Citations

Abstract Background: Sarcopenia is one of the early pathological features of cancer cachexia, yet the effect of sarcopenia on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced HCC is unclear. Our objective was to determine the effect of Sarcopenia on response to systemic therapy with advanced HCC. Methods: Patients with unresectable and advanced liver cancer were retrospectively evaluated between 2010 to 2019. Skeletal muscle area (SMA) was computed with a previously validated computed tomography (CT) body composition AI algorithm. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was derived from the skeletal muscle area (SMA) (cm2) divided by patient height (m2) calculated from images at the level of L3 on pretreatment CT. Sarcopenia cutoffs for females was less than 39 cm2/m2 SMI or less than 50 cm2/m2 SMI for males. Patients’ demographics, systemic treatment response, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between first-line therapy groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were used for survival analysis comparisons. Results: A total of 146 patients with advanced HCC were assessed from Mayo Clinic Arizona and Emory University. Seventy-six patients received immunotherapy as first-line treatment and seventy patients received TKI as first-line therapy. Sarcopenia at baseline was assessed in a total of 91 patients at first-line systemic treatment: n=48 with immunotherapy (IO) and n=43 with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Sarcopenia was more prevalent in male patients (p=0.009), and in patients with low BMI (p=0.02). When comparing those with sarcopenia at baseline, higher response rate was observed in patients treated with IO without sarcopenia (47% versus 15%, p=0.019), this was not observed in TKI group. Interestingly, median PFS and OS was not significantly changed in patients with or without sarcopenia treated with IO or TKI on first-line therapy. Conclusions: Sarcopenia was associated with reduced response rate (RR) in patients treated with IO, but not in TKI groups. Both didn’t translate into deleterious effect in PFS and or OS. Further research with sufficient adjustments for confounding factors is warranted to better elucidate the prognostic value of sarcopenia in these patients. Citation Format: Gehan Botrus, Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior, Heidi Kosiorek, Mehmet Akce, Isabela Chang, Zhubene Mesbah, Eric Yancey, Daniel Blezek, Jason Klug, Lana Khalil, Puneet Raman, Mohamad Sonbol, Mitesh Borad, Daniel Ahn, Tanios Bekaii-Saab. Prognostic impact of Sarcopenia on clinical outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with systemic therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 6274.

10588 Background: Detection of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) has implications for cancer screening, prognostication, treatment selection, clinical trial enrollment and family testing. Published guidelines provide indications for PGV testing, determined by clinical and demographic factors, but these leave a significant number of cases missed by guideline-directed testing (incremental PGV). We have previously shown that 50% of patients with PVGs would not have been detected with guideline-based testing alone. In this project, we aimed to determine the feasibility and generalizability of this approach within a more racially/ethnically diverse cohort from a community cancer practice. Methods: We completed a prospective study of proactive germline genetic sequencing among patients with solid tumor malignancies at a community-based oncology practice in downtown Jacksonville, FL between June 2020, and September 2021. The patients were unselected for cancer type, stage, family history, race/ethnicity, and age. PGVs identified using an 84-gene NGS platform were stratified by penetrance. National Comprehensive Cancer Networks (NCCN) guidelines were used to determine incremental PGV rates. Results: 221 patients were enrolled, median age 63.0 years, 21.7% male. 56.6% of patients were white (non-Hispanic), 32.6% were black/African American, 5.4% were Hispanic. 39.8% of patients were commercially insured, 52.4% insured by Medicare/Medicaid and 2.7% uninsured. The cohort was comprised predominantly of breast cancer (61.5%), lung cancer (10.4%) and colon cancer (7.2%) patients. A total of 27 PGVs were identified in 23 patients. We found no significant difference in the rate of PGVs based on race/ethnicity. The overall rate of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) was numerically higher in black/African American patients (61.1%) compared with other ancestry (45%). 13 of 23 (56.5%) patients with detected PGVs did not meet NCCN guidelines for germline genetic screening (incremental PGVs). Conclusions: This prospective study found that universal multi-gene panel testing among patients from a racially/ethnically diverse cohort from a community cancer practice was associated with an increased detection of heritable variants with treatment implications over the predicted yield of targeted testing based on guidelines. This study is the first to evaluate this approach in an exclusively community-based practice. Clinical trial information: NCT04456140.

e21134 Background: Therapies with monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1 and its ligands are associated with remarkable outcomes and have revolutionized cancer treatment (Honey 2017). However, patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade may develop “a primary or secondary resistance” to therapy (Sharma, Hu-Lieskovan et al. 2017). Contrary to monoclonal antibodies, chimeric B-cell cancer vaccines have the advantage of producing polyclonal B-cell antibodies that can potentially induce memory B- and T-cell responses, while reducing immune evasion and suppression. The hypothesis is that a polyclonal induced B-cell antibody response will be more effective or as effective with improved safety over current monoclonal antibody therapy. IMU-201 (PD1-Vaxx) is being developed using an active immunization approach to treat cancers that overexpress PD-L1 by inducing the production of anti-PD-1 antibodies with a peptide epitope designed to stimulate polyclonal antibodies against PD-1 (Kaumaya et al. 2020). Methods: The IMPRINTER study is an ongoing open-label dose escalation study of IMU-201 as monotherapy (Phase 1) or in combination with atezolizumab (Phase 1b) for patients with PD-L1 expressing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). All patients enrolled in Phase 1 of the study must have previously received an immune checkpoint inhibitor and experienced disease progression. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IMU-201 and identify the optimal biological dose (OBD). The secondary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of IMU-201 as monotherapy and in combination with atezolizumab. Humoral and cellular immunogenicity data will be evaluated, including IMU-201 and PD-1 specific antibodies (IgG, IgM), vaccine-specific cytokine levels, and regulatory and effector T and B cells. IMU-201 is administered by intramuscular (IM) injection on Day 1, Day 15, and Day 29. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment is completed after 29 days on treatment. Tumor progression is evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 at Day 43 then every 42 days until progression or withdrawal. Results: In Phase 1, four patients were enrolled into each of the three cohorts at 10 μg/dose, 50 μg/dose and 100 μg/dose IMU-201 with no DLTs observed. In the 10 μg/dose cohort, one patient achieved CR and one patient SD; in the 50 μg/dose cohort, four patients achieved SD; and in the 100 μg/dose cohort, one patient achieved PR and two patients achieved SD. Within the 100 μg/dose cohort, one patient experienced an immune related pneumonitis after two IMU-201 administrations and discontinued from study treatment. Conclusions: IMU-201 had no observed DLT and demonstrated preliminary signs of efficacy. The study will therefore move into Phase 1b with IMU-201 being assessed in combination with atezolizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT04432207.

TPS4170 Background: IMbrave150 is the first study demonstrating the benefit of anti-PDL1 in the frontline treatment of aHCC, and established Atezo/Bev as a new 1st line standard for aHCC. There is currently limited evidence to guide subsequent therapy for aHCC patients progressing on Atezo/Bev. ACCRU-GI-2008 is designed to determine the benefit of continuing Atezo into 2nd line and the safety of Atezo plus a MKI in patients with aHCC who previously received Atezo/Bev. The study is being conducted across 12 centers in the United States (ClincalTrials.gov#: NCT05168163). Methods: This study utilizes a 2:1 randomized phase II design where eligible patients will receive either Atezo/MKI (experimental arm) or MKI alone (control). Patients will be stratified according to the MKI choice (cabozantinib or lenvatinib, per physician’s decision), etiology of HCC (viral vs. non-viral) and alpha-fetoprotein level ( < 400 vs. > = 400 ng/mL). The major eligibility criteria are histological/cytological diagnosis or clinical diagnosis of HCC per the AASLD or WASL 2018 guidelines, has advanced disease not amendable to curative treatment, previously received and progressed on Atezo/Bev, has received only 1 previous line of systemic therapy (2nd line only), ECOG PS 0-1, Child Pugh Class A, adequate organ reserves and RECIST v1.1 measurable disease; previous MKI for advanced disease is excluded. The primary endpoints are overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). A total sample size of 122, with 89 PFS events, we will have 80% power to detect an improvement in median PFS from 4 to 7 months, assuming a one-sided significance level of 0.05. With approximately 84 deaths, we will have 80% power to detect an improvement in median OS from 10 to 18 months, assuming a one-sided significance level of 0.05. The overall one-sided significance level, for the study, is 0.1. An OS interim analysis will be conducted at 89 PFS events. Secondary endpoints include objective response, duration of response, and adverse events. Archival tumor and serial blood samples will be collected to evaluate for potential prediction biomarkers and mechanisms of sensitivity/resistance. Baseline and on-treatment tumor biopsy specimens will also be collected from the initial 10 patients of each arm. The study is approved by the ethics committee and enrollment to the study will be underway by Q2/3 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05168163.

4145 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the 4th leading cause of cancer death. Outcomes remain poor, due to irresectability at diagnosis for many and sub-optimal responses to systemic therapy. Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the standard of care. High microsatellite instability (MSI-H) predicts response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in many cancers. Detecting high MSI is rare in PDAC (incidence <2%), but case reports demonstrate potential therapeutic benefit with ICI. Here, we present multi-institutional data to characterize the clinical behavior of MSI-H PDAC, with special attention to response to ICI. Methods: Cases of MSI-H PDAC were obtained by reviewing data of all PDAC patients from our tertiary cancer center who had undergone genomic sequencing by one commercially available platform. The resulting cohort was supplemented with MSI-H PDAC cases identified by GI oncology specialists at multiple institutions. De-identified patient data were compiled and analyzed. Results: 15 MSI-H PDAC patients were identified. 20% had stage II disease at diagnosis, 27% stage III, and 53% stage IV. 73% of patients received ICI (n=11); 40% as 1st line and 33% as 2nd line. These patients demonstrated 100% overall response rate; 45% complete response (1 pathologic CR, 4 radiographic CR) and 55% partial response. No patient that received ICI had lost response or died after a median follow-up of 18 months (range 6-89 mos). 1 patient had oligoprogression of a single hepatic lesion after 7 mos that was then irradiated; this patient retained radiographic CR for 17 subsequent mos (ongoing). In this cohort, we observe poor responses to cytotoxic chemotherapy. In total, 12 regimens were trialed among 9 patients. Overall response rate was 0%. 42% achieved disease stability, with median duration of response of 2 mos; only 2 cases maintained disease stability for >5 mos. 4 patients did not receive ICI; all patients died, with a median survival of 7.5 mos. Conclusions: MSI-H PDAC represents a rare but important subtype of PDAC with unique clinical behavior. Given its rarity, large-scale analyses and trials are unlikely to be performed, making case series such as ours crucial. In our cohort, we observe impressive, durable responses to ICI, along with very poor responses to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Our data argues for consideration of ICI in any patient presenting with MSI-H PDAC, including in the first-line and neoadjuvant settings.

4130 Background: KRAS is mutationally activated in over 90% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Compared to pts with KRAS mutation, KRAS wild-type (wt) PDAC seem to have better response to therapy and may harbor potentially actionable molecular alterations. Here, we analyze the molecular profile and clinical outcome of a cohort of pts with KRAS wt PDAC. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on pts with PDAC who underwent CLIA-certified Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) testing at Mayo Clinic between December 1, 2018 and December 1, 2021. Pts with KRAS wt PDAC with available reports were included. Their genomic drivers, RNA expression, demographics, disease characteristics, therapies offered, and clinical outcome data were collected. The study was approved by the institutional IRB. Results: Of the 241 eligible pts, 8% (19) has KRAS wt PDAC. Among those, 2 pts had no mutation identified by the gene/molecular panel used. Of the 17 pts (89%) with identified alterations, mutations found in ³ 2 pts were TP53 (53%), CDKN2A (16%) and CDKN2B/ERBB2/PTEN/MSH3/RNF43/FBXW7/KMT2D/GNAS (11% each). Chromosomal rearrangements were identified in 5 (26%): CADPS2-BRAF, GP2-ERBB2, PTPRK-RSPO3, EML4-NTRK3 and TFG-MET. RNA expression results were available in 12 pts: common overexpression were ERBB2 (27%) and MET/NRAS/MYC/CCDN1/CCNE1/AR (18% each); and the under-expression MGMT (18%). Among the 13 pts with available MSI status via NGS, 2 (11%) were MSI-high (both had high TMB [28.4 and 23.7 m/MB]) while all others were TMB < 10 m/MB. The median age at diagnosis was 61 years (68% males). 8/19 (42%) were Stage IV at diagnosis with 15/19 (79%) pts ultimately diagnosed with metastatic disease. Among metastatic pts, median lines of treatment received was 2.5 (range:0-4). 4 pts received FOLFIRINOX (FFX), 2 gemcitabine/ nab-paclitaxel (GP) and tumor response were comparable to previously reported results. 1 received 1st-line pembrolizumab and remained on therapy at the time of analysis. The median length of follow up from diagnosis was 29 months. A patient with TFG-MET re-arrangement previously progressed on FFX and GP was treated using a MET inhibitor, and achieved significant CA19-9 drop and pancreas tumor shrinkage at 1st restaging, with ongoing response. Conclusions: The molecular profile of KRAS wt PDAC is highly heterogeneous and difficult to generalize. Novel approaches (e.g., basket trials) are needed to develop therapy for this rare PDAC subgroup.

4086 Background: Abnormalities in the MAPK pathway are potential therapeutic targets in various cancers. However, the clinical impact of alterations in the MAPK pathway in BTC have not been elucidated, especially outside of canonical mutations in KRAS and BRAF. We investigated the clinical outcomes of advanced BTC with MAPK pathway alterations treated with chemotherapy in Japan and the United States. Methods: Patients with advanced BTC who received gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line therapy were included from the GOZILA study in Japan and Duke Molecular Registry of Tumors in the US. Genetic abnormalities were detected by Guardant360, a cell-free DNA assay, in Japan and by blood or tissue-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) at Duke University. Two hundred and seven patients with BTC from Japan were included in an exploratory cohort to evaluate the association of MAPK alterations with overall survival (OS) according to MAPK alteration status. One hundred and ten patients with BTC from both Japan and the US harboring oncogenic alterations in the MAPK pathway were included in a biomarker selected cohort to assess the association of specific MAPK alterations with OS. Multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox regression model based on a univariate p-value < 0.2. Results: MAPK pathway-related oncogenic alterations detected in each cohort are shown in the table below. In the exploratory cohort, median OS was shorter for patients with MAPK alterations vs. no MAPK alteration (15.9 m vs. 24.9 m, log-rank p = 0.001). Based on univariate analysis, the following covariates were selected for multivariate analyses: age, prior resection, and MAPK pathway alteration in the exploratory cohort; country, the timing of NGS, distant metastasis, KRAS amplification, and BRAF class 2 mutation in the biomarker selected cohort. In the exploratory cohort, multivariate analysis identified MAPK pathway alterations as an independent predictor of shorter OS with a HR of 1.92 (95% CI = 1.28-2.87, p = 0.001). In the biomarker selected cohort, multivariate analysis identified BRAF class 2 mutations and KRAS amplification as independent predictors of shorter OS with a HR of 16.2 (95% CI = 3.26-80.8, p = 0.001) and 5.97 (95% CI = 1.74-19.3, p = 0.002) respectively. Conclusions: MAPK pathway alterations, especially BRAF class 2 mutation and KRAS amplification, had a significant negative impact on clinical outcomes in BTC receiving first-line chemotherapy. These results are newly confirmed in BTC. [Table: see text]

TPS3634 Background: Among patients with MSI-H/dMMR CRC, BRAF mutations occur in approximately 30%. MSI-H/dMMR and BRAF mutations are both associated with poor prognosis; in patients who have both biomarkers, poor prognosis is thought to be driven by the BRAF mutation. Pembrolizumab is indicated for the treatment of patients with MSI-H/dMMR unresectable or metastatic CRC (mCRC). The BRAF inhibitor encorafenib, in combination with cetuximab, is indicated for previously treated patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. Currently, there are no first-line treatment options indicated specifically for patients with both MSI-H/dMMR and BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. To assess the safety and efficacy of combining pembrolizumab with encorafenib + cetuximab, the SEAMARK study (NCT05217446) will evaluate this combination vs pembrolizumab alone in patients with previously untreated BRAF V600E-mutant MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Methods: SEAMARK is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase 2 study. Approximately 104 patients (randomized 1:1; stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status [ECOG PS] 0 vs 1) will receive either pembrolizumab + encorafenib + cetuximab or pembrolizumab. Enrolled patients must be aged ≥16 or ≥18 years (per country-specific regulations) and have previously untreated BRAF V600E-mutant MSI-H/dMMR mCRC; measurable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1); ECOG PS 0 or 1; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. Patients who received prior treatment with BRAF/EGFR inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors, or who have brain metastases (unless radiologically stable) or RAS mutation (or unknown RAS status), will be excluded. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability, overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, and quality of life. Enrollment will begin in April 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05217446.

3590 Background: Co-occurring alterations (COAs) in the HER2 and MAPK pathway are rare in mCRC. RAS, HER2 and BRAF alterations have been associated with resistance to EGFR inhibitor therapy (EGFR-mab). Typical co-occurring mutually exclusive gene mutations such as in KRAS and BRAF have been reported. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of co-occurring alterations in the MAPK pathway or across MAPK/ HER2 and correlate to outcomes in patients with mCRC treated with EGFR-mab. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients with mCRC within the Mayo Clinic database who have available blood-based NGS Guardant 360 data (September 2017-November 2021) and contained co-alterations in the MAPK pathway or across MAPK/ HER2. MSI-high cases were excluded. Typical-RAS was defined as alterations in codons 12, 13, 59, 61, 117, and 146 of KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS. Atypical-RAS alterations were considered mutations at other codons of these genes. Patient characteristics, specific mutations, and outcome data were assessed. Results: 692 patients (pts) with mCRC were identified and 66 (9.5%) of those had COAs detected. 59/66 pts had clinical data available. Median age was 52 years, 55.9% were male, and 61.0% had left-sided tumors. The frequency of detected alterations was: BRAF-V600E (7.3%), BRAF-non-V600E (7%), BRAF-amplification (3.04%), RAS-typical (39.5%), RAS-atypical (2.1%), HER2 amp (0.5%), HER2-mutation (1.2%) and PIK3CA (13%). COAs are described in the table. Twenty-three pts received EGFR-mab; COAs developed in 19 of them after progression on EGFR-mab. Four pts received EGFR-mab with documented COAs at baseline with none of them responding to treatment. Conclusions: COAs in MAPK and MAPK/ HER2 pathway are not uncommon in pts with mCRC emphasizing on the importance and feasibility of blood based NGS vs. selected gene testing. In pts with prior EGFR-mab treatment, COAs were detected after progression on treatment in the majority of pts, suggesting a mechanism of secondary treatment resistance. Further data including prospective validation is warranted. [Table: see text]

3571 Background: In colorectal cancer (CRC), mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF predict resistance to anti-EGFR therapies. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), ~90% of patients harbor KRAS mutations, while KRAS wild-type tumors often have clinically actionable fusion alterations. Thus, in both cancers, the accurate ascertainment of RAS and BRAF driver status is essential. Sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma allows convenient assessment of a tumor’s molecular profile, but sensitivity can be limited by low ctDNA shedding. We sought to establish a ctDNA shedding threshold at which actionable driver mutations can be reliably detected. Methods: Molecular reports and matched clinical data were obtained from the Duke Molecular Registry of Tumors and the SCRUM-Japan GOZILA and GI-SCREEN. CRC or PDAC patients with a pathogenic KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF activating point mutation (“driver”) present on tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays and who also had cfDNA assay available were included. Tissue NGS included Foundation One CDx and Oncomine Comprehensive Assay. Guardant 360 (G360) was the sole plasma cfDNA assay. 131 CRC and 24 PDAC cases with 189 total G360 assays met criteria and were included. Samples were analyzed according to detection of the driver mutation and the maximum mutant allele frequency (MAF) of non-driver mutations on G360. An optimal cut-point for max MAF was explored among the CRC and PDAC patients using a maximally selected Wilcoxon rank statistic method. Results: 76.8% of driver mutations were in KRAS, 22.6% in BRAF, and 1.9% in NRAS with an overlap of 1 BRAF and 1 NRAS mutation with a KRAS mutation. Overall sensitivity of G360 for drivers was 83.0% for CRC and 54.2% for PDAC. No variants were detected on G360 in 9.1% of CRC and 37.5% of PDAC. Sensitivity for driver mutations increased with higher maximum non-driver MAF, with MAF > 1% predicting sensitivity > 98% (Table). Optimal cut-point analysis identified MAF of > 0.34% (p < 0.0001), above which the driver was identified in 97% of patients and below which only 27%. Conclusions: In our study, non-driver MAF > 1% on cfDNA NGS predicts high sensitivity for RAS and BRAF mutations and thus is adequate to guide clinical decisions such as anti-EGFR therapy in CRC, evaluation for fusions in PDAC, and validity in clinical trials. MAF ≤0.34% is a clear threshold to consider an assay inadequate and thus seek alternative testing. Sensitivity rises for MAF between 0.35 and 1% but will require greater patient numbers to establish clinically relevant sensitivity thresholds. These results will be updated with additional data for final presentation. [Table: see text]