Citations

Abstract Background The legality and use of marijuana is a controversial topic. With increased prevalence of usage, cannabis detection for legal, medical, and workforce drug testing is on the rise. LC-MS/MS quantification of delta 9-carboxy tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC-COOH) in urine is accepted as the standard to detect marijuana use. One challenge faced by testing laboratories has been identifying adulterated samples. Many products/reagents can be used to manipulate the urine to avoid positive drug testing results. In this study, we developed a dilute-and-shoot strategy to separate and quantify both the delta 8- and 9-THC-COOH in urine samples and tested the effects of adulteration using a combination of nitrite and/or acids which can be used to mask cannabinoid use. Methods Five authentic delta 8- and 9-THC-COOH positive specimens, and one spiked sample were treated with strong acids (1N HCL or 10% TCA), 500 µg/mL nitrite, or a combination. After hydrolysis with sodium hydroxide, the analytes were quantified using a 6495 Mass Spectrometer coupled to a StreamSelect LC system (Agilent). LC separation was performed with a CORTECS T3 column utilizing a shallow gradient. In addition, twelve urine specimens with varying concentrations of delta 8- and 9-THC-COOH were treated with nitrite and screened using a delta 9-THC-COOH immunoassay on the Roche Cobas C501 and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Results Nitrite did not change the physical appearance or the pH of the urine samples. Strong acid treatment also did not alter the appearance but did drop the urine pH ≤2. Pre-treated specimens with 1N HCL, 10% TCA, or 500 µg/mL of nitrite did not affect the delta 8- and 9-THC-COOH concentrations up to 6 days (refrigerated); however, specimens treated with strong acid combined with 500 µg/mL of nitrite for 30 min made both analytes undetectable. Additional experiments confirmed that 0.5 and 1 mol/L of nitrite lowered the concentration of all analytes, including internal standard, to undetectable levels in 48 h. Twelve additional specimens were collected, 3 with delta 8-THC-COOH, 3 with delta 9-THC-COOH, and 6 with both. All 12 samples screened positive using the Roche immunoassay and were quantified using the LC-MS/MS method. After treatment with 0.5 mol/L of nitrite, 10 of the 12 samples were negative using the immunoassay, but 2 samples remained positive. However, all nitrite treated specimens were negative (<LLOQ) using the LC-MS/MS method and the internal standard was eliminated. Later experiments confirmed that the delta 8- and 9-THC-COOH could be eliminated with as little as 0.1 mol/L nitrite for 30 min. Conclusion The unique dilute-and-shoot method can separate and quantify delta 8- and 9-THC-COOH. In addition, high concentrations of nitrite were shown to degrade both analytes along with the isotopically labeled internal standard. As a result, labs can distinguish true negative delta 8- and 9-THC-COOH (no analyte peaks) from nitrite adulterated specimens since the adulterated samples have no peaks for both the analytes and internal standard. A limitation of the study is that only sodium nitrite was tested. Other adulterants, such as potassium nitrite, pyridinium chlorochromate, peroxide etc. require further investigation.

Abstract Background We evaluated the analytical sensitivity and specificity of 4 rapid antigen diagnostic tests (Ag RDTs) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, using reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) as the reference method and further characterizing samples using droplet digital quantitative PCR (ddPCR) and a mass spectrometric antigen test. Methods Three hundred fifty (150 negative and 200 RT-qPCR positive) residual PBS samples were tested for antigen using the BD Veritor lateral flow (LF), ACON LF, ACON fluorescence immunoassay (FIA), and LumiraDx FIA. ddPCR was performed on RT-qPCR–positive samples to quantitate the viral load in copies/mL applied to each Ag RDT. Mass spectrometric antigen testing was performed on PBS samples to obtain a set of RT-qPCR–positive, antigen-positive samples for further analysis. Results All Ag RDTs had nearly 100% specificity compared to RT-qPCR. Overall analytical sensitivity varied from 66.5% to 88.3%. All methods detected antigen in samples with viral load >1 500 000 copies/mL RNA, and detected ≥75% of samples with viral load of 500 000 to 1 500 000 copies/mL. The BD Veritor LF detected only 25% of samples with viral load between 50 000 to 500 000 copies/mL, compared to 75% for the ACON LF device and >80% for LumiraDx and ACON FIA. The ACON FIA detected significantly more samples with viral load <50 000 copies/mL compared to the BD Veritor. Among samples with detectable antigen and viral load <50 000 copies/mL, sensitivity of the Ag RDT varied between 13.0% (BD Veritor) and 78.3% (ACON FIA). Conclusions Ag RDTs differ significantly in analytical sensitivity, particularly at viral load <500 000 copies/mL.