Citations

Background: Anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCLs) represent a heterogeneous group of T-cell lymphomas that currently are classified by the presence or absence of ALK tyrosine kinase (TK) fusion genes (ALK+ or ALK−) and clinical presentation (systemic, cutaneous, or breast implant-associated). Two overarching molecular types of ALCL recently were discovered, defined by the presence (Type I) or absence (Type II) of a gene expression signature highly enriched for JAK-STAT3 activation. Fusions involving non-ALK TK genes occur in some ALK− cases, but the fusion landscape of ALCL remains incompletely characterized. Methods: Expert consensus pathology review was conducted in the Lymphoma/Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project (LLMPP). RNAseq was performed and fusions were identified using FusionCatcher. Here, we focused on recurrent in-frame coding fusions. Previously unreported fusions were validated by RT-PCR. Type I/II was assigned using a previously validated gene expression-based model. Genes with adjusted (adj) P<0.05 were considered differentially expressed. Overall survival (OS) was assessed for systemic ALCL, when available. Results: We evaluated 379 ALCLs (229M/150F; mean age, 56 y). Of 199 candidate fusions (excluding reciprocal events), 28 were recurrent and passed quality metrics. At least 1 of these 28 fusions was present in 150 cases (40%). ALK fusions were present in 106 ALK+ ALCLs (all Type I; P<0.0001). Of these, NPM1::ALK was seen in 68/106 (64%). Alternate partners (X::ALK) included ATIC (N=24) and CTLC, COL1A2, MSN, MYH9, RNF213, SATB1, TFH, TPM3, and TRAF1 (1-3 cases each). X::ALK was associated with older age (mean, 52 y) than NPM1::ALK (32 y; P<0.0001) and showed relative overexpression of 49 genes, including multiple activators of small GTPases such as CGNL1 (FC, 5.6; Padj=2.4×10-6), SRGAP1, ALS2, DOCK1, and NCKAP1. ALK expression was similar in cases with NPM1::ALK and X::ALK and there was no significant difference in OS. Non-ALK TK fusions were seen in 17/273 ALK− cases (6%), including TYK2 (N=9); JAK2 (N=6); and ROS1 (N=2). All were Type I ALCLs (P<0.0001). ALK− cases with non-ALK TK fusions overexpressed 38 genes compared to ALK− cases without TK fusions, including cytokines involved in the IL17 signaling pathway such as CXCL6 (FC, 12.5; Padj=4.2×10-3), CXCL1, and CSF3. We then assessed the relationship between ALK− cases with non-ALK TK fusions and ALK+ cases by separately comparing each subset to ALK− cases without TK fusions. FC values for ALK− cases with non-ALK TK fusions were significantly correlated with FC values for ALK+ ALCLs over the set of expressed genes (R=0.54; P<0.0001). At a median follow-up of 32 months, 0/4 systemic ALCL patients with non-ALK TK fusions had died, while 30% of those with ALK− ALCL without TK fusions had died, but this was not statistically significant (P=0.26). The other 13 ALK− cases with non-ALK TK fusions were either localized ALCLs or did not have outcome data available. Of 20 TP63 fusions, 17 (85%) were TBL1XR1::TP63 and 3 were X::TP63. As previously reported, TP63 fusions were associated with poor OS (median OS, 10 months; not reached for other ALK− ALCLs; P=0.007). Four ALCLs had a novel NCL::UBTF fusion involving genes encoding the nucleolar proteins nucleolin and nucleolar (upstream binding) transcription factor-1. Four cases each had PARG::BMS1 and TNK1::GPS2 (the latter seen only in Type I ALCLs). Conclusions: This large consortium-based analysis of coding fusions further elucidates the molecular distinction between Type I and Type II ALCLs. Both ALK and non-ALK TK fusions were seen exclusively in Type I ALCLs, which we have shown previously are enriched for JAK-STAT3 pathway genes and correlate strongly with pSTAT3Y705 positivity by immunohistochemistry. These fusions were not identified in Type II ALCLs, which previous data suggest are associated with epigenetic alterations. ALK+ ALCLs with NPM1::ALK and X::ALK showed differences in gene expression, suggesting biological differences. Furthermore, ALCLs with non-ALK TK fusions shared gene expression features with ALK+ ALCL. Clinical fusion detection could enhance molecular classification of Type I and Type II ALCLs and may guide precision therapy.

Introduction: HIV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (HIV-DLBCL) is a significant complication in HIV-positive individuals, presenting unique clinical challenges and a poorer prognosis compared to patients with de novo DLBCL. Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) status is a critical factor influencing the pathogenesis, clinical behavior, and therapeutic responses in these lymphomas. Plasmablastic lymphomas (PBL) have shared some overlapping genomic abnormalities with HIV-DLBCL including MYC rearrangements. This study aims to elucidate the differences in the genetic profiles and pathway activations between EBV(+) and EBV(-) HIV-DLBCL through comprehensive genomic profiling. Methods: Cases of DLBCL were identified in patients living with HIV from a multi-institute cooperative group. Cases of Burkitt lymphoma and PBL were excluded. We performed whole exome sequencing (WES) on 106 tumors of HIV-DLBCL and RNA sequencing on 39 tumors and mapped the reads to hg38 reference genome using BWA and STAR, respectively. EBV status of cases was determined by in situ hybridization and/or reads mapped on EBV genome in sequencing data. Somatic mutations were identified using variant callers (Strelka2, Mutect2) with WES data. For those mutated genes in COSMIC, allele frequency cutoff was set at 0.03. Mutations with an artifact score larger than 0.7 in SOBDetector and those located in segmental duplications were further removed. They were annotated with Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor, manually checked, and plotted with maftools. RNAseq read counts aligned to each gene were obtained by featureCounts and DEseq2 was used for differential expression (DE) analysis between EBV positive and negative groups. Pathway analysis with the DE genes was performed using GSEA. FISH analysis was performed using MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 break-apart probes. Results: There were 41 cases of EBV(+) HIV-DLBCL and 65 cases of EBV(-) HIV-DLBCL. FISH of EBV(+) HIV-DLBCL identified 42% (3/7) with MYC rearrangement (MYCr), none with BCL2 rearrangements (BCL2r) (0/6), and 33% (2/6) positive for BCL6 rearrangement (BCL6r) with 1 tumor having a MYCr/BCL6r. For EBV(-) HIV-DLBCL, there were 35% with a MYCr (6/17), 18% with BCL2r (2/11), and 27% with a BCL6r (3/11) with 2 tumors with MYCr/BCL6r, and 1 tumor with MYCr/BCL2r/BCL6r. The most frequent mutations seen in EBV(+) HIV-DLBCL were STAT3 (32%), DDX3X (22%), and TP53 (15%). For EBV(-) HIV-DLBCL, the most frequent mutations were KMT2D (25%), TP53 (23%), GNA13 (22%), and TET2 (22%). Pathways that were most commonly associated with EBV(+) HIV-DLBCL were JAK/STAT (42%) (STAT3, JAK1) and NF-kB (39%)(DDX3X, TNFAIP3) while EBV(-) HIV-DLBCL was associated with epigenetic modifiers (62%)(KMT2D, TET2, EP300), JAK/STAT (45%)(SOCS1, JAK3) and PI3K/mTOR (40%)(GNA13, MTOR). Significant disparities between EBV(+) and EBV(-) were KMT2D (24% vs 50%, P=0.0025), TET2 (10% vs 26%, P=0.008), SOCS1 (29% vs 39%, P=0.04), DDX3X (15% vs 5%, P=0.03), and GNA13 (5% vs 24%, P=0.001). RAS mutations (KRAS, NRAS) were infrequent in HIV-DLBCL (EBV(+), 12%; EBV(-), 6%), in contrast to prior studies of PBL. Gene expression profiling showed enrichment of MYC targets, oxidative phosphorylation, and the mTORC pathway in EBV(+) as compared to EBV(-) HIV-DLBCL. Conclusion: EBV(+) HIV-DLBCL show a distinct mutational profile compared to EBV(-) HIV-DLBCL, with EBV(+) cases showing frequent mutations with STAT3 and DDX3X in contrast to EBV(-) cases with frequent mutations associated with epigenetic modification pathways (KMT2D, TET2). These genetic profiles underscore the need for tailored therapeutic approaches depending on EBV status. Although the analysis is limited and requires confirmation in a larger cohort, this is the largest study at present evaluating these tumors.

Introduction Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) encompasses a heterogeneous group of clinically aggressive entities. ~30% of cases cannot be further classified and are designated as PTCL - not otherwise specified (NOS). We delineated two novel molecular subgroups among PTCL-NOS with distinct clinical and biological features: PTCL-GATA3 which is characterized by high expression of GATA3, a master regulator of T-helper-2-cell (TH2) differentiation, and its target genes (i.e., CCR4, IL4, IL13) and PTCL-TBX21 which is characterized by high expression of TBX21, a master regulator of TH1 differentiation, and its target genes (i.e., CXCR3, IFNG), with the GATA3 subtype showing significantly worse clinical outcomes (overall survival). Nonsense mutations in CCR4 are found predominately in PTCL-GATA3, often within the cytoplasmic domain and gain-of-function in nature. Methods Mutation and copy number data were generated from whole exome sequencing (TFH phenotype excluded following LLMPP pathology review; n = 153). Single nucleotide variants were determined using Mutect2 and Varsvan2 using in-house filtering. Copy number (CN) profiles were generated using CNVkit. Four CCR4 cytoplasmic domain mutants and controls (cytoplasmic domain knockout [CDKO], wild-type CCR4 overexpression (CCR4-WT), and empty vector [EV]) were transduced into healthy-donor CD4+ T cells (n = 2). Polarization studies were generated using TH1- or TH2-associated cytokine exposure. Surface plasmon resonance was used to determine the binding affinity of CCR4 proteins to CCL17 and CCL22. In silico docking studies were done through Schrödinger's BioLuminate. Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) assay was performed through co-incubation of NK92 (CD16 and CD56) and CCR4 edited primary CD4+ T-cells (stained with calcein AM) for 2 hours at a 5:1 NK:T cell ratio by 7-AAD flow cytometry. Results PTCL-GATA3 had a higher frequency of CN aberrations (e.g. TP53, PTEN CN loss) and a more aberrant genome (p < 0.001) than PTCL-TBX21, including mutations with genes associated with DNA repair and damage (TP53, ATM) and T-cell differentiation (CCR4). CCR4 mutations were virtually mutually exclusive with TP53 mutations, and these cases showed higher CCR4 mRNA and protein expression than CCR4-WT cases (p < 0.05). Primary CD4+ T-cells with ectopic expression of the CCR4 variants, especially CCR4-Q330X, did not require CD3/CD28 for proliferation, bypassing CD3/CD28 ligation for T-cell activation. In addition, proliferation rates were similar between TH2-conditional media and normal media, but proliferation and TBX21 expression in TH1-conditional media were inhibited, implying a novel role of CCR4 in T-cell receptor (TCR) activation and TH-differentiation. CCR4 variant proteins showed higher binding affinity for their natural ligands, CCL22 and CCL17, with mutants exhibiting tighter binding to both ligands (1.5- to 3-fold decrease in KD) by surface plasmon resonance and in silico modeling studies. The in silico models demonstrated mutant CCR4 bound mogamulizumab tighter than CCR4-WT, consistent with a higher ADCC-induced apoptosis rate, highest with CCR4-Q330X mutation. CCR4-Y331X exhibited a worse docking score compared to CCR4-WT and a lower ADCC-induced apoptosis rate. Conclusions Our findings reveal distinct genetic characterizations including aberrant TP53 and PI3K signaling and CCR4 mutations in PTCL-GATA3. These CCR4 mutations are shown to have a key role in PTCL-GATA3 pathogenesis by dysregulating TH-differentiation and aberrantly activating the TCR. CCR4 mutation promotes the TH2 phenotype by blocking TH1 differentiation. CCR4 mutant proteins demonstrated an increased binding affinity towards its known ligands, CCL17 and CCL22, and mogamulizumab, consistent with previous studies exhibiting mogamulizumab efficacy against CCR4 mutations. However, the most frequent CCR4 mutant, Y331X, showed worse binding compared to other CCR4 mutants or CCR4-WT, a mutation that showed Mogamulizumab-resistance in a prior CTCL study as well as in an in vitro ADCC assay. The results emphasize aberrant pathways implicated by genomic and clinical evaluation of two novel PTCL subtypes, as well as support the novel role of mutant CCR4 in enhancing T-cell lymphomagenesis and T-helper differentiation, highlighting multiple therapeutic targets.

Introduction Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare aggressive subtype of lymphoma. It is more common in HIV positive patients, and is often associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and MYC rearrangements. PBL is characterized by markers of plasmacytic differentiation including CD138 and MUM1/IRF4, and loss of B-cell markers such as CD20, which suggests a cell of origin similar to that of multiple myeloma (MM) or activated B-cell-like (ABC) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The standard of care for PBL is CHOP-based chemotherapy but this is frequently not curative. Other than EBV-negative status, which defines a high-risk group, no other biological features have been discovered that are associated with outcomes. Methods Here, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the genomic and transcriptomic landscape of PBL using a collection of 176 exomes and genomes (n=55 new, contributed by Lymphoma/Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project [LLMPP] sites and centrally reviewed by the LLMPP pathology panel [WHO 2016]; n=121 previously published [PMID: 33225311, 33951889, 34465776, 34714908]), 65 transcriptomes (n=44 new; n=21 published) and 37 in situ single cell transcriptomic profiles (CosMx Spatial Molecular Imager) from archival diagnostic tissue biopsies. Somatic mutations (SNVs/Indels) were identified using an ensemble of four variant callers (Strelka2, Lofreq, Mutect2, SAGE). Salmon and DESeq2 were used to identify differentially expressed genes. This multi-omics dataset was compared to other known B-cell malignancies including 92 MM, 238 Burkitt lymphomas (BL), and 208 DLBCLs. Cell segmentation of the CosMx data was performed using Baysor and downstream analyses were conducted using the Seurat workflow. For functional validation, cell viability assays (CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Assay) were conducted in the PBL cell line, PBL-1, and 4 control DLBCL cell lines. Results Within the cohort, 63% (106/169) of primary PBL cases were EBV-positive (EBV+) and 57% (82/144) harbored MYC rearrangements (MYC+). When stratifying patients by EBV and MYC rearrangement status, mutations in different genes were enriched in each group: STAT3 occurred in 55% (29/53) of EBV+/MYC+ PBLs; NOTCH1 in 19% (7/36) of EBV+/MYC-; MYC in 24% (6/25) and TP53 in 40% (10/25) of EBV-/MYC+ tumors; TET2 was mutated in 38% (9/24) and KRAS in 25% (6/24) of EBV-/MYC- PBLs. EBV-/MYC+ tumors represented a subgroup of patients with dismal outcomes. The 2-year overall survival (OS) of these patients was 22% compared to 61%, 78%, and 54% of EBV+/MYC+, EBV+/MYC-, and EBV-/MYC- PBL patients, respectively (log-rank test p-adj. < 0.05). Consistent with previous studies, we observed recurrent mutations affecting JAK-STAT (STAT3, SOCS1, SOCS3, DUSP2) in 41% of cases and RAS-RAF (NRAS, KRAS, BRAF) signaling in 38% of all PBLs. In contrast to ABC-DLBCL, very few mutations occurred in the NF-κB signalling pathway. Accordingly, PBL showed marked downregulation of genes involved in B-cell receptor and NF-κB signaling. Consistent with the lack of reliance on these pathways, functional analyses in PBL-1 showed resistance to treatment to ibrutinib as well as PI3K- and MALT1-inhibitors. Moreover, constitutive expression of the IκBα super-repressor did not affect viability of PBL-1 cells. In situ single cell transcriptomic data analyses showed a sparse tumor microenvironment (TME) in PBL, with the primary non-malignant cell types being, on average, 10% macrophages, 7% NK/T cells, and 4% stromal cells of all represented cell types. EBV+/MYC+ tumors displayed a more abundant immune cell population with higher levels of macrophages (median 12%) and NK/T cells (median 9%), whereas EBV-/MYC- tumors were composed of the lowest levels of immune cells (median 4% macrophages and 1% NK/T cells). With respect to malignant cell phenotypes, we noted a novel population of SPP1-expressing cells that were enriched in EBV+/MYC+ tumors and a population of CD44-expressing cells that were enriched in EBV+/MYC- tumors. Conclusion Here we present novel subgroups of PBL with unique biology and clinical outcomes. We show that PBL does not rely on B-cell receptor signaling, instead relying on potentially targetable vulnerabilities in JAK-STAT, NOTCH, and RAS-RAF signaling according to EBV positivity and MYC rearrangement status. Lastly, we provide insight into the TME of PBL and demonstrate a novel population of SPP1 and CD44 expressing malignant cells in EBV+ tumors.

7080 Background: Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is an uncommon type of aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. PMBCL has distinct clinicopathologic features compared to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma but shares some clinical and biologic features with nodular sclerosis classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is exceedingly rare in cHL, therefore one may expect that CNS relapse in PMBCL is also uncommon. Herein, we examined the incidence of CNS relapse in patients with PMBCL. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed PMBCL seen at Mayo Clinic between 1/2002 and 4/2023 were identified from the Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Database. Clinical features, treatment details and outcomes were abstracted from medical records. The CNS relapse rate was calculated using a competing risk model, with death considered as a competing risk. Results: A total of 154 PMBCL cases were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 38 years (range 18-77) and 60.4% were female. The distribution of CNS-IPI was low-risk in 80 (51.9%) patients, intermediate-risk in 43 (27.9%), and high-risk in 3 (1.9%), and data were missing for 28 patients (18.2%). 78 patients (50.6%) received R-CHOP and 76 patients (49.4%) received R-DA-EPOCH as frontline therapy. High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) for CNS prophylaxis was administered to 5 patients (all treated with R-CHOP). 20 patients received intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy (methotrexate and/or cytarabine) for CNS prophylaxis (4 with R-CHOP [1 received HD-MTX too],16 with R-DA-EPOCH). The median follow-up was 39 months (95% CI 28.2-49.8). Only 3 patients had CNS relapse, all associated with systemic relapse (1 concurrent, 1 had CNS relapse 8.8 months after systemic relapse, 1 had CNS relapse 2 months before systemic relapse). The cumulative incidence of CNS relapse for the entire cohort was 1.43% (95% CI 0.3%-4.6%) at 1 year and 2.21% (95% CI 0.6%-5.8%) at both 2 and 5 years. For those who did not receive CNS prophylaxis (n=130), the incidence was 0.86% (95% CI 0.1%-4.3%) at 1 year and 1.82% (95% CI 0.4%-5.8%) at both 2 and 5 years. All 3 patients who experienced CNS relapse had R-CHOP as frontline therapy; two patients did not receive any CNS prophylaxis, while 1 patient received IT CNS prophylaxis. Conclusions: The risk of isolated CNS relapse in PMBCL appears to be very low, even in patients who did not receive CNS prophylaxis. While some patients may experience CNS relapse associated with systemic relapse, the overall incidence was low (1.43% at 1 year and 2.21% at 2 and 5 years). The rarity of isolated CNS relapse in PMBCL suggests that routine CNS prophylaxis may not be necessary as part of initial therapy.

Abstract Rearrangements that place the oncogenes MYC, BCL2, or BCL6 adjacent to superenhancers are common in mature B-cell lymphomas. Lymphomas with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or high-grade morphology with both MYC and BCL2 rearrangements are classified as high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements (“double hit”; HGBCL-DH-BCL2) and are associated with aggressive disease and poor outcomes. Although it is established that MYC rearrangements involving immunoglobulin (IG) loci are associated with inferior outcomes relative to those involving other non-IG superenhancers, the frequency of and mechanisms driving IG vs non-IG MYC rearrangements have not been elucidated. Here, we used custom targeted capture and/or whole-genome sequencing to characterize oncogene rearrangements across 883 mature B-cell lymphomas including Burkitt lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, DLBCL, and HGBCL-DH-BCL2 tumors. We demonstrate that, although BCL2 rearrangement topology is consistent across entities, HGBCL-DH-BCL2 have distinct MYC rearrangement architecture relative to tumors with single MYC rearrangements or with both MYC and BCL6 rearrangements (HGBCL-DH-BCL6), including both a higher frequency of non-IG rearrangements and different architecture of MYC::IGH rearrangements. The distinct MYC rearrangement patterns in HGBCL-DH-BCL2 occur on the background of high levels of somatic hypermutation across MYC partner loci in HGBCL-DH-BCL2, creating more opportunity to form these rearrangements. Furthermore, because 1 IGH allele is already disrupted by the existing BCL2 rearrangement, the MYC rearrangement architecture in HGBCL-DH-BCL2 likely reflects selective pressure to preserve both BCL2 and B-cell receptor expression. These data provide new mechanistic explanations for the distinct patterns of MYC rearrangements observed across different lymphoma entities.

Abstract There are no studies directly comparing the efficacy of bendamustine with rituximab (BR) as induction therapy followed by maintenance rituximab (Rm) against rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) followed by Rm in previously untreated, older, transplant-ineligible patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The objective of this international study was to retrospectively compare the efficacy of these two treatment regimens by pooling and comparing a clinical trial cohort with a population-based cohort. 140 patients treated with R-CHOP and 112 patients treated with BR were evaluable for the analysis of the primary endpoint progression-free survival (PFS). Patients receiving R-CHOP had a more favorable risk profile. Median PFS for the R-CHOP group was 3.93 years (95% CI: 2.79–5.30) and for the BR group 2.88 years (95% CI: 1.84–4.61, p-value = 0.12). The Hazard ratio of PFS of R-CHOP vs. BR adjusted for MIPI score was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.57–1.13, p-value = 0.2) and adjusted for MIPI score, Ki67 and cytology was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.51–1.40, p-value = 0.52). These data indicate that there was no difference regarding the efficacy between R-CHOP + Rm and BR + Rm for previously untreated, older patients with MCL.

Introduction: We previously showed that HIV associated EBV negative (-) diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) of germinal center origins (GCB) have enhanced genomic stability and increased expression of DNA repair genes compared to their HIV negative counterparts (Maguire et al 2019). Given that immune deficiency can be induced virally or therapeutically, including the administration of immunosuppressive drugs post solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant, we questioned whether these observations are specific to HIV or if they represent a more global immune impaired signature. Here we assessed the genomic stability of monomorphic DLBCL post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) and the potential role of DNA repair. Methods: A total of 49 monomorphic DLBCL PTLDs (26 EBV(-), 23 EBV positive (+)) and 170 immune competent (IC) DLBCL (EBV status unknown) were studied. All were pathologically reviewed and samples with <60% tumor content were macro-dissected before RNA/DNA extraction. Cell of origin (COO) profiles were assessed using the DLBCL90 molecular assay which can distinguish primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) from GCB, Activated B-cell (ABC) and unclassified (UNC) DLBCL (Ennishi et al 2019). NanoString gene expression profiling (GEP) was performed using the PanCancer Pathways panel and analyzed using NanoString nSolver Advanced Analysis. Copy number (CN) analysis was performed on a subset of samples (45 PTLD, 41 DLBCL) using the OncoScan CN assay and analyzed using Chromosome Analysis Suite (ChAS) v4.1. All p-values listed were Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted and Mann-Whitney tested for the GEP and CN data respectively. Results: In contrast to IC-DLBCL which are GCB enriched (50%), COO profiling revealed PTLD to be ABC enriched (43%). CN analyses revealed that the median CN/sample for PTLD (0.57, p<0.001), EBV(+)PTLD (0.25, p<0.001) and EBV(-)PTLD (0.80, p = 0.050) tumors were significantly less aberrant than IC-DLBCL (1.01). The data also showed that EBV(+)PTLD are less aberrant than EBV(-)PTLD tumors (0.25 vs 0.80, p<0.001). GEP pathway analysis identified DNA repair as downregulated in PTLD and EBV(+)PTLD but upregulated in EBV(-)PTLD compared IC-DLBCL. Nine DNA repair genes ( RAD51, CCNA2a, CHEK1b, POLR2Da, PCNAa, WHSC1a, GTF2H3a, ATM c, EP300 c) were differentially expressed (DE) in EBV(-)PTLD compared to IC-DLBCL (7 increased, 2 decreased, p ≤ 0.0425): where the most overexpressed gene RAD51, a critical mediator of Homologous Recombination (HR) and the Fanconi Anemia (FA) DNA repair pathways, was not DE in PTLD or EBV(+)PTLD compared to IC-DLBCL. Five a genes were increased in PTLD (p ≤ 0.0204) but not EBV(+)PTLD, 1 b was decreased in EBV(+)PTLD (p = 0.01) but not PTLD and 2 c were reduced in PTLD regardless of EBV status compared to IC-DLBCL (p ≤ 0.0024). Twenty-8 genes were DE in EBV(+)PTLD compared to IC-DLBCL. Of these, 23 were downregulated (p ≤ 0.0418) and included HR, FA and mismatch repair genes ( CHEK1, CHEK2, BRAC1/FANCS, FANCA, FANCB, FANCE, MSH2, MSH6). All but 2/23 were similarly expressed in PTLD compared to IC-DLBCL of which 11 were significant (p ≤ 0.0356). The five upregulated genes ( ZBTB32, DDB2, NBN, POLB, RBX1, p ≤ 0.0092) were also upregulated in PTLD (p ≤ 0.0042) but not EBV(-)PTLD compared to IC-DLBCL. Two additional genes ( SKP1, FBXW7) were also identified as increased in EBV(+)PTLD and PTLD (p ≤ 0.0204) compared to IC-DLBCL. In contrast, SKP1 was increased (p = 2.7E-4) and FBXW7 was decreased (p = 0.3610) in EBV(-)PTLD compared to IC-DLBCL. Together the protein products of RBX1, SKP1 and FBXW7 comprise the functional cores of a complete UPS complex, the SCF FBXW7 E3 ubiquitin ligase which have been reported to regulate the DNA damage response and promote genomic stability. Conclusions: Like HIV associated DLBCL, these results show that PTLD is more genomically stable than IC-DLBCL, and that genomic stability is further enhanced in EBV(+)PTLD which have increased expression of UPS related genes. In contrast, EBV(-)PTLD have increased expression of DNA damage repair genes, including RAD51. In summary, monomorphic DLBCL PTLD tumors have enhanced genomic stability that appears to be mediated by two distinct mechanisms stratified by EBV status. Further work is required to assess if this stratification of mechanisms is unique to PTLD or reflects a more global immune impaired EBV related signature.

Background Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is an uncommon type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Clinicopathologic features are distinct from diffuse large B cell lymphoma, but it shares some clinical and biologic features with Nodular sclerosis classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Central nervous system (CNS) relapse appears to be rare in patients with PMBCL, with limited literature reporting a rate of approximately 1.5% to 4%. We examined the incidence of CNS relapse, treatment approaches and survival outcomes in patients with PMBCL. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed PMBCL seen at Mayo Clinic between 2002 and 2022 were identified using the prospective Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Database. Clinical features, treatment details and outcomes were abstracted from the medical record. Cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was analyzed with death as a competing risk. The association of CNS-IPI, systemic treatment, and CNS prophylaxis approach with CNS relapse rate was analyzed using competing risk models and descriptively. Event-free survival (EFS) for the cohort was defined as time from PMBCL diagnosis to first recorded CNS and/or systemic relapse or death from any cause. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from PMBCL diagnosis (or CNS relapse) to death from any cause. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results A total of 124 PMBCL cases were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 37 years and 61% were female. The distribution of CNS-IPI was low-risk in 67 (61%), intermediate-risk in 41 (37%), and high-risk in 2 (2%). 64 patients (52%) received R-CHOP and 54 patients (44%) received R-DA-EPOCH as frontline therapy. High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) for CNS prophylaxis was administered to 6 patients (5%), 5 with R-CHOP and 1 with R-DA-EPOCH. 16 patients received intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy (methotrexate and/or cytarabine) for CNS prophylaxis, 3 with R-CHOP and 13 with R-DA-EPOCH. The median follow-up was 56.0 months. The 5-year EFS rate was 75.1% and the 5-year OS rate was 90.7% for the entire cohort. 20 patients had systemic relapse only and 3 had CNS relapse. The cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was 1.84% (95% CI 0.46%-7.17%) at 2 years and 2.92% (95% CI 0.50%-8.84%) at 5 years (Figure 1). No statistically significant association of CNS-IPI, systemic therapy or CNS prophylaxis regimen with CNS relapse rate was found in competing risk models; however, this analysis was limited by a small event number (n=3). Among the 3 patients with CNS relapse, 1 had high-risk CNS-IPI and 2 had intermediate risk. All 3 patients were treated initially with R-CHOP. Two patients did not receive any CNS prophylaxis and 1 patient received IT CNS prophylaxis. All three patients who had CNS relapse were female. Patient #1 was diagnosed at age 48 and had simultaneous CNS and systemic relapse 6 months later. The patient was treated with HD-MTX, temozolomide and rituximab for CNS relapse, and subsequently received multiple therapies for systemic disease including R-DHAP, R-ICE, and died 17 months after CNS relapse. Patient #2 was diagnosed at age 22 and had CNS relapse after 8.7 months, followed by systemic relapse 2 months later. The patient received HD-MTX, temozolomide and rituximab for CNS relapse, followed by systemic and whole-brain radiation therapy (RT) for both systemic and CNS relapse. Subsequently the patient received salvage chemotherapy, autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplant for systemic relapse. The patient died 26.8 months after CNS relapse. Patient #3 was diagnosed at age 24 and had systemic relapse after 20.7 months, followed by CNS relapse 5.4 months later. The patient received methotrexate and whole-brain RT following CNS relapse and died 1.2 months after CNS relapse. Besides these 3 patients, we identified 6 PMBCL patients with CNS relapse who were diagnosed at other medical centers and subsequently referred to our institution for management of refractory disease. The survival after CNS relapse was poor, with a median OS of 10.4 months (95% CI 5.6-15.2). Conclusion Our study showed that the CNS relapse rate (1.84% at 2 years and 2.92% at 5 years) was overall low in patients with PMBCL, consistent with previous reports. CNS relapse was associated with poor survival despite aggressive treatment approaches. Novel approaches utilizing biological risk factors for CNS relapse, such as circulating tumor DNA, are needed to identify patients with CNS relapse.