Citations

ABSTRACTBackgroundThe criteria for PD‐MCI allow the use of global cognitive tests. Their predictive value for conversion from PD‐MCI to PDD, especially compared to comprehensive neuropsychological assessment, is unknown.MethodsThe MDS PD‐MCI Study Group combined four datasets containing global cognitive tests as well as a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment to define PD‐MCI (n = 467). Risk for developing PDD was examined using a Cox model. Global cognitive tests were compared to neuropsychological test batteries (Level I&II) in determining risk for PDD.ResultsPD‐MCI based on a global cognitive test (MMSE or MoCA) increases the hazard for developing PDD (respectively HR = 2.57, P = 0.001; HR = 4.14, P = <0.001). The C‐statistics for MMSE (0.72) and MoCA (0.70) were lower than those based on neuropsychological tests (Level I = 0.82; Level II = 0.81). Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy balance was best in Level II.ConclusionMMSE and MoCA predict conversion to PDD. However, Level II neuropsychological assessment seems the preferred assessment for PD‐MCI.

Abstract Background and study aims Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a new technology available for evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures. It allows under-the-surface visualization and preliminary studies have confirmed standardized characteristics associated with malignancy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the first interobserver agreement in identifying previously agreed upon OCT criteria and diagnosing of malignant versus benign disease. Patients and methods Fourteen endoscopists were asked to review an atlas of reference clips and images of eight criteria derived from expert consensus A total of 35 de-identified video clips were then evaluated for presence of the eight criteria and for final diagnosis of malignant versus benign using the atlas as reference Intraclass correlation (ICC) analysis was done to evaluate interrater agreement. Results Clips of 23 malignant lesions and 12 benign lesions were scored. Excellent interobserver agreement was seen with dilated hypo-reflective structures (0.85) and layering effacement (0.89); hyper-glandular mucosa (0.76), intact layering (0.81), and onion-skin layering (0.77); fair agreement was seen with scalloping (0.58), and thickened epithelium (0.4); poor agreement was seen with hyper-reflective surface (0.36). The diagnostic ICC for both neoplastic (0.8) and non-neoplastic (0.8) was excellent interobserver agreement. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 51 %, ranging from 43 % to 60 %. Conclusions Biliary OCT is a promising new modality for evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures. Interobserver agreement ranged from fair to almost perfect on eight previously identified criteria. Interobserver agreement for malignancy diagnosis was substantial (0.8). Further studies are needed to validate this data.

INTRODUCTION: Although an additional coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine dose for immunocompromised persons has been recommended in some countries, further data to guide vaccination strategies for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are urgently needed. We sought to identify factors affecting initial humoral immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines among patients with IBD. METHODS: In this prospective cohort of SARS-CoV-2 immunized patients with IBD, we evaluated associations between participant age, sex, vaccine type, medication use, and the presence of a detectable antireceptor binding domain antibody and quantitative antibody level. RESULTS: In total, 1,909 participants were included (1,123, 692, and 94 received BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and Ad26.COV2.S, respectively) of whom 96% achieved a positive antibody response. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with lack of antibody response were older age ( P = 0.043), BNT162b2 vs mRNA-1273 (odds ratio [OR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–3.9), and combination therapy with anti-TNF and 6MP, azathioprine, or methotrexate (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.4–7.3). The use of 5-aminosalicylate or sulfasalazine (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1–0.8) and ustekinumab (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.05–0.8) was associated with decreased odds of lacking antibody response. DISCUSSION: Most patients with IBD mount an initial response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; however, older patients and those treated with anti-TNF and immunomodulator have blunted responses and may benefit the most from an additional vaccine dose. Patients treated with other classes of immunosuppressive medications have more robust initial immune responses to vaccination. These data should inform key decisions about patient selection for additional coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine doses in patients with IBD.

AbstractBackgroundLittle is known about sleep in those with a history of contact sports, who are at increased risk for neurodegenerative disease(s). Sleep disruption and disorders are increasingly recognized as having a bidirectional relationship with Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. Here, we investigated self‐reported sleep disruption and disorders in male former college and professional American football players.Method116 former National Football League (NFL) players, 60 former college football players, and 60 asymptomatic men without a history of traumatic brain injury or repetitive head impacts (controls), all between 45‐74 years, completed the Mayo Sleep Questionnaire (MSQ) which includes the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Former American football players were enrolled across the spectrum of symptom severity (asymptomatic to mild dementia). Using binary logistic regression or analysis of covariance, comparisons (controlling for age, racial identity, body mass index, APOE e4 status) on each of the MSQ items and the ESS were made between each of the study groups.ResultCompared to controls, former NFL players were more likely to restless legs (OR = 7.32, 95% CI = 1.63‐32.97*), sleepwalking (OR = 8.65, 95% CI = 1.08‐69.22*), observed apnea (OR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.04‐4.85*), lower alertness levels (marginal mean diff. = 0.90**) and had higher ESS (marginal mean diff. = 2.37**). Former college football players reported greater sleep disturbances compared with controls: restless legs (OR = 10.82, 95% CI = 1.86‐62.89**), sleepwalking (OR = 10.45, 95% CI = 1.12‐97.58*), alertness levels (marginal mean diff. = 1.48**) and ESS (marginal mean diff. = 2.76*). There were no college vs control differences for observed apnea. There were no differences between former NFL players and former college football players on any sleep metric. **p<.005, *p<.05.ConclusionSleep disturbances may be an important factor to investigate in those with a history of participation in American football.

AbstractBackgroundRepetitive head impacts from American football have been associated with long‐term cognitive symptoms. The late neuropsychological profiles of this population is not well‐characterized. Research has relied on retrospective informant reports and/or has been small samples of former professional players. We describe objective neuropsychological test performance in former college and professional American football players.MethodsMale (45‐74 years) former National Football League (n=107) and college football players (n=59) from the DIAGNOSE‐CTE Research Project completed a neuropsychological test battery, Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) and Quick Dementia Rating Scale (QDRS). Neuropsychological test scores were converted to T‐scores using age, sex, and/or education‐adjusted normative data. T‐scores<35 defined impairment. Participants were enrolled across the spectrum of symptom severity (asymptomatic to dementia). Individuals without decisional capacity were excluded. Participants with missing data (n=4) and who scored <45 on Test of Memory Malingering Trial 2 (n=10) were excluded.Results108 (65.1%) identified as White and 53 (31.9%) as Black. Mean education years was 16.76 (SD=1.48). Fourteen (8.4%) and 6 (3.6%) reported diagnostic history of ADHD and learning disability, respectively. Average Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 24.96 (SD=3.17); 85 (51.2%) scored <26. Impairment rates were highest for learning and episodic memory. On Neuropsychological Assessment Battery List Learning, 29.5% were impaired on Immediate recall, 36.1% on Short Delay, and 44.0% on Long Delay Recall. Impairment rates for Craft Story Immediate and Delayed Recall (Paraphrase) were 15.7% and 18.7%, respectively. 19.9% and 15.7% were impaired on learning and delayed recall of the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test‐Revised. Impairments were frequent on the Multilingual Naming Test (20.5%), Trail Making Test Parts B (19.3%) and A (18.1%), Animal Fluency (15.7%), and Number Span Backward (15.1%). Impairments were less common (<10%) for phonemic fluency, planning, basic attention, and visual‐perceptual abilities, Mean FAQ was 3.11 (SD=5.14); 23 (13.9%) had an FAQ >9. Based on QDRS scores, 66 (39.8%) had mild cognitive impairment, 44 (26.5%) mild dementia, and 6 (3.6%) moderate dementia.ConclusionsIn these former American football players, neuropsychological impairments were most frequent in episodic memory, followed by confrontation naming and executive function. Further research is needed to delineate this population’s unique neuropsychological profile.

AbstractBackgroundAlthough parkinsonism is a core feature of Parkinson’s Disease Dementia (PDD) and Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), its evolution is less delineated. We aimed to assess differences in severity and progression of parkinsonian motor symptoms and signs in a community autopsy cohort with clinicopathologic diagnosis of DLB, PDD or Alzheimer’s Disease (AD).MethodData included were from 194 participants in the Arizona study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders with clinicopathologic diagnosis of DLB (n=48), PDD (n=98) (±AD co‐pathology) or pure AD (n=48), and at least two movement exams performed by movement disorders subspecialists who classified PD and parkinsonism according to MDS‐UPDRS criteria. DLB was subgrouped by presence or absence of parkinsonism at final exam (DLB+Park and DLB–Park). Between group trajectory of UPDRS‐II and UPDRS‐III scores were explored using piecewise‐linear and non‐linear MMRM multivariate analysis.ResultOver 1435 participant‐years of longitudinal data were included in the analyses (Figure 1). Mean±SD age at baseline movement exam and death were 76.0±7.5 and 83.4±6.8 years, respectively. At baseline, most participants did not have dementia or substantial motor abnormalities (except motor abnormalities in PDD). DLB (73.9%) and PDD (69.2%) groups had more males than AD (33.3%). Parkinsonism was present in 65.6% of DLB at last exam. Piecewise‐linear MMRM analysis showed baseline UPDRS‐II and UPDRS‐III scores were highest (p<0.001) for PDD (mean±SE: 14.3±0.78 and 27.4±1.64), followed by DLB+Park (5.0±1.05 and 17.4±3.10), DLB‐Park (3.7±2.54 and 3.8±1.35) and AD (3.2±0.88 and 8.0±1.94). Annual rate of increase in UPDRS‐II was greatest for DLB+Park (1.44±0.20) and PDD (1.04±0.08), followed by DLB‐Park (0.89±0.18) and AD (0.30±0.11). Annual rate of increase in UPDRS‐III was highest for PDD and DLB+Park (2.12±0.20 vs 2.64±0.42), followed by DLB‐Park and AD (1.31 ± 0.38 and 0.64 ± 0.22). Preliminary non‐linear MMRM models (Figure 2) further supported substantial between group/subgroup differences in motor trajectories, and progression in DLB‐Park.ConclusionThese preliminary results in a large, well‐characterized clinicopathological community‐based autopsy cohort support that DLB+Park experience comparable, or greater, parkinsonian motor progression to PDD. Future modeling/sensitivity analyses will better delineate expected trajectories of motor progression to add prognostication value in clinic and design of DLB clinical trials.