Background Artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs), are potential tools for enhancing healthcare delivery and clinical research. Presently, there is a scarcity of research regarding the viewpoints of medical students toward LLMs. This study aims to explore the perceptions of LLMs and their applications among this demographic. Methods A cross-sectional study was done using an online survey. It was designed using Google Forms and circulated from July 2023 to August 2023. The target population included medical students from Ecuador, Ethiopia, India, Mauritius, Pakistan, United Arab Emirates (UAE), and the United States (USA). Results A total of 1180 responses were collected from 10 medical colleges across 7 countries. The UAE had the largest number of responses (31.7%), followed by Ecuador (17.6%), and Mauritius (13.7%). And 77.4% respondents were already aware about LLMs before attempting the survey, most popularly, ChatGPT. Participants were most familiar with the specific use of LLMs in research (46%), and the lowest familiarity was seen in the use of LLMs in healthcare (37%). More than half of the participants (52%) support the use of LLMs healthcare, yet a significant number of them remained neutral (37%) or disagreed (31%) on LLMs being safe in this context. Conclusion While most of the medical students are aware of LLMs and their applications, the multinational survey demonstrated hesitancy among medical students in fully adopting LLMs into healthcare practice and clinical research. This study prompts further exploration of medical students’ attitudes and acceptance concerning the integration of LLMs for research methodologies, ethical considerations, and healthcare practice.
Safety and efficacy of (+)‐epicatechin in subjects with Friedreich's ataxia: A phase
II
, open‐label, prospective study
Abstract Background (+)‐Epicatechin (EPI) induces mitochondrial biogenesis and antioxidant metabolism in muscle fibers and neurons. We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of (+)‐EPI in pediatric subjects with Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA). Methods This was a phase II, open‐label, baseline‐controlled single‐center trial including 10 participants ages 10 to 22 with confirmed FA diagnosis. (+)‐EPI was administered orally at 75 mg/d for 24 weeks, with escalation to 150 mg/d at 12 weeks for subjects not showing improvement of neuromuscular, neurological or cardiac endpoints. Neurological endpoints were change from baseline in Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) and 8‐m timed walk. Cardiac endpoints were changes from baseline in left ventricular (LV) structure and function by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and echocardiogram, changes in cardiac electrophysiology, and changes in biomarkers for heart failure and hypertrophy. Results Mean FARS/modified (m)FARS scores showed nonstatistically significant improvement by both group and individual analysis. FARS/mFARS scores improved in 5/9 subjects (56%), 8‐m walk in 3/9 (33%), 9‐peg hole test in 6/10 (60%). LV mass index by cardiac MRI was significantly reduced at 12 weeks ( P = .045), and was improved in 7/10 (70%) subjects at 24 weeks. Mean LV ejection fraction was increased at 24 weeks ( P = .008) compared to baseline. Mean maximal septal thickness by echocardiography was increased at 24 weeks ( P = .031). There were no serious adverse events. Conclusion (+)‐EPI was well tolerated over 24 weeks at up to 150 mg/d. Improvement was observed in cardiac structure and function in subset of subjects with FRDA without statistically significant improvement in primary neurological outcomes. Synopsis A (+)‐epicatechin showed improvement of cardiac function, nonsignificant reduction of FARS/mFARS scores, and sustained significant upregulation of muscle‐regeneration biomarker follistatin.
BackgroundTricuspid annular plane systolic excursion measured by M‐mode (MM‐TAPSE) has been validated as a marker of right ventricular systolic performance. A similar measurement by 2D imaging (2D‐TAPSE) can be obtained. We sought to determine the correlation and strength of agreement between MM‐TAPSE and 2D‐TAPSE in children.MethodsEchocardiographic studies performed for clinical indications were reviewed retrospectively. All consecutive subjects ≤18 years of age were included. The cohort was divided into those with normal echocardiographic findings and those with disorders affecting the right ventricle. Digitally recorded images were analyzed for both MM‐TAPSE and 2D‐TAPSE. Measurements of 2D‐TAPSE were made in an apical four‐chamber view, from the tricuspid valve annulus to a consistent point at the apex of the imaging sector at end‐diastole and end‐systole, with the difference representing the 2D‐TAPSE value.ResultsA total of 329 subjects (mean age 9.0 ± 6.1 years) met entry criteria. Correlation coefficient between MM‐TAPSE and 2D‐TAPSE was 0.90. Bland–Altman analysis showed agreement between the two methods to be within 1.2 ± 2.6 mm (mean percentage difference of 6.5%). About 1 mm difference between MM‐TAPSE and 2D‐TAPSE was consistently observed in all diagnostic subgroups, and across all age categories.ConclusionMM‐TAPSE and 2D‐TAPSE correlate strongly, with 2D‐TAPSE being consistently about 1 mm less than values obtained by the M‐mode technique. We conclude that 2D‐TAPSE can provide a reliable alternative to MM‐TAPSE to quantitatively measure right ventricular systolic function and may be especially useful in situations where retrospective comparisons are sought.