Citations

Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination is recommended for all individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including those on immunosuppressive therapies; however, little is known about vaccine safety and efficacy in these patients or the impact of vaccination on IBD disease course. Methods We evaluated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine–related adverse events (AEs) and the effect of vaccination on IBD disease course among participants in the PREVENT-COVID (Partnership to Report Effectiveness of Vaccination in populations Excluded from iNitial Trials of COVID) study, a prospective, observational cohort study. Localized and systemic reactions were assessed via questionnaire. Disease flare was defined by worsening IBD symptoms and change in IBD medications. Outcomes were stratified by vaccine type and IBD medication classes. Results A total of 3316 individuals with IBD received at least 1 COVID-19 vaccine. Injection site tenderness (68%) and fatigue (46% dose 1, 68% dose 2) were the most commonly reported localized and systemic AEs after vaccination. Severe localized and systemic vaccine-related AEs were rare. The mRNA-1273 vaccine was associated with significantly greater severe AEs at dose 2 (localized 4% vs 2%, systemic 15% vs 10%; P < .001 for both). Prior COVID-19 infection, female sex, and vaccine type were associated with severe systemic reactions to dose 1, while age <50 years, female sex, vaccine type, and antitumor necrosis factor and vedolizumab use were associated with severe systemic reactions to dose 2. Overall rates (2%) of IBD flare were low following vaccination. Conclusions Our findings provide reassurance that the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine is safe and well tolerated among individuals with IBD, which may help to combat vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccine confidence.

Abstract Background and study aims Despite the clinical efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), postoperative symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a major concern. While it is known that length of the gastric myotomy affects postoperative GERD, the clinical relevance of variation in esophageal myotomy length is not well known. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing outcomes of short versus standard myotomy length in patients with achalasia. Patients and methods We searched multiple databases from inception through November 2020 to identify studies that reported on outcomes of achalasia patients who underwent short compared with standard esophageal myotomy. Meta-analysis was performed to determine pooled odds ratio (OR) of clinical success, GERD outcomes, and adverse events with the two techniques. Results 5 studies with 474 patients were included in the final analysis (short myotomy group 214, standard myotomy group 260). There was no difference in clinical success (OR 1.17, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.54–2.52; I2 0 %; P = 0.69), postoperative symptomatic GERD (OR 0.87, 95 %CI 0.44–1.74; I2 29 %; P = 0.70), and overall adverse events (OR 0.52, 95 %CI 0.19–1.38; I2 40 %; P = 0.19), between the two groups. Incidence of postoperative erosive esophagitis as determined by endoscopy was lower in the short myotomy group (OR 0.50, 95 %CI 0.24–1.03; I2 0 %; P = 0.06). Conclusion Our analysis showed that performing POEM with short esophageal myotomy in achalasia was as safe and effective as standard myotomy, with lower incidence of postoperative erosive esophagitis.

AbstractBackground and purposeSeveral clinical and demographic factors relate to anatomic spread of adult‐onset isolated dystonia, but a predictive model is still lacking. The aims of this study were: (i) to develop and validate a predictive model of anatomic spread of adult‐onset isolated dystonia; and (ii) to evaluate whether presence of tremor associated with dystonia influences model predictions of spread.MethodsAdult‐onset isolated dystonia participants with focal onset from the Dystonia Coalition Natural History Project database were included. We developed two prediction models, one with dystonia as sole disease manifestation (“dystonia‐only”) and one accepting dystonia OR tremor in any body part as disease manifestations (“dystonia OR tremor”). Demographic and clinical predictors were selected based on previous evidence, clinical plausibility of association with spread, or both. We used logistic regressions and evaluated model discrimination and calibration. Internal validation was carried out based on bootstrapping.ResultsBoth predictive models showed an area under the curve of 0.65 (95% confidence intervals 0.62–0.70 and 0.62–0.69, respectively) and good calibration after internal validation. In both models, onset of dystonia in body regions other than the neck, older age, depression and history of neck trauma were predictors of spread.ConclusionsThis predictive modeling of spread in adult‐onset isolated dystonia based on accessible predictors (demographic and clinical) can be easily implemented to inform individuals’ risk of spread. Because tremor did not influence prediction of spread, our results support the argument that tremor is a part of the dystonia syndrome, and not an independent or coincidental disorder.

Abstract Background : Non‐motor symptoms are well established phenotypic components of adult‐onset idiopathic, isolated, focal cervical dystonia (AOIFCD). However, improved understanding of their clinical heterogeneity is needed to better target therapeutic intervention. Here, we examine non‐motor phenotypic features to identify possible AOIFCD subgroups. Methods : Participants diagnosed with AOIFCD were recruited via specialist neurology clinics (dystonia wales: n = 114, dystonia coalition: n = 183). Non‐motor assessment included psychiatric symptoms, pain, sleep disturbance, and quality of life, assessed using self‐completed questionnaires or face‐to‐face assessment. Both cohorts were analyzed independently using Cluster, and Bayesian multiple mixed model phenotype analyses to investigate the relationship between non‐motor symptoms and determine evidence of phenotypic subgroups. Results : Independent cluster analysis of the two cohorts suggests two predominant phenotypic subgroups, one consisting of approximately a third of participants in both cohorts, experiencing increased levels of depression, anxiety, sleep impairment, and pain catastrophizing, as well as, decreased quality of life. The Bayesian approach reinforced this with the primary axis, which explained the majority of the variance, in each cohort being associated with psychiatric symptomology, and also sleep impairment and pain catastrophizing in the Dystonia Wales cohort. Conclusions : Non‐motor symptoms accompanying AOIFCD parse into two predominant phenotypic sub‐groups, with differences in psychiatric symptoms, pain catastrophizing, sleep quality, and quality of life. Improved understanding of these symptom groups will enable better targeted pathophysiological investigation and future therapeutic intervention.

Objective: To understand the patient and caregiver experience with the management of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) Background: nOH is a sustained reduction in blood pressure (BP) with postural change associated with autonomic dysfunction. Clinical symptoms may include falls, leading to activity limits and a diminished sense of well-being. Methods: A US-based survey designed by the authors was conducted by Harris Poll. Eligible participants had Parkinson disease (PD), multiple system atrophy, or pure autonomic failure and ≥1 of the following: orthostatic hypotension (OH), nOH, low BP, OH/nOH symptoms, or were caregivers of eligible patients. Descriptive statistics are reported. Results: PD was the most frequent underlying diagnosis (Table 1) . Healthcare provider (HCP) communication with patients was rated as satisfactory by ≥75% of respondents, yet when nOH symptoms were first discussed with the HCP, only 35% of patients and 31% of caregivers reported the patient received guidance on management. The most frequently recommended interventions are listed in Table 1 ; 25% of patients reported that no interventions were recommended. Medication prescribed to treat nOH was reported by 34% of patients and 45% of caregivers. Among patients treated, 79% of patients and 71% of caregivers said that the patient’s symptoms were somewhat to very well managed. Conclusions: Survey findings suggest the need for increased awareness of nOH and engagement with patients and caregivers regarding symptom management. A variety of interventions were recommended; no single treatment approach was noted. Respondents felt nOH symptoms were at least somewhat well managed with treatment.

Objective: To understand the burden and impact of symptoms of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) on patients Background: nOH and its symptoms such as dizziness/lightheadedness are common in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and other forms of autonomic dysfunction. Methods: An author-designed, US-based survey was conducted by Harris Poll. Eligible participants were aged ≥18 years with PD, multiple system atrophy (MSA), or pure autonomic failure and ≥1 of the following: orthostatic hypotension, nOH, low BP, OH/nOH symptoms, or were caregivers of eligible patients. Results: Most patients (90%) had a diagnosis of PD, and most caregivers (88%) cared for a patient with PD (Table 1) . Patients (34%) and caregivers (49%) reported experiencing nOH symptoms before PD or MSA motor symptoms and >40% indicated that nOH symptoms were more troublesome than motor manifestations of PD or MSA. Less than a quarter (22%) of respondents suggested symptoms were most severe in the morning; more (30%) reported a consistent severity throughout the day. Patients (40%) and caregivers (63%) reported trouble managing symptoms during the day. In the past 12 months, a fall due to nOH symptoms was reported by 57% of patients and 80% of caregivers. Conclusions: These findings suggest that nOH symptoms may predate the onset of motor symptoms in neurodegenerative conditions linked to alpha-synuclein pathology. Many respondents report nOH symptoms are the same severity through the day. Patients with nOH may have trouble managing symptoms and note an increased risk for falls.