Citations

AbstractBackgroundA recent meta‐analysis (Human Reproduction Update 23, 2017 and 265) reported positive sperm retrieval rates (SRR) in 50% of patients with Klinefelter syndrome (KS) undergoing testicular sperm extraction (TESE). However, these results do not reflect the rates of SR that we observe in clinical practice. We assessed the rate and potential predictors of SR in Klinefelter patients in the real‐life setting.Materials and MethodsWe reviewed clinical data of 103 KS men who underwent TESE between 08/2008 and 03/2019 at five tertiary referral Andrology centers. Patients underwent testis ultrasound, hormonal evaluation, and genetic testing. All patients were azoospermic based on the 2010 WHO reference criteria. Conventional TESE (cTESE) or microsurgical TESE (mTESE) was performed based on the surgeon's preference. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression models to describe the whole cohort.ResultsMedian (IQR) patient's age was 32 (24‐37) years. Baseline serum FSH and total testosterone levels were 29.5 (19.9‐40.9) mUI/mL and 3.8 (2.5‐11.0) ng/mL, respectively. Conventional TESE and mTESE were performed in 38 (36.5%) and 65 (63.5%) men, respectively. The sperm retrieval rate was 21.4% (22/103 men). Fifteen patients used spermatozoa for ICSI and five ended in live birth children. Patients with positive SR were similar to those with a negative TESE in terms of clinical, hormonal, and procedural parameters (all P > .05). Logistic regression analyses confirmed the lack of association between clinical, hormonal, and procedural parameters with SR outcome.DiscussionGiven the conflicting results in the literature regarding SRR in KS, patients should be carefully counseled regarding TESE outcomes based on data from published literature and local results.ConclusionsIn the real‐life setting, we observed a lower SRR (21.4%) than that reported in meta‐analyses in our cohort of KS patients. No associations between clinical, hormonal, and procedural variables with TESE success were found.

Background: To assess the differential effect of robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) versus open radical cystectomy (ORC) on survival outcomes in matched analyses performed on a large multicentric cohort. Methods: The study included 9757 patients with urothelial bladder cancer (BCa) treated in a consecutive manner at each of 25 institutions. All patients underwent radical cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. To adjust for potential selection bias, propensity score matching 2:1 was performed with two ORC patients matched to one RARC patient. The propensity-matched cohort included 1374 patients. Multivariable competing risk analyses accounting for death of other causes, tested association of surgical technique with recurrence and cancer specific mortality (CSM), before and after propensity score matching. Results: Overall, 767 (7.8%) patients underwent RARC and 8990 (92.2%) ORC. The median follow-up before and after propensity matching was 81 and 102 months, respectively. In the overall population, the 3-year recurrence rates and CSM were 37% vs. 26% and 34% vs. 24% for ORC vs. RARC (all p values > 0.1), respectively. On multivariable Cox regression analyses, RARC and ORC had similar recurrence and CSM rates before and after matching (all p values > 0.1). Conclusions: Patients treated with RARC and ORC have similar survival outcomes. This data is helpful in consulting patients until long term survival outcomes of level one evidence is available.

Objectives To identify which patients with macroscopic bladder‐infiltrating T4 prostate cancer ( PC a) might have favourable outcomes when treated with radical cystectomy ( RC ). Materials and Methods We evaluated 62 patients with cT 4cN0–1 cM0 PC a treated with RC and pelvic lymph node dissection between 1972 and 2011. In addition to descriptive statistics, the Kaplan–Meier method and log‐rank tests were used to depict survival rates. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis tested the association between predictors and progression‐free, PC a‐specific and overall survival. Results Of the 62 patients, 19 (30.6%) did not have clinical progression during follow‐up, two (3.2%) had local recurrence, and 32 (51.6%) had haematogenous and nine (14.5%) combined pelvic and distant metastasis. Forty patients (64.5%) died, 34 (54.8%) from PC a and six (9.7%) from other causes. The median (range) survival time of the 19 patients who were metastasis‐free at last follow‐up was 86 (1–314) months, 8/19 patients had a follow‐up of >5 years, and five patients survived metastasis‐free for >15 years. Patients without seminal vesicle invasion ( SVI ) had the best outcomes, with an estimated 10‐year PC a‐specific survival of 75% compared with 24% for patients with SVI . Conclusion For cT 4 PC a RC can be an appropriate treatment for local control and part of a multimodality‐treatment approach. Although recurrences are probable, these do not necessarily translate into cancer‐specific death. Men without SVI had a 75% 10‐year PC a‐specific survival. Although outcomes for patients with SVI are not as favourable, there can be good local control; however, these patients are at higher risk of progression and may need more aggressive systemic treatment.

BACKGROUNDA new prostate cancer (PCa) grading system (namely, Gleason score‐GS‐ ≤6 vs. 3 + 4 vs. 4 + 3 vs. 8 vs. ≥9) was recently proposed and assessed on biochemical recurrence (BCR) showing improved predictive abilities compared to the commonly used three‐tier system (GS ≤6 vs. 7 vs. ≥8). We assessed the predictive ability of the five‐tier grade group (GG) system on harder clinical endpoint, namely clinical recurrence (CR).METHODSBetween 2005 and 2014, 9,728 clinically localized PCa patients were treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) at two tertiary referral centers. Kaplan–Meier curves, multivariable Cox regression analyses, and concordance index (C‐index) were used to assess CR after treatment according to four Gleason grade classifications at biopsy and RP: Group 1: ≤6 versus 7 versus ≥8; Group 2: ≤6 versus 3 + 4 vs. 4 + 3 versus ≥8; Group 3: ≤6 versus 7 versus 8 versus ≥9; Group 4: ≤6 versus 3 + 4 versus 4 + 3 versus 8 versus ≥9. Same analyses were repeated in patients who had BCR (n = 1,624). Decision curve analyses were performed to evaluate and compare the net benefit associated with the use of the four Gleason grade classifications.RESULTSOverall, 443 (4.6%) patients had CR. The hazard ratio of the GS 3 + 4, 4 + 3, 8, and ≥9 relative to GS ≤6 were 3.63, 5.93, 11.44, 18.08 and 4.93, 9.99, 15.31 and 25.12 in the pre‐ and post‐treatment models, respectively. The C‐index of the five‐tier GG system was slightly higher relative to the other 3 Gleason grade classifications both in the pre‐ (range: 0.001–0.006) and post‐treatment models (range: 0–0.008). Similar findings were observed when we focused our analyses in patients with BCR after RP. The use of the five‐tier GG system did not result into higher net‐benefit relative to the other three Gleason grade classifications.CONCLUSIONSThe difference in accuracy between the five‐tier GG system and the other Gleason grade classifications, using CR as an endpoint, is clinically negligible. Current evidence suggests that the five‐tier GG system represents a simplified user‐friendly scheme available for patient counseling rather than a new histopathological diagnostic system that improves the prediction of CR. Prostate 77:263–273, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Objective To investigate the long‐term utility of adjuvant therapy after radical prostatectomy ( RP ) for prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion ( SVI ; pT 3b), as the published data are conflicting. Patients and Methods Patients with SVI during RP and pelvic lymph node dissection at two major referral centres from 1986 to 2014 were included. Kaplan–Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regressions were used to determine if adjuvant radiotherapy ( aRT ) and adjuvant hormonal therapy ( aHT ) were predictors of biochemical recurrence ( BCR ), cancer‐specific mortality ( CSM ) and overall mortality ( OM ). Subset analyses were performed for pN 0 patients and pN + patients. Results Overall, 3 279 patients with prostate cancer and SVI were included with a median follow‐up of 148 months. Considering the whole SVI population, 1 387 (42%) received no adjuvant therapy, 1 179 (36%) received aHT , 461 (14.1%) received aRT , while 252 (7.7%) received both aHT and aRT . The 10‐year BCR , CSM , and OM rates were 64%, 14%, and 27%, respectively. In the overall population, aRT and aHT were predictors of BCR , CSM and OM (all P < 0.04). When only pT 3bN0 patients were considered, aHT was a significant multivariate predictor of BCR [hazard ratio ( HR ) 0.50, P < 0.001), CSM ( HR 0.62, P = 0.01) and OM ( HR 0.75, P = 0.004). Conversely, aRT was not associated with survival outcomes (all P > 0.05). When only the subgroup pT 3bN+ was considered, the use of aRT was related to an improvement in CSM ( HR 0.65, P = 0.03) and OM (HR 0.78, P = 0.03). Conclusions aHT + aRT seems to be effective in pT 3b patients. However, when stratified according to the presence of nodal metastases, aHT remains effective only in the node‐negative subgroup, while aRT remains effective only in the node‐positive subgroup. Further data including prospective trials are warranted to study the utility of adjuvant therapies in this setting.

Objective To assess the impact of primary or progressive status on recurrence‐free survival ( RFS ), cancer‐specific mortality ( CSM ) and overall mortality ( OM ) after radical cystectomy ( RC ) for muscle‐ invasive bladder cancer ( MIBC ). Patients and Methods A total of 768 consecutive patients underwent RC as treatment for MIBC at our institution between 2000 and 2012. Primary MIBC was defined as no previous history of bladder cancer and progressive was defined as recorded previous treated non‐ MIBC ( NMIBC ) that had progressed to MIBC . The median follow‐up was 85 (60–109) months. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to compare RFS , CSM and OM between these two cohorts. Results In all, 475 (61.8%) patients had primary and 293 (38.2%) patients had progressive MIBC . There were no differences between the two groups in terms of demographics, pathological and peri‐operative complications (all P > 0.1). The 10‐year RFS , CSM and OM rates for primary vs progressive status were 43 vs 36% ( P = 0.01), 43 vs 37% ( P = 0.01), and 35 vs 28% ( P = 0.03), respectively. On multivariable Cox regression analyses, progressive status remained significantly associated with a higher rate of recurrence (hazard ratio [ HR ] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [ CI ] 1.12–1.79; P = 0.03), CSM ( HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07–1.89; P = 0.01) and OM ( HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.13–1.65; P = 0.02). Conclusions Among patients treated with RC for MIBC , progressive status was associated with a higher CSM , OM and recurrence rate after RC . The present study thus provides an impetus to improve risk sub‐stratification when bladder cancer is still at the NMIBC stage, be it through new biomarkers or improved imaging, as a subset of patients with NMIBC are likely to benefit from early RC .

Purpose The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) in treating patients with pN1 prostate cancer is controversial. We tested the hypothesis that the impact of aRT on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in these individuals is related to tumor characteristics. Methods We evaluated 1,107 patients with pN1 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy and anatomically extended pelvic lymph node dissection between 1988 and 2010 at two tertiary care centers. All patients received adjuvant hormonal therapy with or without aRT. Regression tree analysis stratified patients into risk groups on the basis of their tumor characteristics and the corresponding CSM rate. Cox regression analysis tested the relationship between aRT and CSM rate, as well as overall mortality (OM) rate in each risk group separately. Results Overall, 35% of patients received aRT. At multivariable analysis, aRT was associated with more favorable CSM rate (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; P < .001). However, when patients were stratified into risk groups, only two groups of men benefited from aRT: (1) patients with positive lymph node (PLN) count ≤ 2, Gleason score 7 to 10, pT3b/pT4 stage, or positive surgical margins (HR, 0.30; P = .002); and (2) patients with PLN count of 3 to 4 (HR, 0.21; P = .02), regardless of other tumor characteristics. These results were confirmed when OM was examined as an end point. Conclusion The beneficial impact of aRT on survival in patients with pN1 prostate cancer is highly influenced by tumor characteristics. Men with low-volume nodal disease (≤ two PLNs) in the presence of intermediate- to high-grade, non–specimen-confined disease and those with intermediate-volume nodal disease (three to four PLNs) represent the ideal candidates for aRT after surgery.