Citations

Clear

69 citation(s) found for "Offit, Kenneth".

Twenty-one gene recurrence scores in individuals with breast cancer associated with CHEK2 and ATM germline pathogenic variants.
Shah, Payal D. , Brower, Jamie , Cuff, Lauren, Richardville, Robert, Offit, Kenneth , Hamilton, Jada G. , Garber, Judy E. , Yadav, Siddhartha , Couch, Fergus J. , Domchek, Susan M. , Robson, Mark E.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 4, 2023 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 10585-10585

10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.10585 Get It

10585 Background: The 21-gene recurrence score assay (Oncotype DX, Genomic Health Inc., CA) is prognostic, quantifies predicted benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, and informs clinical decisions for patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). Differences in Oncotype recurrence scores (RS) in individuals with and without BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PV) have been demonstrated, but the results of this assay in patients with BC and germline CHEK2 or ATM PV have not previously been described. This is of particular relevance as CHEK2 BC have been associated with a worse prognosis. Methods: Prospective Registry of MultiPlex Testing (PROMPT) is an online research registry for individuals who have had multigene panel testing for inherited cancer susceptibility. We retrospectively evaluated Oncotype DX recurrence scores from PROMPT participants (pts) with PV or likely PV in CHEK2 or ATM. Mood’s median tests were used to compare median RS, and Yates corrected Chi-square tests were used to compare RS distributions between carriers and a genetically unselected reference population. Results: Oncotype DX reports were reviewed for 75 pts with 77 BC (n = 50 pts with CHEK2 PV with 51 BC; n = 24 with ATM PV; n = 1 with CHEK2 and ATM PV with 2 BC). Among CHEK2 carriers, median RS was 17 (range 2-43) overall, 17 (2-36) for pts < age 50, and 18.5 (8-43) for pts ≥age 50 (p-value 0.47), with distributions not significantly different than reference ( < 50, p = 0.70; ≥50, p = 0.93). Ten pts had low penetrance CHEK2 alleles (p.S428F or p.I157T) with median RS 16 (9-28) compared to 18 (2-43) in those with other CHEK2 alleles (p = 0.35). Among ATM carriers, median RS was 17 (1-35) overall, 17 (1-35) for pts < age 50, and 16 (11-32) for pts ≥age 50 (p = 0.51), with distributions also not significantly different ( < 50, p = 0.78; ≥50, p = 0.79). Conclusions: Unlike data seen in BC associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2, Oncotype DX RS in individuals with CHEK2 and ATM-associated BC are similar to the published genetically unselected commercial database median RS of 16, with no clear difference based on penetrance of CHEK2 allele. Proportions of patients < 50 and ≥50 with CHEK2 and ATM PV with RS within the range for chemoendocrine therapy consideration are also similar to the historical reference. The inferior prognosis that has been suggested in CHEK2 BC is not reflected in Oncotype DX RS. [Table: see text]
Genome-wide analyses characterize shared heritability among cancers and identify novel cancer susceptibility regions
Lindström, Sara , Wang, Lu , Feng, Helian , Huo, Sijia , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Turman, Constance , Chen, Hongjie , Bammler, Theo K. , Gallinger, Steve, Gruber, Stephen B. , Moreno, Vı́ctor , Offit, Kenneth , O’Mara, Tracy A. , Tomlinson, Ian, Gharahkhani, Puya , MacGregor, Stuart , Schumacher, Johannes , Bondy, Melissa L. , Houlston, Richard S. , Jenkins, Robert B. , Melin, Beatrice , Wrensch, Margaret , Brennan, Paul , Johansson, Mattias , McKay, James , Aldrich, Melinda C. , Landi, Maria Teresa , Bishop, D. Timothy , Iles, Mark M. , Law, Matthew H. , Wolpin, Brian M. , Petersen, Gloria M. , Purdue, Mark P. , Scélo, Ghislaine , Kar, Siddhartha , Hung, Rayjean J, Kraft, Peter , Lissowska, Jolanta , Simard, Jacques , Dörk, Thilo , John, Esther M. , Carracedo, Ángel , Huang, Wen‐Yi , Vodička, Pavel , Taylor, Jack A. , Lessel, Davor , Kurian, Allison W. , Hung, Rayjean J. , Kundaje, Anshul , Zhong, Jun , Turman, Constance , Chen, Hongjie , Gruber, Stephen B , Marchand, Loïc Le , Moreno, Victor , Offit, Kenneth , Gharahkhani, Puya , MacGregor, Stuart , Schumacher, Johannes , Houlston, Richard S , Brennan, Paul , Johansson, Mattias , Iles, Mark M , Law, Matthew H , Amundadottir, Laufey , Klein, Alison P , Petersen, Gloria, Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Kar, Siddhartha , Kraft, Peter , Dörk, Thilo , Lissowska, Jolanta , John, Esther M , Hung, Rayjean J , Harrison, Tabitha A , O'Mara, Tracy A , Lessel, Davor , Bishop, D Timothy , Huang, Wen-Yi , Taylor, Jack A , Simard, Jacques , Kurian, Allison W , Kundaje, Anshul , Vodicka, Pavel , Zhong, Jun , Majumdar, Arunabha , MacDonald, James W. , Mancuso, Nicholas , Gunter, Marc J. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Vivo, Immaculata De , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. , Gockel, Ines , Jankowski, Janusz , Barnholtz‐Sloan, Jill S. , Christiani, David C. , Amos, Christopher I. , Tardón, Adonina , Démenais, Florence , Goldstein, Alisa M. , Kanetsky, Peter A. , Ámundadóttir, Laufey T. , Stolzenberg‐Solomon, Rachael Z. , Klein, Alison P. , Risch, Harvey A. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Paşaniuc, Bogdan

Mayo Clinic

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | March 17, 2023 | Volume: 115 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 712-732

10.1093/jnci/djad043 | PMID 36929942 Get It

Abstract Background The shared inherited genetic contribution to risk of different cancers is not fully known. In this study, we leverage results from 12 cancer genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to quantify pairwise genome-wide genetic correlations across cancers and identify novel cancer susceptibility loci. Methods We collected GWAS summary statistics for 12 solid cancers based on 376 759 participants with cancer and 532 864 participants without cancer of European ancestry. The included cancer types were breast, colorectal, endometrial, esophageal, glioma, head and neck, lung, melanoma, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, and renal cancers. We conducted cross-cancer GWAS and transcriptome-wide association studies to discover novel cancer susceptibility loci. Finally, we assessed the extent of variant-specific pleiotropy among cancers at known and newly identified cancer susceptibility loci. Results We observed widespread but modest genome-wide genetic correlations across cancers. In cross-cancer GWAS and transcriptome-wide association studies, we identified 15 novel cancer susceptibility loci. Additionally, we identified multiple variants at 77 distinct loci with strong evidence of being associated with at least 2 cancer types by testing for pleiotropy at known cancer susceptibility loci. Conclusions Overall, these results suggest that some genetic risk variants are shared among cancers, though much of cancer heritability is cancer-specific and thus tissue-specific. The increase in statistical power associated with larger sample sizes in cross-disease analysis allows for the identification of novel susceptibility regions. Future studies incorporating data on multiple cancer types are likely to identify additional regions associated with the risk of multiple cancer types.
Abstract PD14-05: PD14-05 Prospective longitudinal validation of a breast cancer risk prediction model in a cohort of 130,058 women
Mabey, Brent, Hughes, Elisha , Probst, Braden , Simmons, Timothy , Hullinger, Brooke, Gary, Monique, Klemp, Jennifer R. , Offit, Kenneth , Pruthi, Sandhya , Whitworth, Pat, Wagner, Susanne , Slavin, Thomas P. , Gutin, Alexander , Pederson, Holly J. , Morris, Brian, Domchek, Susan M. , Eng, Charis , Mukherjee, Semanti , Vijai, Joseph , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Kurian, Allison W. , Robson, Mark E. , Lanchbury, Jerry S.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | March 2, 2023 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 5_Supplement | Pages: PD14-05-PD14-05

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd14-05 Get It

Abstract Background: Personalized breast cancer (BC) risk assessment depends on known traditional risk factors, specific germline mutations, and genome-wide polygenic risk scores (PRS). PRS explains a substantial proportion of genetic BC susceptibility. Accuracy of BC risk prediction may be improved by combining a PRS with traditional risk factors. We recently developed and validated a 149-SNP PRS for women of diverse ancestries using ancestry-informative genetic markers and combined this with version 7 of the Tyrer-Cuzick (TC) model to generate a Combined Risk Score (CRS). Here, we describe a pre-specified prospective longitudinal clinical validation of CRS as a predictor of BC risk. Methods: Women in the U.S. who were referred for clinical genetic testing between January 2017 and February 2019 were matched to medical and hospital claims in an anonymized dataset. Women with a pathogenic mutation in a BC-related gene were excluded from analysis. Follow-up began 4 months after testing and extended to the earliest date of BC diagnosis, censoring at the time of BC preventive treatment, or November 1, 2019. Incident BC events were determined by an ICD10 code of C50.* and confirmed by relevant treatment codes. CRS calibration was evaluated by the ratio of observed (O) to expected (E) incident BCs for the full cohort, and for women split into event-based 5-year CRS risk deciles. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate discriminatory accuracy in terms of hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values from likelihood ratio chi-squared statistics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to examine risk for women split into high- or low-risk groups according to a 3% 5-year CRS risk threshold. Results: 130,058 women with 148,349 total patient years met study eligibility criteria and were matched to claims data. Over a median (range) follow-up of 12.1 (4.0-29.5) months, 340 incident BC events were observed. The CRS was well calibrated in the overall cohort with an O/E ratio of 1.11 (95% CI=0.99-1.23) and within deciles of predicted risk (Table). Importantly, in the highest risk decile, the O/E was 0.91 (95% CI=0.63-1.27) with CRS, but 0.67 (95% CI=0.46-0.94) with TC alone, illustrating the superior calibration of CRS. In a Cox model adjusted for age at testing, PRS had an HR per standard deviation (SD) of 1.48 (95% CI=1.33-1.64, p=2.55×10-13); the HR/SD was 1.43 (95% CI=1.29-1.59, p=1.61×10-11) after adjusting for family history. In a bivariate analysis using both CRS and TC to predict time to BC, CRS added significantly to the model after accounting for TC (HR/SD=2.89, 95% CI=2.12-3.94, p=1.20×10-11), whereas TC did not add significant information after accounting for CRS. 15,986 (12.3%) women were above the CRS high-risk threshold, including 123 with events. A total of 10,248 (7.9%) women were reclassified by the CRS model compared to the TC model. Among women who were classified as high-risk by TC, 32.6% were reclassified as low-risk by CRS; among those classified as low-risk by TC, 4.3% were reclassified as high-risk by CRS. The CRS high-risk group experienced events at over three times the rate of the low-risk group (HR=3.75, 95% CI=3.00-4.68, p=6.39×10-27). Conclusion: The CRS was well-calibrated in predicting BC and significantly improved upon a traditional risk factor model. Clinical use of the CRS may lead to improved BC prevention and screening strategies. Table: Absolute risk calibration by 5-year risk decile Incidence is reported per 1,000 women-years. 34 breast cancers were observed per decile. Citation Format: Brent Mabey, Elisha Hughes, Braden Probst, Holly J. Pederson, Timothy Simmons, Brian Morris, Brooke Hullinger, Susan Domchek, Charis Eng, Monique Gary, Jennifer Klemp, Semanti Mukherjee, Vijai Joseph, Kenneth Offit, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Sandhya Pruthi, Allison W. Kurian, Mark E. Robson, Pat Whitworth, Susanne Wagner, Jerry Lanchbury, Thomas Slavin, Alexander Gutin. PD14-05 Prospective longitudinal validation of a breast cancer risk prediction model in a cohort of 130,058 women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD14-05.
Association of the CHEK2 c.1100delC variant, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with contralateral breast cancer risk and breast cancer-specific survival
Morra, Anna , Andrulis, Irene L. , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Camp, Nicola J. , Cessna, Melissa H., Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Collaborators, NBCS, Daly, Mary B., Easton, Douglas F. , Eccles, Diana M., Evans, D. Gareth , Fasching, Peter A. , Flyger, Henrik, García‐Closas, Montserrat , Gündert, Melanie , Hahnen, Eric , Haiman, Christopher A. , Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia, Hoppe, Reiner , Howell, Anthony , Investigators, ABCTB, Investigators, kConFab, Janni, Wolfgang, Johnson, Nichola , Kristensen, Vessela N. , Lindblom, Annika , Mannermaa, Arto , Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Nevelsteen, Ines, Neven, Patrick , Obi, Nadia , Offit, Kenneth , Park‐Simon, Tjoung‐Won , Patel, Alpa V. , Phillips, Kelly‐Anne , Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Rack, Brigitte , Rhenius, Valerie , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Schmutzler, Rita K. , Schuetze, Sabine, Shah, Mitul , Smichkoska, Snezhana , Tollenaar, Rob A.�E.�M. , Tomlinson, Ian , Vachon, Celine M. , Veen, Elke M. van , Wang, Qin , Wendt, Camilla, Wildiers, Hans , Adank, Muriel A. , Hooning, Maartje J. , Eccles, Diana , Plaseska‐Karanfilska, Dijana , Eccles, Diana , Evans, D Gareth , García-Closas, Montserrat , Phillips, Kelly-Anne , Wildiers, Hans , Lindblom, Annika , Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana , Sawyer, Elinor J , Schreurs, Maartje A. C. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Augustinsson, Annelie , Behrens, Sabine , Bojesen, Stig E. , Brauch, Hiltrud , Broeks, Annegien , Buys, Saundra S. , Castelao, Jose E. , Chung, Wendy K. , Colonna, Sarah V. , Couch, Fergus J. , Cox, Angela , Cross, Simon S. , Czene, Kamila , Dennis, Joe , Devilee, Peter , Dörk, Thilo , Dunning, Alison M. , Dwek, Miriam , Eriksson, Mikael , Fehm, Tanja , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Gabrielson, Marike , Gago-Domínguez, Manuela , García-Sáenz, José Á. , Genkinger, Jeanine M. , Graßmann, Felix , Hartikainen, Jaana M. , Hopper, John L. , Houlston, Richard S. , Jakubowska, Anna , Jernström, Helena , John, Esther M. , Jones, Michael E. , Kurian, Allison W. , Lambrechts, Diether , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Lubiński, Jan , Lux, Michael P. , Mulligan, Anna Marie , Muranen, Taru , Nevanlinna, Heli , Newman, William G. , Olshan, Andrew F. , Peterlongo, Paolo , Polley, Eric C. , Presneau, Nadège , Pylkäs, Katri , Radice, Paolo , Rashid, Muhammad Usman , Robson, Mark E. , Romero, Atocha , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Scott, Christopher, Southey, Melissa C. , Tapper, William , Teras, Lauren R. , Tomczyk, Katarzyna , Troester, Melissa A. , Vachon, Celine M. , Winqvist, Robert , Ziogas, Argyrios , Hall, Per N , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Schmidt, Marjanka K.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | February 13, 2023 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-2569372/v1 | PMID 36824750 Get It

Abstract Breast cancer (BC) patients with a germline CHEK2 c.1100delC variant have an increased risk of contralateral BC (CBC) and worse BC-specific survival (BCSS) compared to non-carriers. We aimed to assess the associations of CHEK2 c.1100delC, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with CBC risk and BCSS. Analyses were based on 82,701 women diagnosed with invasive BC including 963 CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers; median follow-up was 9.1 years. Differential associations of treatment by CHEK2 c.1100delC status were tested by including interaction terms in a multivariable Cox regression model. A multi-state model was used for further insight into the relation between CHEK2 c.1100delC status, treatment, CBC risk and death. There was no evidence for differential associations of therapy with CBC risk by CHEK2 c.1100delC status The strongest association with reduced CBC risk was observed for the combination of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy [HR(95%CI): 0.66 (0.55–0.78)]. No association was observed with radiotherapy. Results from the multi-state model showed shorter BCSS for CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers versus non-carriers also after accounting for CBC occurrence [HR(95%CI) :1.30 (1.09–1.56)]. In conclusion, systemic therapy was associated with reduced CBC risk irrespective of CHEK2 c.1100delC status. Moreover, CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers had shorter BCSS, which appears not to be fully explained by their CBC risk. (Main MS: 3201 words)
NBN Pathogenic Germline Variants are Associated with Pan-Cancer Susceptibility and In Vitro DNA Damage Response Defects
Belhadj, Sami , Khurram, Aliya , Bandlamudi, Chaitanya , Palou-Márquez, Guillermo , Steinsnyder, Zoe , Wildman, Temima , Catchings, Amanda , Kemel, Yelena , Mukherjee, Semanti , Fesko, Benjamin , Mehine, Miika , Dandiker, Sita , Izhar, Aalin , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Brower, Jamie , Walsh, Michael F. , Topka, Sabine , Offit, Kenneth , Ravichandran, Vignesh , Steinsnyder, Zoe , Wildman, Temima , Catchings, Amanda , Kemel, Yelena , Mukherjee, Semanti , Fesko, Benjamin , Arora, Kanika , Mehine, Miika , Dandiker, Sita , Izhar, Aalin , Petrini, John , Domchek, Susan M , Nathanson, Katherine L , Brower, Jamie , Couch, Fergus J. , Stadler, Zsofia , Robson, Mark , Walsh, Michael , Joseph, Vijai , Berger, Michael , Supek, Fran , Karam, Rachid , Topka, Sabine , Offit, Kenneth , Ravichandran, Vignesh , Domchek, Susan M. , Couch, Fergus J. , Robson, Mark E. , Vijai, Joseph , Karam, Rachid

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Cancer Research | November 8, 2022 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 422-431

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1703 | PMID 36346689 Get It

Abstract Purpose: To explore the role of NBN as a pan-cancer susceptibility gene. Experimental Design: Matched germline and somatic DNA samples from 34,046 patients were sequenced using Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets and presumed pathogenic germline variants (PGV) identified. Allele-specific and gene-centered analysis of enrichment was conducted and a validation cohort of 26,407 pan-cancer patients was analyzed. Functional studies utilized cellular models with analysis of protein expression, MRN complex formation/localization, and viability assessment following treatment with γ-irradiation. Results: We identified 83 carriers of 32 NBN PGVs (0.25% of the studied series), 40% of which (33/83) carried the Slavic founder p.K219fs. The frequency of PGVs varied across cancer types. Patients harboring NBN PGVs demonstrated increased loss of the wild-type allele in their tumors [OR = 2.7; confidence interval (CI): 1.4–5.5; P = 0.0024; pan-cancer], including lung and pancreatic tumors compared with breast and colorectal cancers. p.K219fs was enriched across all tumor types (OR = 2.22; CI: 1.3–3.6; P = 0.0018). Gene-centered analysis revealed enrichment of PGVs in cases compared with controls in the European population (OR = 1.9; CI: 1.3–2.7; P = 0.0004), a finding confirmed in the replication cohort (OR = 1.8; CI: 1.2–2.6; P = 0.003). Two novel truncating variants, p.L19* and p.N71fs, produced a 45 kDa fragment generated by alternative translation initiation that maintained binding to MRE11. Cells expressing these fragments showed higher sensitivity to γ-irradiation and lower levels of radiation-induced KAP1 phosphorylation. Conclusions: Burden analyses, biallelic inactivation, and functional evidence support the role of NBN as contributing to a broad cancer spectrum. Further studies in large pan-cancer series and the assessment of epistatic and environmental interactions are warranted to further define these associations.
Summary of the experiences, knowledge, medical management, and family communication of monoallelic MUTYH carriers
McKenna, Danielle , Sanchez, Pauleen, Powers, Jacquelyn , Brower, Jamie , Wang, Louise , Mueller, Rebecca , Symecko, Heather , Hamilton, Jada G. , Wildman, Temima , Offit, Kenneth , McKenna, Danielle B , Katona, Bryson W , Domchek, Susan M. , Couch, Fergus J. , Garber, Judy E. , Robson, Mark E.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Genetic Counseling | October 17, 2022 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 342-350

10.1002/jgc4.1641 | PMID 36245263 Get It

AbstractGermline genetic testing for inherited cancer risk is increasingly being performed with multigene panel testing with MUTYH often included on colorectal cancer‐ and polyposis‐focused panels, as well as on broader pan‐cancer panels. With up to 1%–2% of the general population being monoallelic MUTYH carriers, pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in MUTYH are one of the most common findings on multigene cancer panels. However, little is known about patient experience and understanding of monoallelic MUTYH P/LP variants, nor whether such findings influence medical management recommendations and familial communication, which this study aims to better understand. Monoallelic P/LP MUTYH carriers were recruited from the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT) and completed a cross‐sectional self‐report survey on sociodemographic characteristics, medical and family history, experiences with MUTYH genetic testing, genetics and MUTYH knowledge, perceived cancer risk, and familial communication. Of 115 eligible PROMPT participants, 49 (43%) completed the survey who were primarily female (94%), white (96%), had a history of cancer (61%), and a median age of 51.4 years. Most participants (61%) reported satisfaction with how their healthcare provider managed their genetic test result and care, and 65% of survey participants reported their provider recommended colonoscopy based on their genetic test results. Participants' responses also reflected variable levels of knowledge regarding cancer risks and screening recommendations for MUTYH carriers. The majority (98%) of participants shared their genetic test results with at least some of their relatives; however, only 13% of eligible relatives reportedly underwent cascade testing. Taken together, this study provides needed insight into the overall experiences of monoallelic MUTYH carriers and highlights numerous areas for improvement in clinician education, communication, and management of these individuals.
Breast and Prostate Cancer Risks for MaleBRCA1andBRCA2Pathogenic Variant Carriers Using Polygenic Risk Scores
Barnes, Daniel R. , Silvestri, Valentina , Leslie, Goska , McGuffog, Lesley, Yang, Xin , Adlard, Julian , Agnarsson, Bjarni A. , Ahmed, Munaza, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L. , Arason, Aðalgeir , Azzollini, Jacopo , Barkardóttir, Rósa B. , Barrowdale, Daniel , Belotti, Muriel, Berthet, Pascaline, Boonen, Susanne E. , Borg, Åke , Brady, Angela F., Brewer, Carole, Brunet, Joan , Bucalo, Agostino, Caldés, Trinidad , Cassingham, Hayley , Christensen, Lise Lotte , Cini, Giulia , Claes, Kathleen , Collaborators, GEMO Study, Collaborators, EMBRACE, Cortesi, Laura , Damante, Giuseppe , Darder, Esther , Davidson, Rosemarie, Leeneer, Kim De , Putter, Robin De , Valle, Jesús Del , Ding, Yuan Chun , Donaldson, Alan , Eason, Jacqueline , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Engel, Christoph , Evans, D. Gareth , Feliubadaló, Lídia , Frone, Megan N. , Frost, Debra, Gehrig, Andrea, Giraud, Sophie , Glendon, Gord , Goldgar, David E. , Greene, Mark H. , Gregory, Helen , Groß, Eva, Hahnen, Eric, Hamann, Ute, Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Hanson, Helen , Horváth, Judit , Investigators, KConFab, Investigators, HEBON, Izatt, Louise , James, Paul A. , Janavičius, Ramūnas , Jensen, Uffe Birk , Johannsson, Oskar T., John, Esther M. , Kramer, Gero , Kroeldrup, Lone , Kruse, Torben A. , Lautrup, Charlotte Kvist , López‐Fernández, Adrià , Mai, Phuong L, Manoukian, Siranoush , Mátrai, Zoltán , Matricardi, Laura , Mebirouk, Noura, Meindl, Alfons , Montagna, Marco , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Morrison, Patrick J. , Muranen, Taru , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Niederacher, Dieter , Oláh, Edith , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Pedersen, Inge Søkilde , Peissel, Bernard , Peterlongo, Paolo , Petersen, Annabeth Høgh , Pinto, Pedro, Porteous, Mary, Pottinger, Caroline , Pujana, Miquel Angel, Ramser, Juliane, Rantala, Johanna, Rogers, Mark T., Rønlund, Karina, Abajo, A.M. SÁnchez De, Shah, Payal D. , Sharif, Saba , Side, Lucy, Stadler, Zsofia, Steele, Linda , Sutter, Christian , Tan, Yen Y. , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Teulé, Àlex , Thull, Darcy L. , Trainer, Alison H., Tripathi, Vishakha , Valentini, Virginia , Viel, Alessandra , Walker, Lisa, Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Wappenschmidt, Barbara , Whaite, Anna , Offit, Kenneth, Thomassen, Mads , Schmutzler, Rita K., Simard, Jacques , Easton, Douglas F. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Pujana, Miguel Ángel , Dennis, Joe , Yang, Xin , Adlard, Julian , Agnarsson, Bjarni A , Andrulis, Irene L , Arason, Adalgeir , Arnold, Norbert , Auber, Bernd , Azzollini, Jacopo , Barkardottir, Rosa B , Barrowdale, Daniel , Benitez, Javier , Boonen, Susanne E , Bozsik, Aniko , Brennan, Paul , Brunet, Joan , Bucalo, Agostino , Caligo, Maria A , Campbell, Ian G , Cassingham, Hayley , Cini, Giulia , Claes, Kathleen B M , Coppa, Anna , Cortesi, Laura , Darder, Esther , de la Hoya, Miguel , de Putter, Robin , Del Valle, Jesús , Domchek, Susan M , Donaldson, Alan , Eason, Jacqueline , Engel, Christoph , Fostira, Florentia , Frone, Megan , Glendon, Gord , Godwin, Andrew K. , Greene, Mark H , Hahnen, Eric , Hanson, Helen , Izatt, Louise , Izquierdo, Angel , James, Paul , John, Esther M , Kroeldrup, Lone , Kruse, Torben A , Lazaro, Conxi , Lesueur, Fabienne , Matrai, Zoltan , Montagna, Marco , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Morrison, Patrick J , Muranen, Taru A , Nathanson, Katherine L , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Nevanlinna, H , Nguyen-Dumont, Tu , Niederacher, Dieter , Palli, Domenico , Parsons, Michael T , Perez-Segura, Pedro , Peterlongo, Paolo , Pinto, Pedro , Pottinger, Caroline , Radice, Paolo , Robson, Mark , Rump, Andreas , Sharif, Saba , Steele, Linda , Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique , Teixeira, Manuel R , Thull, Darcy L , Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Tommasi, Stefania , Toss, Angela , Tripathi, Vishakha , Valentini, Virginia , van Asperen, Christi J , Venturelli, Marta , Viel, Alessandra , Joseph, Vijai , Whaite, Anna , Simard, Jacques , Easton, Doug , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Ottini, Laura , Barnes, Daniel R , Leslie, Goska , Pujana, Miquel Angel , Eeles, Rosalind A , Evans, D Gareth , Matricardi, Laura , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Silvestri, Valentina , De Leeneer, Kim , Feliubadaló, Lidia , Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Manoukian, Siranoush , Arnold, Norbert , Auber, Bernd , Balmañà, Judith , Barwell, Julian , Benı́tez, Javier , Bozsik, Anikó , Brady, Angela F., Buys, Saundra S. , Caligo, Maria A. , Campbell, Ian , Collaborators, GEMO Study, Collaborators, EMBRACE, Cook, Jackie A , Hoya, Miguel de la , Dı́ez, Orland , Domchek, Susan M. , Gallagher, David James , Hentschel, Julia , Investigators, KConFab, Investigators, HEBON, Izquierdo, Á. , Lázaro, Conxi , Lesueur, Fabienne , Mai, Phuong L, Maxwell, Kara N. , Meindl, Alfons , Nevanlinna, Heli , Nguyen‐Dumont, Tú , Palli, Domenico , Parsons, Michael T. , Radice, Paolo , Robson, Mark E. , Rump, Andreas , Singer, Christian F. , Stoppa‐Lyonnet, Dominique , Asperen, Christi J. van , Vijai, Joseph , Zanna, Ines , Couch, Fergus J. , Ottini, Laura

Mayo Clinic

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | July 26, 2021 | Volume: 114 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 109-122

10.1093/jnci/djab147 | PMID 34320204 Get It

AbstractBackgroundRecent population-based female breast cancer and prostate cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS) have been developed. We assessed the associations of these PRS with breast and prostate cancer risks for male BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers.Methods483 BRCA1 and 1318 BRCA2 European ancestry male carriers were available from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). A 147-single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) prostate cancer PRS (PRSPC) and a 313-SNP breast cancer PRS were evaluated. There were 3 versions of the breast cancer PRS, optimized to predict overall (PRSBC), estrogen receptor (ER)–negative (PRSER-), or ER-positive (PRSER+) breast cancer risk.ResultsPRSER+ yielded the strongest association with breast cancer risk. The odds ratios (ORs) per PRSER+ standard deviation estimates were 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] =1.07 to 1.83) for BRCA1 and 1.33 (95% CI = 1.16 to 1.52) for BRCA2 carriers. PRSPC was associated with prostate cancer risk for BRCA1 (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.28 to 2.33) and BRCA2 (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.34 to 1.91) carriers. The estimated breast cancer odds ratios were larger after adjusting for female relative breast cancer family history. By age 85 years, for BRCA2 carriers, the breast cancer risk varied from 7.7% to 18.4% and prostate cancer risk from 34.1% to 87.6% between the 5th and 95th percentiles of the PRS distributions.ConclusionsPopulation-based prostate and female breast cancer PRS are associated with a wide range of absolute breast and prostate cancer risks for male BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. These findings warrant further investigation aimed at providing personalized cancer risks for male carriers and informing clinical management.
Sequencing at lymphoid neoplasm susceptibility loci maps six myeloma risk genes
Waller, Rosalie, McKay, James , Clay‐Gilmour, Alyssa , Wei, Xiaomu , Madsen, Michael J. , Sborov, Douglas W. , Curtin, Karen , Slager, Susan L, Offit, Kenneth , Vachon, Celine M. , Lipkin, Steven M. , Camp, Nicola J. , Waller, Rosalie G. , Griffin, R. L. , Clay-Gilmour, Alyssa, Waller, Rosalie G , Griffin, Rosalie , Klein, Robert J. , Vijai, Joseph , Vachon, Celine M. , Dumontet, Charles

Mayo Clinic

Human Molecular Genetics | March 2, 2021 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1142-1153

10.1093/hmg/ddab066 | PMID 33751038 Get It

Abstract Inherited genetic risk factors play a role in multiple myeloma (MM), yet considerable missing heritability exists. Rare risk variants at genome-wide association study (GWAS) loci are a new avenue to explore. Pleiotropy between lymphoid neoplasms (LNs) has been suggested in family history and genetic studies, but no studies have interrogated sequencing for pleiotropic genes or rare risk variants. Sequencing genetically enriched cases can help discover rarer variants. We analyzed exome sequencing in familial or early-onset MM cases to identify rare, functionally relevant variants near GWAS loci for a range of LNs. A total of 149 distinct and significant LN GWAS loci have been published. We identified six recurrent, rare, potentially deleterious variants within 5 kb of significant GWAS single nucleotide polymorphisms in 75 MM cases. Mutations were observed in BTNL2, EOMES, TNFRSF13B, IRF8, ACOXL and TSPAN32. All six genes replicated in an independent set of 255 early-onset MM or familial MM or precursor cases. Expansion of our analyses to the full length of these six genes resulted in a list of 39 rare and deleterious variants, seven of which segregated in MM families. Three genes also had significant rare variant burden in 733 sporadic MM cases compared with 935 control individuals: IRF8 (P = 1.0 × 10−6), EOMES (P = 6.0 × 10−6) and BTNL2 (P = 2.1 × 10−3). Together, our results implicate six genes in MM risk, provide support for genetic pleiotropy between LN subtypes and demonstrate the utility of sequencing genetically enriched cases to identify functionally relevant variants near GWAS loci.
Genetic architectures of proximal and distal colorectal cancer are partly distinct
Huyghe, Jeroen R. , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Schmit, Stephanie L. , Chen, Sai , Barfield, Richard , Cross, Amanda J. , Diergaarde, Brenda , Duggan, David , Harlid, Sophia , Imaz, Liher , Kang, Hyun Min , Levine, David , Perduca, Vittorio , Perez‐Cornago, Aurora , Slattery, Martha L. , Duijnhoven, Fränzel J.B. van , Guelpen, Bethany Van , Anderson, Kristin E. , Arnau‐Collell, Coral, Banbury, Barbara L. , Berndt, Sonja I. , Bishop, D. Timothy , Boehm, Juergen , Boeing, Heiner , Brenner, Hermann , Buch, Stephan , Burnett‐Hartman, Andrea N. , Carr, Prudence R. , Castells, Antoni , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Curtis, Keith R. , Chapelle, Albert de la , Easton, Douglas F. , English, Dallas R. , Gala, Manish , Gallinger, Steven , Gauderman, W. James, Goodman, Phyllis J. , Grove, John, Gsur, Andrea , Gunter, Marc J. , Haile, Robert W. , Hampe, Jochen , Hoffmeister, Michael , Hsu, Wan‐Ling, Huang, Wen‐Yi , Joshi, Amit D. , Kühn, Tilman , Küry, Sébastien , Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Li, Li , Lindblom, Annika , Lindor, Noralane M. , Markowitz, Sanford D. , Moreno, Lorena , Murphy, Neil , Nassir, Rami , Offit, Kenneth, Parfrey, Patrick S. , Pearlman, Rachel , Phipps, Amanda I. , Prentice, Ross L. , Qi, Lihong , Rennert, Gad , Rennert, Hedy S., Ríboli, Elio , Schafmayer, Clemens, Seminara, Daniela, Song, Mingyang , Su, Yu‐Ru, Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Thomas, Duncan C. , Trichopoulou, Antonia , Visvanathan, Kala, Vodička, Pavel , Vodičková, Ludmila, Weigl, Korbinian , Weinstein, Stephanie J. , Woods, Michael O. , Wu, Anna H. , Nickerson, Deborah A. , Scacheri, Peter C. , Kundaje, Anshul , Casey, Graham , Gruber, Stephen B. , Hayes, Richard B. , Peters, Ulrike , Visvanathan, Kala , Brenner, Hermann , Buchanan, Daniel D , Chan, Andrew T , Gsur, Andrea , Hampe, Jochen , Hoffmeister, Michael , Huang, Wen-Yi , Jenab, Mazda , Murphy, Neil , Peters, Ulrike , Rennert, Gad , English, Dallas R , Gunter, Marc J , Haile, Robert W , Harrison, Tabitha A , Van Guelpen, Bethany , Visvanathan, Kala , Kury, Sebastien , Bishop, D Timothy , Song, Mingyang , Hayes, Richard B , Perez-Cornago, Aurora , Nassir, Rami , Kundaje, Anshul , Riboli, Elio , Vodicka, Pavel , Diergaarde, Brenda , Lindblom, Annika , Bien, Stephanie A. , Hampel, Heather , Conti, David V. , Qu, Conghui , Lin, Yi , Baron, John A. , Sakoda, Lori C. , Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Agudo, Antonio , Albanes, Demetrius , Alonso, M. Henar , Arndt, Volker , Bassik, Michael Cory , Bezieau, Stéphane , Boutron‐Ruault, Marie‐Christine , Brezina, Stefanie , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Caan, Bette J. , Campbell, Peter T. , Castellvı́-Bel, Sergi , Chan, Andrew T. , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Feskens, Edith J. M. , Giles, Graham G. , Grady, William M. , Hopper, John L. , Hudson, Thomas J , Jenab, Mazda , Jenkins, Mark A. , Keku, Temitope O , Kooperberg, Charles , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Li, Christopher I , Lieb, Wolfgang , Männistö, Satu , Milne, Roger L. , Ogino, Shuji , Panico, Salvatore , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Platz, Elizabeth A. , Potter, John D. , Raskin, Leon , Schoen, Robert E. , Tangen, Catherine M. , Ulrich, Cornelia M. , Vymetalkova, Veronika Polakova , White, Emily E. , Wolk, Alicja , Abecasis, Gonçalo R. , Hsu, Li , Moreno, Vı́ctor , Newcomb, Polly A.

Mayo Clinic

Gut | February 25, 2021 | Volume: 70 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1325-1334

10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321534 | PMID 33632709 Get It

Objective An understanding of the etiologic heterogeneity of colorectal cancer (CRC) is critical for improving precision prevention, including individualized screening recommendations and the discovery of novel drug targets and repurposable drug candidates for chemoprevention. Known differences in molecular characteristics and environmental risk factors among tumors arising in different locations of the colorectum suggest partly distinct mechanisms of carcinogenesis. The extent to which the contribution of inherited genetic risk factors for CRC differs by anatomical subsite of the primary tumor has not been examined. Design To identify new anatomical subsite-specific risk loci, we performed genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analyses including data of 48 214 CRC cases and 64 159 controls of European ancestry. We characterised effect heterogeneity at CRC risk loci using multinomial modelling. Results We identified 13 loci that reached genome-wide significance (p<5×10 −8 ) and that were not reported by previous GWASs for overall CRC risk. Multiple lines of evidence support candidate genes at several of these loci. We detected substantial heterogeneity between anatomical subsites. Just over half (61) of 109 known and new risk variants showed no evidence for heterogeneity. In contrast, 22 variants showed association with distal CRC (including rectal cancer), but no evidence for association or an attenuated association with proximal CRC. For two loci, there was strong evidence for effects confined to proximal colon cancer. Conclusion Genetic architectures of proximal and distal CRC are partly distinct. Studies of risk factors and mechanisms of carcinogenesis, and precision prevention strategies should take into consideration the anatomical subsite of the tumour.
Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Daly, Mary B., Dickson, Patricia , Elkhanany, Ahmed , Friedman, Susan , Hutton, Mollie L., CGC, Khan, Seema, Klein, Catherine, Kohlmann, Wendy , CGC, Kurian, Allison W. , Laronga, Christine , Mak, Julie , LCGC, Menendez, Carolyn S. , Merajver, Sofía D. , Norquist, Barbara S., Offit, Kenneth , Pederson, Holly J. , Reiser, Gwen , CGC, Senter-Jamieson, Leigha, CGC, Shannon, Kristen M. , Shatsky, Rebecca , Visvanathan, Kala , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Wick, Myra , Wisinski, Kari B. , Yurgelun, Matthew B. , Darlow, Susan, Dwyer, Mary A., Norquist, Barbara M. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Visvanathan, Kala , Kurian, Allison W , Norquist, Barbara , Elkhanany, Ahmed , Shatsky, Rebecca , Pal, Tuya , Berry, Michael P., Buys, Saundra S. , Domchek, Susan M. , Goggins, Michael , CGC, Karlan, Beth Y. , CGC, Litton, Jennifer K. , LCGC, CGC, CGC

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | January 6, 2021 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 77-102

10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001 | PMID 33406487 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancer and recommended approaches to genetic testing/counseling and management strategies in individuals with these pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. This manuscript focuses on cancer risk and risk management for BRCA-related breast/ovarian cancer syndrome and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Carriers of a BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant have an excessive risk for both breast and ovarian cancer that warrants consideration of more intensive screening and preventive strategies. There is also evidence that risks of prostate cancer and pancreatic cancer are elevated in these carriers. Li-Fraumeni syndrome is a highly penetrant cancer syndrome associated with a high lifetime risk for cancer, including soft tissue sarcomas, osteosarcomas, premenopausal breast cancer, colon cancer, gastric cancer, adrenocortical carcinoma, and brain tumors.