Citations

Clear

253 citation(s) found for "Hou, Xu".

Characterization of fusion genes in common and rare epithelial ovarian cancer histologic subtypes
Earp, Madalene A. , Li, Qian , Cunningham, Julie M. , Natanzon, Yanina , Kalli, Kimberly R., Hou, Xiaonan , Weroha, S. John , Haluska, Paul , Lawrenson, Kate , Gayther, Simon A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Winham, Stacey J. , Raghavan, Rama , Dai, Junqiang , Wang, Chen , Fridley, Brooke L. , Lawrenson, Kate

Mayo Clinic

Oncotarget | April 1, 2017 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 29 | Pages: 46891-46899

10.18632/oncotarget.16781 | PMID 28423358 Get It

Oxidative Stress-Induced Afterdepolarizations and Protein Kinase C Signaling
Fei, Yu-Dong, Hou, Jian-Wen, Guo, Kai , Chen, Xiao-Meng, Chen, Yi-He , Wang, Qian , Xu, Xiao-Lei, Wang, Yue-Peng, Li, Yi‐Gang , Fei, Yudong, Li, Wei , Wang, Yue‐Peng

Mayo Clinic

International Journal of Molecular Sciences | March 30, 2017 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 688

10.3390/ijms18040688 | PMID 28358314 Get It

Background: Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-induced oxidative stress has been demonstrated to induce afterdepolarizations and triggered activities in isolated myocytes, but the underlying mechanisms remain not fully understood. We aimed to explore whether protein kinase C (PKC) activation plays an important role in oxidative stress-induced afterdepolarizations. Methods: Action potentials and ion currents of isolated rabbit cardiomyocytes were recorded using the patch clamp technique. H2O2 (1 mM) was perfused to induce oxidative stress and the specific classical PKC inhibitor, Gö 6983 (1 μM), was applied to test the involvement of PKC. Results: H2O2 perfusion prolonged the action potential duration and induced afterdepolarizations. Pretreatment with Gö 6983 prevented the emergence of H2O2-induced afterdepolarizations. Additional application of Gö 6983 with H2O2 effectively suppressed H2O2-induced afterdepolarizations. H2O2 increased the late sodium current (INa,L) (n = 7, p < 0.01) and the L-type calcium current (ICa,L) (n = 5, p < 0.01), which were significantly reversed by Gö 6983 (p < 0.01). H2O2 also increased the transient outward potassium current (Ito) (n = 6, p < 0.05). However, Gö 6983 showed little effect on H2O2-induced enhancement of Ito. Conclusions: H2O2 induced afterdepolarizations via the activation of PKC and the enhancement of ICa,L and INa,L. These results provide evidence of a link between oxidative stress, PKC activation and afterdepolarizations.
Abstract B34: Integrated Approaches to Treating Lung Adenocarcinoma Resistant to Targeted Therapy
Jen, Jin , Eiken, Patrick W. , Stoddard, Shawn M., Pierson, Karlyn E. , Hou, Xiaonan , Ren, Hong, Molina, Julian R. , Yi, Joanne, Yang, Ping , Mansfield, Aaron S.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Cancer Research | March 1, 2017 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 16_Supplement | Pages: B34-B34

10.1158/1557-3265.pdx16-b34 Get It

Abstract Mutations in the EGFR gene or transcript fusion involving EML4-ALK result in oncogenic activation of these oncogenes driving lung adenocarcinoma growth in tumors carrying such an alteration. For lung adenocarcinoma with these genetic changes, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been highly effective at reducing tumor burden and improve the outcome of the patients. Unfortunately, drug resistance eventually develops in these tumors and challenges remain in controlling lung cancer recurrence after targeted therapy. To overcome recurrence, we initiated a prove-of-principle study to evaluate the feasibility of an integrated strategy utilizing genomic profiles of the tumor and patient-specific tumor xenografts derived (PDX) from biopsies for ex vivo evaluation of antitumor drugs to help guide personalized treatment of lung cancer in patients who have developed resistance to targeted therapy drugs. Our study has three main objectives. 1) Use tumor biopsies obtained at the time of recurrence for oncogene mutation and RNAseq analyses to identify molecular changes in oncogenes and gene pathways that can be potentially targeted. 2) Evaluate drug efficacy and optimize personalized therapy for each patient using PDX models. 3) Assess clinical feasibility and our experience using integrated approaches for lung cancer patients who failed targeted therapy. This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB) and utilizes both clinical and research biopsies. A dedicated nurse study coordinator reviews clinical patient list and history on weekly basis and informs the study team of each potential candidate patient. A total of 30 patients having ALK positive lung cancers have been identified and followed up from nearly 500 potentially ALK positive cases between April 2014 to Sept. 2015. Most patients were never smokers but six were former smokers and two were current smokers. Age at diagnoses ranged from 27-78 years (median = 61). Seven patients (23%) were 45 years or younger at the time of diagnosis. A total of 22 patients are currently being treated with crizotinib while eight are on ceritinib or alectinib. For each biopsy, tumor tissues are obtained using a 20 gauge needle, transferred on ice in preserving media and implanted within one hour into 6-8 week old NOD/SCID mice. Many patients have been on treatment for 2-3 years with stable disease so they do not require biopsy. Using a similar strategy, we also obtained biopsies from patients with EGFR gene mutations in their tumors and have progressed while on targeted therapy. A total of seven cases have been implanted. We will report our experiences in patient selection, clinical follow up, patient consent, PDX development, time from biopsy to tumor establishment, and the results of molecular analyses. Our study enabled us to gain new insights regarding the molecular changes associated with recurring tumors after they have failed targeted therapy as well as clinical experiences on how to utilize state-of-the art approaches and comprehensive genomic information to further improve cancer patient care upon disease progression. Acknowledgements: This work is supported in part by the Hillsberg Award from the National Foundation for Cancer Research and by the Biomarker Discovery Program at the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine. Citation Format: Jin Jen, Aaron Mansfield, Patrick W. Eiken, Shawn Stoddard, Karlyn Pierson, Xiaonan Hou, Hong Zheng Ren, Julian Molina, Joanne Yi, Ping Yang. Integrated Approaches to Treating Lung Adenocarcinoma Resistant to Targeted Therapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Patient-Derived Cancer Models: Present and Future Applications from Basic Science to the Clinic; Feb 11-14, 2016; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(16_Suppl):Abstract nr B34.
Abstract A34: Targeting genes which are amplified in ovarian cancer
Harris, Faye R. , Hou, Xiaonan , Leventakos, Konstantinos , Weroha, Saravut J., Vasmatzis, George , Kovtun, Irina V. , Yang, Lin

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Cancer Research | January 4, 2017 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 1_Supplement | Pages: A34-A34

10.1158/1557-3265.pmccavuln16-a34 Get It

Abstract Over the recent years significant knowledge has been accumulated on which drugs can be therapeutically beneficial for a given patient based on mutational profiling of their tumors using selected gene panels. Much less, however, is known under which conditions targeting of genes which are amplified could be beneficial. Apart from successfully targeting HER2-positive cancers, many of which frequently carry amplified ERBB2 gene, no other targeted therapy based on DNA amplifications or gains of the genes is offered to the patients due to lack of clinical response data. Using mate pair sequencing we have profiled 60 high grade serous ovarian tumors to compare genomic rearrangements and copy number changes. The analyses revealed that these tumors carry highly rearranged genome. Copy number changes amplifications, gains and losses were very common and included genes potentially therapeutically targetable. In contrast, only a few of targetable fusion genes were identified in a set of 60 cases. The tumors were propagated in immunocompromised mice (mouse avatars), sequenced and showed identical to original patient tumor landscape of rearrangements. Using these mouse avatar models we tested whether a therapy inhibiting selected based on genomic amplification targets provided a benefit compared to standard chemotherapy. Mice which harbored tumors showing amplifications of CDKs (CDK2, 4 and 9) and ERBB3 were treated with flavopiridol and pertuzumab respectively, and response was compared to that of standard for ovarian cancer chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel combination). We observed that application of either agent, significantly inhibited tumor growth in treated mice as compared to untreated. However, neither drug alone caused tumor regression. The treatment regimen then was modified to administer chemotherapy and targeted therapy together. A mouse avatars in which genomic analyses revealed amplification at loci involving AKT3 and RICTOR genes was treated with chemotherapy alone and in combination with MK2206 (AKT inhibitor) or MK8669 (mTOR inhibitor). The high level of both target proteins was confirmed by immunoblotting. Significant regression of tumor was observed after 6 weeks of treatment. Addition of either targeted drug provided an extra benefit in killing tumor cells compared to chemotherapy alone. The mice are followed to study tumor recurrence. These data indicated that genomic information obtained using next generation sequencing can aid therapy decisions by tailoring treatments to individual tumor makeup. Avatar models in conjunction with genomic analyses of the original tumors are invaluable for testing specific targeted therapies selected based on amplification/gains of putative genes-targets and for studying mechanisms of tumor recurrence and therapy resistance. Citation Format: Faye R. Harris, Lin Yang, Xiaonan Hou, Konstantinos Leventakos, Saravut J. Weroha, George Vasmatzis, Irina V. Kovtun. Targeting genes which are amplified in ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Precision Medicine Series: Targeting the Vulnerabilities of Cancer; May 16-19, 2016; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(1_Suppl):Abstract nr A34.
PINK1, Parkin, and Mitochondrial Quality Control: What can we Learn about Parkinson’s Disease Pathobiology?
Truban, Dominika, Hou, Xu , Caulfield, Thomas R. , Fiesel, Fabienne C. , Springer, Wolfdieter , Fričová, Dominika , Hou, Xu , Caulfield, Thomas R , Fiesel, Fabienne C , Springer, Wolfdieter

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Parkinson’s Disease | December 2, 2016 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 13-29

10.3233/jpd-160989 | PMID 27911343 Get It

The first clinical description of Parkinson’s disease (PD) will embrace its two century anniversary in 2017. For the past 30 years, mitochondrial dysfunction has been hypothesized to play a central role in the pathobiology of this devastating neurodegenerative disease. The identifications of mutations in genes encoding PINK1 (PTEN-induced kinase 1) and Parkin (E3 ubiquitin ligase) in familial PD and their functional association with mitochondrial quality control provided further support to this hypothesis. Recent research focused mainly on their key involvement in the clearance of damaged mitochondria, a process known as mitophagy. It has become evident that there are many other aspects of this complex regulated, multifaceted pathway that provides neuroprotection. As such, numerous additional factors that impact PINK1/Parkin have already been identified including genes involved in other forms of PD. A great pathogenic overlap amongst different forms of familial, environmental and even sporadic disease is emerging that potentially converges at the level of mitochondrial quality control. Tremendous efforts now seek to further detail the roles and exploit PINK1 and Parkin, their upstream regulators and downstream signaling pathways for future translation. This review summarizes the latest findings on PINK1/Parkin-directed mitochondrial quality control, its integration and cross-talk with other disease factors and pathways as well as the implications for idiopathic PD. In addition, we highlight novel avenues for the development of biomarkers and disease-modifying therapies that are based on a detailed understanding of the PINK1/Parkin pathway.
Lung Injury Prediction Score in Hospitalized Patients at Risk of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Soto, Graciela J., Kor, Daryl J. , Park, Pauline K. , Hou, Peter C. , Kaufman, David A. , Yadav, Hemang , Hsu, Michael C. , Shvilkina, Tatyana , Grewal, Yekaterina, Aguirre, Manuel De, Gunda, Sampath , Gajic, Ognjen, Gong, Michelle N. , Kim, Mimi , Kim, Mimi S. , Teman, Nicholas R. , Aguirre, Manuel De, Gajic, Ognjen

Mayo Clinic

Critical Care Medicine | August 11, 2016 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2182-2191

10.1097/ccm.0000000000002001 | PMID 27513358 Get It

Objective: The Lung Injury Prediction Score identifies patients at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome in the emergency department, but it has not been validated in non-emergency department hospitalized patients. We aimed to evaluate whether Lung Injury Prediction Score identifies non-emergency department hospitalized patients at risk of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome at the time of critical care contact. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Five academic medical centers. Patients: Nine hundred consecutive patients (≥ 18 yr old) with at least one acute respiratory distress syndrome risk factor at the time of critical care contact. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Lung Injury Prediction Score was calculated using the worst values within the 12 hours before initial critical care contact. Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome at the time of initial contact were excluded. Acute respiratory distress syndrome developed in 124 patients (13.7%) a median of 2 days (interquartile range, 2–3) after critical care contact. Hospital mortality was 22% and was significantly higher in acute respiratory distress syndrome than non-acute respiratory distress syndrome patients (48% vs 18%; p < 0.001). Increasing Lung Injury Prediction Score was significantly associated with development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.21–1.42) and the composite outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome or death (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.18–1.34). A Lung Injury Prediction Score greater than or equal to 4 was associated with the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (odds ratio, 4.17; 95% CI, 2.26–7.72), composite outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome or death (odds ratio, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.68–3.49), and acute respiratory distress syndrome after accounting for the competing risk of death (hazard ratio, 3.71; 95% CI, 2.05–6.72). For acute respiratory distress syndrome development, the Lung Injury Prediction Score has an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 and a Lung Injury Prediction Score greater than or equal to 4 has 90% sensitivity (misses only 10% of acute respiratory distress syndrome cases), 31% specificity, 17% positive predictive value, and 95% negative predictive value. Conclusions: In a cohort of non-emergency department hospitalized patients, the Lung Injury Prediction Score and Lung Injury Prediction Score greater than or equal to 4 can identify patients at increased risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome and/or death at the time of critical care contact but it does not perform as well as in the original emergency department cohort.
The Ets protein pointed prevents both premature differentiation and dedifferentiation of Drosophila intermediate neural progenitors
Xie, Yong-Gang , Li, Xiaosu , Deng, Xiaobing, Hou, Yanjun , O’Hara, Krysten , Urso, Andreacarola , Peng, Ying , Zhu, Sijun , Zhu, Sijun , Chen, Li

Mayo Clinic

Development | August 11, 2016 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1242/dev.137281 | PMID 27510969 Get It

Intermediate neural progenitor cells (INPs) need to avoid both dedifferentiation and differentiation during neurogenesis, but the mechanisms are not well understood. In Drosophila, the Ets protein Pointed P1 (PntP1) is required to generate INPs from type II neuroblasts. Here, we investigated how PntP1 promotes INP generation. By generating pntP1-specific mutants and using RNAi knockdown, we show that the loss of PntP1 leads to both an increase in the type II neuroblast number and the elimination of INPs. We show that the elimination of INPs results from premature differentiation of INPs due to the ectopic Prospero expression in newly generated immature INPs (imINP), whereas the increase in the type II neuroblast number results from the dedifferentiation of imINPs due to a loss of Earmuff at later stages of imINP development. Furthermore, reducing Buttonhead enhances the loss of INPs in pntP1 mutants, suggesting that PntP1 and Buttonhead act cooperatively to prevent premature INP differentiation. Our results demonstrate that PntP1 prevents both the premature differentiation and dedifferentiation of INPs by regulating the expression of distinct target genes at different stages of imINP development.
Erythromelalgia in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera
Hou, Jennifer L., Onajin, Oluwakemi , Gangat, Naseema , Davis, Mark D.P. , Wolanskyj, Alexandra P. , Wolanskyj-Spinner, Alexandra P

Mayo Clinic

Leukemia & Lymphoma | August 10, 2016 | Volume: 58 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 715-717

10.1080/10428194.2016.1205740 | PMID 27684959 Get It

Genome-Wide Meta-Analyses of Breast, Ovarian, and Prostate Cancer Association Studies Identify Multiple New Susceptibility Loci Shared by at Least Two Cancer Types
Kar, Siddhartha , Beesley, Jonathan, Olama, Ali Amin Al , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Lawrenson, Kate , Lindström, Sara, Ramus, Susan J. , Thompson, Deborah J. , Investigators, ABCTB, Kibel, Adam S. , Dansonka‐Mieszkowska, Agnieszka , Michael, Agnieszka , Dieffenbach, Aida Karina, Whittemore, Alice S. , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Peixoto, Ana , González‐Neira, Anna , Wu, Anna H. , Lindblom, Annika , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Cancer), AOCS Study Group & Australian Cancer Study (Ovarian, BioResource, APCB, Ekici, Arif B. , Burwinkel, Barbara , Nordestgaard, Børge G. , Blomqvist, Carl , Phelan, Catherine, McLean, Catriona , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Vachon, Celine M. , Stegmaier, Christa, Maier, Christiane, Høgdall, Claus , Kang, Daehee , Tessier, Daniel C., Schaid, Daniel J. , Neal, David E. , Eccles, Diana , Flesch‐Janys, Dieter, Wokozorczyk, Dominika, Levine, Douglas A. , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Goode, Ellen L. , Хуснутдинова, Э. К. , Høgdall, Estrid , Song, Fengju, Bruinsma, Fiona, Heitz, Florian , Hamdy, Freddie C. , Olsson, Håkan , Wildiers, Hans , Ulmer, Hans-Ulrich, Pandha, Hardev , Darabi, Hatef, Salvesen, Helga B., Grönberg, Henrik , Brenner, Hermann , Brauch, Hiltrud , Song, Honglin , Lim, Hui-Yi, McNeish, Iain A. , Campbell, Ian , Vergote, Ignace , Lubiński, Jan , Stanford, Janet L. , Benı́tez, Javier , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Donovan, Jenny , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Schleutker, Johanna , Hopper, John L. , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Clements, Judith A. , Knight, Julia A. , Peto, Julian , Cunningham, Julie M. , Pow‐Sang, Julio M. , Batra, Jyotsna , Lu, Karen H., Herkommer, Kathleen , Investigators, kConFab, Matsuo, Keitaro , Muir, Kenneth , Offitt, Kenneth, Chen, Kexin , Moysich, Kirsten B., Aittomäki, Kristiina, Odunsi, Kunle , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Hooning, Maartje J. , Pike, Malcolm C., Bolla, Manjeet K. , Luedeke, Manuel, Teixeira, Manuel R. , Goodman, Marc T. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Riggan, Marjorie J. , Rossing, Mary Anne, Beckmann, Matthias W. , Moisse, Matthieu , Southey, Melissa C. , Jones, Michael E. , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Hou, Ming‐Feng , Schoemaker, Minouk J. , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Bogdanova, Natalia , Investigators, NBCS, Le, Nhu D. , Orr, Nick , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Pashayan, Nora , Peterlongo, Paolo , Guénel, Pascal , Brennan, Paul , Paulo, Paula , Webb, Penelope M. , Broberg, Per, Fasching, Peter A. , Devilee, Peter , Wang, Qin, Kaneva, Radka , Kopperud, Reidun Kristin, Schmutzler, Rita K., Stephenson, Robert A., MacInnis, Robert J. , Hoover, Robert N. , Winqvist, Robert , Ness, Roberta B., Travis, Ruth C. , Benlloch, Sara, Olson, Sara H. , McDonnell, Shannon K. , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Maia, Sofia , Berndt, Sonja I., Lee, Soo Chin , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Bojesen, Stig E. , Gapstur, Susan M. , Tammela, Teuvo L.J. , Network, the GENICA, Dörk, Thilo , Brüning, Thomas , Wahlfors, Tiina , Edwards, Todd L., Menon, Usha , Hamann, Ute , Mitev, Vanio , Kosma, Veli‐Matti , Setiawan, Veronica Wendy , Kristensen, Vessela, Vogel, Walther , Zheng, Wei , Sieh, Weiva , Blot, William J. , Kluźniak, Wojciech , Gao, Yu‐Tang , Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Freedman, Matthew L., Dunning, Alison M. , Simard, Jacques , Haiman, Christopher A. , Sellers, Thomas A. , Hunter, David J. , Henderson, Brian E., Kraft, Peter , Gayther, Simon A. , Easton, Douglas F. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Lambrechts, Diether , Lu, Karen H. , Durocher, Francine , Zheng, Wei , Thorne, Heather , Lambrechts, Diether , Chen, Kexin , Vachon, Celine, Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Investigators, ABCTB, Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Wolk, Alicja , Kierzek, Andrzej , Cox, Angela , Rudolph, Anja , Cancer), AOCS Study Group & Australian Cancer Study (Ovarian, BioResource, APCB, Ziogas, Argyrios , Karlan, Beth Y. , Vachon, Celine M. , Cybulski, Cezary , Slavov, Chavdar , Ambrosone, Christine B. , Teerlink, Craig C. , Stram, Daniel O. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Edwards, Digna R. Velez , Bandera, Elisa V. , Poole, Elizabeth M. , Song, Fengju , Modugno, Francesmary , Wiklund, Fredrik E. , Giles, Graham G. , Risch, Harvey A. , Nevanlinna, Heli , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Gronwald, Jacek , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Permuth, Jennifer B. , Dennis, Joe , Park, Jong Y. , Czene, Kamila , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Investigators, kConFab, Moysich, Kirsten B., FitzGerald, Liesel M. , Cook, Linda S. , Cannon‐Albright, Lisa , Hooning, Maartje J. , Aly, Markus , Sanderson, Maureen , Lush, Michael J. , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Rahman, Nazneen , Investigators, NBCS, Wang, Qin, Cai, Qiuyin , Li, Qiyuan , Bützow, Ralf C. , Milne, Roger L. , Berndt, Sonja I. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Network, the GENICA, Key, Tim , Kristensen, Vessela N. , Arndt, Volker , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Berchuck, Andrew , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Couch, Fergus J. , Hall, Per N , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , McNeish, Iain A , Peterlongo, Paolo , Ramus, Susan J , Teixeira, Manuel R , Teo, Soo H , Tworoger, Shelley S , Webb, Penelope M , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Lawrenson, Kate , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Moysich, Kirsten , Campbell, Ian G , Eeles, Rosalind A , Southey, Melissa C , Donovan, Jenny L , Muir, Kenneth , Schleutker, Johanna , Travis, Ruth C , Pashayan, Nora , Michael, Agnieszka , Maclnnis, Robert , Matsuo, Keitaro , Dunning, Alison M , Heitz, Florian , Jones, Michael E , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Brenner, Hermann , Guénel, Pascal , García-Closas, Montserrat , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Ekici, Arif B , Moisse, Matthieu , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Kraft, Peter , Benitez, Javier , Simard, Jacques , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Zheng, Wei , Figueroa, Jonine D , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Kar, Siddhartha , Batra, Jyotsna , Clements, Judith , Setiawan, Veronica W , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Devilee, Peter , Lubinski, Jan , Bojesen, Stig E , Schoemaker, Minouk J , Goodman, Marc T , Wildiers, Hans , Mclean, Catriona , Brauch, Hiltrud , Lindblom, Annika , Sawyer, Elinor J , Orr, Nick , McDonnell, Shannon K , Kang, Daehee

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Discovery | July 18, 2016 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1052-1067

10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-1227 | PMID 27432226 Get It

Abstract Breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers are hormone-related and may have a shared genetic basis, but this has not been investigated systematically by genome-wide association (GWA) studies. Meta-analyses combining the largest GWA meta-analysis data sets for these cancers totaling 112,349 cases and 116,421 controls of European ancestry, all together and in pairs, identified at P &lt; 10−8 seven new cross-cancer loci: three associated with susceptibility to all three cancers (rs17041869/2q13/BCL2L11; rs7937840/11q12/INCENP; rs1469713/19p13/GATAD2A), two breast and ovarian cancer risk loci (rs200182588/9q31/SMC2; rs8037137/15q26/RCCD1), and two breast and prostate cancer risk loci (rs5013329/1p34/NSUN4; rs9375701/6q23/L3MBTL3). Index variants in five additional regions previously associated with only one cancer also showed clear association with a second cancer type. Cell-type–specific expression quantitative trait locus and enhancer–gene interaction annotations suggested target genes with potential cross-cancer roles at the new loci. Pathway analysis revealed significant enrichment of death receptor signaling genes near loci with P &lt; 10−5 in the three-cancer meta-analysis. Significance: We demonstrate that combining large-scale GWA meta-analysis findings across cancer types can identify completely new risk loci common to breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers. We show that the identification of such cross-cancer risk loci has the potential to shed new light on the shared biology underlying these hormone-related cancers. Cancer Discov; 6(9); 1052–67. ©2016 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 932
Abstract B50: Antineoplastic activity of Top I inhibitor etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) and PARP inhibitor rucaparib (CO-388) in platinum-resistant high-grade serous BRCA WT ovarian cancer PDX models.
Nitschmann, Caroline C., Hurley, Rachel M. , Becker, Marc A., Hou, Xiaonan , Hoch, Ute , Harding, Thomas C., Charych, Deborah H. , Kaufmann, Scott H. , Weroha, Saravut J., Haluska, Paul , Kaufmann, Scott H

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Cancer Research | May 20, 2016 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 2_Supplement | Pages: B50-B50

10.1158/1557-3265.ovca15-b50 Get It

Abstract Background: At the time of ovarian cancer platinum resistance, standard therapies have limited activity. New anti-cancer drug combinations may lead to improved clinical outcomes. Activity of topoisomerase I (Top I) inhibitors or poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been reported in ovarian cancer and have demonstrated potentiation in other models. Objective: To investigate the efficacy of the Top I inhibitor etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) and the PARP inhibitor rucaparib (CO-338) as single agents and in combination in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of ovarian cancer. Methods: Five ovarian cancer PDX models in SCID mice were treated for 28 days with NKTR-102 (10 mg/kg/q7d IV), rucaparib (150 mg/kg/qd PO), or combination NKTR-102 plus rucaparib at the same doses and schedules. Of the five PDX models, four were platinum resistant and one was a platinum-sensitive positive control. Each treatment arm had a total of 10 mice and animals were observed daily for body weight and general condition. Tumor size was assessed weekly by ultrasound. The primary endpoint was change in tumor cross-sectional area (cm2) from pretreatment baseline to final tumor burden. Western blot was performed to investigate potential biomarkers of response. Results: Compared to vehicle-treated controls, statistically significant improvement (p&lt;0.05) was observed in 3 of 5 models in single agent rucaparib treated tumors and in 5 of 5 models in single agent NKTR-102 treated tumors. The combination of NKTR-102 plus rucaparib also demonstrated statistically significant improvement compared to vehicle-treated controls in 5 of 5 models. The combination of NKTR-102 plus rucaparib induced maximal tumor regression in 2 of 5 tumors with a trend towards smaller tumors compared to single agent treatment arms. This was not found to be statistically significant in the 28 day study period under which the experiment was performed. Exploratory analysis to assess candidate drug response determinants (e.g.Top I, PAPR I, and PARP polymer formation levels) was investigated. Conclusion: NKTR-102 and rucaparib are well tolerated in mice and demonstrate activity in platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer PDX models. Combination therapy demonstrated a trend towards decreased tumor size when compared to single agent activity during treatment. Current efforts are focused on extending the time on study for the PDX models evaluated to determine if statistical superiority of the NKTR-102/rucaparib combination can be established. Citation Format: Caroline C. Nitschmann, Rachel M. Hurley, Marc A. Becker, Xiaonan Hou, Ute Hoch, Thomas C. Harding, Deborah H. Charych, Scott H. Kaufmann, Paul Haluska, Saravut J. Weroha. Antineoplastic activity of Top I inhibitor etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) and PARP inhibitor rucaparib (CO-388) in platinum-resistant high-grade serous BRCA WT ovarian cancer PDX models. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: Exploiting Vulnerabilities; Oct 17-20, 2015; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B50.