Citations

Bladder cancer, the sixth most common cancer in the United States, is most commonly of the urothelial carcinoma histologic subtype. The clinical spectrum of bladder cancer is divided into 3 categories that differ in prognosis, management, and therapeutic aims: (1) non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC); (2) muscle invasive, nonmetastatic disease; and (3) metastatic bladder cancer. These NCCN Guidelines Insights detail recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Bladder Cancer, including changes in the fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours: Urinary and Male Genital Tumours and how the NCCN Guidelines aligned with these updates; new and emerging treatment options for bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)–unresponsive NMIBC; and updates to systemic therapy recommendations for advanced or metastatic disease.

642 Background: Perioperative blood transfusion has been reported in up to 60% of patients undergoing RC. Unfortunately, perioperative blood transfusion in patient undergoing RC has been associated with poor oncological outcomes. Tranexamic acid (TXA) use has been proposed to decrease the need for perioperative blood transfusion. Here we seek to investigate the impact of intraoperative TXA on survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer. Methods: We queried the prospectively maintained Mayo Clinic Radical Cystectomy registry and identified all RC performed for bladder cancer between 1990-2021. Primary outcomes were patient’s overall survival and cancer specific survival among patients who received TXA versus patients who did not receive TXA. Results: Among 2929 patients who underwent RC in our institution between 1990-2021, 468 received TXA (IV) intraoperatively (Group A) and were propensity score matched 1:1 for age, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, pT stage, pN stage, and preoperative hemoglobin with a group who did not receive TXA (Group B, n= 468). At 8 years followup, 61% of patients who received TXA were alive versus 46% of patients who did not receive TXA. In univariable and multivariable analyses of factors associated with CSS (Table1), node positive disease, pT2-T4, peri-operative blood transfusion were associated with poor survival outcomes. While use of TXA was associated with improved CSS outcomes. Conclusions: In our study, TXA use in patients undergoing radical cystectomy was associated with decreased risk or peri-operative transfusion, improved patient’s overall survival, and cancer specific survival. We can’t explain the biological rational for improved survival however these findings warrant further prospective investigation. [Table: see text]

641 Background: Perioperative blood transfusion is associated with an increased risk of adverse events and tranexamic acid (TXA) use has been proposed to decrease the need for perioperative blood transfusion. Herein, we seek to investigate the impact of intraoperative TXA on perioperative risk of VTE in a subset of patients who underwent robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) for bladder cancer. Methods: We queried the prospectively maintained Mayo Clinic Radical Cystectomy registry and identified patients who underwent RARC between 2004-2021 and received TXA intraoperatively. In univariable and multivariable analyses, we investigated factors associated with bleeding and VTE within 30 days post-operatively. Results: Of 2862 patients, we identified 94 patients who received TXA (IV) intraoperatively (Group A) and were propensity score matched 1:1 for age, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pT stage, pN stage, and preoperative hemoglobin with a group who did not receive TXA; 38 patients (Group B). In univariable and multivariable models, use of TXA has no statistically significant impact on patient’s risk of bleeding or VTE. In a univariable model, number of positive lymph nodes and extent of lymph node dissection were associated with increased risk of VTE (Table 1). Conclusions: In our study, use of TXA in patient’s undergoing RARC was safe and was not associated with increased risk of VTE. [Table: see text]

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become the leading approach for radical prostatectomy driven by innovations aimed at improving functional and oncological outcomes. The initial advancement in this field was transperitoneal multiport robotics, which has since undergone numerous technical modifications. These enhancements include the development of extraperitoneal, transperineal, and transvesical approaches to radical prostatectomy, greatly facilitated by the advent of the Single Port (SP) robot. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of these evolving techniques and their impact on RARP. Additionally, we explore the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in digitizing robotic prostatectomy. AI advancements, particularly in automated surgical video analysis using computer vision technology, are unprecedented in their scope. These developments hold the potential to revolutionize surgeon feedback and assessment and transform surgical documentation, and they could lay the groundwork for real-time AI decision support during surgical procedures in the future. Furthermore, we discuss future robotic platforms and their potential to further enhance the field of RARP. Overall, the field of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer has been an incubator of innovation over the last two decades. This review focuses on some recent developments in robotic prostatectomy, provides an overview of the next frontier in AI innovation during prostate cancer surgery, and highlights novel robotic platforms that may play an increasing role in prostate cancer surgery in the future.

This article reviews the implementation of standards for surgical video deidentification.

Objective To report open‐label phase data from a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), after previous data from that study showed improved penile length and erectile function among post‐prostatectomy men treated with Restorex penile traction therapy (RxPTT). Materials and Methods An RCT (NCT05244486) was performed to evaluate RxPTT vs no treatment (Tx) for 5 months, which was followed by a 3‐month open‐label phase. Men were stratified based on as‐treated data: Group 1 = No Tx; Group 2 = No Tx → Tx; Group 3 = Tx → No Tx; Group 4 = Tx. Assessments included stretched penile length and standardized (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]) and non‐standardized questionnaires. Results A total of 82 men were enrolled (mean age 58.6 years) with 9‐month data available in 45 of the men. Baseline characteristics were similar among the cohorts. Comparing Group 1 and Group 4 (respectively), notable differences included: IIEF Erectile Function domain (IIEF‐EF) score (−8 vs −0.5; P = 0.16), penile length (−0.1 vs +1.7 cm; P < 0.01), intracavernosal injection use (86% vs 14%; P < 0.01), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 2 (50% vs 100%; P < 0.01), SEP Question 3 (33% vs 100%; P < 0.01). Men who crossed over to Tx (Group 2) failed to achieve equivalent improvements in length (+0.5 cm) or sexual function (IIEF‐EF score −6) compared to men treated early (Groups 3 and 4). Those who crossed over to no treatment after initial treatment (Group 3) experienced preserved length (+1.8 cm), and erectile function (IIEF‐EF score +0) despite therapy discontinuation. Conclusions Use of RxPTT beginning 1 month post‐prostatectomy results in improved penile length and erectile function, with benefits maintained after discontinuing therapy. If confirmed, these results represent the first postoperative therapy shown in a RCT to improve erectile function post‐prostatectomy. External validation is warranted.

60 Background: Recent studies, including a post-hoc analysis of the ARCHES trial, highlight radiographic disease progression (rDP) occurring without concordant rise in prostate specific antigen (PSA). In a previous study by our group, we reported that almost 40% of patients on 2nd generation hormone therapy experience rDP with non-rising PSA and have poor survival outcomes. The current analysis more specifically focuses on the subgroup of patients with rDP occurring at low PSA (<0.5 ng/dL) and describes factors associated with poorer survival outcomes in this patient population. Methods: In a single institution study, we reviewed the prospectively maintained Mayo Clinic C-11 Choline PET registry for patients treated between 2011 and 2021, who experienced rDP at low PSA (value < 0.5 ng/mL). Disease progression on C-11 choline PET was confirmed by either tissue biopsy or subsequent response to therapy. We investigated factors associated with poor cancer-specific survival outcomes in univariable and multivariable cox regression analyses. Results: In total, 220 (16%) patients experiencing rDP at low PSA were identified. Median (IQR) age at rDP was 67.91 (61.10 – 73.87) yrs., median (IQR) primary Gleason score was 9 (7-9), and median (IQR) PSA was 0.17 (0 – 0.32) ng/ml. 75% of the patients (n=166) had CRPC disease status at time of rDP. Prior systemic treatments included 2nd generation HT in 18% (n= 40) and chemotherapy in 31% (n=70). Sites of rDP were divided into 7% local (n=16), 42% lymph nodes (n=91), 43% bone (n=95), and 8% visceral metastases (n=18). Over a median follow-up duration of 55 months, 46% of patients (n=100) reported death. Factors associated with poor survival outcomes are demonstrated in the table and include age at rDP, CRPC status, and disease location (P-value <0.05). Conclusions: We found that radiographic disease progression commonly occurs at low PSA (<0.5 ng/mL). CRPC-disease status and the development of visceral metastases are associated with particularly poor survival outcomes. To identify early progression, monitoring with imaging may be warranted, even in the patients with low PSA. [Table: see text]