Citations

Background/aims: Some of the most promising avenues of cancer clinical investigation center on immunotherapeutic approaches. These approaches have provided notable gains in cancer therapeutics with recent Food and Drug Administration approvals of agents of this class in several types of cancers, although gains for ovarian cancer lag behind. This study examined perceptions of therapeutic trials including immunotherapy and virotherapy among ovarian cancer patients and their family members. Methods: A total of 72 semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 33 patients and 39 family members at two National Cancer Institute–designated comprehensive cancer centers. Eligible patients were diagnosed with epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma and had experience with clinical trial conversations; family members were nominated by patients and interviewed separately. Applied thematic analysis was used to understand and interpret the data. Results: More participants were aware of vaccine trials than virus trials, although more than half had heard of at least one of them. Initial reactions to vaccine trials were generally favorable. For many, childhood experience with vaccines lent a familiar frame of reference. Virus trials elicited more negative initial reactions, including the use of adjectives such as “scary” and “dreadful.” Viruses seemed contagious or difficult to control. Increased receptivity to these trials occurred in the context of limited therapeutic options and cancer recurrence. Most participants, including those not immediately drawn to these types of trials, indicated openness to learning more. Conclusion: Although vaccine and viral trials are both immunologically based therapeutic approaches, patients who are offered these trials may perceive their potential benefit and safety quite differently. There is a need to consider terminology, solicit and address “gut reactions,” and provide information that enables patients and their family members to better understand the science behind these trials.

AbstractObjectiveThe objectives were to assess the feasibility of using a novel, comprehensive chaplain‐led spiritual life review interview to develop a personal Spiritual Legacy Document (SLD) for persons with brain tumors and other neurodegenerative diseases and to describe spiritual well‐being (SWB), spiritual coping, and quality of life (QOL) of patients and their support persons (SP) before and after receipt of the SLD.MethodsPatient‐SP pairs were enrolled over a 2‐year period. Assessments included the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy‐Spiritual Expanded Version, Brief Religious Coping Scale, Brief COPE Inventory, and QOL Linear Analog Scale. Baseline assessments were completed prior to an audio‐recorded spiritual life review interview with a chaplain.ResultsThirty‐two patient/SP pairs were enrolled; 27 completed baseline assessments and the interview. Twenty‐four reviewed their SLD and were eligible for follow‐up. A total of 15 patients and 12 SPs completed the 1‐month follow‐up; 10 patients and seven SPs completed the 3‐month follow‐up. Patients endorsed high levels of SWB and spiritual coping at baseline. Both patients and SPs evidenced improvement on several aspects of SWB, spiritual coping, and QOL at 1 month, but patients' decreased financial well‐being was also observed. Patients and SPs demonstrated favorable changes in peacefulness and positive religious coping at both time points.ConclusionsA chaplain‐led spiritual life review is a feasible intervention for patients with neurodegenerative disease and results in beneficial effects on patients and SPs. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract Background: Racial disparities in breast cancer (BC) outcomes are well-documented. As guidelines for BC screening change, it is particularly important that women have accurate knowledge of risk factors in order to meaningfully participate in screening decisions. We examined knowledge of risk factors for BC among a nationally representative sample of women for whom mammography screening is routinely recommended. Method: Non-Hispanic black (B), non-Hispanic white (W), Hispanic (H), and women of other/multiple races (O) were surveyed using a probability-based web panel weighted to match the known U.S. population of females aged 40-74 years. A total of 17 items were presented in English or Spanish; response options included: “does not put you at increased risk,” “puts you at a small increased risk,” and “puts you at a large increased risk.” For scoring, the latter two categories were combined to reflect “increased risk.” Items included 9 established risk factors: having mammographically dense breasts, first-degree relative diagnosed with BC, second-degree relative diagnosed with BC, drinking alcohol in excess, history of a breast biopsy, having a first child after age 30, use of hormone therapy for postmenopausal symptoms, BRCA gene mutation, late onset of menopause; 5 protective factors: menarche after age 15, having children, breastfeeding, having a diet rich in fruits and vegetables, exercising or being active; one factor with no clear association: being a smoker (correct response was no increased risk); and 2 distractors (beliefs for which there is no evidence, correct response was no increased risk): using antiperspirant/talc under your arms, experiencing injury/trauma to the breast. The survey cooperation rate was 65% (1,506 responders out of 2,311). Items were scored correct if the respondent's answer matched the actual risk profile (either does/does not put you at increased risk). Percent correct was calculated for each item overall and by race/ethnicity. All reported percentages and analyses are weighted to be nationally representative and compared for differences based on race/ethnicity using logistic regression models. P-values represent differences in percent correct between the racial/ethnic groups. Results: Knowledge of risk factors varied across items (range >90% to 20% correct). Percent correct was high overall for classifying a first-degree relative with BC as a risk factor and differed by race/ethnicity, with 86% B, 98% W, 92% H and 92% O recognizing this risk factor (p<0.001); similar percentages were observed for second-degree relatives (p=0.003). Lower knowledge overall was observed for risk factors including BRCA mutation (25% B, 44% W, 24% H, 38% O, p=0.002), later onset of menopause (41% B, 38% W, 42% H, 37% O, p=0.92), and having the first child after age 30 (39% B, 41% W, 38% H, 33% O, p=0.53). Having mammographically dense breasts is one of the strongest risk factors for BC, however knowledge of this was only moderate and did not differ by race/ethnicity (61% B, 54% W, 56% H, 52% O, p=0.64). Relative to risk factors, knowledge of protective factors was generally higher; only correct classification of fruits/vegetables as a protective factor differed by race/ethnicity (84% B, 93% W, 88% H, 89% O, p=0.03). Most women correctly responded that use of antiperspirant/talc does not increase risk of BC, however 60% of H women incorrectly classified injury/trauma to the breast as a risk factor, relative to 50% B, 41% W, and 40% O (p=0.02). Conclusions: Among U.S. women, there is wide variation in knowledge across several established BC risk factors and only moderate knowledge of breast density as an important risk factor. Differences in knowledge by race/ethnicity for several risk factors highlight the need for targeted education. Citation Format: Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Deborah J. Rhodes, Sarah M. Jenkins, Jeanette Y. Ziegenfuss, Celine M. Vachon. Racial and ethnic differences in knowledge of risk factors for breast cancer: Findings from a recent national survey. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Sixth AACR Conference: The Science of Cancer Health Disparities; Dec 6–9, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014;23(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B42. doi:10.1158/1538-7755.DISP13-B42

Purpose Legislation mandating disclosure of breast density (BD) information has passed in 21 states; however, actual awareness of BD and knowledge of its impact on breast cancer detection and risk are unknown. Methods We conducted a national cross-sectional survey administered in English and Spanish using a probability-based sample of screening-age women, with oversampling of Connecticut, the only state with BD legislation in effect for > 1 year before the survey. Results Of 2,311 women surveyed, 65% responded. Overall, 58% of women had heard of BD, 49% knew that BD affects breast cancer detection, and 53% knew that BD affects cancer risk. After multivariable adjustment, increased BD awareness was associated with white non-Hispanic race/ethnicity (Hispanic v white non-Hispanic: odds ratio [OR], 0.23; P < .001), household income (OR, 1.07 per category increase; P < .001), education (OR, 1.19 per category increase; P < .001), diagnostic evaluation after a mammogram (OR, 2.64; P < .001), and postmenopausal hormone therapy (OR, 1.69; P = .002). Knowledge of the masking effect of BD was associated with higher household income (OR, 1.10; P < .001), education (OR, 1.22; P = .01), prior breast biopsy (OR, 2.16; P < .001), and residing in Connecticut (Connecticut v other states: OR, 3.82; P = .003). Connecticut residents were also more likely to have discussed their BD with a health care provider (67% v 43% for residents of other US states; P = .001). Conclusion Disparities in BD awareness and knowledge exist by race/ethnicity, education, and income. BD legislation seems to be effective in increasing knowledge of BD impact on breast cancer detection. These findings support continued and targeted efforts to improve BD awareness and knowledge among women eligible for screening mammography.

Surveys are an important tool for assessing physician and nursing professionals’ practice patterns and guideline adherence. Obtaining quality survey data consisting of low item and unit nonresponse remains a persistent challenge in these populations. We tested the relative impact of two envelope types (padded vs. priority mail) on unit and item nonresponse in a survey of Minnesota health care workers. Respondents were randomized to receive a survey in one of two envelope types: a padded 8.5′′ × 11′′ envelope or a similarly sized priority mail envelope. After the first mailing, the response rate was 53.9% and did not differ across envelope conditions. Females and RNs were more likely to respond to the priority envelope than the padded envelope, but this finding did not hold in multivariate analysis. There was no difference in item nonresponse across the two envelope conditions. It may be that our two approaches were not enough to permeate the semi-porous membrane of gatekeeping that has been posited as a driver of low physician survey response rates relative to those observed in the general population. Nonetheless, our findings suggest that packaging may matter for some populations and not others.

Background: Recent literature suggests that one in nine children in the United States uses some type of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Children with challenging neurological conditions such as headache, migraine, and seizures may seek CAM in their attempts at self-care. Our objective was to describe CAM use in children with these conditions. Methods: We compared use of CAM among children aged 3 to 17 years with and without common neurological conditions (headaches, migraines, seizures) where CAM might plausibly play a role in their self-management using the 2007 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data. Results : Children with common neurological conditions reported significantly more CAM use compared to the children without these conditions (24.0% vs 12.6%, P< .0001). Compared to other pediatric CAM users, children with neurological conditions report similarly high use of biological therapies and significantly higher use of mind-body techniques (38.6% vs 20.5%, P<.007). Of the mind-body techniques, deep breathing (32.5%), meditation (15.1%), and progressive relaxation (10.1%) were used most frequently. Conclusions: About one in four children with common neurological conditions use CAM. The nature of CAM use in this population, as well as its risks and benefits in neurological disease, deserve further investigation.

Objective To assess recommendations for prostate‐specific antigen ( PSA ) screening in a national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists following the recent USA P reventive S ervices T ask F orce ( USPSTF ) grade D recommendation. Methods A random sample of 1366 radiation oncologists and urologists were identified from the A merican M edical A ssociation P hysician M asterfile. From N ovember 2011 to A pril 2012, a mail survey was sent to query PSA screening recommendations for men at average risk of prostate cancer for the following age groups: 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–74, 75–79 and ≥80 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test for differences in PSA ‐based screening recommendations by physician characteristics. Results Response rates were similar at 52% for radiation oncologists and urologists ( P = 0.92). Overall, 51.5% of respondents recommended PSA ‐based screening for men aged 40–49 years, while nearly all endorsed it for those aged 50–74 years (96.1% for 50–59, 97.3% for 60–69, and 87.7% for 70–74 years). However, screening recommendations decreased to 43.9% and 12.8% for men aged 75–79 and ≥80 years, respectively. On multivariable analysis, urologists were more likely to recommend screening for men aged 40–49 (odds ratio [ OR ] 3.09; P < 0.001) and 50–59 years ( OR 3.81; P = 0.01), but less likely for men aged 75–79 ( OR 0.66; P = 0.01) and ≥80 years ( OR 0.45; P = 0.002) compared with radiation oncologists. Conclusion While radiation oncologists and urologists recommended PSA screening for men aged 50–69 years, there was less agreement about screening for younger (40–49 years old) and older (≥70 years) men at average risk for prostate cancer.

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Variations in the type of urinary diversion exist for patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Although its use has been increasing from 2001 to 2008, patients who are older, female, and primary insured by Medicaid are less likely to receive continent diversions. Furthermore, patients treated surgically at high‐volume and teaching hospitals are more likely to receive continent diversions. Objective To describe the contemporary trends in urinary diversion among patients undergoing radical cystectomy ( RC ) for bladder cancer; and elucidate whether socioeconomic disparities persist in the type of diversion performed in the USA from a population‐based cohort. Patients and Methods Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer between 2001 and 2008. Multivariable regression models were used to identify patient and hospital covariates associated with continent urinary diversion and enumerate predicted probabilities for statistically significant variables over time. Results Overall, 55 635 (92%) patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer received incontinent urinary diversion, while 4552 (8%) patients received continent diversion from 2001 to 2008. Receipt of continent urinary diversion increased from 6.6% in 2001–2002 to 9.4% in 2007–2008 ( P < 0.001 for trend). Patients who were older (odds ratio [ OR ] 0.93; P < 0.001), female ( OR 0.52; P < 0.001) and insured by Medicaid ( OR 0.54; P = 0.002) were less likely to receive continent urinary diversion. However, patients treated at teaching ( OR 2.14; P < 0.001) and high‐volume hospitals ( OR 2.39; P = 0.04) had higher odds of continent urinary diversion. Predicted probabilities of continent diversion remained lower for female patients, Medicaid insurance status, and non‐teaching and medium/low‐volume hospitals over time. Conclusions In this nationally representative sample of hospitals from 2001 to 2008, the use of continent diversion in RC gradually increased. Although variations in urinary diversion exist by hospital teaching status, case volume, patient gender and primary health insurance, increased attention in expanding the use of continent diversions may help reduce these disparities for patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer.