Citations

Abstract The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after distal ulna resection (Darrach procedure) in young adults. A retrospective chart review identified all adult patients who underwent Darrach resection at 40 years of age or younger and had a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Twenty-one patients (24 wrists) were available for final follow-up. Fifteen patients (16 wrists) returned for in-person evaluation, and seven patients (eight wrists) completed questionnaires by phone. Mean PRWE and QuickDASH scores were 32 and 34, respectively. The median visual analog scale at rest was 0 and 1 with activity. In 88% of cases, patients reported they would have the same surgery again. Of those who were employed preoperatively, 81% (13/16) returned to work, with all but one patient returning to their preoperative job. Radioulnar convergence occurred in all patients, but only three (23%) were symptomatic. The Darrach procedure may be a viable surgical option for DRUJ pathology in younger adults when other options are unavailable. Therapeutic IV.

Background: Surgical management of failed metacarpophalangeal (MCP) arthroplasties includes revision arthroplasty and arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to review the indications and outcomes of arthrodesis as a salvage procedure for failed MCP arthroplasties. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing salvage MCP arthrodesis at a single institution from 1990 to 2020. Patient charts were reviewed for patient demographics, indication for salvage, surgical technique, revision rate, and time to radiographic union. Patient-reported outcomes, including the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and an MCP-specific questionnaire detailing pain, functional, appearance, and patient satisfaction, were also collected. Results: Eleven digits in 9 patients (6 women, 3 men, median age of 66) with median 36-month follow-up were included. The majority (91%) of patients also had concomitant soft tissue deformities, including joint contractures, extension lag, and collateral ligament insufficiency. The overall revision rate following arthrodesis was 45% with 3 digits requiring one revision each, and 2 digits undergoing 3 revisions. The overall union rate was 91% with median time to union of 4 months from most recent arthrodesis. Patient-reported outcomes obtained from 4 patients demonstrated improvements in pain and function. Conclusion: Despite a high revision rate of 45%, salvage MCP arthrodesis following arthroplasty has a high eventual union rate of 91% and is associated with improved pain and function based on 4 patients’ experiences. Arthrodesis as a salvage procedure for failed MCP arthroplasties should be considered in patients with persistent joint instability and functionally limiting soft tissue deformities.

Abstract The scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) joint is involved in load transmission between the wrist and thumb. A quantitative description of baseline STT joint morphometrics is needed to capture the variation of normal anatomy as well as to guide staging of osteoarthritis. Statistical shape modeling (SSM) techniques quantify variations in three‐dimensional shapes and relative positions. The objectives of this study are to describe the morphology of the STT joint using a multi‐domain SSM. We asked: (1) What are the dominant modes of variation that impact bone and articulation morphology at the STT joint, and (2) what are the morphometrics of SSM‐generated STT joints? Thirty adult participants were recruited to a computed tomography study of normal wrist imaging and biomechanics. Segmentations of the carpus were converted to three‐dimensional triangular surface meshes. A multi‐domain, particle‐based entropy system SSM was used to quantify variation in carpal bone shape and position as well as articulation morphology. Articular surface areas and interosseous proximity distributions were calculated between mesh vertex pairs on adjacent bones within distance (2.0 mm) and surface‐normal angular (35°) thresholds. In the SSM, the first five modes of variation captured 76.2% of shape variation and contributed to factors such as bone scale, articular geometries, and carpal tilt. Median interosseous proximities—a proxy for joint space—were 1.39 mm (scaphotrapezium), 1.42 mm (scaphotrapezoid), and 0.61 mm (trapeziotrapezoid). This study quantifies morphological and articular variations at the STT joint, presenting a range of normative anatomy. The range of estimated interosseous proximities may guide interpretation of imaging‐derived STT joint space.

Abstract Background Hemiarthroplasty may be indicated for patients with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthritis. Recently, the use of the pyrocarbon metacarpophalangeal implant has been proposed as a novel means of treating DRUJ arthritis due to the materials improved mechanical properties and wear characteristics. Purpose This study compares midterm outcomes of metallic and pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasties for the treatment of symptomatic DRUJ arthritis. Questions of interest included outcomes and complications. Materials and Methods In total, 32 hemiarthroplasties, 10 metallic and 22 pyrocarbon, were performed between 2010 and 2020 by three surgeons at one tertiary medical center. Patients' retrospective outcomes were extracted from the electronic medical record. Results Postoperatively, the metallic implant group (mean follow-up: 38 months) demonstrated decreased pain but no changes in range of motion. Comparatively, the pyrocarbon group experienced an improved range of motion and postoperative pain (p < 0.05). Radiographic analysis demonstrated 10% of metallic implants and 9% of pyrocarbon implants to have resulted in thinning of the lateral cortex of the radius at the final follow-up. Minor complications in metallic and pyrocarbon implant groups warranting reoperation occurred at rates of 10 and 13.5% while implant failure occurred at a rate of 30 and 18%, respectively. Discussion Within this study, pyrocarbon implants resulted in significant functional improvement with comparable complication and failure rates to the metallic implant. Long-term stability demonstrated efficacy for both techniques in symptomatic DRUJ treatment. Type of Study/Level of Evidence Observational Case Series IV.

Background: Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint arthritis is common secondary to a variety of inflammatory, degenerative, and traumatic causes. Although MCP arthroplasty is more common for the second to fifth digits, primary arthrodesis can be used for high-demand patients with arthritis or unsalvageable fractures of the MCP joint. There has been limited recent studies on the outcomes of these patients. Methods: A retrospective review of 38 fingers in 27 patients with primary arthrodesis from 1990 to 2020 was conducted. The major outcomes were complications, reoperations, radiographic union, and time to union. Patient-reported outcomes including the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and a questionnaire specific to the operative MCP joint were collected. Results: Rate of radiographic union was 84% including revisions. The average time to union was 3.6 months. Rates of complications, reoperation, and amputation were 26%, 16%, and 7%, respectively. Arthrodesis as part of emergent trauma reconstruction was significantly more likely to result in reoperation (50% vs 7%) and complication (63% vs 17%) than chronic arthritis. Patient-reported outcomes were fair to good with improvement in pain (79%), function (66%), and appearance (40%). Sixty-six percent (66%) of patients were satisfied with their surgery, and 73% would repeat the surgery. Conclusion: Arthrodesis for unsalvageable MCP fractures was associated with higher rates of reoperation and complication than inflammatory or degenerative arthritis. Excluding emergent trauma, MCP fusion was reliable with a reoperation rate of 7% and a modest complication rate of 17%. Patients rated reasonable levels of satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure despite complications.

Summary: This article reviews the state of the art for arthroplasty of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints. Arthritis that affects these joints can result in significant pain and compromised function. The authors review indications for arthroplasty for each joint, types of implants to consider, technical considerations, patient expectations, and outcomes and complications.

Background: The aim of this study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation versus closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of metacarpal fractures in relation to anatomic and surgical variables. Methods: Electronic medical records at two institutions were reviewed for patients who underwent surgical intervention for metacarpal fractures. Data were collected from those who underwent reduction and internal fixation with either plates or Kirschner wires (K-wires). Inclusion criteria included minimum postoperative follow-up of 60 days and age 18 years or older. Exclusion criteria included insufficient radiographic data, previously attempted closed reduction with immobilization, pathologic fracture mechanism, history of previous trauma or surgery to the affected bone, and fixation technique other than plate or K-wire. Results: We reviewed data for patients treated over a 22-year time period. Ultimately, 81 metacarpal shaft and neck fractures in 60 patients met inclusion criteria. Among all metacarpal fractures, complications were present in 39 (48.1%) cases. There were no significant associations between complication prevalence and hardware type. Revision surgery was required in 11 (13.6%) patients; there were no significant associations between revision procedures and hardware type. Postoperatively, all patients with imaging data had radiograph follow-up to assess union status. There was no significant association between time to union and hardware type. Conclusions: Outcomes showed no significant difference between plate and pin fixation for metacarpal shaft and neck fractures. These findings suggest that surgeons may have flexibility to decide on the type of operative intervention while considering patient-specific factors, such as the need for early mobilization.

AbstractIntroductionThe distal radius is a common location for giant cell tumors (GCTs) of bone. Management includes intralesional curettage or wide excision, however, long‐term comparisons of treatment options are limited. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate our institutions' outcomes of treatment of these tumors.MethodsWe reviewed 24 GCT of the distal radius in 23 patients (12 males: 11 females) with a mean age of 42 years at the time of surgery. Functional outcomes were collected including the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS), QuickDash, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). The mean follow‐up was 13 years.ResultsTumor grade included Campanacci Grade II (n = 14) and Grade III (n = 10). Treatment included extended intralesional curettage (n = 16) and wide excision (n = 8). Reconstruction mainly included bone grafting/cement (n = 16) or free vascularized fibula radiocarpal arthrodesis (n = 5). At most recent follow‐up, there was no difference in MSTS, VAS, and PRWE (p > 0.05) between patients undergoing a joint sparing or arthrodesis. Patients undergoing arthrodesis had a lower QuickDASH score (13.7 vs. 20.8, p = 0.04)ConclusionsTreatment for GCT of the distal radius is individualized however in the setting of articular surface involvement, arthrodesis can lead to superior functional results at long‐term follow‐up.

Background: When treating upper-extremity infections, clinicians frequently must decide whether to initiate antibiotics or delay them with the goal of optimizing culture yield at the time of surgical debridement. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the administration of preoperative antibiotics affects intraoperative culture yield and whether there is a “safe” interval prior to culture acquisition within which antibiotics can be administered without affecting culture yield. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 470 consecutive patients who underwent debridement for a presumed acute infection of the hand, wrist, or forearm at a single tertiary care center between January 2015 and May 2020. Data including patient demographics, mechanism of infection and affected body part(s), and details of antibiotic administration, including type and timing with respect to culture acquisition, were collected. Results: Three hundred and forty-one patients (73%) received preoperative antibiotics prior to debridement and culture acquisition. The rate of positive cultures among patients who received preoperative antibiotics was 81% compared with 95% among patients who did not receive preoperative antibiotics (p < 0.01; odds ratio, 4.73). Even a single dose of antibiotics imparted a significantly increased risk of obtaining negative intraoperative cultures, and an incremental increase in the likelihood of obtaining negative cultures was seen with each preoperative dose given up to 7 doses. We did not identify a “safe” interval of time between antibiotic administration and culture acquisition such that culture yield was not affected. Conclusions: Patients who received preoperative antibiotics for the treatment of upper-extremity infections were approximately 5 times more likely to have negative cultures at the time of debridement than those who did not receive preoperative antibiotics. This effect persisted regardless of the number of doses given or the interval between antibiotic administration and culture acquisition. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.