to MRD were 76.1%, 63.3% and 25.6% while for those not in CR these outcomes were 17.7%, 15% and 85%, respectively (p= 0.007, 0.006 and 0.002). 2-yr LFS (71.4% [95% CI 25.8-92]) and RI (0%) was significantly better for pts receiving CART2 for BCR than in those who received it for relapse (31.6% [15.6-48.9] and 68.4% [46.7-82.8]; p= 0.036, p=0.002). Conclusion: This is a large registry study describing indications and outcome of CART2 in patients with r/r B-ALL. At 2-yrs after CART2, the LFS was of 39.9% and for patients receiving CART2 due to B-cell recovery was of 71.4%. These results show that CART2 is associated with low NRM and might be a bridge to SCT or other additional therapies. Updated results with data about subsequent therapies after CART2 will be presented at ASH meeting.

Introduction: Despite the success of anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells (CART19) in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), an allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) might rescue patients with disease recurrence. However, in patients at high risk of relapse, indication and timing of HSCT are challenging. Whether waiting for detectable disease or proceeding to consolidative HSCT in remission, is still controversial. This GoCART Coalition registry study aimed at investigating the outcome of patients who received HSCT after CART19. Methods: We retrieved data from the EBMT registry on adults and children with B-ALL who received autologous CART19 from 2016 and 2023. Baseline, previous treatment, bridging therapy, CART19 therapy, B cell aplasia duration, outcome, disease status at follow-up were collected. Kaplan Meier estimates were used for overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) from date of HSCT, whereas cumulative incidence was used for relapse after HSCT. The relapse was defined as molecular or hematologic recurrence of the disease. Relapse and NRM were mutually competing events. Results: Of 345 patients (173 adults and 172 children) infused with CART19 (Tisagenlecleucel in 65.2%, Varnimcabtagene autoleucel 25.8%, brexucabtagene autoleucel 5.5%, and others 3.5%), 113 subsequently received an HSCT (37 adults and 76 children; median age 13.5 years, IQR 8.2-22.2) at a median of 6.2 months (3.7-11.8) after CART19 infusion. Median follow-up was 1.6 years (95%CI 1.1-1.9). Overall, 67/113 (59.3%) patients were transplant-naive (17 adults; 50 children). 78.2% received a myeloablative conditioning, 36.8% were grafted from a mismatched related donor. Most of the patients (64.2%) were transplanted in CR3 or more. Disease status at HSCT was relapsed disease for 9% of the patients, whereas among patients in CR with reported MRD 26/95 (27%) received HSCT with MRD positivity (MRD+). Among the patients with disease recurrence after CART19, 19/60 (32%) detected a CD19-negative clone. Indication for the subsequent HSCT was reported for 110 patients, as follow: (I) Rescue HSCT in 68 (62%) patients with molecular/morphological disease after CAR-T (including one patient with MDS post CAR-T); (II) Pre-emptive HSCT in 22 (20%) patients with B-cell aplasia loss with no signs of disease recurrence; (III) ConsolidativeHSCT in the 20 patients (18%) who were transplanted for the high risk of relapse, despite ongoing B cell aplasia and no disease recurrence. Median time elapsed between CART19 and HSCT was 9.5, 4.4 and 3.4 months in the three groups, respectively. The 2-yr OS was 71.1% (95%CI 59.8-79.7) and 2-yr LFS was 53.5% (41.9- 63.8), relapse incidence was 32.7% (22.4-43.5), while NRM was 11.6% (6.1-19.1). The 2-years LFS was 59.6% (45.2-71.4) vs 42% (19.2-63.4), for patients transplanted with negative or positive MRD, respectively. 5/11 patients transplanted with overt disease (including one with MDS) relapsed or died, the 6 survivors free of disease had follow-up inferior to 2 years. Children compared with adults showed better OS (76.8%, 62.1-86.4; 59.9%; 40.8-74.6; p=0.02), and better LFS (64.3%, vs. 36.4%; p= 0.02). Patients receiving a rescue HSCT for MRD+ or overt relapse had a significant lower LFS (43.6% and 33.2%), as compared to pre-emptive (77.3%) and consolidative HSCT (83.6%, p= 0.001). In univariate analysis, no significant differences in OS (74.5% vs 65.6%, p=0.32), LFS (54.3% vs 52.4%, p=0.75) and NRM (10.7% vs 12.9%, p=0.68) were reported for those patients having a previous HSCT before CART19. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge this is the largest cohort of transplanted patients after CART19. In this “real-world” registry-based study we found that patients transplanted without disease recurrence had a better LFS, also accounting for MRD. For those who experienced molecular or overt relapse, achieving MRD negativity appeared to be relevant for a better outcome. The low NRM, with no differences between pre-transplanted and transplant naive patients, suggest that HSCT after CART19 is well tolerated, and represent a valid strategy to reduce the risk of relapse. As it remains unclear for which patients autologous CART19 cells remains a stand-alone treatment, future studies should focus on strategies for early identification of patients at higher risk of treatment failure.

Background: Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare and understudied plasma cell disorder. It is caused by abnormal misfolding of monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains, leading to extracellular deposition of amyloid, ultimately resulting in organ dysfunction and death. Since AL amyloidosis is uncommon, therapies are adapted from the more common plasma cell disorders like multiple myeloma. Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, was first tested in several prospective and retrospective studies in AL patients with relapsed refractory disease. The ANDROMEDA study (Kastritis E et al, NEJM 2021) established daratumumab in combination with CyBorD (Cyclophosphamide-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone) followed by daratumumab maintenance as the new standard of care compared to CyBorD alone for newly diagnosed patients. Consequently, daratumumab maintenance has become universally offered to all newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients. Notably, there was no second randomization before the initiation of maintenance therapy in ANDROMEDA. Hence, a critical question that remains is whether the superior efficacy observed in the investigational arm of the ANDROMEDA trial is solely a result of the addition of daratumumab during the induction phase or if the maintenance phase contributed to the favorable outcomes in the investigational arm. We hypothesize that a shorter duration of maintenance would prove non-inferior to the standard duration of daratumumab maintenance in patients with AL amyloidosis that have responded to Daratumumab-CyBorD induction. To answer this question we are conducting a pragmatic phase 2 randomized trial assessing the optimal duration of daratumumab maintenance in patients with AL amyloidosis who have responded to Daratumumab-CyBorD induction. Study Design, Patients and Methods: We use broadened eligibility criteria consistent with pragmatic trial design. The estimated total enrollment is up to 96 patients. The main eligibility criteria are patients with biopsy-proven AL Amyloidosis who have completed 6 cycles of Dara-CyBorD-based induction treatment and achieved an adequate response to induction (defined as hematological complete response (CR), hematological very good partial response (VGPR), or hematological partial response (PR) with at least one organ response). Patients in whom bortezomib and/or cyclophosphamide were omitted from induction due to toxicity concerns or adverse effects are allowed. The major exclusion criteria are patients who were concomitantly diagnosed with multiple myeloma based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. This phase II, open-label, multicenter trial (NCT05898646) randomizes patients who have attained an adequate response to 6 cycles of Dara-CyBorD-based induction in a 1:1 ratio, using a dynamic allocation procedure that balances the marginal distributions of the stratification factors (age, cardiac stage, and t(11;14) status). Randomization is to either single-agent daratumumab maintenance of 6 cycles duration (experimental arm) or 18 cycles of daratumumab maintenance (control arm) (cycle = 28 days). Treatment is allowed to be given at a local facility After completing maintenance treatment, patients will follow up every 3 months for up to 36 months from registration. The primary endpoint of the trial is to evaluate the non-inferiority of a shorter (6 cycles) daratumumab maintenance measured by event-free survival (EFS) compared to the standard maintenance of 18 cycles in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis who receive 6 cycles of daratumumab-CyBorD based induction. EFS in this study is defined as time from registration to any of the following events: hematological progression, organ progression, subsequent anti-plasma cell therapy in the absence of hematological progression but with persistent organ dysfunction or death, whichever occurs first. Secondary endpoints are depth of hematological and organ response, bone marrow measurable residual disease negativity rate, duration of response, quality of life, and survival. By investigating whether a shorter duration of maintenance is non-inferior to the standard duration, we aim to inform clinical practice and potentially reduce the toxicities associated with prolonged maintenance therapy, including hypogammaglobulinemia, recurrent infections, the need for intravenous gammaglobulin replacement, and financial toxicity.

Introduction: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is an antibody targeting CD22 conjugated with a cytotoxic antitumor antibiotic (calicheamicin) approved for treatment of relapsed/refractory CD22 positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (Kantarjian et al. NEJM 2017). CD22 is expressed on the surface of lymphoblasts in ALL (~95%). Young adult patients (pts) 18-39 years (yrs) treated on the pediatric regimen CALGB 10403 resulted in a 3-yr event-free survival (EFS) of 59% (95% CI: 52-67%) and an estimated 3-yr overall survival (OS) of 73% (95% CI: 68-78%) (Stock et al. Blood 2019). Alliance A041501(NCT03150693), a phase 3 NCTN sponsored cooperative group trial was conducted to determine if the addition of INO to the CALGB 10403 pediatric regimen would significantly improve EFS. Methods: Eligibility included pts 18-39 years with newly diagnosed CD22 positive ALL, defined as baseline expression in > 20% of lymphoblasts by local institution. Pts with Burkitt-type ALL, BCR::ABL1 positive ALL, or Down syndrome were excluded. Eligible pts received the CALGB 10403 regimen modified to omit extended induction, include dexamethasone as opposed to prednisone as steroid backbone, cap the pegaspargase dose to 3750 units, and adding rituximab for pts with CD20 expression (> 20%). An amendment added blinatumomab for minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity. Pts achieving a complete remission (CR/CRi) or partial remission (PR) were eligible for randomization. Following a 6 pt safety run-in with INO, pts were randomized 1:1 to receive INO or continue CALGB 10403 backbone. Two cycles of INO (1.5 mg/m2/cycle) were administered following induction in the experimental arm. Pts were stratified by age, disease status post induction (M0/M1 vs M2), CD20 status, and LDA Card, which tests for the Ph-like status. The primary endpoint was to determine if the addition of INO would improve the EFS of the pediatric regimen CALGB 10403 without censoring for stem cell transplant (SCT). Key secondary endpoints included the impact of INO on disease-free survival (DFS), OS, and MRD. The Alliance Data and Safety Monitoring Board halted enrollment after 273 out of a planned 341 pts were registered because of increased grade (gr) 5 events in the INO arm compared with the control arm. Results: 273 pts were enrolled between 6/15/2018, and 5/24/2022. Median age was 27.0 yrs, 65.2% were White, 30.4% were Hispanic, and 63.4% were male. Baseline CSF analysis revealed 14% with CNS-2/3 disease. The overall CR rate was 86.8% (82.8-90.8%). 46 pts were not randomized due to death (5), withdrawal (6), ineligibility (3), toxicity (5), receipt of non-protocol therapy (8), progression (5), and other (14). 227 eligible pts were randomized 1:1 to receive INO (N=111) or not (N=116)). For randomized pts, 92.5% achieved M0/M1 marrow status, 48.9% had a positive LDA Card defining Ph-like ALL, 50.7% were CD20 positive. Only 36 pts (13%) received a SCT. With a median follow up of 28.3 months for randomized pts, 3-yr EFS was 69.0% (59.1-80.5%) for the INO arm and 66.7% (57.1-78.1%) for the control (HR=0.97; 0.58-1.63). Similarly, the 3-yr OS was 79.4% (71.0-88.7%) for the INO arm and 80.3% (71.9-89.6%) for the control (HR=1.05; 0.55-2.01). The MRD undetectable rate at Course II Day 56 was 80.6% in the INO arm and 74.2% in the control arm. Univariate analysis suggests improved EFS with INO in pts with a positive LDA card (Ph-like ALL) and of Hispanic ethnicity. There were 22 gr 5 events, 7 occurred prior to randomization. Of the 15 gr 5 events on the randomized cohort, 12 were reported in the INO arm and 3 in the control arm. Of the 12 gr 5 events in the INO arm, all occurred during intensive consolidation courses complicated by prolonged pancytopenia infection/sepsis (8), hepato-biliary in setting of infection (2), multi-organ failure (1), or post-surgical complication (1). These events occurred after INO during Course II (3), Course III (5), or Course IV (4). Conclusions: Although this trial did not meet the primary EFS endpoint for the addition of INO to the pediatric regimen CALGB 10403, these data provide compelling evidence for continued use of pediatric regimens in young adults with ALL as the EFS and OS compares favorably with prior published results. INO may still be efficacious if late toxicity can be mitigated. A pilot study is planned that will decrease INO dose, add 2 cycles of blinatumomab and strict infectious prophylaxis guidelines. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882

Abstract Background The phase III RxPONDER trial has affected treatment for node-positive (1-3), hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with a 21-gene recurrence score (RS) less than 26. We investigated how these findings apply to different racial and ethnic groups within the trial. Methods The trial randomly assigned women to endocrine therapy (ET) or to chemotherapy plus ET. The primary clinical outcome was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), with distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) as a secondary outcome. Multivariable Cox models were used to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and survival outcomes, adjusting for clinicopathological characteristics, RS, and treatment. Results A total of 4048 women with self-reported race/ethnicity were included: Hispanic (15.1%), non-Hispanic Black (NHB) (6.1%), Native American/Pacific Islander (0.8%), Asian (8.0%), and non-Hispanic White (NHW) (70%). No differences in RS distribution, tumor size, or number of positive nodes were observed by race/ethnicity. Relative to NHWs, IDFS was worse for NHB participants (5-year IDFS 91.6% vs 87.1%, HR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.81) and better for Asians (91.6% vs 93.9%, HR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.91). Relative to NHW, DRFS was worse for NHB participants (5-year DRFS 95.8% vs 91.0%, HR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.17 to 2.32) and better for Asians (95.8% vs 96.7%, HR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.95). Adjusting for clinical characteristics, particularly body mass index, diminished the effect of race on outcomes. Chemotherapy treatment efficacy did not differ by race/ethnicity. Conclusions NHB women had worse clinical outcomes compared with NHWs in the RxPONDER trial despite similar RS and comparable treatment. Our study emphasizes the persistent racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes while highlighting complex interactions among contributing factors. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01272037.