Citations

Abstract Background Plasma biomarkers offer improved accessibility compared to established diagnostic modalities for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, current plasma biomarker candidates have not been tested comprehensively in diverse populations, and represent only a fraction of pathways dysregulated in AD. This study seeks to address these knowledge gaps through untargeted plasma biomarker discovery in African Americans (AA), an underrepresented group in AD research despite having a higher risk of developing dementia compared to non‐Hispanic Whites (NHW). Method Untargeted proteomics were generated using the SomaScan 7k platform on plasma samples from AA study participants clinically diagnosed as AD dementia ( n = 181) or cognitively unimpaired (CU; n = 142). Machine learning was implemented to identify a set of plasma proteins to distinguish between AD dementia and CU. Predictive models were constructed by elastic net regression optimized with nested cross‐validation on 6,853 proteins and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The generalizability of plasma protein predictors was evaluated in an external Alzheimer's Disease Research Center cohort of 369 NHW and AA study participants diagnosed as AD dementia or CU. Result Thirty‐six proteins were selected as predictors. Proteins selected by machine learning were enriched for processes previously associated with AD including synaptic dysfunction, inflammation, vascular dysfunction, and amyloid processing. The 36 plasma proteins alone achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 to classify AD dementia in the discovery cohort, representing a 22% improvement over a model including age and sex. The 36 proteins were validated in an external cohort also achieving AUC=0.94, a 35% improvement over age and sex. Conclusion Biomarker discovery combining untargeted proteomics and machine learning identified a set of plasma proteins that could serve as a novel and highly accurate diagnostic plasma biomarker panel for AD. Work is underway to assess the association of the predictive panel with p ‐tau217, medical comorbidities, and social/structural determinants of health.

Abstract Background Standardizing beam modeling in the treatment planning system is challenging due to machine‐specific configuration variations. Because of the proton therapy system (PTS) complexity and continuous development, there is no vendor's representative (“golden”) beam data like in LINACs at this stage. Purpose The primary goal of this study is to create a PTS‐specific repository of source model parameters and beam commissioning data for scanning proton therapy treatment planning systems and establish a set of reference values with associated bands of variations for this data. Methods We conducted a survey of 31 PTSs at 27 proton therapy centers to gather beam commissioning source model parameters used in their treatment planning system, ensuring a diverse selection of PTSs from major vendors: Hitachi, IBA, Varian, and Mevion. For each proton therapy center, we collected (i) beam meterset calibration in protons per MU, (ii) in‐air spot size at isocenter in terms of standard deviation in x‐ (crossline, σ x ) and y‐ (inline, σ y ) directions, (iii) in‐air angular spread at isocenter in x‐direction (θ x ) and y‐direction (θ y ) and (iv) distal falloff. For each PTS, we plotted each parameter as a function of nominal energy and performed polynomial regression analysis with optimal model selection based on Akaike Information Criterion. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to quantify inter‐PTS variability and generated uncertainty bands representing standard deviations across PTSs for each parameter. Additionally, we computed percentage deviations of each individual PTS from the overall multi‐vendor mean to identify systematic vendor‐specific patterns and outliers across the 31 total PTSs analyzed. Results Multi‐vendor beam parameter analysis across 31 PTSs revealed systematic vendor‐specific patterns in inter‐PTS consistency and energy dependencies. Beam meterset calibration demonstrated excellent inter‐PTS consistency across most vendors (ICC: Varian ProBeam ≈ 0, IBA Proteus ONE = 0.006, Mevion S250i with HYPERSCAN = 0.015), with IBA Proteus PLUS systems showing moderate variation (ICC = 0.156 for the dedicated nozzle, ICC = 0.248, for the universal nozzle). Spot size and angular spread variability were highly vendor‐dependent, ranging from excellent consistency in IBA Proteus ONE to substantial variation in IBA Proteus PLUS with the universal nozzle (angular spread ICC = 0.566). Distal falloff maintained excellent consistency across all vendors (ICC < 0.023), indicating reliable energy spread characteristics. Uncertainty band analysis revealed characteristic energy‐dependent patterns, with most systems showing larger uncertainties at lower energies for spot size and angular spread, while IBA Proteus PLUS with the universal nozzle exhibited the largest uncertainty bands overall. Percentage deviation analysis demonstrated vendor‐specific clustering patterns, with some systems showing systematic positive or negative deviations from the multi‐vendor mean. Conclusions The reference data provided in this work will help to cross‐check the beam model during treatment planning system commissioning. Furthermore, this information is useful for Monte Carlo applications and research, where beam characteristics are required to set up phase space parameters, thereby avoiding the need to model the entire PTS. Finally, the results of this study will have indispensable educational value by providing valuable insights into the characteristics and capabilities of different PTSs.

Abstract Introduction Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation is a common and effective surgical treatment for erectile dysfunction. However, the presence of comorbidities and the use of anti-thrombotic therapy (AT) can complicate surgical decision-making. Due to the correlation between erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease, the preoperative comorbidities of surgical patients are important to examine. Objective The goal of this study was to assess the outcomes of IPP implantation in men on active AT therapy compared to a non-AT therapy cohort. Methods A retrospective analysis from 2015 to 2023 was conducted using data from three high-volume implant centers. The study focused on men who underwent three-piece IPP placement. Demographics, comorbidities, secondary procedures, drain information, and complications were recorded. The three centers each have different techniques and approaches to the surgery. Center 1 utilizes a penoscrotal approach, never places a drain, and places the reservoir in an ectopic location. Center 2 utilizes an infra-pubic approach, places a drain which remains in place for 3 days, and utilizes various reservoir locations depending on patient profile. Lastly, center 3 utilizes a penoscrotal approach, places a drain with removal when output is less than 50 mL over 8 hours, and places the reservoir in an ectopic location. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariate and univariate analysis. Results A total of 210 patients on active AT therapy and 128 non-AT patients were included. The AT and non-AT groups showed significant differences in baseline comorbidities, with the AT group exhibiting higher rates of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and thrombosis (p&lt;0.05). Among patients on anti-thrombotic therapy, 27.6% required revision surgeries and had increased rates of ectopic reservoir placement compared to the non-AT group (p&lt;0.001). Despite these differences, there were no statistically significant variations in overall complication rates between the two groups. Drain output was notably higher in the AT cohort on postoperative days 1 (mean 110.5 cc vs 60 cc, p&lt;0.001) and 2 (mean 78 cc vs 20 cc, p&lt;0.001); however, hematoma rates remained comparable between both groups (p=0.667). Importantly, neither the type of anti-thrombotic therapy nor the surgical approach used appeared to influence postoperative outcomes. Eleven patients (5.2%) experienced complications in the AT arm and 5 patients (3.9%) experienced complications in the non-AT arm (p=0.793). Conclusions IPP implantation is feasible and safe in men on active anti-thrombotic therapy when performed in high-volume centers with appropriate perioperative management. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are needed to refine protocols and determine long-term outcomes for these high-risk patients. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction: cBTKi have made a substantial impact in pts w/ MCL, but pts who develop PD while on treatment w/ cBTKi have historically had poor responses to subsequent lines of therapy (LOT). Brexucel, lisocel, and the non-covalent BTKi pirto have been approved in this population. While two RW studies have substantiated the benefit of brexucel, similar data for pirto are lacking. Accordingly, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of pts treated w/ pirto in the RW setting. Methods: We performed a multi-center retrospective cohort study of adult pts w/ a diagnosis of MCL who experienced PD after any approved cBTKi and subsequently received pirto. Pts who received pirto w/ bridging intent and those who switched to pirto due to intolerance of cBTKi were excluded. The 95% exact binomial confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were defined as the time from pirto start to PD or death, whichever occurred first, and the time from pirto start to death, respectively, and calculated w/ the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves. A multivariate (MV) Cox proportional hazard model was built to calculate adjusted hazard ratio (aHR). Analyses were performed w/ SAS, version 9.4. Results: Data on 111 pts w/ MCL treated across 21 institutions were collected. Median (mdn) age was 72 (range 33 – 93) years. Twenty-seven pts (24%) were female, 3 (3%) were Asian, 5 (5%) Black, 9 (8%) Hispanic, 86 (77%) White. Among the 53 (48%) pts w/ available MIPI-c at diagnosis, 28 (53%) pts were high-risk. Ki67 at diagnosis was available in 84 (76%) pts: of those, 58 (69%) had a Ki67 ≥30%, and 41 (49%) ≥50%. TP53 mutational status was available in 70 (63%) pts: 33 (47%) had documented TP53 mutation and 10/52 (19%) pts had a disease w/ complex karyotype. Pts had a mdn of 3 (range 1 – 9) prior LOT (n=106). Ninety-one pts (86%) received chemo-immunotherapy (CIT), 16 (15%) autologous stem cell transplant, 19 (18%) venetoclax (ven), 29 (27%) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell, 4 (4%) allogeneic stem cell transplant. For cBTKi, 39 (35%) pts received ibrutinib, 56 (50%) pts acalabrutinib, 33 (30%) pts zanubrutinib, and 17 (15%) pts received more than one cBTKi. The mdn time from the last dose of cBTKi to pirto start was 55 (range 0 – 2587) days, w/ 51 (46%) pts who switched from a cBTKi directly to pirto. Thirty (27%) pts had no response (stable disease or PD as best response) to cBTKi, and 40 (36%) pts had no response to the last LOT. Two (2%) pts received pirto in combination w/ CIT, 8 (7%) w/ an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb), 11 (10%) w/ ven ± a mAb, while 86 (77%) pts as single agent. In 104 (94%) pts, pirto was given at full dose, 10 (9%) pts had a subsequent dose reduction. A total of 35 serious (grade ≥3) adverse events (AE) were documented in 27 (24%) pts: 4 (4%) pts had a serious bleeding AE, 5 (5%) pts a serious cardiac AE, 10 (9%) a serious GI AE, and 16 (14%) a serious infectious AE. Ninety-eight (88%) pts were evaluable for response. The ORR was 40% (95% CI 30% – 50%) w/ a CRR of 29% (95% CI 20%– 39%). At the last follow-up, 29 (26%) pts remained on pirto w/ a mdn treatment duration of 15.1 months (range 0.4 – 26). Fifty-eight (52%) pts died, 35 (78%) because of PD. At a mdn follow-up of 15.8 (range 0.4 – 26) months among survivors, the mdn PFS was 4.7 months (95% CI 3.3 – 8.2) and the mdn OS was 13 months (95% CI 9.2 – not available). Using the log-rank test, age (quartile groups), number of LOT (1-2 vs. 3-4 vs. 5+), time from cBTKi to pirto (quartile groups), Ki67≥30%, and high MIPI-C did not result in a statistically significant difference in PFS (p&gt;0.05). Presence of TP53 mutation was associated w/ a non-statistically significant adverse trend in PFS (p=0.0585). No response to cBTKi and Ki67≥50% were associated w/ a statistically significant inferior PFS in log-rank test (p=&lt;0.05), which persisted in a MV Cox regression model (aHR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.2, and aHR 2.6, 95% CI 1.6-4.4, respectively). Conclusions: This is the first RW report on pirto in MCL pts. In this high-risk population, ORR to pirto was comparable to the BRUIN trial, while PFS was significantly worse, especially in pts w/ no response to cBTKi and w/ a high Ki67. However, prolonged remissions were seen in a subset of pts, suggesting that a better characterization of this population w/ durable benefit from pirto is needed.

Background: Piperacillin-Tazobactam (PTZ) is often used to treat community-acquired intra-abdominal infections (CA-IAIs) despite common causative pathogens being susceptible to more narrow-spectrum agents. However, susceptibility to PTZ among these predominant pathogens has been declining. Antibiotic de-escalation to non-antipseudomonal beta-lactams whenever possible is an important strategy to prevent the development of resistance to PTZ. Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess PTZ length of therapy in patients with CA-IAI, by comparing patients who received a pharmacist-led intervention involving the de-escalation of PTZ to narrow-spectrum regimens with those who did not receive the intervention. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted among patients >18 years old and admitted with CA-IAI empirically placed on PTZ between January 1, 2022, through June 30, 2022 (pre-intervention group), and January 1, 2024, through June 30, 2024 (post-intervention group). A total of 246 patients were included in the pre-intervention group and 129 patients in the post-intervention group. The utilization of PTZ, hospital length of stay (LOS), and treatment-associated complications were assessed using linear and logistic regression model, respectively. Results: Compared with patients in the pre-intervention group, those in the post-intervention group had a mean 1.2-day reduction in PTZ length of therapy (2.3 vs 1.2 days, P < 0.001). There was no difference in LOS, (β = 0.001, 98% confidence interval [CI] −1.29 to 1.29; P = 0.477), hospital readmission within 30 days due to IAI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.85, 98% CI = 0.51 to 1.44; P = 0.56), treatment-associated complications during current hospitalization (OR = 0.77, 98% CI = 0.45 to 1.32; P = 0.35), development of Clostridium difficile -associated diarrhea (OR = 3.29, 98% CI = 0.77 to 22.4; P = 0.14), or medication toxicity (OR = 2.07, 98% CI = 0.79 to 6.08; P = 0.15). Conclusion and relevance: The use of narrow-spectrum antibiotics for the empiric treatment of CA-IAI-reduced PTZ length of therapy and did not result in adverse clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE Hundreds of thousands of Americans undergo decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis annually. The mild (minimally invasive lumbar decompression) procedure was developed as a potentially less invasive alternative to open decompression; however, much of the evidence has been gathered from industry-sponsored studies. The present study sought to compare real-world clinical outcomes between the mild procedure and open decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS All patients who underwent the mild procedure at a single-institution, multisite, tertiary care center from 2005 to October 2024 were included. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to identify patients who underwent open decompression at the same institution, with age, sex, smoking, and comorbidities as covariates. Primary outcomes were change in pain on the numeric rating scale (NRS), surgical reoperation, and perioperative complications. For pain, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as a 30% improvement in NRS score. RESULTS A total of 175 patients who underwent the mild procedure (mean age 76.3 ± 8.7 years; 44.6% female) were matched to 175 patients treated with open decompression (mean age 75.4 ± 8.7 years; 44.0% female). Among patients with at least 60 days of follow-up, those treated with open decompression were more likely to achieve the MCID for pain (43.1% vs 22.2%, p < 0.001). Patients treated with mild were more likely to require reoperation (46.2% vs 29.3%, p = 0.008). Those who underwent the mild procedure experienced lower rates of durotomies (0% vs 2.9%, p = 0.024) but had higher rates of neurological deficits (6.3% vs 0.6%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS For patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis, those who underwent open decompression were more likely to achieve pain improvement and less likely to require reoperation compared with those who underwent the mild procedure.

Background/Objectives: Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have demonstrated a reduction in heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in HF patients and decreased recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF), including in those who have undergone catheter ablation (CA). The effects of SGLT2i are likely due to suppression of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, reduction in oxidative stress with subsequent improvement in myocardial efficiency, and attenuation of cardiac remodeling. We aim to present the effects of SGLT2i on AF recurrence in patients who have undergone CA for AF. Methods: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies evaluating the effect of SGLT2i on AF recurrence following CA compared with non-SGLT2i. The primary outcome was the recurrence of AF by the final follow-up reported in each study. Secondary outcomes include AF recurrence by the first follow-up within 12 to 24 months and follow-up intervals (6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 to 42 months) post-ablation, multivariate risk of AF recurrence, and the effect on left atrial diameter (LAD) (less than 45 mm vs. greater than or equal to 45 mm). For risk of bias (ROB) analysis, the NIH ROB and Cochrane ROB2 tool were used. All statistical, heterogeneity, and sensitivity analyses were conducted using Cochrane Review Manager. A random-effect model was employed for all pooled statistical analyses. Results: A total of nine studies, two RCTs and seven retrospective studies, were included (N = 6874) for the primary outcome. Compared to non-SGLT2i (N = 3693), SGLT2i (N = 3181) significantly decreased AF recurrence by the final follow-up (OR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.45–0.85; p = 0.008). For secondary outcomes, SGLT2i significantly reduced AF recurrence by the first follow-up within 12 to 24 months post-ablation (OR = 0.58; p = 0.0001) and by the different follow-up periods, 6-month (OR = 0.53; p = 0.02), 12-month (OR = 0.56; p = 0.0001), 18-month (OR = 0.55; p = 0.01), and 24-month (OR = 0.60; p = 0.12) follow-up periods. On the other hand, by 36 to 42 months, SGLT2i was associated with increased risk of AF recurrence (OR = 1.41; p = 0.004). Conclusions: We conclude that SGLT2i demonstrated a reduction in AF recurrence following CA, particularly by 12 to 18 months post-ablation.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor with poor outcomes due to resistance to radiation and temozolomide (TMZ). Death receptor 5 (DR5), a proapoptotic receptor, induces tumor-selective apoptosis upon activation, is expressed in GBM, and can be upregulated by radiation/TMZ. Ozekibart (INBRX-109), a tetravalent DR5 agonist antibody, has demonstrated tolerability and clinical benefit as monotherapy in chondrosarcoma (PMID: 37265425), prompting a phase 2 trial (NCT04950075), and in combination with irinotecan and TMZ in Ewing’s sarcoma. INBRX-109 was evaluated in GBM using in vitro and in vivo models. DR5 expression in cell lines was determined by flow cytometry and drug sensitivity was measured using CellTiter-Glo®. Efficacy of INBRX-109 as a single agent and in treatment combinations was evaluated in intracranial U87-MG and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models with activity assessed by survival and tumor imaging. Pharmacodynamic activity was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for cleaved caspase-3 and PARP. TMZ upregulated DR5 and sensitized U87-MG cells to INBRX-109. GBM cell lines (n=33) exhibited variable sensitivity to INBRX-109 and TMZ as single agents, but a majority showed enhanced sensitivity to combination treatment. In the U87-MG model, combination therapy improved tumor control and survival versus TMZ alone (tumor volume fold increase over baseline 1.1 vs 7.4; median survival 44 vs 36d). IHC staining of tumors indicated INBRX-109 crosses the blood brain barrier and is pharmacologically active. In three PDX models, INBRX-109 improved survival as monotherapy (survival ratios 1.38, 1.47, 1.50). In two models, combination therapy improved survival vs TMZ (survival ratios 1.76 vs 0.93, 2.47 vs 1.94). In summary, TMZ upregulates DR5 and enhances INBRX-109 activity in intracranial GBM models. This combinatorial activity and potential for synergy with radiation/TMZ support clinical evaluation of INBRX-109 in GBM. Moreover, the established clinical safety and activity of INBRX-109 in solid tumors support its development in this indication.

Abstract Introduction: The disproportionate prostate cancer (CaP) burden, which includes high mortality rates, is significantly attributed to the characteristics of the social determinants of the health status of the Black Male population. Designing targeted interventions to address poor health outcomes through a collaborative population-based approach could reduce CaP health disparities. The Community Living Lab (CoLLab) Learning Health System was developed to address ethnically sensitive, targeted approaches that will eliminate CaP health disparities among Black Men. This study assessed demographic factors and Knowledge on prostate cancer screening attitudes and research participation among black men. Method: The collab project employed a social ecological model to design intervention to address barriers to CaP screening and participation in clinical trials. A validated, pretested questionnaire was used to collect information on demographics, CaP knowledge, attitudes, testing, and a history of participation in research and clinical trials. Baseline data were collected from 3 American Legion posts (ALPs). The association between variables was evaluated using the Chi-square test. Results: Participants between 60-69 years were 28.38%, and those aged 40-49 were 12.16%. Most are US-born Black (89.8%), with others identifying as African-born Black (6.76%) and Caribbean-born Black (1.35%). Approximately 43.24% were retired, and 36.49% were working full-time. CaP knowledge was high in 43.9%, moderate in 46.6%, and low in 9.5%. Only 45% of the participants have undergone Prostate-Specific Antigen test, and 24.6% have had a Digital Rectal Examination. Reported past clinical trials and research participation were very low (9.38%). Participants with higher knowledge levels had higher information scores (p &lt; .0001), favored various research settings (p = 0.0008), had favorable attitudes towards CaP testing (p &lt; .0001), and were more likely to participate in research (p = 0.0117). Work status was found to impact CaP Knowledge (p = 0.0117). Participants with stronger beliefs about prostate cancer may have different attitudes toward testing (p = 0.0444). Age did not impact attitudes toward CaP testing (p = 0.4298). Conclusion: The knowledge of CaP was found to impact the attitudes, testing, and disposition of the participants towards research. The baseline data generated from the clinical study will curate insightful evidence that will create innovative approaches to prostate cancer education among males in Black communities. Citation Format: Opeyemi O. Bolajoko, Quincy A. Wimberly, Daniel W. Lee, Collisa Mahin, Michelle Fudge, Shaina E. Flynn, Arnold J. Merriweather, Trevanne R. Matthews Hew, Monica L. Albertie, Dery Greene, Wayne Ford, Toshiko Moultrie, Floyd B. Willis, Folakemi T. Odedina. Influence of demographic factors and knowledge on prostate cancer screening attitude and research participation among Black men [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 18th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities; 2025 Sep 18-21; Baltimore, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2025;34(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C138.