Citations

LBA514 Background: Preclinical and clinical data show that antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) such as T-DXd may synergize with immunotherapy. Rilvegostomig (R) is a monovalent, Fc-reduced, dual checkpoint bispecific IgG1 monoclonal antibody against PD-1 and TIGIT receptors. R + T-DXd was evaluated as neoadjuvant therapy for up to 4 cycles. Methods: I-SPY2.2 is a phase II neoadjuvant trial with three neoadjuvant sequences (Blocks A/B/C). All HER2-negative subtypes were eligible for R + T-DXd in Block A. Predicted responders at the end of Block A or B could undergo surgery; otherwise, they continued to Block B +/- C. Block B pts received paclitaxel +/- carboplatin +/- pembrolizumab and Block C pts doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (AC) +/- pembrolizumab, HR+ immune+ received IO in Blocks B/C. Results are analyzed by receptor and response predictive subtypes (RPS), that include expression-based immune, and luminal signatures with hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status. Some pts were randomized to a control regimen (skipping R + T-DXd in block A and starting in block B). To minimize risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD) that could lead to treatment discontinuation, pts underwent pulmonary function tests and high-resolution chest CTs every 6 weeks. Abnormalities were reviewed in real time. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR), within each RPS and HR/HER2 signature, with estimated pCR (EpCR) rates compared to subtype-specific block A goal rates and control pts in those groups. Other endpoints included safety and treatment discontinuation. Results: 105 pts were treated with R + T-DXd in block A, while 31 pts were randomized to the control regimen. Block A EpCR rate was 57% in the 12 HR+Immune+ pts vs a pre-specified goal of 15% (posterior probability, PP > .99). In 35 HR-Immune+ pts EpCR was 52% vs a pre-specified goal of 40% (PP = .87). No other groups (Immune-) had a PP > .85 for their respective pCR goal rate. HER2-IHC was 0 (27.6%), 1+ (49.5%) and 2+ (22.9%) in the treatment arm vs. 37.7%, 37.7%, and 24.7% in the control arm, with no difference in distribution between arms in immune subtypes. The most common adverse events in Block A were fatigue (84.8%), nausea (81.0%) and alopecia (58.1%). ILD was the most common adverse event of special interest in Block A and overall, occurring in 12 pts (11.4%; 7G1, 4G2, 1G3) during Block A and in 3 pts (G1, 2.9%) in other Blocks. 8 pts discontinued T-DXd + R due to ILD and proceeded to the next Block. Conclusions: When considering the full treatment strategy including block B and C regimens, experimental strategies had similar EpCR rates vs. controls in immune+ subtypes but block A rates exceeded pre-defined goal thresholds. This infers that treatment beginning with R + T-DXd has equivalent efficacy to standard of care for immune+ pts, but 64% pts with pCR skip chemotherapy (Block B) and 97% avoid AC (Block C). R + T-DXd participants avoided persistent ILD. Clinical trial information: NCT01042379 .

As machine learning (ML)-based decision support tools proliferate in clinical practice, understanding how clinicians integrate personalized ML predictions alongside randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence is critical. We designed a web-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) presenting survival and adverse event data from a simulated RCT and ML model across 12 synthetic multiple myeloma scenarios. In a within-subjects study with 32 physicians, we evaluated how clinicians synthesize competing evidence sources to make treatment decisions. When ML and RCT outputs were concordant, physicians reported greater confidence than with RCT data alone. When results were discordant, most physicians shifted toward the ML-supported treatment, often before reviewing any information about model training or validation, suggesting a tendency toward automation bias rather than algorithm avoidance. Despite reporting higher perceived reliability after viewing model quality disclosures, physicians were largely unable to describe the validation procedures they had reviewed. Taken together, these findings reveal that clinicians may over-rely on ML recommendations even when equipped with tools designed to support critical appraisal. We discuss implications for CDSS design, clinician training, and the institutional safeguards needed before ML-based systems are deployed in high-stakes oncology settings.

TPS2103 Background: Treatment for newly diagnosed IDH-mutant astrocytoma, WHO grade 3, is based on the results of the CATNON study, demonstrating benefit of radiotherapy followed by 12 months of adjuvant temozolomide. While temozolomide and radiotherapy significantly improved survival, the prognosis for these patients remains limited and more effective therapies are required. This trial will evaluate the benefit of the addition of the IDH1 and IDH-2 inhibitor vorasidenib to adjuvant temozolomide versus placebo following standard radiotherapy to evaluate possible improvement in outcomes. Methods: Alliance A072301 (NCT07215910) is a multicenter, double-blinded phase 3 randomized study to determine if the addition of vorasidenib to adjuvant temozolomide significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS), based on blinded central review in patients with newly diagnosed, IDH-mutant astrocytoma, WHO grade 3. Key inclusion criteria include age ≥ 12 years old, histological confirmation of astrocytoma (absence of 1p/19q codeletion), WHO grade 3, presence of any IDH mutation, plan for radiation and chemotherapy and surgery within 6 months. The presence of CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, spinal or leptomeningeal disease, as well as prior chemotherapy, cranial irradiation or IDH inhibitor therapy, is exclusionary. 408 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive vorasidenib 40 mg or placebo daily with 12 cycles of temozolomide following radiotherapy and then continued as monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Stratification factors include age (< 40 years old vs ≥ 40 years old) and residual disease (< 2 cm vs ≥ 2 cm). Tumor assessments with MRI will be every three months for the first two years, every four months for the next two years and then every six months thereafter as per blinded independent central review using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0 criteria. Key secondary endpoints include PFS by local review, time to next treatment, safety and tolerability, quality of life measures. Exploratory measures will include seizure frequency. The trial will have 85% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.625 with one-sided type I error rate of 0.025. Enrollment for the trial commenced February 2026. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org.

e19023 Background: Undetectable measurable residual disease (uMRD) is associated with prolonged progression free survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (Rios-Olais et al., 2024). Peripheral blood (PB) MRD testing is less invasive and allows more frequent MRD monitoring than bone marrow (BM) MRD testing. As MRD testing and MRD-guided time-limited therapies become more common, there is a need to determine the concordance between rates of uMRD in the PB and BM. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in CLL to determine the concordance between rates of uMRD in the PB and BM. Prospective clinical trials evaluating first-line, time-limited treatment of CLL with targeted agents or anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were identified via searches of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception until December 15 th , 2025. Studies were included if they reported rates of BM and PB uMRD at the same timepoint using the same method of MRD testing. Study arms evaluating chemotherapy, single-agent targeted therapy or single-agent anti-CD20 mAbs were excluded. Study sample size, number of patients receiving MRD testing, rates of uMRD in PB and BM, time and method of MRD testing, depth of MRD testing, and treatment arm were extracted. The agreement of uMRD rates between PB and BM was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: 3128 studies were identified on initial search. After study selection criteria were applied, 24 timepoints across 12 prospective clinical trials were analyzed. Across all timepoints, 3121 PB and 2782 BM MRD measurements were included. All timepoints defined uMRD at a depth of under 0.01% CLL cells (10^-4). 20/24 timepoints utilized flow cytometry for MRD testing, 3 utilized allele-specific oligonucleotide PCR (ASO-PCR), and one utilized next-generation sequencing (NGS). 8 timepoints evaluated patients treated with a BTK inhibitor + venetoclax, 10 evaluated patients treated with venetoclax + an anti-CD20 mAb, and 6 evaluated patients treated with triplet therapy. The ICC between rates of uMRD in PB and BM was 0.925 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.95), indicating an excellent degree of agreement between the two methods of testing.(Koo & Li, 2016) The mean uMRD rates in PB and BM were 70.1% and 64.3%, respectively. The mean rate of uMRD in the PB was 5.87% (95% CI: -7.05, 18.80%) higher than in the BM; indicating a consistent slight bias of higher PB uMRD rates compared to BM across timepoints. Conclusions: Overall, we demonstrate that in patients with CLL treated with modern, time-limited therapy, there is high concordance in uMRD rates between PB and BM. Rates of uMRD in the PB are typically slightly higher than in BM.

e16159 Background: Pivotal trials established atezolizumab-bevacizumab and durvalumab-tremelimumab as first-line therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab demonstrated superior survival outcomes compared to sorafenib for unresectable HCC in the IMbrave150 trial in 2020, while durvalumab plus tremelimumab showed superior survival in the HIMALAYA trial in 2022. However, data on head-to-head comparison of these two combinations as first-line systemic therapy for the patient with decompensated HCC are limited. This study aims to compare survival outcomes between these two treatment regimens in decompensated HCC patients to address a critical gap in the current literature, as decompensated patients have largely been excluded from clinical trials. Methods: This retrospective study utilized electronic health records from 146 U.S. healthcare organizations within the TriNetX Network. Adults aged ≥21 years diagnosed with decompensated HCC receiving atezolizumab/bevacizumab and durvalumab/tremelimumab from 10/21/2022 to 8/20/2024 were included. The comparison group received atezolizumab/bevacizumab, and the control group received durvalumab/tremelimumab. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. A 1:1 propensity score matching was conducted to balance baseline characteristics (age, gender, race/ethnicity, lab results including liver function tests, platelet counts, INR, gamma glutamyl transferase, alpha-fetoprotein, and underlying liver diseases). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox regression was used to estimate the mortality risk. Subgroup analysis was stratified by HCC etiology. Results: A total of 302 and 664 patients received durvalumab/tremelimumab, atezolizumab/bevacizumab, respectively. After propensity matching, 253 patients per group were included. Median OS was 283 days with durvalumab/tremelimumab and 391 days with atezolizumab/bevacizumab. The two treatment regimens showed no significant difference in survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.875, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.696–1.101, p=0.254). Subgroup analyses demonstrated no significant differences in survival between the two groups of patients in MASLD (HR: 0.698, 95% CI: 0.468–1.040), alcohol associated liver disease (HR: 0.821, 95% CI: 0.603–1.118), and chronic viral hepatitis (HR: 0.852, 95% CI: 0.596–1.219). Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in survival outcomes between atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab in patients with decompensated advanced HCC. These results support current real-world practice in which both regimens may be considered viable first-line treatment options in this high-risk population with liver decompensation.

625 Background: I-SPY 2 is a multicenter phase II adaptive platform trial evaluating novel agents for stage II-III high-risk breast cancer using response-predictive subtypes (RPS) and a sequential neoadjuvant treatment design of up to three blocks (A/B/C). Investigational regimens are given in Block A, followed by response-guided escalation to standard-of-care (SOC) therapy (tx) in subsequent blocks or early surgery for responders. Topoisomerase I (TOPO1) inhibition plus PARP inhibition may enhance DNA damage and tumor response. DAN-222 is a tumor-targeted polymeric camptothecin conjugate designed to improve the therapeutic index of TOPO1 inhibition. Based on favorable phase 1 safety and preliminary activity in metastatic breast cancer, DAN-222 plus niraparib was evaluated as Block A tx in HER2− disease. Notably, the neoadjuvant regimen used a higher dose of niraparib (200 mg daily) than the prior phase 1 metastatic study. Methods: Patients (pts) with HER2− breast cancer were randomized to DAN-222 plus niraparib for up to 12 weeks in Block A. Response was assessed by serial MRI and biopsy. Inadequate responders escalated early to SOC tx in Blocks B/C. Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints included residual cancer burden, safety, early discontinuation, and treatment-strategy performance versus subtype-specific SOC tx controls. Given established PARPi sensitivity in BRCA mut disease, the key objective was to assess clinically meaningful activity of DAN-222 plus niraparib in BRCA wt pts. Accordingly, a prespecified Bayesian interim futility analysis focused on BRCA wt and tested the probability of the true pCR rate after Block A alone exceeded 15% after 50 pts. Results: Fifty pts enrolled from Sep to Dec 2024. In BRCA wt (n=47), estimated Block A pCR was 3%, with posterior probability of 0.02 that that true pCR exceeded 15%, meeting futility criteria and prompting arm closure. Across all blocks, pCR rate was 57% (8/14) for HR-HER2−; 11% (4/36) for HR+ HER2−, largely after SOC tx. 2/3 BRCA mut pts achieved pCR. Treatment strategies initiating with DAN-222 plus niraparib underperformed subtype-specific controls. 68% discontinued Block A early, mainly due to toxicity. Grade ≥3 cytopenias were common: neutropenia (n=25; 50%), anemia (24%), and thrombocytopenia (18%). Cystitis occurred in 36% (1 grade ≥3). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant DAN-222 plus niraparib showed insufficient activity and no treatment-strategy benefit in BRCA wt HER2− breast cancer, underscoring challenges for TOPO1–PARP inhibitor combinations. Although not supported for further development in this setting, these results highlight the strength of I-SPY 2 in rapidly enrolling patients and quickly distinguishing ineffective from promising therapeutic strategies to accelerate progress toward improved outcomes for patients with curable breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01042379 .

Abstract Introduction Narcolepsy type 2 (NT2) is characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness, heterogeneous symptom severity, and typically normal endogenous orexin levels. The Vibrance-2 phase 2 study evaluated alixorexton, a selective orexin 2 receptor agonist, in patients with NT2. Methods Vibrance-2 was a placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase 2 study. After a 2-week washout from current narcolepsy medications, adults with NT2 meeting ICSD-3-TR diagnostic criteria were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo or alixorexton once daily at doses of 10, 14, or 18mg for 8 weeks, followed by an optional 5-week open-label extension. Dual primary endpoints were the change from baseline to week 8 in mean sleep latency (MSL) on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) and on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Safety evaluation included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). P-values were adjusted for multiplicity. Results Ninety-three patients were randomized to placebo (n=24) or alixorexton (10mg, n=23; 14mg, n=22; 18mg, n=24); 90 completed double-blind treatment. At baseline, patients had severe symptoms (MWT: 5.6 minutes; ESS: 17.4). The study met its dual primary endpoints. At week 8, MSL on MWT increased 9.3, 6.7, and 6.7 minutes at 10, 14, and 18mg, respectively, from baseline versus placebo, with statistically significant differences observed for the 14 and 18mg doses (adjusted p&lt; 0.05). ESS improved by -2.1, -3.2, and -3.6 points from baseline versus placebo at week 8 for the 10, 14, and 18mg groups, respectively, with statistical significance observed for the 18mg dose (adjusted p&lt; 0.05), where more than 70% of patients achieved normalization. TEAEs in 10% of all alixorexton-treated patients through week 8 were pollakiuria, insomnia, micturition urgency, dizziness, and headache. Most TEAEs were mild-to-moderate with no serious TEAEs. Conclusion Vibrance-2 was the first large clinical trial in patients with NT2 to demonstrate positive results with an orexin 2 receptor agonist. Alixorexton resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in wakefulness and daytime sleepiness at Week 8 and was generally well tolerated. These results support phase 3 clinical development of alixorexton as a treatment for NT2. Support (if any) Alkermes, Inc.

Abstract Introduction Hypoglossal nerve stimulators (HGNS) are used in patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who are unable to tolerate or do not respond to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. However, a subgroup of patients fail to achieve resolution of OSA with HGNS alone. Previous studies have shown that lower BMI, lower nadir oxygenation, decreased sleep latency, and higher VOTE score on drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) predict better treatment outcome. We hypothesize that baseline diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) may further predict which patients will achieve successful therapeutic outcome with HGNS therapy. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of all adult patients who underwent HGNS implantation at Mayo Clinic Arizona between 2019-2025 and had a pre-implantation diagnostic PSG available for review. Treatment success was defined by Sher Criteria: &gt;50% reduction in post-treatment apnea hypopnea index (AHI) to a final AHI of &lt; 20/hr. Responders met Sher criteria and non-responders did not meet Sher criteria. Demographics, sleep questionnaire results, PSG variables, and VOTE score on DISE were collected and analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation of reduction in AHI. Results Twenty-three patients (11M/12F, median age: 69[IQR:64,75] years) met inclusion criteria. Median baseline AHI was 24[IQR:19,37]/hr. Median post-implant AHI was 8 [IQR:3, 14]/hr. Responders (n=15, 65%) and non-responders (n=8, 35%) demonstrated median post-implant AHI of 4.5[IQR:2.3,7.3]/hr and 15.7[IQR:12.3,28.5]/hr, respectively. Treatment response was associated with less time with SpO2 &lt; 88% (T88%) (21min [IQR:3,64] vs. 73[IQR:36,105mins]; p=0.023) and higher central apnea index (CAI) (1[IQR:0.1,3] vs. 0[IQR:0,1], p=0.03) on pre-implantation PSG. Conclusion In this small cohort of OSA patients, less nocturnal hypoxemia as defined by T88% and higher baseline central apnea index were predictors of better treatment response to HGNS therapy as measured by Sher criteria. We hypothesize that greater nocturnal hypoxemia likely reflects more severe airway obstruction during sleep. Our analysis also showed that responders had higher baseline CAI than non-responders, however we believe this association is not clinically significant and likely driven by one outlier (CAI 13/hr). Further analysis in a larger HGNS cohort is needed to confirm these findings. Data enrichment efforts and more sophisticated analyses are underway. Support (if any)

Abstract Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive hepatobiliary malignancy with marked molecular heterogeneity, limited systemic treatment options, and poor prognosis. Chemoresistance and KRAS mutations remain major therapeutic challenges. Dysregulation of the Hippo pathway, particularly YAP/TAZ hyperactivation, drives CCA progression and resistance. TEAD, the essential transcriptional partner of YAP/TAZ, represents a promising target. IAG933 is a novel oral pan-TEAD inhibitor designed to disrupt YAP/TAZ-TEAD interactions. RMC-6236, a pan-KRAS inhibitor, has also gained attention. Combined TEAD and KRAS inhibition may overcome resistance and improve efficacy in CCA. Methods: We evaluated IAG933 in human (HuCCT1, RBE) and murine (SB1, FAC) CCA cell lines. Cells were treated with IAG933 alone or in combination with GemCis or RMC-6236. Cell viability assays were used to determine IC50 values and calculate combination indexes (CI). TEAD activity was assessed by luciferase reporter and qRT-PCR of YAP/TAZ target genes (CTGF, CYR61, NUAK2). Transcriptomic alterations were analyzed by RNA sequencing. In vivo efficacy was evaluated in syngeneic orthotopic and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Results: IAG933 suppressed TEAD-dependent transcription (IC50 ≈ 500 nM) and downregulated YAP/TAZ target genes. Combination with GemCis or RMC-6236 produced synergistic effects (CI &lt; 1) in all CCA lines. Transcriptomic analysis revealed activation of oxidative stress response pathways, particularly SOD2 upregulation. MitoSOX staining confirmed increased mitochondrial ROS after treatment. In vivo, IAG933 monotherapy suppressed tumor growth similarly to GemCis. Dual TEAD and KRAS inhibition achieved marked tumor regression and significantly delayed tumor regrowth after treatment cessation in KRAS-mutant PDX models. Conclusion: IAG933 effectively suppresses YAP/TAZ-TEAD signaling and inhibits CCA growth. While the combination with GemCis showed limited additional benefit due to strong single-agent efficacy, synergy with RMC-6236 produced durable antitumor effects, particularly in run-out studies, delaying regrowth in KRAS-mutant models. These findings highlight IAG933 as a promising therapeutic candidate targeting the Hippo-TEAD pathway, with potential benefit in KRAS-mutant CCA. Citation Format: Hidemi Nishi,Erik Jessen,Danielle M. Carlson,Amro M. Abdelrahman,Enis H. Ozmert,J. Pedro Fincatto Safi,Brandon A. Wilbanks,Shelby K. Yee,Jack W. Sample,Nathan W. Werneburg,Rory L. Smoot. TEAD inhibition by IAG933 as a novel therapeutic strategy for cholangiocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3081.

Abstract Introduction: Src Family Kinases (SFKs) have a crucial role in tumor proliferation, survival, and metastasis. NXP900 is a highly selective SFK inhibitor with a novel mechanism of action that locks SFKs in a closed, inhibited conformation, providing sustained suppression of catalytic and non-catalytic functions, which is distinct from other SFK inhibitors like dasatinib. A phase I clinical trial of NXP900 in patients with advanced solid tumors is ongoing. Our preclinical studies showed therapeutic efficacy of NXP900 in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) through decreased YAP, RAF-MAP and PI3K-AKT signaling. Multiomic profiling (RNA-seq, proteomics, phosphoproteomics) of CCA patient-derived xenografts implicated AKT pathway activation in primary NXP900 resistance. NXP900-resistant CCA cell lines generated via prolonged sublethal dose escalation showed a strong IL13RA2-AKT signature on multiomic analysis. Thus, we hypothesized that IL13RA2-AKT signaling was a mechanism of NXP900 resistance. We aimed to define this mechanism and demonstrate that the combinatorial targeting of IL13RA2 or AKT resensitizes to NXP900 treatment. Methods: HuCCT1 or HuCCT1-Resisant (HuCCT1-R) cells were injected bilaterally into the flanks of NOD/SCID mice and were allowed to grow for 3 months prior to tumor collection and analysis. Tumor engraftment and growth between HuCCT1 and HuCCT1-R groups were compared. To delineate the mechanisms for acquired NXP900 resistance, in-vitro treatment studies were performed using siRNAs targeting IL13RA2 as well as combination treatment with capivasertib, a pan-AKT inhibitor. Results: The HuCCT1-R cell line exhibited a higher rate of tumor engraftment and formed significantly larger tumors compared to the parental HuCCT1 cell line, indicating enhanced tumorigenic potential associated with acquired resistance. Silencing of IL13RA2 in HuCCT1-R cells resulted in pronounced reduction of cell proliferation and partially restored sensitivity to NXP900 treatment. Immunoblot analysis demonstrated a corresponding reduction in phosphorylated AKT (Thr308), consistent with suppression of downstream PI3K-AKT signaling. Furthermore, combination treatment of HuCCT1-R cells with the AKT inhibitor capivasertib, and NXP900 led to a significant increase in cell death and a greater inhibition in cell proliferation compared to either agent alone, indicating enhanced responsiveness and improved therapeutic efficacy. Conclusion: These findings confirm the central role of IL13RA2 signaling and the PI3K-AKT pathway in mediating acquired resistance to NXP900, consistent with our previous multiomics analysis. Importantly, this study identifies combination strategies that may be able to overcome NXP900 resistance, supporting the development of combinatorial approaches to restore therapeutic efficacy in resistant tumors. Citation Format: Shelby K. Yee, Hendrien Kuipers, Danielle M. Carlson, Jack W. Sample, Enis Ozmert, Hidemi Nishi, Erik Jessen, Dong-Gi Mun, Aushinie M. Abeynayake, Jennifer L. Tomlinson, Amro M. Abdelrahman, Nathan W. Werneburg, Binbin Li, Mitesh J. Borad, Mark J. Truty, Sumera I. Ilyas, Gregory J. Gores, Rory L. Smoot. Resistance to the SFK inhibitor NXP900 in cholangiocarcinoma is characterized by IL13RA2-AKT signaling and can be overcome by combination therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 7124.