Citations

AbstractTo determine whether CSF leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated 1(LGI1)‐IgG titer, index or IgG subclass has prognostic significance, we tested serum and CSF specimens collected concomitantly from 39 seropositive patients. LGI1‐IgG index was elevated (>1) in 21 patients (54%), suggesting intrathecal synthesis. Patients with worse outcome at last follow‐up (modified Rankin Scale >2) had significantly higher index (median 6.57 vs. 0.5, P = 0.048) compared to those with better outcome. Higher CSF LGI1‐IgG4 subclass‐specific titer and index correlated with worse outcome (P < 0.005 for both). These data suggest that evidence of intrathecal LGI1‐IgG synthesis may correlate with neuronal injury and warrant consideration of aggressive immunotherapy.

Purpose of review We describe clinical and diagnostic features of various autoimmune and viral encephalitis subtypes. Recent findings Population-based studies have demonstrated both autoimmune and viral causes have similar prevalence and incident rates. Repertoire of autoimmune biomarkers has considerably increased with discovery of many novel neural antibodies including glial fibrillary acidic proteinα-immunoglobulin G. Similarly, with use of next generation sequencing and DNA libraries, many viral causes are being detected which would have been categorized as encephalitis of unknown cause a decade ago. Summary Autoimmune and viral encephalitides can resemble one another and sometimes autoimmune encephalitis may be triggered by viral infections. Early diagnosis and treatment is the key to both causes, which emphasizes the importance of clinical diagnosis before laboratory confirmation.

Objective To evaluate the incidence and prevalence of autoimmune encephalitis and compare it to that of infectious encephalitis. Methods We performed a population‐based comparative study of the incidence and prevalence of autoimmune and infectious encephalitis in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis and subgroups were defined by 2016 diagnostic criteria, and infectious encephalitis diagnosis required a confirmed infectious pathogen. Age‐ and sex‐adjusted prevalence and incidence rates were calculated. Patients with encephalitis of uncertain etiology were excluded. Results The prevalence of autoimmune encephalitis on January 1, 2014 of 13.7/100,000 was not significantly different from that of all infectious encephalitides (11.6/100,000; p = 0.63) or the viral subcategory (8.3/100,000; p = 0.17). The incidence rates (1995–2015) of autoimmune and infectious encephalitis were 0.8/100,000 and 1.0/100,000 person‐years, respectively ( p = 0.58). The number of relapses or recurrent hospitalizations was higher for autoimmune than infectious encephalitis ( p = 0.03). The incidence of autoimmune encephalitis increased over time from 0.4/100,000 person‐years (1995–2005) to 1.2/100,000 person‐years (2006–2015; p = 0.02), attributable to increased detection of autoantibody‐positive cases. The incidence (2.8 vs 0.7/100,000 person‐years, p = 0.01) and prevalence (38.3 vs 13.7/100,000, p = 0.04) of autoimmune encephalitis was higher among African Americans than Caucasians. The prevalence of specific neural autoantibodies was as follows: myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, 1.9/100,000; glutamic acid decarboxylase 65, 1.9/100,000; unclassified neural autoantibody, 1.4/100,000; leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated protein 1, 0.7/100,000; collapsin response‐mediator protein 5, 0.7/100,000; N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor, 0.6/100,000; antineuronal nuclear antibody type 2, 0.6/100,000; and glial fibrillary acidic protein α, 0.6/100,000. Interpretation This study shows that the prevalence and incidence of autoimmune encephalitis are comparable to infectious encephalitis, and its detection is increasing over time. Ann Neurol 2018;83:166–177

Objective To describe an expanded phenotypic spectrum and longitudinal outcome in 256 LGI1‐IgG–seropositive and/or CASPR2‐IgG–seropositive patients. Methods Patients were identified through service neural autoantibody evaluation. Ninety‐five had longitudinal follow‐up (7–456 months; median = 35). Results Among 3,910 patients tested, 196 were LGI1‐IgG positive, 51 were CASPR2‐IgG positive, and 9 were dual positive. Cerebrospinal fluid testing was less sensitive than serum testing, detecting only 24 of 38 (63%) LGI1‐IgG–positive and 5 of 6 (83%) CASPR2‐IgG–positive patients. LGI1‐IgG–positive specimens had higher voltage‐gated potassium channel–IgG immunoprecipitation values (0.33nmol/l, range = 0.02–5.14) than CASPR2‐IgG–positive specimens (0.10nmol/l, range = 0.00–0.45, p < 0.001). Of patients presenting with pain or peripheral nervous system (PNS) manifestations, 39% were LGI1‐IgG seropositive (7% had solely neuropathy or pain). Multivariate analysis identified age as the only significant predictor of central nervous system (CNS) versus PNS involvement (>50 years; odds ratio = 15, p < 0.001). Paroxysmal dizziness spells (PDS), a unique LGI1‐IgG accompaniment (14% of patients), frequently delayed the diagnosis. T2‐mesiotemporal hyperintensity was more common in LGI1‐IgG–positive (41%) than in CASPR2‐IgG–positive patients ( p = 0.033). T1‐bright basal ganglia were confined to LGI1‐IgG–positive patients with faciobrachial–dystonic seizures (9 of 39, 31%). Cancer was found in 44% of LGI1‐IgG/CASPR2‐IgG dual seropositive patients (one‐third thymoma). Response to initial immunotherapy was favorable in 97%; mean modified Rankin score was 3 (range = 1–5) at onset and 1.74 (range = 0–6) at last follow‐up, with 9% having severe refractory disability, 20% being asymptomatic, 28% receiving immunotherapy, and 58% receiving antiepileptic medication. Interpretation Older age is a strong predictor of CNS involvement in patients seropositive for CASPR2‐IgG or LGI1‐IgG. Pain, peripheral manifestations, and stereotypic paroxysmal dizziness spells are common with LGI1‐IgG. Response to initial immunotherapy is often favorable, but some patients remain severely disabled, requiring long‐term immunotherapy and/or antiepileptic medications. Ann Neurol 2017;82:79–92

Summary Objective To validate predictive models for neural antibody positivity and immunotherapy response in epilepsy. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of epilepsy cases at Mayo Clinic (Rochester‐ MN ; Scottsdale‐ AZ , and Jacksonville‐ FL ) in whom autoimmune encephalopathy/epilepsy/dementia autoantibody testing profiles were requested (06/30/2014‐06/30/2016). An Antibody Prevalence in Epilepsy ( APE ) score, based on clinical characteristics, was assigned to each patient. Among patients who received immunotherapy, a Response to Immunotherapy in Epilepsy ( RITE ) score was assigned. Favorable seizure outcome was defined as >50% reduction of seizure frequency at the first follow‐up . Results Serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from 1,736 patients were sent to the Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory for neural autoantibody evaluation. Three hundred eighty‐seven of these patients met the diagnostic criteria for epilepsy. Central nervous system (CNS)–specific antibodies were detected in 44 patients. Certain clinical features such as new‐onset epilepsy, autonomic dysfunction, viral prodrome, faciobrachial dystonic seizures/oral dyskinesia, inflammatory CSF profile, and mesial temporal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities had a significant association with positive antibody results. A significantly higher proportion of antibody‐positive patients had an APE score ≥4 (97.7% vs. 21.6%, p < 0.01). Sensitivity and specificity of an APE score ≥4 to predict presence of specific neural auto‐antibody were 97.7% and 77.9%, respectively. In the subset of patients who received immunotherapy (77), autonomic dysfunction, faciobrachial dystonic seizures/oral dyskinesia, early initiation of immunotherapy, and presence of antibodies targeting plasma membrane proteins (cell‐surface antigens) were associated with favorable seizure outcome. Sensitivity and specificity of a RITE score ≥7 to predict favorable seizure outcome were 87.5% and 83.8%, respectively. Significance APE and RITE scores can aid diagnosis, treatment, and prognostication of autoimmune epilepsy. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section here .