Citations

Our study examined healthy human MASH and MASH-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (MASH-HCC) livers using bulk and scRNA sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and immunohistochemistry. We found that ACSLs displayed differential and spatially heterogeneous expression. ACSL4 was abundant in tumor tissues, whereas ACSL5 was elevated in noncancerous MASH tissues. ACSL4 was mainly found in immune cells like natural killer cells and natural killer T cells in murine MASH-HCC, suggesting its role in tumor immune microenvironment modulation.

ABSTRACT Background The association between transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt TIPS and waitlist outcomes in simultaneous liver‐kidney (SLK) transplant recipients remains unclear. Methods Between 2003 and 2023, we examined the scientific registry of transplant recipients. All adult candidates with overlapping waiting lists for liver and kidney transplants ( N = 15 087) were analyzed (entire cohort). Candidates without TIPS ( n = 13 980) and with ( n = 1107) were followed through November 30, 2023, and the following outcomes were analyzed: death, SLK transplant, liver‐ or kidney‐alone transplant, or removal from the list. The Aalen–Johansen method was used to calculate the cumulative incidence rates of the outcomes, where the outcomes were considered competing risks. Mixed effects Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the outcomes by TIPS status. We separately analyzed dialysis‐dependent candidates ( n = 10 370). Results In the entire cohort, the 1‐year cumulative incidence of death in those without TIPS was higher than in those with (12.5% vs. 9%). In the dialysis‐dependent cohort, the 1‐year death incidence was 13.3% versus 8.8% in those without TIPS and those with, respectively. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, TIPS was associated with a 29% lower mortality risk in the entire cohort (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.60–0.84, p < 0.001) and a 33% lower risk of mortality in the dialysis‐dependent cohort. The likelihood of receiving SLK was lower for recipients with TIPS in the univariable analysis. However, this association was attenuated after adjustment. The causes of removal were similar irrespective of TIPS status in both cohorts. Conclusion In this large cohort of SLK candidates, those with TIPS had a better waitlist survival, irrespective of their dialysis requirements before transplantation. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Background & Aims: Liver transplantation (LT) remains the only cure for severe polycystic liver disease (PLD). However, LT indications and strategies vary across Europe, resulting in (unwanted) practice variation and unequal access to care for patients with PLD. This study aimed to (1) identify existing PLD-specific LT criteria across European countries, (2) assess which criteria are considered relevant by specialist, and (3) map the variation in liver-kidney transplant strategies among patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Methods: National PLD-specific LT criteria were collected, and if unavailable ERN RARE-Liver representatives from that country were asked to provide information. An online survey was conducted amongst hepatologists, LT surgeons, and nephrologists managing patients with PLD. The survey assessed relevant LT indications/listing requirements, clinical case evaluations, and explored preferences for liver-kidney transplantation in patients with ADPKD. Results: Defined LT criteria for patients with PLD were available in only 8 of the 17 assessed countries and showed substantial variation. Sixty-nine clinicians (43 hepatologists, 15 surgeons, 11 nephrologists), predominantly from LT centers (75.4%), completed the survey. Key LT indications were recurrent liver cyst infections (78.3%), significant impaired quality of life (75.4%), and severe malnutrition (75.4%). In ADPKD simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLK) was preferred by 40.4% of respondents, primarily due the favorable immunological profile (47.6%) and prevention of renal failure (33.3%). In contrast, those favoring a liver-first approach (30.8%), followed by sequential kidney transplant, highlighted the potential harm to the kidney graft during SLK (62.5%). Conclusions: Uniform PLD-specific LT criteria in Europe are lacking. While recurrent liver cyst infections, decreased quality of life, and malnutrition are widely recognized as crucial LT indications, they are insufficiently reflected in existing criteria, contributing to unequal access to LT. Moreover, considerable variation exists in liver-kidney transplantation for ADPKD patients, with a current lack of evidence to support one approach over another.

Background and Aims: The optimal treatment strategy for de novo perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) remains debated. This study compares outcomes between liver transplantation following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (RT+LT) and liver resection (LR), with (LR+VR) and without vascular resection (LR w/o VR). Approach and Results: This single-center, retrospective study included patients with de novo perihilar cholangiocarcinoma treated at the Mayo Clinic Rochester (1993–2023) with curative-intent surgery. Patients underwent either (1) LR, classified as LR+VR or LR w/o VR, or (2) RT+LT following the transplant protocol. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival were analyzed using as-treated and intention-to-treat approaches, incorporating competing risk analysis and direct matching. In the as-treated analysis, RT+LT showed superior median OS compared with LR w/o VR (78.0 vs. 58.2 mo, p =0.03) and LR+VR (25.8 mo, p <0.001). Considering dropout rates (RT+LT: 41%, LR: 28%), intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant OS difference between LR and RT + LT (31.7 vs. 38.5 mo, p =0.19). In matched as-treated analysis, RT + LT had no significant survival benefit over LR w/o VR (50.6 vs. 140.6 mo, p =0.08) or LR+VR (25.8 mo, p =0.11). Perioperative mortality was 4% (RT+LT), 7% (LR w/o VR), and 8% (LR + VR). Conclusions: Both LR and RT+LT achieve excellent oncological outcomes in selected patients with de novo perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Key challenges remain dropouts during neoadjuvant therapy in patients planned for LT and high perioperative mortality for patients undergoing LR. OS doubles in patients undergoing LR+VR compared with dropouts, supporting LR+VR as a viable option for patients who are ineligible for LT. Appropriate patient selection is crucial, as those not undergoing surgery suffer from a dismal prognosis.

Objective: To develop and validate a risk score for predicting post-transplant recurrence in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) patients. Background: pCCA is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by liver transplantation (LT) offers a potential cure for patients with unresectable, early-stage de novo or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)-associated pCCA, post-transplant recurrence negatively impacts survival. Currently, no risk stratification tools exist. Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with unresectable de novo or PSC-associated pCCA who underwent neoadjuvant CRT followed by LT at Mayo Clinic (1993–2024). Predictors of post-transplant recurrence were identified using multivariable Cox regression with LASSO variable selection. The Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence after Transplant (PRETREAT) risk score was created by assigning points from model coefficients. Score performance was evaluated by discrimination (c-statistic), internally validated with 10-fold cross-validation, and externally validated in a separate cohort. Survival outcomes were compared across 3 PRETREAT risk groups and between 2 time periods. Results: This study included 399 patients (development: 301; validation: 98). The 5-year cumulative incidence of post-transplant recurrence was 29.7% in the development cohort and 27.6% in the validation cohort. Multivariable analysis identified 4 independent predictors: macroscopic residual tumor on explant [hazard ratio (HR): 12.4], vascular encasement (HR: 2.18), lymphovascular invasion (HR: 2.04), and radial tumor diameter (HR: 1.02/mm). The PRETREAT score (0–22), based on these factors, demonstrated excellent performance in both internal and external validation (C-index 0.83 and 0.85, respectively). Patients were stratified into low-risk (0–7), moderate-risk (8–15), and high-risk (16–22) groups. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates significantly differed across low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk groups (89.0%, 38.3%, and 15.4%, respectively; P<0.001). Over the last decade, overall survival improved significantly only in moderate-risk patients (70.4% vs 46.9%, P=0.024), without significant improvement in recurrence-free survival. Conclusions: The PRETREAT score provides a valuable tool for guiding post-transplant management of pCCA, enabling risk-stratified surveillance, and laying the foundation for future clinical trials.