Citations

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the impact of trimodality treatment versus monotherapy or dual therapy for radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAASB) after prior breast cancer treatment. Experimental Design: With Institutional Review Board approval, we identified patients diagnosed with RAASB and abstracted data on disease presentation, treatment, and oncologic outcomes. Trimodality therapy included (i) taxane induction, (ii) concurrent taxane/radiation, and then (iii) surgical resection with wide margins. Results: A total of 38 patients (median age 69 years) met inclusion criteria. Sixteen received trimodality therapy and 22 monotherapy/dual therapy. Skin involvement and disease extent were similar in both groups. All trimodality patients required reconstructive procedures for wound closure/coverage, compared with 48% of monotherapy/dual therapy patients (P < 0.001). Twelve of 16 (75%) patients receiving trimodality therapy had a pathologic complete response (pCR). With median follow-up of 5.6 years, none had local recurrence, 1 patient (6%) had distant recurrence, and no patients died. Among 22 patients in the monotherapy/dual therapy group, 10 (45%) had local recurrence, 8 (36%) had distant recurrence, and 7 (32%) died of disease. Trimodality therapy demonstrated significantly better 5-year recurrence-free survival [RFS; 93.8% vs. 42.9%; P = 0.004; HR, 7.6 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.3–44.2)]. Combining all patients with RAASB regardless of treatment, local recurrence was associated with subsequent distant recurrence (HR, 9.0; P = 0.002); distant recurrence developed in 3 of 28 (11%) patients without local recurrence compared with 6 of 10 (60%) with local recurrence. The trimodality group had more surgical complications that required reoperation or prolonged healing. Conclusions: Trimodality therapy for RAASB was more toxic but is promising, with a high rate of pCR, durable local control, and improved RFS.

ObjectiveTo compare improvement in patient‐reported outcomes (PROM) in persons undergoing endoscopic and open surgical management of Zenker diverticula (ZD).MethodologyProspective, multicenter cohort study of all individuals enrolled in the Prospective OUtcomes of Cricopharyngeus Hypertonicity (POUCH) Collaborative who underwent surgery for ZD. Patient survey, radiography reports, and the 10‐item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT‐10) pre‐ and post‐procedure were abstracted from a REDCap database, which summarized means, medians, percentages, and frequencies of. Outcome based on operative intervention (endoscopic vs. open) was compared using t‐test, Wilcoxon rank sum test or chi‐square test, as appropriate.ResultsOne hundred and forty‐seven persons were prospectively followed. The mean age (SD) of the cohort was 68.7 (11.0). Overall, 66% of patients reported 100% improvement in EAT‐10; 81% of patients had greater than 75% improvement; and 88% had greater than 50% improvement. Endoscopic was used for n = 109 patients, and open surgical intervention was used for n = 38. The median [interquartile range, IQR] EAT‐10 percent improvement for endoscopic treatment was 93.3% [72, 100], and open was 100% [92.3, 100] (p = 0.05). The incidence of intraoperative complications was 3.7% for endoscopic and 7.9% for open surgical management. The median [IQR] in follow‐up was 86 and 97.5 days, respectively.ConclusionBoth endoscopic and open surgical management of ZD provide significant improvement in patient‐reported outcomes. The data suggest that open diverticulectomy may provide a modest advantage in symptomatic improvement compared to endoscopic management. The data suggest that the postoperative complication rate is higher in the open surgical group.Level of Evidence3 Laryngoscope, 134:97–102, 2024

Abstract Background Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultrarare genetic disorder with episodic and progressive heterotopic ossification. Tissue trauma is a major risk factor for flareups, heterotopic ossification (HO), and loss of mobility in patients with FOP. The International Clinical Council on FOP generally recommends avoiding surgery in patients with FOP unless the situation is life-threatening, because soft tissue injury can trigger an FOP flareup. Surprisingly little is known about flareups, HO formation, and loss of mobility after fractures of the normotopic (occurring in the normal place, distinct from heterotopic) skeleton when treated nonoperatively in patients with FOP. Questions/purposes (1) What proportion of fractures had radiographic evidence of union (defined as radiographic evidence of healing at 6 weeks) or nonunion (defined as the radiographic absence of a bridging callus at 3 years after the fracture)? (2) What proportion of patients had clinical symptoms of an FOP flareup because of the fracture (defined by increased pain or swelling at the fracture site within several days after closed immobilization)? (3) What proportion of patients with fractures had radiographic evidence of HO? (4) What proportion of patients lost movement after a fracture? Methods We retrospectively identified 36 patients with FOP from five continents who sustained 48 fractures of the normotopic skeleton from January 2001 to February 2021, who were treated nonoperatively, and who were followed for a minimum of 18 months after the fracture and for as long as 20 years, depending on when they sustained their fracture during the study period. Five patients (seven fractures) were excluded from the analysis to minimize cotreatment bias because these patients were enrolled in palovarotene clinical trials (NCT02190747 and NCT03312634) at the time of their fractures. Thus, we analyzed 31 patients (13 male, 18 female, median age 22 years, range 5 to 57 years) who sustained 41 fractures of the normotopic skeleton that were treated nonoperatively. Patients were analyzed at a median follow-up of 6 years (range 18 months to 20 years), and none was lost to follow-up. Clinical records for each patient were reviewed by the referring physician–author and the following data for each fracture were recorded: biological sex, ACVR1 gene pathogenic variant, age at the time of fracture, fracture mechanism, fracture location, initial treatment modality, prednisone use at the time of the fracture as indicated in the FOP Treatment Guidelines for flare prevention (2 mg/kg once daily for 4 days), patient-reported flareups (episodic inflammatory lesions of muscle and deep soft connective tissue characterized variably by swelling, escalating pain, stiffness, and immobility) after the fracture, follow-up radiographs of the fracture if available, HO formation (yes or no) as a result of the fracture determined at a minimum of 6 weeks after the fracture, and patient-reported loss of motion at least 6 months after and as long as 20 years after the fracture. Postfracture radiographs were available in 76% (31 of 41) of fractures in 25 patients and were independently reviewed by the referring physician–author and senior author for radiographic criteria of fracture healing and HO. Results Radiographic healing was noted in 97% (30 of 31) of fractures at 6 weeks after the incident fracture. Painless nonunion was noted in one patient who sustained a displaced patellar fracture and HO. In seven percent (three of 41) of fractures, patients reported increased pain or swelling at or near the fracture site within several days after fracture immobilization that likely indicated a site-specific FOP flareup. The same three patients reported a residual loss of motion 1 year after the fracture compared with their prefracture status. HO developed in 10% (three of 31) of the fractures for which follow-up radiographs were available. Patient-reported loss of motion occurred in 10% (four of 41) of fractures. Two of the four patients reported noticeable loss of motion and the other two patients reported that the joint was completely immobile (ankylosis). Conclusion Most fractures treated nonoperatively in individuals with FOP healed with few flareups, little or no HO, and preservation of mobility, suggesting an uncoupling of fracture repair and HO, which are two inflammation-induced processes of endochondral ossification. These findings underscore the importance of considering nonoperative treatment for fractures in individuals with FOP. Physicians who treat fractures in patients with FOP should consult with a member of the International Clinical Council listed in the FOP Treatment Guidelines (https://www.iccfop.org). Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.

Pain assessment is a complex task largely dependent on the patient’s self-report. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool for automating and objectifying pain assessment through the identification of pain-related facial expressions. However, the capabilities and potential of AI in clinical settings are still largely unknown to many medical professionals. In this literature review, we present a conceptual understanding of the application of AI to detect pain through facial expressions. We provide an overview of the current state of the art as well as the technical foundations of AI/ML techniques used in pain detection. We highlight the ethical challenges and the limitations associated with the use of AI in pain detection, such as the scarcity of databases, confounding factors, and medical conditions that affect the shape and mobility of the face. The review also highlights the potential impact of AI on pain assessment in clinical practice and lays the groundwork for further study in this area.

Pain is a complex and subjective experience, and traditional methods of pain assessment can be limited by factors such as self-report bias and observer variability. Voice is frequently used to evaluate pain, occasionally in conjunction with other behaviors such as facial gestures. Compared to facial emotions, there is less available evidence linking pain with voice. This literature review synthesizes the current state of research on the use of voice recognition and voice analysis for pain detection in adults, with a specific focus on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques. We describe the previous works on pain recognition using voice and highlight the different approaches to voice as a tool for pain detection, such as a human effect or biosignal. Overall, studies have shown that AI-based voice analysis can be an effective tool for pain detection in adult patients with various types of pain, including chronic and acute pain. We highlight the high accuracy of the ML-based approaches used in studies and their limitations in terms of generalizability due to factors such as the nature of the pain and patient population characteristics. However, there are still potential challenges, such as the need for large datasets and the risk of bias in training models, which warrant further research.

AbstractBackgroundState of the Science (SoS) meetings are used to define and highlight important unanswered scientific questions. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health, and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH), Department of Health and Human Services held a virtual SoS in transfusion medicine (TM) symposium.Study Design and MethodsIn advance of the symposium, six multidisciplinary working groups (WG) convened to define research priorities in the areas of: blood donors and the supply, optimizing transfusion outcomes for recipients, emerging infections, mechanistic aspects of components and transfusion, new computational methods in transfusion science, and impact of health disparities on donors and recipients. The overall objective was to identify key basic, translational, and clinical research questions that will help to increase and diversify the volunteer donor pool, ensure safe and effective transfusion strategies for recipients, and identify which blood products from which donors best meet the clinical needs of specific recipient populations.ResultsOn August 29–30, 2022, over 400 researchers, clinicians, industry experts, government officials, community members, and patient advocates discussed the research priorities presented by each WG. Dialogue focused on the five highest priority research areas identified by each WG and included the rationale, proposed methodological approaches, feasibility, and barriers for success.DiscussionThis report summarizes the key ideas and research priorities identified during the NHLBI/OASH SoS in TM symposium. The report highlights major gaps in our current knowledge and provides a road map for TM research.

Unnecessary ED visits and transfers to hand clinics raise treatment costs and patient burden at trauma centers. In the present COVID-19 pandemic, needless transfers can increase patients’ risk of viral exposure. Therefore, this review analyzes different aspects of the remote diagnosis and triage of traumatic hand injuries. The most common file was photography, with the most common devices being cell phone cameras. Treatment, triage, diagnosis, cost, and time outcomes were assessed, showing concordance between teleconsultation and face-to-face patient evaluations. We conclude that photography and video consultations are feasible surrogates for ED visits in patients with traumatic hand injuries. These technologies should be leveraged to decrease treatment costs and potentially decrease the time to definitive treatment after initial evaluation.

Background: We developed a deep learning algorithm that detects coronary artery calcium (CAC) score using 12-lead electrocardiograms (CAC- ECG). We tested the hypothesis that the output from the CAC-ECG algorithm would be associated with incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events and that the CAC- ECG would refine the AHA/ACC Pooled Cohort Equation’s (PCE) predictive capabilities. Methods: A community-based cohort of consecutive patients seeking primary care in Olmsted County, MN, between 1998-2000 with passive follow-up via record linkage. Inclusion was identical to the PCE. The original CAC-ECG was developed in 43,210 subjects yielding an AUC of 0.83. Herein, we used the CAC-ECG output to predict a high CAC (≥ 300). Primary outcome was ASCVD defined as fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, secondary outcome was Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) further including PCI, CABG, and mortality. Events were validated in duplicate. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for variables included in the PCE and were stratified to evaluate the effect of the CAC-ECG on PCE-predicted risk. Follow-up was truncated at 10 years for PCE analyses. Results: We included 24,793 subjects, mean ± SD age 53.9 ± 12.1, 52% women, 95% white. After 16.7±3.7 yrs follow-up, 2,366 (9.5%) had ASCVD and 3,401 (13.7%) had MACE. Risk of ASCVD and MACE increased with CAC-ECG probability quintiles, independent of risk factors, p for trend <0.001 ( Fig. A-B ). The CAC-ECG enhanced the predicted capabilities of the PCE across all ASCVD risk groups ( Fig. C ). Net reclassification improved 13.7% with comparable C-statistic from 0.77 vs. 0.78 for PCE and CAC-ECG. Conclusions: CAC-ECG was associated with ASCVD and MACE and improved PCE predicted risk. The CAC-ECG algorithm could identify individuals at risk in primary prevention; Unlike the PCE, the CAC-ECG can be applied without chart review or performing a computer tomography and may be reliably used retrospectively in cohorts with digitally stored ECGs.

ImportanceAurora A kinase (AURKA) activation, related in part to AURKA amplification and variants, is associated with downregulation of estrogen receptor (ER) α expression, endocrine resistance, and implicated in cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i) resistance. Alisertib, a selective AURKA inhibitor, upregulates ERα and restores endocrine sensitivity in preclinical metastatic breast cancer (MBC) models. The safety and preliminary efficacy of alisertib was demonstrated in early-phase trials; however, its activity in CDK 4/6i–resistant MBC is unknown.ObjectiveTo assess the effect of adding fulvestrant to alisertib on objective tumor response rates (ORRs) in endocrine-resistant MBC.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted through the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium, which enrolled participants from July 2017 to November 2019. Postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant, ERBB2 (formerly HER2)–negative MBC who were previously treated with fulvestrant were eligible. Stratification factors included prior treatment with CDK 4/6i, baseline metastatic tumor ERα level measurement (&amp;lt;10%, ≥10%), and primary or secondary endocrine resistance. Among 114 preregistered patients, 96 (84.2%) registered and 91 (79.8%) were evaluable for the primary end point. Data analysis began after January 10, 2022.InterventionsAlisertib, 50 mg, oral, daily on days 1 to 3, 8 to 10, and 15 to 17 of a 28-day cycle (arm 1) or alisertib same dose/schedule with standard-dose fulvestrant (arm 2).Main Outcomes and MeasuresImprovement in ORR in arm 2 of at least 20% greater than arm 1 when the expected ORR for arm 1 was 20%.ResultsAll 91 evaluable patients (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [11.3] years; 1 American Indian/Alaskan Native [1.1%], 2 Asian [2.2%], 6 Black/African American [6.6%], 5 Hispanic [5.5%], and 79 [86.8%] White individuals; arm 1, 46 [50.5%]; arm 2, 45 [49.5%]) had received prior treatment with CDK 4/6i. The ORR was 19.6%; (90% CI, 10.6%-31.7%) for arm 1 and 20.0% (90% CI, 10.9%-32.3%) for arm 2. In arm 1, the 24-week clinical benefit rate and median progression-free survival time were 41.3% (90% CI, 29.0%-54.5%) and 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.9-10.0), respectively, and in arm 2 they were 28.9% (90% CI, 18.0%-42.0%) and 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.8), respectively. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events attributed to alisertib were neutropenia (41.8%) and anemia (13.2%). Reasons for discontinuing treatment were disease progression (arm 1, 38 [82.6%]; arm 2, 31 [68.9%]) and toxic effects or refusal (arm 1, 5 [10.9%]; arm 2, 12 [26.7%]).Conclusions and RelevanceThis randomized clinical trial found that adding fulvestrant to treatment with alisertib did not increase ORR or PFS; however, promising clinical activity was observed with alisertib monotherapy among patients with endocrine-resistant and CDK 4/6i–resistant MBC. The overall safety profile was tolerable.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02860000

Importance Physical abuse is a common but preventable cause of long-term childhood morbidity and mortality. Despite the strong association between abuse in an index child and abuse in contact children, there is no guidance outlining how to screen the latter, significantly more vulnerable group, for abusive injuries. Consequently, the radiological assessment of contact children is often omitted, or variably performed, allowing occult injuries to go undetected and increasing the risk of further abuse. Objective To report an evidence-based and consensus-derived set of best practices for the radiological screening of contact children in the context of suspected child physical abuse. Evidence Review This consensus statement is supported by a systematic review of the literature and the clinical opinion of an internationally recognized group of 26 experts. The modified Delphi consensus process comprised 3 meetings of the International Consensus Group on Contact Screening in Suspected Child Physical Abuse held between February and June 2021. Findings Contacts are defined as the asymptomatic siblings, cohabiting children, or children under the same care as an index child with suspected child physical abuse. All contact children should undergo a thorough physical examination and a history elicited prior to imaging. Contact children younger than 12 months should have neuroimaging, the preferred modality for which is magnetic resonance imaging, and skeletal survey. Contact children aged 12 to 24 months should undergo skeletal survey. No routine imaging is indicated in asymptomatic children older than 24 months. Follow-up skeletal survey with limited views should be performed if abnormal or equivocal at presentation. Contacts with positive findings should be investigated as an index child. Conclusions and Relevance This Special Communication reports consensus recommendations for the radiological screening of contact children in the context of suspected child physical abuse, establishing a recognized baseline for the stringent evaluation of these at-risk children and providing clinicians with a more resilient platform from which to advocate for them.