Citations

Hillebrandt, David, Anil Gurtoo, Thomas Kupper, Paul Richards, Volker Schöffl, Pankaj Shah, Rianne van der Spek, Nikki Wallis, and Jim Milledge. UIAA Medical Commission recommendations for mountaineers, hillwalkers, trekkers, and rock and ice climbers with diabetes. High Alt Med Biol . 24: 110–126.—The object of this advice article is not only to give the diabetic mountaineer general guidance but also to inform his or her medical team of practical aspects of care that may not be standard for nonmountaineers. The guidelines are produced in seven sections. The first is an introduction to the guidelines, and the second is an introduction to this medical problem and is designed to be read and understood by diabetic patients and their companions. The third section is for use in an emergency in mountains. The fourth is for rock, ice, and competition climbers operating in a less remote environment. These initial sections are deliberately written in simple language. The fifth and sixth sections are written for clinicians and those with skills to read more technical information, and the seventh looks at modern technology and its pros and cons in diabetes management in a remote area. Sections One and Two could be laminated and carried when in the mountains, giving practical advice.

To determine whether type 2 diabetes mellitus alters systemic and regional free fatty acid ([3H]palmitate) metabolism, 14 nondiabetic (ND) and 14 type 2 diabetic (D) subjects underwent hyperinsulinemic-hyperglycemic (∼9.3 mM) clamps. The subjects were matched for age, body mass index, percent body fat, and fat-free mass. D subjects had more ( P < 0.05) visceral fat than ND. During somatostatin, replacement growth hormone, and glucagon infusions, insulin was infused to achieve moderate (∼75 pmol/l) and high (∼150 pmol/l) physiological insulin levels. D subjects had greater ( P < 0.02) systemic and regional (splanchnic and leg) palmitate release than ND subjects during both insulin infusion intervals. The relative contributions of splanchnic, leg, and nonsplanchnic upper body regions to systemic palmitate release did not differ between groups, although the last contributed the most (∼75%) to systemic palmitate release. Visceral fat area correlated with systemic palmitate flux ( r = 0.45, P < 0.03) during both insulin infusions. We conclude that type 2 diabetes is associated with a generalized impairment in insulin suppression of lipolysis compared with equally obese ND individuals.

People with type 2 diabetes have defects in both α- and β-cell function. To determine whether lack of suppression of glucagon causes hyperglycemia when insulin secretion is impaired but not when insulin secretion is intact, twenty nondiabetic subjects were studied on two occasions. On both occasions, a “prandial” glucose infusion was given over 5 h while endogenous hormone secretion was inhibited. Insulin was infused so as to mimic either a nondiabetic ( n = 10) or diabetic ( n = 10) postprandial profile. Glucagon was infused at a rate of 1.25 ng ⋅ kg−1⋅ min−1, beginning either at time zero to prevent a fall in glucagon (nonsuppressed study day) or at 2 h to create a transient fall in glucagon (suppressed study day). During the “diabetic” insulin profile, lack of glucagon suppression resulted in a marked increase ( P < 0.002) in both the peak glucose concentration (11.9 ± 0.4 vs. 8.9 ± 0.4 mmol/l) and the area above basal of glucose (927 ± 77 vs. 546 ± 112 mmol ⋅ l−1⋅ 6 h) because of impaired ( P < 0.001) suppression of glucose production. In contrast, during the “nondiabetic” insulin profile, lack of suppression of glucagon resulted in only a slight increase ( P< 0.02) in the peak glucose concentration (9.1 ± 0.4 vs. 8.4 ± 0.3 mmol/l) and the area above basal of glucose (654 ± 146 vs. 488 ± 118 mmol ⋅ l−1⋅ 6 h). Of interest, when glucagon was suppressed, glucose concentrations differed only minimally during the nondiabetic and diabetic insulin profiles. These data indicate that lack of suppression of glucagon can cause substantial hyperglycemia when insulin availability is limited, therefore implying that inhibitors of glucagon secretion and/or glucagon action are likely to be useful therapeutic agents in such individuals.

Background and Objective Low vitamin D levels correlate with measures of insulin resistance and prevalence of diabetes mellitus, but there are limited and conflicting data on changes in insulin resistance after vitamin D replacement. The objective of the current study was to examine whether vitamin D replacement improves insulin sensitivity. Methods In this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, 12 healthy subjects with plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25[OH]D) levels of less than 20 ng/mL were treated with ergocalciferol, 50,000 units, orally once a week for 8 weeks or matching placebo. The main outcome measure was insulin-stimulated glucose infusion rate during the last 20 minutes of a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic glucose clamp study. Results At baseline, plasma 25(OH)D levels were similar between the ergocalciferol and placebo groups (13.3 ± 3.8 and 15.7 ± 2.4 ng/mL, respectively; P = 0.3) but were higher in the ergocalciferol group at 8 weeks (18.8 ± 5 vs 12.5 ± 2.2 ng/mL; P = 0.02). Glucose infusion rate was similar between the 2 groups both at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment. Changes in plasma 25(OH)D levels did not correlate with change in glucose infusion rate. Conclusion Administration of ergocalciferol, 50,000 units, weekly for 8 weeks in subjects with low vitamin D levels improves 25(OH)D levels but does not improve insulin sensitivity.

Numerous studies have used the dual-tracer method to assess postprandial glucose metabolism. The present experiments were undertaken to determine whether the marked tracer nonsteady state that occurs with the dual-tracer approach after food ingestion introduces error when it is used to simultaneously measure both meal glucose appearance (Ra meal) and endogenous glucose production (EGP). To do so, a novel triple-tracer approach was designed: 12 subjects ingested a mixed meal containing [1-13C]glucose while [6-3H]glucose and [6,6-2H2]glucose were infused intravenously in patterns that minimized the change in the plasma ratios of [6-3H]glucose to [1-13C]glucose and of [6,6-2H2]glucose to endogenous glucose, respectively. Ra meal and EGP measured with this approach were essentially model independent, since non-steady-state error was minimized by the protocol. Initial splanchnic glucose extraction (ISE) was 12.9% ± 3.4%, and suppression of EGP (EGPS) was 40.3% ± 4.1%. In contrast, when calculated with the dual-tracer one-compartment model, ISE was higher ( P < 0.05) and EGPS was lower ( P < 0.005) than observed with the triple-tracer approach. These errors could only be prevented by using time-varying volumes different for Ra meal and EGP. Analysis of the dual-tracer data with a two-compartment model reduced but did not totally avoid the problems associated with marked postprandial changes in the tracer-to-tracee ratios. We conclude that results from previous studies that have used the dual-tracer one-compartment model to measure postprandial carbohydrate metabolism need to be reevaluated and that the triple-tracer technique may provide a useful approach for doing so.

To determine if enteral delivery of glucose influences splanchnic glucose metabolism, 10 subjects were studied when glucose was either infused into the duodenum at a rate of 22 μmol · kg −1 · min −1 and supplemental glucose given intravenously or when all glucose was infused intravenously while saline was infused intraduodenally. Hormone secretion was inhibited with somatostatin, and glucose (∼8.5 mmol/l) and insulin (∼450 pmol/l) were maintained at constant but elevated levels. Intravenously infused [6,6- 2 H 2 ]glucose was used to trace the systemic appearance of intraduodenally infused [3- 3 H]glucose, whereas UDP-glucose flux (an index of hepatic glycogen synthesis) was measured using the acetaminophen glucuronide method. Despite differences in the route of glucose delivery, glucose production (3.5 ± 1.0 vs. 3.3 ± 1.0 μmol · kg −1 · min −1 ) and glucose disappearance (78.9 ± 5.7 vs. 85.0 ± 7.2 μmol · kg −1 · min −1 ) were comparable on intraduodenal and intravenous study days. Initial splanchnic glucose extraction (17.5 ± 4.4 vs. 14.5 ± 2.9%) and hepatic UDP-glucose flux (9.0 ± 2.0 vs. 10.3 ± 1.5 μmol · kg −1 · min −1 ) also did not differ on the intraduodenal and intravenous study days. These data argue against the existence of an “enteric” factor that directly (i.e., independently of circulating hormone concentrations) enhances splanchnic glucose uptake or hepatic glycogen synthesis in nondiabetic humans.

Objectives Chronic constipation in diabetes mellitus is associated with colonic motor dysfunction and is managed with laxatives. Cholinesterase inhibitors increase colonic motility. This study evaluated the effects of a cholinesterase inhibitor on gastrointestinal and colonic transit and bowel function in diabetic patients with constipation. Design After a 9-day baseline period, 30 patients (mean±SEM age 50±2 years) with diabetes mellitus (18 type 1, 12 type 2) and chronic constipation without defaecatory disorder were randomised to oral placebo or pyridostigmine, starting with 60 mg three times a day, increasing by 60 mg every third day up to the maximum tolerated dose or 120 mg three times a day; this dose was maintained for 7 days. Gastrointestinal and colonic transit (assessed by scintigraphy) and bowel function were evaluated at baseline and the final 3 and 7 days of treatment, respectively. Treatment effects were compared using analysis of covariance, with gender, body mass index and baseline colonic transit as covariates. Results 19 patients (63%) had moderate or severe autonomic dysfunction; 16 (53%) had diabetic retinopathy. 14 of 16 patients randomised to pyridostigmine tolerated 360 mg daily; two patients took 180 mg daily. Compared with placebo (mean±SEM 1.98±0.17 (baseline), 1.84±0.16 (treatment)), pyridostigmine accelerated (1.96±0.18 (baseline), 2.45±0.2 units (treatment), p<0.01) overall colonic transit at 24 h, but not gastric emptying or small-intestinal transit. Treatment effects on stool frequency, consistency and ease of passage were significant (p≤0.04). Cholinergic side effects were somewhat more common with pyridostigmine (p=0.14) than with placebo. Conclusions Cholinesterase inhibition with oral pyridostigmine accelerates colonic transit and improves bowel function in diabetic patients with chronic constipation. Clinical trial registration number TrialRegNo (NCT 00276406).

OBJECTIVE—To determine mechanisms by which pioglitazone and metformin effect hepatic and extra-hepatic insulin action. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Thirty-one subjects with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to pioglitazone (45 mg) or metformin (2,000 mg) for 4 months. RESULTS—Glucose was clamped before and after therapy at ∼5 mmol/l, insulin raised to ∼180 pmol/l, C-peptide suppressed with somatostatin, glucagon replaced at ∼75 pg/ml, and glycerol maintained at ∼200 mmol/l to ensure comparable and equal portal concentrations on all occasions. Insulin-induced stimulation of glucose disappearance did not differ before and after treatment with either pioglitazone (23 ± 3 vs. 24 ± 2 μmol · kg−1 · min−1) or metformin (22 ± 2 vs. 24 ± 3 μmol · kg−1 · min−1). In contrast, pioglitazone enhanced (P &lt; 0.01) insulin-induced suppression of both glucose production (6.0 ± 1.0 vs. 0.2 ± 1.6 μmol · kg−1 · min−1) and gluconeogenesis (n = 11; 4.5 ± 0.9 vs. 0.8 ± 1.2 μmol · kg−1 · min−1). Metformin did not alter either suppression of glucose production (5.8 ± 1.0 vs. 5.0 ± 0.8 μmol · kg−1 · min−1) or gluconeogenesis (n = 9; 3.7 ± 0.8 vs. 2.6 ± 0.7 μmol · kg−1 · min−1). Insulin-induced suppression of free fatty acids was greater (P &lt; 0.05) after treatment with pioglitazone (0.14 ± 0.03 vs. 0.06 ± 0.01 mmol/l) but unchanged with metformin (0.12 ± 0.03 vs. 0.15 ± 0.07 mmol/l). CONCLUSIONS—Thus, relative to metformin, pioglitazone improves hepatic insulin action in people with type 2 diabetes, partly by enhancing insulin-induced suppression of gluconeogenesis. On the other hand, both drugs have comparable effects on insulin-induced stimulation of glucose uptake.