Citations

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Women now comprise over half of US medical school matriculants yet remain underrepresented in academic leadership, including emergency medicine (EM). Leadership training within medical education is variable, particularly in communication, conflict management, negotiation, and operations. Concurrently, large language models (LLMs) are emerging as accessible tools to support leadership skill development. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an AI‐augmented leadership skills workshop designed to address the leadership gap for women in academic emergency medicine. Materials and Methods The Academy for Women in Academic Emergency Medicine (AWAEM) developed and piloted a leadership development workshop at the 2025 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting. The curriculum integrated evidence‐based leadership frameworks with experiential small‐group learning and structured demonstrations of LLM use. Educational strategies included brief didactics, reflection on lived leadership challenges, peer discussion, and guided LLM‐supported simulation of leadership conversations. Pre‐workshop and postworkshop surveys and qualitative feedback were collected to assess participant confidence and perceived utility. Results Participants demonstrated increased confidence in navigating power‐differential conversations and initiating negotiations following the workshop. There was greater reported intent to apply leadership frameworks and to utilize LLMs for leadership‐related tasks. Qualitative feedback highlighted themes of empowerment, practical applicability, and the importance of a psychologically safe, gender‐informed learning environment. Participants identified LLMs as a novel and accessible adjunct to traditional leadership development resources. Discussion and Conclusions An AI‐augmented, experiential leadership workshop is a feasible and scalable approach to addressing persistent leadership development gaps for women in academic emergency medicine. Integrating LLM‐supported practice with established leadership frameworks may enhance learner confidence and engagement. This model offers a practical strategy to support leadership skills for women physicians needed to navigate systemic barriers and advance into leadership roles.

ABSTRACT Autoantibody internalization has been implicated in autoimmune disease pathogenesis, yet its mechanisms, and generality across different diseases, cell types, and affected tissues remain poorly defined. Using bulk RNA sequencing, we identified reproducible, autoantibody-specific transcriptomic signatures consistent with autoantigen dysfunction in muscle biopsies from patients with anti-Mi2 dermatomyositis and anti-PM/Scl scleromyositis across independent cohorts. Electroporation of purified patient IgG into primary cultures of healthy cells was sufficient to induce the corresponding transcriptomic programs in vitro . Direct immunofluorescence demonstrated immunoglobulin internalization into subcellular compartments matching the localization of the autoantigen in different affected tissues. Spatial transcriptomic analyses revealed that antibody-secreting cells translocated cytoplasmic material (i.e., immunoglobulin RNA) into adjacent affected cells expressing autoantibody-specific transcripts. The disease-specific transcripts were present not only in muscle fibers, but also in other cells, including macrophages, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts. Autoantibody-induced transcriptomic programs were associated with cell damage and autoantibody-specific reactive inflammatory programs, including activation of type I interferon and TGF-ß1 signaling in anti-Mi2 dermatomyositis and activation of type II interferon in anti-PM/Scl scleromyositis. Antibody internalization was also observed in different tissues from patients with other autoimmune diseases, including anti-U1RNP mixed connective tissue disease, anti-Ku overlap syndrome, and anti-Scl70 systemic sclerosis. Together, these findings establish autoantibody internalization as a shared pathogenic mechanism across diverse autoimmune diseases, providing a unifying framework for conditions driven by autoantibodies against intracellular antigens.

Abstract Glioblastomas exhibit low immunogenicity and a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) mediated by both tumor cells and tumor associated microglia/macrophages (TAMs). However, biomarkers that allow for specific detection, monitoring and therapy response assessment of the TAM phenotype in glioblastoma are still lacking. To address this gap, we characterized the dynamics of TAM clusters in the TME of experimental SB28 glioblastoma using single-cell RNA sequencing, immunofluorescence, and molecular imaging and identified Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2 (TREM2) as a dynamic TAM-specific target. Consequently, we investigated a novel 64 Cu-labeled TREM2 radiotracer with a blood-brain barrier transport vehicle for translational mapping of TAMs in the TME of glioblastoma. We found strong and highly myeloid cell-specific PET signals that followed the trajectory of TREM2 gene expression from early- towards late-stage tumors. Transient myeloid cell depletion via CSF1R inhibition showed a reduction of TREM2 PET signals compared to placebo and prolonged survival in SB28 glioblastoma mice, while TREM2 stimulation led to increased TREM2 PET signals. Translation into a pilot cohort of patients with glioblastoma revealed strong TREM2 PET signals predominantly at lesion edges and high heterogeneity across individuals, matching with immunohistochemistry. In summary, TREM2 PET imaging has strong potential as an immune cell-specific biomarker for personalized assessment of the TAM phenotype in the TME of patients with glioblastoma.

Background and importance Renal colic pain is typically managed using intravenous opioids, but the intranasal route has emerged as a less invasive and time-efficient alternative. Intranasal ketamine has shown promise as a safe and effective analgesic for acute pain in emergency settings. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of intranasal ketamine versus intravenous opioids for renal colic pain management in the emergency department. Design, settings, and participants PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intranasal ketamine to intravenous morphine or intravenous fentanyl in patients with renal colic. Intervention or exposure Intranasal ketamine as the primary intervention; comparators were intravenous morphine or fentanyl. Outcomes, measure, and analysis The primary outcome was pain intensity at various time points, measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes: need for rescue analgesia, incidence of adverse events, nausea, and dizziness. Data were pooled using random-effects models to calculate mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratios for binary outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses were performed using R Software, version 4.2.3. Main results We included four RCTs, involving 454 patients, of whom 230 (50.6%) received intranasal ketamine. There were no significant differences between groups in pain scores at 5 min (mean difference: −0.41 VAS/NRS, 95% CI: −1.88 to 1.07, P = 0.59), 15 min (mean difference: −0.20 VAS/NRS, 95% CI: −0.86 to 0.46, P = 0.56), and 30 min (mean difference: 0.53 VAS/NRS, 95% CI: −0.08 to 1.13, P = 0.09). No significant differences were found between groups in the need for rescue analgesia or in the incidence of adverse events, nausea, or dizziness. Conclusion Intranasal ketamine demonstrated analgesic efficacy comparable to intravenous opioids at 5, 15, and 30 min, with no increase in adverse events or rescue analgesia requirements.

Background. Liver transplantation (LT) remains the most effective treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), offering 5-y recurrence rates as low as 15%. Recent advances in organ preservation, particularly hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE), have demonstrated the ability to attenuate ischemia–reperfusion injury (IRI). However, whether HOPE can reduce HCC recurrence rates by mitigating IRI remains an open question. In this study, we aimed to compare oncological outcomes after LT for HCC with and without the use of HOPE. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 137 patients who underwent LT for HCC with grafts from donation after brain death. Risk factors for HCC recurrence were analyzed using Cox regression. To assess the impact of HOPE on oncological outcomes, propensity score matching was used to adjust for baseline differences. Results. Cox regression identified Milan Criteria status as a significant predictor of HCC recurrence. Among the 32 patients in the HOPE group, no HCC recurrence was observed over a median follow-up of 2.11 y. In contrast, within the control group of 105 patients, 8 (7.6%) experienced recurrence within 2 y posttransplantation. Although this translated into a significant difference in time-to-recurrence after propensity score matching, recurrence-free survival and overall survival did not differ significantly. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that HOPE treatment of donation after brain death liver grafts may reduce early HCC recurrence after LT. Although only nonsignificant trends were observed in recurrence-free survival and overall survival within the first 2 y posttransplant, these results underscore the potential of HOPE to influence oncological outcomes. Long-term follow-up, prospective randomized controlled trials, and basic research are warranted to further elucidate the role of HOPE and IRI.

Abstract Background Several BsAbs with different treatment (Tx) approaches have been approved by the FDA for Tx of lymphoma, including: fixed-duration and less frequently dosed mosunetuzumab (mosun) and glofitamab (glofit) (Option 1 Tx approach); and treat to progression and more frequently dosed epcoritamab (epcor) (Option 2 Tx approach). Differences in Tx approaches have implications for time spent receiving care, known as “time toxicity”. We previously reported that mosun and glofit were associated with about 2 weeks lower time toxicity vs epcor over the first year in R/R FL and DLBCL, based on registrational trial protocols (Torka et al. Blood 2024; Ma et al. Value in Health 2025). In this study, we assessed time toxicity from the perspective of patients (pts) receiving BsAbs for R/R FL or DLBCL. Methods An online survey was conducted aiming for input from 120 pts with R/R FL or DLBCL, who have received BsAb for ≥1 month in the US. Time toxicity was measured by pts recalling time spent on healthcare contacts related to BsAb Tx, cancer management, and any other reasons in the past 30 days. Pts' preferences were assessed through direct elicitation of choice between 2 hypothetical Tx profiles with different Tx approaches and time toxicity, assuming the same efficacy and safety. The survey was pre-tested and refined based on input from 3 BsAb pts with R/R DLBCL to ensure relevance and comprehension. Descriptive analyses were performed on pts characteristics, mean and standard deviation (SD) of time spent per pt per month, and the proportion of pts preferring the convenience of different Tx profiles. Results At this interim analysis, 101 pts receiving BsAbs responded to the survey: 48 pts with R/R FL (mosun n=28; epcor n=20) and 53 pts with R/R DLBCL (glofit n=32; epcor n=21). Most pts with R/R FL lived in urban/suburban areas (87.5% vs 12.5% in rural areas) and had a shorter one-way travel time to receive care vs pts in rural areas (mean±SD: 28.2±13.5 vs 60.3±30.2 minutes). The median age was 58 years for both mosun and epcor. Mean±SD Tx duration was 6.2±1.8 months for mosun vs 4.5±1.3 months for epcor. In the past 30 days, pts on mosun had fewer BsAb Tx visits vs epcor (mean±SD: 1.0±0.2 vs 2.0±1.2), and fewer all-cause healthcare contacts vs epcor (mean±SD: 1.7±0.8 vs 3.5±2.0). The mean±SD time spent per BsAb Tx visit was 5.0±1.4 hours for mosun vs 3.8±1.8 hours for epcor. Less time was spent per pt per month on recovery at home after Tx visit for mosun vs epcor (22.7±16.5 vs 43.2±47.6 hours). Less time was spent per pt per month on Tx and cancer management for mosun vs epcor (mean±SD: 30.5±16.9 vs 56.9±59.3 hours). Most pts with R/R DLBCL lived in urban/suburban areas (88.7% vs 11.5% in rural areas) and had a shorter one-way travel time to receive care vs pts in rural areas (mean±SD: 31.4±14.1 vs 103.3±19.4 minutes). The median age was 67 years for glofit and 66 years for epcor. The mean±SD Tx duration was 6.1±2.0 months for glofit vs 5.9±1.8 months for epcor. In the last 30 days, pts on glofit had fewer BsAb Tx visits vs epcor (mean±SD: 1.1±0.2 vs 1.7±0.5), and fewer all-cause healthcare contacts vs epcor (mean±SD: 2.2±1.3 vs 3.0±1.1). Irrespective of the route of administration, the time spent per BsAb Tx visit was similar (mean±SD: 5.1±1.6 hours for mosun; 5.6±1.2 hours for epcor). Less time was spent per pt per month on recovery at home after Tx visit for glofit vs epcor (mean±SD: 34.3±23.8 vs 69.3±39.4 hours). Less time was spent per pt per month on Tx visits and cancer management for glofit vs epcor (mean±SD: 43.0±25.9 vs 85.0±44.2 hours). Regardless of which BsAb pts received, most pts (93%) preferred the convenience of Option 1 Tx approach with less time required over Option 2 Tx approach with more time required. Conclusions This is the first study to directly measure pt-reported time toxicity from pts with R/R FL and DLBCL receiving BsAbs in a real-world setting. Fixed-duration less frequently dosed mosun and glofit (Option 1 Tx approach) had less pt-reported time toxicity, with less healthcare contact and less time spent per pt per month vs treat to progression more frequently dosed epcor (Option 2 Tx approach). Over 90% of pts preferred the convenience of a fixed-duration, less frequently dosed, and less time required Tx option, suggesting that time toxicity is a significant factor in shared Tx decision-making for pts with R/R FL and DLBCL. Analysis is ongoing to comprehensively measure pt-reported time toxicity.

Abstract Background Teclistamab (Tec) and Talquetamab (Tal) are the two first FDA approved bispecific antibodies (BsAb) for the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Both Tec and Tal should be initiated with step-up dosing (SUD) in an inpatient (IP) setting to mitigate the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), per US label. However, standard of care practice continues to evolve and more pts receive SUD as an outpatient (OP) to reduce healthcare resource utilization and improve pt convenience. While most real-world evidence has focused on clinical and safety outcomes of pts treated with Tec and Tal, pt experience associated with these novel BsAb therapies is relatively unexplored. Methods HealthTree Foundation, a multiple myeloma pt advocacy group which provides enrolled pts with information on treatments, community groups, and research participation, surveyed RRMM patients who have received Tec or Tal. Eligible pts who completed the treatment experience survey had at least 4 months of follow-up after starting BsAb. The survey was fielded from May 2024 through June 2025. Data collection followed IRB-exempt protocols with informed consent. Results A total of 32 patients (24 Tec, 8 Tal) completed the survey. The median age was 70 years, 50% were male, and 84% were white. Most pts (n=24; 75%) received SUD at their primary oncology clinic (n=19, 59% at an academic center; n=5, 16% at local community center), and 8 (25%) at an academic center which was not their primary oncology clinic. All pts who received SUD at an academic center that was not their primary oncology clinic later transitioned to their local community clinic post-SUD and reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their transition of care experience. Overall, most pts (n= 21; 66%) received their entire step-up dosing during a single hospitalization, while some (n=6; 19%) received all doses of the SUD during separate hospitalizations for each dose. About 13% (n=4) received all SUD in an OP setting, and 3% (n=1) received SUD in a hybrid setting (mix of IP and OP). Although 85% (n=27) of the pts received IP SUD, 66% (n=21) would have preferred IP SUD in one hospitalization, while the remaining 34% (n=11) would have preferred OP or hybrid SUD. Among pts who received IP SUD (n=27), almost a quarter reported a preference for either OP (n=4; 15%) or hybrid SUD (n=2; 7%) and 78% (n=21) preferred one IP hospitalization for SUD. The factors influencing their preference for the setting of SUD in this IP sub-group were feeling more secure with IP monitoring (78%), convenience (26%), less worry about staying near healthcare centers (15%), being able to stay with their local physician (11%), staying closer to home (7%), and lower costs to the pt (4%). Among pts receiving OP SUD (n=4), 75% (n=3) preferred fully OP SUD and 25% (n=1) preferred hybrid SUD because of convenience (n=2; 50%), lower cost to pt (n=1; 25%), flexible dosing schedule (n=1; 25%), and feeling of security with IP monitoring (n=1; 25%). All the pts receiving hybrid SUD (n=1) preferred fully OP SUD due to convenience. Although Tec and Tal are subcutaneous (SC) injections, when patients were asked to compare the options of BsAbs with comparable efficacy and safety profile, they favored SC injection (n= 22; 69%) over intravenous infusion (n = 3; 9%), while 22% (n=7) had no preference for mode of drug administration. The challenges that impacted pt experience with Tec or Tal were treatment side effects (Tal pts: n=6, 75%; Tec pts: n=9, 38%) and distance or travel time to the treatment facility (Tal pts: n=2, 25%; Tec pts: n=4; 17%). Other reasons included caring for others, continuing to work, cost and insurance, lack of caregiver/care partner, being away from home, unavailability of the therapy in community setting near home, and eligibility criteria. Conclusions Most pts in this study received SUD at their primary oncology clinic. While most pts received IP SUD and preferred a single planned IP visit, one third preferred OP or hybrid SUD due to convenience. As the field moves toward OP-only SUD, this study underscores the need to consider pt preferences. There is an unmet need for community clinics providing SUD options closer to pt homes.

Abstract Introduction: Somatic mutations in UBA1, encoding an E1 ubiquitin activating enzyme, have recently been linked to an adult-onset, severe inflammation syndrome called VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1-enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic). VEXAS is characterized by systemic inflammation and hematologic abnormalities. While the majority of identified mutations in UBA1 are located in exonic regions, the role of non-coding and intronic mutations in the pathogenesis of VEXAS remains largely unexplored. In this study, we investigated the potential contribution of intronic mutations to VEXAS pathogenesis. Methods: To investigate mutations affecting UBA1 outside the region typically covered in targeted panels (exon 3), whole exome (WES) and genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on peripheral blood of patients with VEXAS-associated clinical presentation previously negative for UBA1 mutations per clinical testing. 265 patients were profiled by WES (~100X) and 36 patients were profiled by WGS (~55X). Clinical history was reviewed for these patients for VEXAS-associated presentation including a combination of hematologic and rheumatologic disease in adults. Participants with known pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in UBA1 or other genetic causes of systemic autoinflammatory disease were excluded. UBA1 transcript and protein expression were assessed by PCR and western blot, respectively, in one case where peripheral blood mononuclear cells were available. Results: We identified 7 patients with VEXAS-like presentation with intronic single nucleotide variants or deletions. Five patients had a recurrent point mutation (median VAF: 0.78; range: 0.38-0.97). 5 patients had been diagnosed with MDS, and bone marrow biopsy revealed vacuolated progenitor cells in 3 patients. The most frequent clinical manifestations included skin rash (n=6), joint pain (n=4), vasculitis (n=4), and chondritis (n=2). One patient had been diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia related changes, with co-mutations in IDH1 and SRSF2. Two additional patients had mutations in ASXL1 of which one also had a ZRSR2 mutation. No co-occurring myeloid driver gene mutations were found in the other cases. Noncoding mutations, similar to canonical UBA1 disease causing mutations, were shown to be lineage restricted to myeloid cells. To assess the functional impact of mutations, CD14+ monocytes were isolated from the peripheral blood. Compared to the CD14- fraction, the CD14+ fraction revealed a decrease in the UBA1 transcript as well as UBA1 protein level. One patient demonstrated loss of novel UBA1 mutation after hypomethylating agent treatment, and allogeneic transplant, placing the patient in remission.Conclusions:Our findings of intronic and non-coding UBA1 mutations in patients with VEXAS-associated clinical presentation suggests these variants may affect the regulation of UBA1 transcription, representing a potential new mechanism of pathogenesis. Further functional studies are underway to understand how these variants contribute to impaired UBA1 activity and VEXAS disease pathogenesis. Collectively, our results advocate for a broader approach in genetic testing for UBA1 mutations and pave the way for improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for VEXAS syndrome.

Abstract Introduction: Autologous CD19 CART therapies have been utilized across a wide range of B cell driven autoimmune diseases (AD), including systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), systemic sclerosis (SSc), & myasthenia gravis (MG). To date, a number of autologous CD19-CART therapies have delivered durable drug free responses in AD patients. However, the safety profile of autologous CD19-CART therapies across different AD has yet to be fully explored. This is especially true for CRS & ICANS. Here, we provide novel insight into the mechanism underlying the safety profile of resecabtagene autoleucel (rese-cel) an autologous CD19 41BBz CART therapy across four separate Phase I/II clinical trials in SLE, IIM, SSc, & MG. Objectives: The primary objective of each trial is safety & tolerability of rese-cel at Day 29. Key secondary objectives include changes in clinical scores & use of immunomodulatory agents. Key translational assessments include CART cell pharmacokinetics (PK), impact on peripheral B cell populations (pharmacodynamics), & serum cytokine levels. Methods: 19 Patients (data cutoff: 6/2/2025 SLE; 5/6/2025 IIM, SSc, and MG), with active disease refractory to standard of care have been treated across 4 Phase I/II clinical trials in SLE (8 patients; NCT06121297), IIM (8 patients; NCT06154252), SSc (2 patients; NCT06328777), & MG (1 patient; NCT06359041). All patients were treated with a single weight-based infusion of rese-cel at a dose of 1 x 106 cells/kg following lymphodepletion (flu 25 mg/m2/d on Days -5, -4, & -3, & cy 1,000 mg/m2/d on Day -3). All non-glucocorticoid immunomodulatory agents were stopped prior to lymphodepletion. Glucocorticoids were tapered post-infusion. Patients were not given prophylactic tocilizumab pre-infusion. Translational assessments were determined as follows: CART PK was evaluated by flow cytometry & dPCR; B-cell enumeration & phenotyping were evaluated by flow cytometry; & serum cytokines were evaluated via immunoassay. Results: Across all indications (19 patients), 7 episodes of CRS were observed (7/19). 6 of 7 patients experienced a Grade 1 CRS, & 1 patient had a Grade 2 CRS. 2 patients developed ICANS; 1 patient had a Grade 4 (previously presented at ACR Convergence 2024), & the other patient had a Grade 3. Both ICANS events were rapidly resolved without sequelae using standard therapy. These CRS and ICANS events differed across indications. In IIM, 4 of 8 patients experienced Grade 1 CRS and no patients experienced ICANs. In SLE, 2 patients experienced Grade 1 CRS and one developed Grade 4 ICANs. In SSC, 1 of 2 patients experienced Grade 2 CRS & the other experienced Grade 3 ICANS. In MG, no CRS or ICANS was observed. Rese-cel infusion products were ~ 66% transduced, with a mean CD4:CD8 ratio of 6. Post-infusion, peak CART expansion was observed on day 12 & the mean peak expansion was 89 cells/µL (SD +/- 214). B cells were rapidly depleted from peripheral blood post-infusion, with nadir occurring at 13 days & repopulation beginning at 62 days post-infusion on average. Re-emergent B cells were largely of the CD24+CD38+ transitional naïve phenotype. Commensurate with B cell depletion, serum BAFF induction was observed, with a mean fold induction of 16 & mean peak level of 56,404 pg/µL (SD: +/- 45,547). Serum cytokines associated with CRS & ICANS; IFNg, IL6, & IL8 reached peak elevation on days 10, 9, & 10 respectively post-infusion. The mean peak elevation for IFNg, IL6, & IL8 were 232 pg/ µL (SD: +/- 320), 44 pg/ µL (SD: +/- 60), & 80 pg/ µL (SD +/- 73), respectively. Conclusion: Rese-cel appears to be well tolerated in autoimmune patients with rates of CRS & ICANS of 37% & 11% across all autoimmune indications, respectively (SLE patients had a 25% CRS rate & 12.5% ICANS rate, IIM patients had a 50% CRS rate & 0% ICANS rate, SSC patients had a 50% CRS & 50% ICANS rate, & MG patients had a 0% CRS & ICANS rate). Notably, the frequency & severity of CRS appears to be low, with no CRS in 63% of patients (12/19) & most CRS events (6/7) being Grade 1. The lower frequency & severity of both CRS & ICANS events are likely correlated with the relatively modest induction of serum IFNg, IL6, & IL8 found in autoimmune patients post rese-cel weight-adjusted dose infusion. High BAFF levels reflect deep systemic B cell depletion. Together, these data support further support late-stage clinical development of rese-cel in autoimmune disease.