Citations

AbstractBackgroundDiagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) with biomarkers requires evidence of abnormal beta‐amyloid (Aβ) and tau. Individuals that are Aβ‐positive, but tau‐negative, are considered to have AD neuropathologic change, or early AD. The objective of this study was to determine whether some Aβ‐positive but tau‐negative individuals remain tau‐negative 5‐years later and describe the characteristics of such individuals.MethodWe identified 45 individuals from ADNI who were Aβ‐positive but tau‐negative on PET more than five years after their first abnormal Aβ‐PET (Amyloid+ Low Tau, ALT group). For comparison, we identified 157 Aβ‐positive individuals that had abnormal tau‐PET within five years of their first abnormal Aβ‐PET (i.e. biomarker‐AD). Aβ‐positivity was determined by ADNI‐provided cut‐points of 1.11 for AV45 and 1.08 for florbetapir. A negative tau‐PET scan was defined using Gaussian mixture modeling.ResultThe ALT and biomarker‐AD groups were similar in terms of sex and age at the time of their first Aβ‐PET scan. However, the ALT group was characterized by a lower proportion of APOE ε4 carriers (31% versus 67%, p<0.001), a lower median centiloid (36 versus 85, p<0.001, Figure) and lower likelihood of having a dementia diagnosis at first Aβ PET (2% versus 22%, p<0.001) compared to the biomarker‐AD group. The ALT group also performed better on tests of general cognition and had larger hippocampal volume compared to biomarker‐AD (p<0.001 for all). APOE ε4 status, centiloid and hippocampal volume were all associated with increased odds of elevated tau within 5 years from baseline Aβ‐PET (Table). Within the ALT group, 19 (42%) had high centiloid (>40): these individuals did not differ from the <40 centiloid individuals in clinical diagnosis, but there was some indication of a higher APOE ε4 frequency (42% versus 23%; p=0.30).ConclusionAmyloid‐positive individuals can remain tau‐negative for at least five years, and without becoming demented. Baseline characteristics can help identify these ALT individuals that have a low risk of progression. These findings beg the question of whether more conservative Aβ cut‐points are required for diagnosis of individuals with a high risk of developing AD.

AbstractBackgroundThe apolipoprotein ε4 (APOE4) allele is the most common and well established risk factor for typical late‐onset amnestic Alzheimer’s dementia. Less is known about the role of APOE in patients with atypical clinical presentations of AD, with studies often disagreeing on APOE4 frequencies in these cohorts. We aimed to assess relationships between APOE genotype and age, amyloid‐beta (Aβ) deposition and clinical phenotype in Alzheimer’s disease.Method138 atypical AD patients (57 posterior cortical atrophy and 81 logopenic aphasia) were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group at Mayo Clinic, and underwent APOE testing and Pittsburgh Compound B PET. 318 typical AD patients with APOE genotype and known onset age were identified from ADNI (121 had Aβ‐PET). Aβ‐PET was quantified using the centiloid scale. Logistic regression was used to estimate the proportion of APOE4 carriers by onset age and clinical group. Linear regression was used to estimate mean Aβ centiloid by age, APOE4 status, and clinical group in patients who were Aβ‐positive (centiloid≥19).ResultThe overall frequency of APOE4 carriers was lower in atypical AD (52%) compared to typical AD (66%), particularly for ε4ε4 homozygotes (9% vs 20%). APOE4 frequency increased with age in atypical AD, but showed a bell‐shaped curve in typical AD where highest frequencies were observed between 65‐70 years (Figure). Typical AD showed higher APOE4 frequencies than atypical AD only between the ages of 57 and 69 years. Aβ centiloid was higher in atypical AD compared to typical AD by approximately 16 centiloid units, but did not differ according to APOE4 status (Figure). Aβ centiloid stayed relatively flat with increasing age for both carriers and non‐carriers in atypical AD, but declines with increasing age in typical AD. Relationships between APOE4 and age, as well as centiloid, did not differ between the two atypical AD phenotypes.ConclusionAPOE4 frequency differs between atypical and typical AD but is highly dependent upon age, with higher APOE4 frequency in typical AD only observed between 57 and 69 years. The findings highlight the importance of age and clinical phenotype in understanding the effects of APOE genotype in Alzheimer’s disease.

Background: It has been hypothesized that medial temporal sparing may be related to preserved posterior cingulate metabolism and the cingulate island sign (CIS) on [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET in posterior cortical atrophy (PCA). Objective: To assess the severity of medial temporal atrophy in PCA and determine whether the presence of a CIS is related to medial temporal sparing. Methods: Fifty-five PCA patients underwent MRI and FDG-PET. The degree and symmetry of medial temporal atrophy on MRI was visually assessed using a five-point scale for both hemispheres. Visual assessments of FDG-PET coded the presence/absence of a CIS and whether the CIS was symmetric or asymmetric. Hippocampal volumes and a quantitative CIS were also measured. Results: Medial temporal atrophy was most commonly mild or moderate, was symmetric in 55% of patients, and when asymmetric was most commonly worse on the right (76%). Older age and worse memory performance were associated with greater medial temporal atrophy. The CIS was observed in 44% of the PCA patients and was asymmetric in 50% of these. The patients with a CIS showed greater medial temporal asymmetry, but did not show lower medial temporal atrophy scores, compared to those without a CIS. Hippocampal volumes were not associated with quantitative CIS. Conclusion: Mild medial temporal atrophy is a common finding in PCA and is associated with memory impairment. However, medial temporal sparing was not related to the presence of a CIS in PCA.

AbstractBackgroundDifferent clinical phenotypes of atypical AD are each associated with characteristic patterns of neurodegeneration and tau deposition on PET. However, longitudinal patterns of tau accumulation and atrophy dissociate and there is significant subject‐level heterogeneity in patterns of progression. We investigate the degree to which heterogeneity in tau progression and atrophy is related to age, apolipoprotein (APOE) genotype and clinical progression.MethodThe Neurodegenerative Research Group (NRG) recruited 138 atypical AD patients (posterior cortical atrophy [PCA] = 57, logopenic progressive aphasia [LPA] = 81), of which 57 underwent longitudinal 3T head MRI and [18F]flortaucipir PET. Region‐of‐interest and voxel‐level analyses were utilized to assess relationships between rates of both atrophy and flortaucipir accumulation with age and APOE ε4 genotype. Principle component analysis using 12 different cognitive tests was used to assess patterns of clinical decline, with the principle components correlated to neuroimaging.ResultFastest rates of tau accumulation were observed in the frontal lobes in PCA and LPA, while fastest rates of atrophy were observed in occipital lobe in PCA and left temporoparietal lobe in LPA. Cortical rates of tau accumulation, particularly in the frontal lobe, were faster in younger patients and in APOE ε4 non‐carriers within LPA and PCA. Spatial patterns of tau accumulation were similar in both carriers and non‐carriers. Cortical rates of atrophy, particularly in parietal regions, were faster in younger patients in PCA and LPA, and in APOE ε4 non‐carriers. Conversely, rates of medial temporal atrophy were faster in older patients and APOE ε4 carriers. Increased rates of tau accumulation across the cortex, but particularly in frontal regions, corresponded to greater severity of clinical decline across tests over time.ConclusionRates of tau accumulation and atrophy are both influenced by age and APOE genotype in atypical AD, but with different regional associations observed for each modality. These findings highlight heterogeneity present in neuroimaging signatures of atypical AD beyond clinical phenotype.

AbstractBackgroundThe Neurodegenerative Research Group (NRG) at Mayo clinic has followed patients with degenerative speech and/or language disorders for over a decade. In this presentation I will present data from this cohort to inform a broader discussion about the importance of apraxia of speech (AOS) and its subtypes, heterogeneity within the agrammatic PPA variant, and perils of mixed phenotypes.MethodWe reviewed the NRG database to identify patients who initially presented with isolated (PPAOS), AOS in conjunction with agrammatic aphasia (AOS‐PAA), isolated agrammatic aphasia (PAA), and patients who had PAA or AOS overlapping with another degenerative diagnosis. Data from the following clinical instruments were abstracted: WAB AQ (aphasia severity), UPDRS III (parkinsonism), WAB Praxis (ideomotor apraxia), and the MoCA (cognitive ability). We assessed the effect of baseline diagnosis and AOS subtype on these outcomes over time using Bayesian linear mixed effects models. We qualitatively reviewed longitudinal diagnostic trajectories. Preliminary analyses were done on available autopsy data.ResultPAA was associated with greater aphasia at baseline and more rapid decline; PPAOS was associated with normal language at baseline and slow decline; and PAA‐AOS with intermediate baseline aphasia and decline. However, for those with AOS longitudinal decline differed based on AOS subtype: prosodic PPAOS was associated with the slowest decline and phonetic PAA‐AOS with the fastest. Some patients met criteria for non‐PPA disorders during follow up. However, compared to patients who met criteria for these disorders at enrollment, the speech/language‐first patients remained qualitatively distinct, and neither resembled the cases that were mixed at onset. Preliminary autopsy data suggests that AOS is predictive of tau and that the specific tauopathy may be related to the initial syndrome and AOS subtype.ConclusionThe differences between PAA, PAA‐AOS and PPAOS suggest that these disorders should not be lumped. In fact, the longitudinal trajectories are sufficiently different that doing so would add noise to observational and interventional studies. Instead, more detailed phenotyping, including AOS subtype, can aid prognostication and may improve prediction of the underlying pathology. Finally, caution should be exercised when considering PPAOS and PPA patients for other FTLD diagnostic categories.

AbstractBackgroundLogopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) have distinct patterns of hypometabolism and atrophy. However, these clinical syndromes overlap: visuospatial impairment has been documented in LPA and aphasia in PCA. Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure – Copy (Rey‐O Copy) performance is correlated with parietal‐occipital atrophy in LPA. We explore visuospatial impairment on the Rey‐O Copy in LPA and PCA with the Mayo Older Americans Normative Studies (MOANS; which uses Meyers & Meyers criteria) and the Boston Qualitative Scoring System (BQSS). We also examine the proportion of visuospatial impairment in LPA, an under‐appreciated phenomenon, compared to PCA wherein it is fundamental.MethodPatients with LPA (n=25) or PCA (n=23) were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group. Patients underwent comprehensive neuropsychological testing (including Rey‐O Copy) at baseline visit. Cut‐offs of T‐score=40 (BQSS) or scaled score=7 (MOANS) were used based on normative data. Proportions of patients with low performance were examined across LPA and PCA groups. Individual logistic regressions and AUROC analyses were then conducted to quantify differences in visuospatial impairment in LPA and PCA with both scoring systems. Identical analyses were conducted using raw scores corrected for age and sex, to avoid confounds of adjustments in normative data.ResultLPA and PCA groups were comparable on age, sex, and disease duration (LPA Median = 2.7 years, IQR=1.9‐3.5; PCA Median = 3.6 years, IQR=1.5‐4.9); p=.823). Surprisingly, 52‐72% of LPA participants demonstrated impaired performance across scoring systems, relative to 96% of the PCA group identified by both scoring systems. Odds ratios (OR) for the Rey‐O Copy MOANS (OR = 1.59; p=.008) and BQSS Copy Presence and Accuracy index (CPA; OR = 1.13, p=.002) were significant, persisting for age‐ and sex‐ controlled raw scores, suggesting the odds of a PCA diagnosis increased with decrement on Rey‐O Copy. AUROC values ranged from 0.77 to 0.88 across these indices.ConclusionA substantial number of LPA participants showed visuospatial impairment, despite initial primary language complaints. Differentiation of diagnostic groups by the Rey‐O is likely underscored by relatively uniform, profound, visuospatial impairment in PCA with more variability in LPA. However, the degree of visuospatial impairment overlaps remarkably across diagnoses.

AbstractBackgroundOptimizing software to measure Flortaucipir (AV‐1451) tau PET SUVR change‐over‐time is crucial for longitudinal observational studies and potential trials of anti‐tau agents. Ideal measurements should have good repeatability (low noise), and should clearly separate clinical cognitive groups.MethodWe compared 456 software methods varying in their use of: two major packages, each with cross‐sectional and longitudinal variants (FreeSurfer and an in‐house pipeline using SPM12, MCALT, and ANTs); three temporal‐lobe target regions (each with/without adjacent WM); seven reference regions; five PVC methods; and two statistics (mean vs. median). We used linear mixed‐effects models to compare methods using scans from 88 Mayo Clinic participants (46 cognitively impaired, 42 impaired, excluding those with symptoms inconsistent with the AD pathology imaged by Flortaucipir), each with three visits with PET and MRI. From these models, we calculated two criteria for each pipeline: relative measurement error (residual from the linear mixed model), and the t‐statistic for testing differences in group‐wise rates of change (which has a Cohen’s d interpretation of effect size for longitudinal data). We plotted both criteria orthogonally, then ranked methods overall according to the average of their ranks on both individual criteria.ResultMethods using the entorhinal cortex target region performed poorly in both criteria (Figure 1). The top 10 methods by the combined criteria (top‐left in Figure 2) all used the Mayo SPM12‐based pipeline with an eroded supratentorial WM (eSWM) or composite (eSWM + pons + cerebellum) reference region. Among them, 9/10 used the longitudinal variant, 8/10 used 2‐compartment PVC, and 7/10 used median. Altogether, our results favored SUVR methods with a longitudinal design (simultaneously calculating all time‐points), a temporal‐lobe meta‐ROI including adjacent WM, a composite reference region, 2‐class voxel‐based (Meltzer) PVC, and median statistics. Methods using GTM‐Tau PVC (Baker et al., Data in Brief, 2017) had the highest group separation but relatively large measurement error, giving them ranks 197 and 199 out of 456 with the joint (average rank) criteria.ConclusionCompared with popular FreeSurfer‐based methods (ranks 176, 258; Figure 2), our top‐ranked approaches approximately halved error in SUVR measurements while maintaining or improving group separation.

AbstractBackgroundMagnetic resonance brainstem measurements are useful structural biomarkers in the Richardson's syndrome variant of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). However, it is unclear how these biomarkers differ across the phenotypic spectrum of PSP and how they relate to underlying pathology.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare brainstem imaging measures across clinical variants of PSP and determine sensitivity and specificity based on pathologically diagnosed cases.MethodsA total of 153 patients with PSP who represented eight clinical variants were recruited at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA) and underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Midbrain and pons area and superior and middle cerebellar peduncle width measurements were performed, and midbrain/pons ratio and Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index (MRPI) were calculated. Among the 43 patients who later died, PSP pathology was confirmed in 29, whereas 14 had other pathology.ResultsBrainstem measurements varied across PSP clinical variants and were most abnormal in PSP‐Richardson's syndrome and frontal variants, followed by PSP‐corticobasal, PSP‐speech/language, and PSP‐parkinsonism variants. All these variants showed abnormalities compared with controls. The PSP‐gait freezing variant and patients with prominent corticospinal tract signs showed normal brainstem measures. Among cases with confirmed PSP pathology, the midbrain area, midbrain/pons ratio, and MRPI were all more abnormal compared to those with other pathologies, with best differentiation obtained with the MRPI (sensitivity = 83%; specificity = 85%).ConclusionsMRI brainstem measures show utility as diagnostic biomarkers across PSP clinical variants and have the potential to be useful in predicting underlying pathology. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

ABSTRACTBackgroundApathy and depression commonly occur in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP)‐Richardson's syndrome variant; depression often requiring treatment. Little is known, however, about apathy and depression among other PSP variants.MethodsWe prospectively studied 97 newly diagnosed PSP patients. All were classified into a PSP variant using the 2017 Movement Disorder Society‐PSP criteria and administered the Geriatric Depression and Apathy Evaluation Scales. Differences in apathy and depression frequency and severity across six variants, and secondarily across PSP‐Richardson's syndrome, PSP‐Cortical and PSP‐Subcortical, were analyzed using ANCOVA and linear regression adjusting for disease severity.ResultsDepression (55%) was more common than apathy (12%). PSP‐Speech/Language (PSP‐SL) variant had the lowest depression frequency (13%) and lower depression scores than the other variants. No differences in apathy frequency/severity were identified.ConclusionPSP‐SL patients may have less depression compared to PSP‐Richardson's syndrome and other PSP variants.

We describe two individuals with progressive verbal difficulty who exhibited impairment of propositional language, with relatively well-preserved auditory comprehension, naming, and repetition—a profile that is consistent with dynamic aphasia. By providing a brief review of pertinent literature and the results from our neurologic, speech and language, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging testing, this report sheds light on the infrequently reported dynamic aphasia in the context of frontotemporal dementia. Our patients’ insights into their verbal difficulty tend to support the notion that dynamic aphasia results from interference at the stage where thoughts are converted into verbal messages—that is, the thought–verbal interface.