Citations

Abstract Objectives To develop and evaluate a real-time methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (RT-MSP) MGMT assay, with a particular focus on small biopsies and indeterminate testing results. Methods We assessed formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded glioblastoma or gliosarcoma specimens (n = 641). A test-validation group (n = 51) with previously obtained reference laboratory (RL) results was used to determine performance characteristics of the RT-MSP assay. An indeterminate (equivocal) category was established for cases that could not be clearly classified as positive or negative. Results Overall agreement of RT-MSP and RL results was 91% (41/45 nonindeterminate cases). Discordant cases were tested by pyrosequencing, and results were most concordant with RT-MSP. Among cases with limited amounts of tissue (n = 7), six yielded valid results by RT-MSP (all negative); the single invalid result consisted of a stereotactic biopsy specimen obtained 14 years prior. A subset of indeterminate cases obtained during clinical testing (n = 18/575 [3%]) was also evaluated by pyrosequencing and showed a heterogeneous pattern of methylation across the eight interrogated CpG sites. Conclusions The RT-MSP assay that we developed in-house is a robust clinical detection method for the heterogeneous process of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma.

AbstractIntracranial myxoid mesenchymal tumor harboring EWSR1 fusions with CREB family of genes was recently described, and it resembles the myxoid variant of angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma. We present three pediatric patients with intracranial EWSR1‐rearranged myxoid mesenchymal neoplasm and provide a molecular genetic characterization of these tumors. Clinical histories and imaging results were reviewed. Histology, immunohistochemistry, EWSR1, FUS, NR4A3 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and next‐generation sequencing (NGS) were performed. A 12‐year‐old male (case 1), 14‐year‐old female (case 2), and 18‐year‐old male (case 3), presented with headaches, emesis, and seizures, respectively. The magnetic resonance images demonstrated tumors abutting the dura (cases 1 and 3) and in the third ventricle (case 2). All tumors were vascular, with solid sheets of monomorphic oval cells in a prominent myxoid/microcystic matrix. A thin fibrous pseudocapsule was present in all lesions, but definitive lymphocytic cuffing was absent. Morphologically, they closely resembled myxoid variant of angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma. Mitoses were rare, and necrosis was absent. All tumors expressed desmin and GLUT1, and focal EMA and CD99. The proliferation index was low. FISH and NGS showed EWSR1–CREB1 fusion (cases 1 and 2), and EWSR1–CREM fusion (case 3). There were no FUS (16p11.2) or NR4A3 (9q22.33) rearrangements in case 3. Gains of 5q (including KCNIP1) and 11q (including CCND1) were present in cases 1 and 2. There were no common pathogenic genomic changes other than EWSR1 rearrangements across cases. CNS myxoid mesenchymal neoplasms with histological and immunophenotypic similarities to myxoid variant of AFH are rare, diagnostically challenging, and harbor EWSR1–CREB1 and also a novel EWSR1–CREM fusion not yet described in AFH. Therefore, it is uncertain if these tumors represent variants of AFH or a new entity. The copy number and mutational changes presented here provide support for future studies to further clarify this issue.