Citations

Purpose To compare short‐term outcomes of intratunnel anchor fixation versus transtibial pull‐through repair for meniscus root tears with a minimum of 12‐month follow‐up. Methods Patients who underwent primary meniscus root repair between 2011 and 2024 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria consisted of primary medial or lateral meniscus root repair using either intratunnel anchor fixation or transtibial pull‐through repair, availability of preoperative radiographs, and completion of postoperative patient‐reported outcome measures with a minimum of 12‐month follow‐up. The groups were propensity‐matched by age, sex, body mass index, operative side, root laterality, and concomitant procedures. Baseline radiographic characteristics (hip‐knee‐ankle angle and posterior tibial slope) were measured. Outcomes included Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner activity score (preoperative and postoperative), Visual Analog Scale for pain at rest and with activity, satisfaction, subjective surgical outcome, and reoperations. Results Fifty patients who underwent intratunnel anchor fixation (mean age, 44 years) were propensity‐matched to 100 patients who underwent transtibial pull‐through repair (mean age, 41 years). Mean follow‐up was 1.5 years (range, 1.0‐2.3) in the intratunnel anchor group and 6.1 years (range, 2.7‐13.7) in the transtibial pull‐through group. Reoperation rates were 8% and 14%, respectively ( P = .43), with repair failure occurring in 4% and 6% ( P > .99). Preoperative and postoperative Tegner scores were similar between groups. Tegner minimal clinical important difference was 0.8, and 26.5% of intratunnel anchor patients achieved this compared with 0% of transtibial pull‐through patients. Patients in the intratunnel anchor cohort reported slightly lower Visual Analog Scale pain with activity (1.8 vs 2.5, P = .02). Postoperative Lysholm (87 vs 83, P = .05) and International Knee Documentation Committee scores (79 vs 76, P = .09) were comparable between groups. A greater proportion of intratunnel anchor patients achieved Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State compared with transtibial pull‐through patients for Visual Analog Scale with activity (74% vs 56%, P = .03) and Lysholm (66% vs 47%, P = .01). Most patients in both cohorts rated their outcome as “much better” or “slightly better” ( P = .49), and satisfaction scores were high. Conclusions At short‐term follow‐up, both the intratunnel anchor and transtibial pull‐through techniques showed high patient satisfaction and comparable overall clinical outcomes. There were no differences in reoperation rates between techniques. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Importance Lichen planus is a chronic, highly pruritic, inflammatory disease that affects the skin and other tissues. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib, 1.5%, cream in patients with cutaneous lichen planus. Design, Setting, and Participants This phase 2, 16-week, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial with a 16-week open-label extension was conducted from November 2022 to February 2024. Patients were enrolled from 19 sites in the US and Canada. The trial included adults with predominantly cutaneous lichen planus, an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3 or 4, an Itch Numerical Rating Scale score of 4 or greater, and an affected body surface area of 20% or less were enrolled. Data were analyzed from February to August 2024. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to ruxolitinib, 1.5%, twice daily cream or vehicle cream for 16 weeks, after which eligible patients applied ruxolitinib cream twice daily as needed in a 16-week, open-label extension. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was IGA treatment success (IGA score of 0 or 1 [clear/almost clear skin] with a ≥2-grade improvement from baseline) at week 16. Results Among 64 randomized patients, 46 (72%) were female, 18 (28%) were male, 18 (28%) were African American/Black, 4 (6%) were Asian, 40 (63%) were White, and the median (range) age was 57.0 (18-78) years. Significantly more patients who applied ruxolitinib, 1.5%, cream vs vehicle achieved IGA treatment success (50.0% [95% CI, 31.9%-68.1%] vs 21.9% [95% CI, 9.3%-40.0%], respectively; response rate difference, 29.4% [95% CI, 7.6%-51.3%]; P = .01; primary end point) at week 16, with further improvement to week 32. Similar results were observed in the proportion of patients who achieved a 4 or greater–point improvement from baseline in Itch Numerical Rating Scale score (week 16, 48.4% [95% CI, 30.2%-66.9%] vs 16.1% [95% CI, 5.5%-33.7%]; response rate difference, 33.5%; 95% CI, 12.2%-54.9%; P = .004; secondary end point). No serious treatment-emergent adverse events or discontinuations due to an adverse event were observed with ruxolitinib cream. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this randomized clinical trial suggest that ruxolitinib cream significantly reduced lesions and itch in patients with lichen planus. Therefore, ruxolitinib cream represents a potential treatment option for patients with cutaneous lichen planus. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05593432

Purpose To identify risk factors for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT) and arthroplasty‐free survival in postmenopausal women, while secondary objectives included analyzing menopause‐specific factors associated with MMPRT and defining risk factors for conversion to arthroplasty in patients with a confirmed MMPRT. Methods All patients at our institution with a diagnosed meniscal tear through December 2024 were identified. From this cohort, women with a menopausal diagnosis preceding their meniscal tear were matched one‐to‐one with men by age and body mass index. Imaging studies were reviewed to identify MMPRTs. Subsequent arthroplasty, Charlson Comorbidity Index, menopausal type (surgical or physiologic), hormone replacement therapy, bisphosphonate usage, and bone mineral density were recorded. Logistic and Cox regression were used to define risk factors for MMPRT and arthroplasty; survivorship was determined using Kaplan‐Meier analyses. Results The final cohort consisted of 1564 patients (n = 782 women) with a median age of 63 years, of which 244 patients (15.6%) had MMPRT. Age and female sex were associated with MMPRT. The presence of an MMPRT, female sex, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were associated with arthroplasty. Among postmenopausal women, age at menopause, surgical menopause, hormone replacement therapy, and bone mineral density were associated with MMPRT. For patients with MMPRT, female sex was associated with arthroplasty. Ten‐year survivorship‐free from arthroplasty in patients with MMPRT was 53.5% for women and 78.4% for men ( P = .02). Conclusions Postmenopausal status, age, and hormone replacement therapy usage are risk factors for MMPRT. Compared with men, postmenopausal women with MMPRT exhibit reduced arthroplasty‐free survival, underscoring the need for targeted interventions. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Diffuse B-cell lymphomas are the most prevalent canine hematologic malignancies, and their clinical presentation resembles that of human B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). However, a lack of a clear subtyping framework perpetuates imprecise treatment approaches that fail to address mechanisms of therapy resistance. Here, we employed deep phenotyping via serial sampling and longitudinal transcriptomics to evaluate intratumoral composition and therapy response in a 6-year-old neutered male goldendoodle with stage 5A marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Following sequential treatment consisting of a single IV dose of oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virotherapy (VSV) and standard CHOP chemotherapy 30 days later, we performed scRNAseq on seven serial lymph node biopsies and spatial sequencing on a resection taken 10 days post-VSV treatment. B cells (>90%) comprised three transcriptionally distinct and temporally stable subpopulations, with specific copy number profiles and robust spatial organization despite disrupted lymph node architecture. Analysis across subpopulations revealed downregulation of the quiescence program including KLF2, suggesting similarity to KLF2-deficient human MZL. While VSV successfully reached target B cells, downstream transcriptional responses were predominantly localized to the T-cell compartment. T cells (≤6%) showed increased proliferation and upregulation of cytotoxicity markers post-VSV administration, enriching for leukocyte-mediated cytotoxicity pathways consistent with an anti-viral immune response. Ultimately, these results provide an in vivo proof-of-concept for the treatment paradigm in canine lymphoma, while emphasizing the need for improved subtyping frameworks and multidimensional treatment strategies targeting intratumoral heterogeneity.

Objective To assess the effect of Moses™ 2.0 (Lumenis Be Ltd., Yokneam Illit, Israel; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) for lithotripsy of renal stones of 8–20 mm in diameter on operative time, surgeon workload, and retropulsion. Subjects/Patients and Methods In our multicentre, randomised, double‐blind clinical trial, patients were randomised 1:1 to standard or Moses 2.0 laser lithotripsy and stratified by stone size. Patients and surgeons were blinded to laser modality. Primary outcomes were total operative time as well as surgeon workload assessed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration‐Task Load Index (NASA‐TLX). Secondary outcomes were stone retropulsion evaluated by blinded video review and postoperative clinical outcomes. Linear regression modelling was used for analysis. Results A total of 153 patients (79 Standard, 74 Moses 2.0) with similar clinical, stone, and operative characteristics were evaluated. There was no significant difference in operative times between the Standard and Moses 2.0 groups ( P = 0.73). Moses 2.0 was associated with lower effort, frustration, mental, physical, and temporal workload, as well as higher rated overall performance compared to the standard laser. Video review demonstrated no difference in rates of retropulsion ( P = 0.13). Complication rates (Standard: 13%; Moses 2.0: 10%) and stone‐free rates (Standard: 51%; Moses: 2.0 55%) were comparable. Conclusion Our study evaluated the impact of Moses 2.0 technology on high‐powered renal stone dusting, constituting the largest double‐blind trial of its kind to date. There was insufficient evidence to suggest any difference in operative times or clinical outcomes when using Moses 2.0 compared to standard laser lithotripsy. Moses 2.0 was associated with reduced surgeon workload, which has implicit impact on surgeon wellness.

Purpose To assess the reliability, predictability, and discriminative capacity of 3 anatomic measurements, tibial tubercle‐trochlear groove (TT‐TG), tibial tubercle‐posterior cruciate ligament, and patellar tendon‐lateral trochlear ridge (PT‐LTR), where PT‐LTR may offer a complementary approach to assessing recurrent patellofemoral instability (PFI) risk. Methods Patients diagnosed with PFI before primary patellofemoral stabilization surgery at a single institution between 2022 and 2024 were included. A control group without PFI was propensity matched 1:1 for age, sex, and laterality. Magnetic resonance images were evaluated to measure TT‐TG, tibial tubercle‐posterior cruciate ligament, and PT‐LTR. A priori power analysis determined the cohort size. Statistical analyses compared differences between the PFI and control groups with Student t‐tests, receiver operating characteristic analyses, and area under the curve with resultant sensitivity, specificity, and an optimal cutoff. Results Patients included 50 knees with PFI (28 women, 22 men; mean age 18 ± 5 years). The control group included 50 knees (27 women, 23 men; mean age 18 ± 4 years). Excellent inter‐ and intra‐rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.7) was shown for TT‐TG and PT‐LTR in the PFI and control groups. The distances for TT‐TG, tibial tubercle‐posterior cruciate ligament, and PT‐LTR were significant predictors ( P ≤ .025) of PFI. The average PT‐LTR distance difference for the PFI and control groups was 7.0 mm ( P < .001). PT‐LTR showed an area under the curve of 0.80 and, when ≥4.6 mm, was 66% sensitive and 92% specific for PFI. Conclusions The PT‐LTR distance is a reliable and discriminative metric for identifying PFI in both pediatric and adult populations. A PT‐LTR cutoff value of 4.6 mm showed diagnostic discrimination and substantially high specificity for recurrent PFI, indicating strong ability to identify patients with instability. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective case control study.

Abstract Meniscus surgery remains one of the most common orthopedic procedures worldwide. Successful meniscus repair requires A natomic reduction, B iologic preparation and augmentation, C ircumferential compression (ABCs), and an optimized rehabilitation protocol. Rehabilitation after surgery is critical for optimizing outcomes, yet the ideal approach remains controversial. A recent international European Union‐United States consensus task force developed recommendations for rehabilitation meniscal surgery. The group concluded that rehabilitation after meniscal repair and reconstruction should progress according to both time‐ and criterion‐based milestones. In practice, 2 rehabilitation pathways are utilized after meniscal repair: a standard protocol for biomechanically stable repairs that tolerate some weight‐bearing in full extension and a complex protocol for repairs requiring greater protection. Standard meniscal repairs (i.e., vertical longitudinal) are biomechanically stable and treated with moderate protection. During the first 4 weeks, patients are restricted to 0° to 90° of knee range of motion, partial weight‐bearing with crutches, and full knee extension during ambulation. Between weeks 4 and 8, patients progress to weight‐bearing as tolerated while avoiding loaded knee flexion beyond 90° until week 16, with emphasis on gait normalization and strengthening. From weeks 8 to 16, aerobic conditioning and strengthening continue. Pending surgeon clearance, return to running begins at week 12, plyometric exercises at week 14, and return to sport at 4 to 8 months. Complex meniscal repairs (e.g., radial or root tears) require a protective rehabilitation approach. During weeks 0 to 6, range of motion is restricted to 0° to 90° with toe‐touch weight‐bearing and full knee extension during ambulation. Range of motion and weight‐bearing progress from weeks 6 to 12, while loaded flexion beyond 90° remains restricted until week 16. Between weeks 12 and 18, aerobic conditioning and strengthening continue. Pending surgeon clearance, running begins at week 14, plyometrics at week 16, and return to sport typically occurs at 6 to 9 months.

Abstract Medial meniscus posterior root repair improves symptoms and function, but repair alone does not normalize gait. In the referenced study, patients who underwent repair achieved an acceptable symptom state more often than those with an unrepaired tear (71.4%‐81.0% vs 10.5%‐26.3%). Gait mechanics moved toward normal but did not reach it: compared with controls, the tear group differed significantly in midstance knee extension and terminal‐stance knee adduction moment, with the repair group falling at an intermediate level. Varus thrust and reduced internal rotation persisted in both groups despite only modest differences in static mechanical alignment. This underscores that dynamic gait assessment, not a static radiograph, is beneficial to fully assess the effect of root repair. Restoration of full extension and objectively confirmed quadriceps recovery may be essential to closing this gap and to long‐term chondroprotection. This raises a rehabilitation paradox: prolonged protection safeguards healing but may potentiate quadriceps inhibition and persistent gait dysfunction. Earlier controlled weightbearing, potentially supported by meniscal centralization with multiple fixation points, warrants a prospective study. Root preservation should extend beyond fixation alone to include gait restoration, extrusion control, and long‐term joint protection.

Purpose To evaluate implantation rates, time to implantation, and predictors of implantation following matrix‐induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) biopsy for knee chondral defects. Methods Patients undergoing MACI biopsy or implantation for symptomatic knee chondral defects from 2017 to 2024 at a single institution were reviewed. At a minimum 1‐year follow‐up, the decision to proceed with implantation, recurrent symptoms, complications, and reoperations were assessed. Kaplan‐Meier analysis estimated time to implantation, and multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of MACI implantation. Results A total of 208 knees in 202 patients (mean age 28.0 ± 10.9 years, range 11‐59) underwent MACI biopsy for 243 chondral defects (patella [38%], femoral condyle [34%], and trochlea [26%]). At a mean follow‐up of 4.3 years (range 1.0‐8.3), 64 knees (31%) proceeded to second‐stage MACI implantation. Among 144 knees not implanted, 87 (60%) reported symptom improvement, and 26 (18%) had persistent symptoms. The remaining 22% did not undergo implantation due to another cartilage procedure, insurance denial, or pending scheduling. Patients who underwent biopsy at the home institution had a shorter time from biopsy to implantation compared with those biopsied at outside institutions (6.1 vs 13.1 months, P = .001). Median time to implantation was 9.4 months (95% confidence level: 7.2‐12.2) for home biopsies. Lower body mass index was associated with progression to implantation after adjusting for covariates (odds ratios 0.92, P = .019). Patients implanted within 4 months had larger chondral defects (4.0 vs 3.0 cm 2 , P = .045). At a mean 4.1‐year follow‐up, 6 patients (8%) experienced postoperative complications, including 3 (4%) who required revision chondroplasty. Conclusions MACI biopsy for knee chondral defects resulted in approximately one‐third of patients proceeding to MACI implantation, at a median of 9.4 months after biopsy. Lower body mass index was associated with higher likelihood of progression to implantation, larger chondral defects with earlier implantation, and among patients who did not proceed to implantation, approximately 60% reported symptom improvement following concomitant chondroplasty at the time of biopsy. Level of Evidence Level IV, retrospective case series.