Citations

Abstract Motor speech disorders (MSDs) are early markers of neurological disease, but expert perceptual analysis is rarely available outside specialized centers. Automated speech analysis offers a scalable alternative, yet prior studies have not systematically compared modeling approaches or assessed clinically relevant metrics in independent datasets. This study compared static acoustic features, articulatory informed Phonet features, and self-supervised pretrained models for binary and multi label MSD classification. We trained and evaluated models on 583 speech samples using speaker level splits. Baseline models included logistic regression and Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) trained on eGeMAPS and MFCCs. We extracted three types of Phonet derived features and evaluated pretrained HuBERT and SSAST models in frozen, partially fine-tuned, and fully fine-tuned configurations. Binary classification distinguished MSDs from controls, while multi label classification identified six MSD subtypes. Models were assessed using validation AUC, and cut points were tested on two independent datasets. Pretrained and Phonet based models substantially outperformed static acoustic features. In binary classification, HuBERT achieved the highest AUC (0.95), while compact Phonet derived GRUs achieved comparable performance (up to 0.94). These models generalized well to independent datasets, maintaining high sensitivity (0.94) and specificity (0.97). In multi label classification, Phonet models achieved the highest macro average AUC (0.86), but threshold-based subtype performance declined on unseen data. Automated MSD detection is feasible and clinically promising. Binary classification generalized well, whereas multi label classification showed limited threshold stability across datasets.

Abstract Genetic studies have significantly advanced our understanding of tauopathies, yet the genetic aetiology of Pick’s disease, a rare 3-Repeat tauopathy, remains unclear. The MAPT p.A152T variant has been identified as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy, but its role in Pick’s disease is unknown. In this study, we examined the prevalence of MAPT p.A152T in the largest series of neuropathologically confirmed Pick’s disease cases to date (n = 401). Through genotyping, we identified a single mutation carrier in the Pick’s disease cohort (minor allele frequency = 0.12%). We previously reported MAPT p.A152T at a 0.20% frequency in healthy controls (n = 2456), suggesting that it does not associate with 3-Repeat tauopathy risk. To further investigate the effect of the variant on MAPT transcript expression, we used bulk RNA sequencing in Alzheimer’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy A152T mutation carriers. We did not detect significant differences in 4-Repeat tau levels, though preliminary trends may indicate more nuanced effects that need to be examined with long-read sequencing in a larger series. Overall, our study suggests that MAPT p.A152T does not increase Pick’s disease risk and may instead be linked to 4-Repeat or mixed tau pathologies, warranting further functional investigation.

Abstract TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) pathology frequently co-occurs with Tau neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) and amyloid β plaques in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), driving significant clinical heterogeneity. Whether TDP-43 engages autonomous molecular programs or instead amplifies Tau-driven neurodegeneration remains difficult to resolve, largely because these pathologies often co-occur. To separate these overlapping signatures, we generated regionally resolved transcriptomic profiles from cognitively normal controls (Controls), neuropathologically defined cohorts of AD, AD with limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (AD/LATE), and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD-TDP), categorizing them by their distinct TDP-43 subtypes (types α and β for AD/LATE; types A and B for FTLD-TDP). By integrating transcriptomic profiles with quantitative measures of phosphorylated TDP-43 (pTDP-43) and Tau (pTau), we separated pathology-associated signals within mixed disease contexts. We found that TDP-43 is linked to distinct transcriptomic programs in AD/LATE that are largely uncoupled from Tau burden and diverge from those observed in FTLD-TDP. These signatures showed regional specificity, with transcriptomic remodeling occurring in the amygdala across both diseases, whereas frontal cortex alterations were largely restricted to FTLD-TDP. Furthermore, by stratifying cases by TDP-43 morphological subtype, we unmasked specific biological trajectories, from immune activation to unique cellular vulnerabilities, that are not apparent in unstratified cohorts. Together, our findings provide a framework for decoupling mixed proteinopathies and demonstrate that TDP-43 shapes autonomous, subtype-dependent transcriptional landscapes in AD.

Background Frontotemporal dementia is an umbrella term that encompasses several clinical syndromes with impaired behavioral, language, and motor functions. These syndromes show considerable overlap in clinical features and imaging patterns. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the syndromic heterogeneity in FTD using unbiased data-driven approaches. Methods We used data-driven clustering analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data on 400 patients with clinical FTD diagnoses [behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), right temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia (rtvFTD), apraxia of speech with agrammatic aphasia (AOS-PAA), primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and primary progressive aphasia who did not fit into the other diagnostic categories (PPA-other)]. MR images were w-scored relative to cognitively unimpaired individuals, and principal component analysis was performed. A clustering ensemble approach, including hierarchical algorithms, was applied to the MR-based principal components, and imaging and clinical characteristics of the clusters were investigated. Various numbers of clusters ( K = 2, 3, or 4) were evaluated. Results The K = 3 solution offered the most clinically meaningful separation of FTD syndromes. The first cluster captured mostly frontal MRI abnormalities related to the speech, language and behavioral clinical dimensions, including patients with AOS-PAA, PPAOS, PPA-other, and bvFTD. The second cluster captured mostly temporal abnormalities and included mainly patients with svPPA and rtvFTD, but also bvFTD, AOS-PAA, and PPA-other. The third cluster captured cortical and subcortical atrophy, particularly in the midbrain, and included atypical Parkinsonian syndromes, with all PSP and CBS patients captured in this cluster, as well as most PPAOS patients. Considerable overlap of clinical syndromes was noted across these clusters, whereby patients with AOS-PAA, svPPA, PPA-other, and bvFTD were captured in more than one cluster. Discussion Our findings highlight heterogeneity in FTD, which mainly exists along three axes: speech, language and behavioral deficits reflecting frontal atrophy, language deficits reflecting temporal atrophy, and motor and motor speech deficits reflecting mostly midbrain and subcortical atrophy, with cortical involvement.

Objective Immunohistochemically (IHC) measured transactive response DNA‐binding protein 43 (TDP‐43) inclusions are observed in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and are associated with medial temporal lobe atrophy. Accumulation of cryptic exons occurs in AD in response to TDP‐43 pathology. We aimed to assess relationships between IHC and biochemically measured insoluble TDP‐43 and cryptic exons and assess associations with hippocampal and amygdala volume loss and atrophy rates on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods Eighty‐one neuropathologically diagnosed AD cases were analyzed. For biochemistry, insoluble TDP‐43 was quantified using a Meso‐scale discovery (MSD) immunoassay. IHC‐TDP burden was quantified with digital histopathology. Cryptic RNAs were assessed via quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR). Thirty‐eight cases had serial brain MRI. Hippocampal and amygdala volumes were calculated using FreeSurfer. Regression models were used to investigate associations among IHC‐TDP‐43 status/burden, MSD‐TDP status/levels, cryptic RNAs, and hippocampal and amygdala volumes and atrophy rates. Results IHC‐TDP(+) cases exhibited elevated levels of MSD‐TDP and cryptic RNAs ( KCNQ2 , STMN2 , and UNC13A ) and increased MSD‐TDP levels were associated with increased cryptic RNA levels, in the hippocampus and amygdala. IHC‐TDP(+) cases had smaller hippocampal and amygdala volumes compared to IHC‐TDP(−) cases. MSD‐TDP(+) cases had smaller hippocampal volumes and faster amygdala rates of atrophy compared with MSD‐TDP(−) cases. Higher KCNQ2 and UNC13A levels were associated with smaller amygdala volumes. Interpretation MSD‐TDP level is a reliable surrogate for IHC‐based TDP‐43 status. Both TDP‐43 and cryptic RNA levels are associated with reduced medial temporal volumes, suggesting cryptic exons may be playing a role in brain volume loss in AD. ANN NEUROL 2026;100:193–205

Transactive response DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43) type-A is associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). In primary age-related tauopathy (PART), TDP-type-α displays similar features to FTLD-TDP type-A. We compared antemortem MRI volumes of amygdala nuclei and hippocampal subfields between 16 PART-TDP-α and 12 FTLD-TDP-A autopsy-confirmed cases. Hippocampal tail and CA1 body volumes were smaller in PART-TDP-α group, which also had smaller lateral and central amygdala nuclei compared to FTLD-TDP-A group, but differences were non-significant after FDR correction. There is no evidence suggesting that TDP-43 type-A in FTLD affects hippocampal and amygdala volume loss differently than TDP-43 type-α in PART.

Background TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) proteinopathy contributes to Alzheimer's disease progression, but diagnosis remains autopsy-dependent. Objective This study aimed to develop a predictive model using FDG-PET imaging to identify brain regions associated with TDP-43 pathology in vivo. Methods Penalized logistic regression analyzed data from 294 participants and a subset of 159 with Braak and Thal ≥4. Features included FDG standard uptake value ratios (SUVRs) from 123 brain regions and age. Participants were split into training (90%) and testing (10%) datasets, with significant predictors identified by non-zero coefficients at optimal lambda. Results The model achieved 68% accuracy (AUC = 0.70) in 294 participants, highlighting the middle temporal gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, and hippocampus. In the subset (n = 159), accuracy was 65% (AUC = 0.71), with the medial amygdala and precentral gyrus as key predictors of TDP-43 pathology. Conclusions This study suggests a moderate predictive accuracy of FDG-PET to identify brain regions associated with Alzheimer's disease-related TDP-43 proteinopathy.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Hippocampal subfields are vulnerable to the transactive response DNA‐binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP‐43) and tau in primary age‐related tauopathy (PART). Geometry‐based morphometric analysis can improve the detection of structural changes in the hippocampus. METHODS Forty‐seven cases of autopsy‐confirmed PART without TDP‐43 and 19 cases of PART with TDP‐43 underwent antemortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) hippocampal segmentation and shape analysis. A separate cohort of 16 younger healthy individuals (YHIs) was included as a reference group. Hippocampal shape was analyzed in Python with non‐parametric cluster permutation testing. RESULTS PART(TDP+) group exhibited thinner left subiculum and CA1, with curvature deformations in left CA1 and CA2/3, relative to PART(TDP–). Both PART groups showed right‐sided predominance of thinning in presubiculum and subiculum, as well as curvature deformations in right presubiculum, subiculum, and CA1 when compared to YHIs. DISCUSSION Geometry‐based analysis showed different patterns of hippocampal thinning and curvature associated with PART(TDP+) compared to PART(TDP–).