Citations

Abstract Aim To assess the long‐term efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in Dravet syndrome and identify key factors influencing treatment response. Method We conducted a two‐center, retrospective cohort study of 15 patients (six females, nine males; median age at seizure onset 4 months [range 2–12 months]) with Dravet syndrome who underwent VNS implantation. Seizure frequency was evaluated over 12 months and up to 10 years after implantation. Linear mixed‐effects regression was used to analyze the impact of antiseizure medications (ASMs) and VNS parameters on seizure outcomes. Results A 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency was observed in 93.3% (14 of 15) of patients at 12 months and 86.7% (13 of 15) of patients across the 10‐year follow‐up. This seizure reduction was independent of ASM use; the VNS duty cycle was a significant predictor of seizure reduction. Two individuals (13.3%) experienced minor adverse events. Interpretation VNS provides durable seizure reduction in Dravet syndrome, independent of ASM adjustments. These findings highlight the importance of early VNS initiation and parameter optimization in managing genetically defined epilepsy syndromes.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare 3 electrode designs—a novel 22-contact circular grid, standard 6-contact strip, and high-density (HD) grid between 32 and 64 contacts—for the detection of epileptiform activity during awake craniotomy. METHODS This study included patients who underwent functional brain mapping with and without direct electrical stimulation during awake craniotomy. Demographic, clinical, and electrocorticography (ECoG) data were collected. RESULTS A total of 194 patients were included, with 264 instances of electrode use: 113 circular grid, 96 strip electrode, and 55 HD grid. The HD grid (15%) was used less to record ECoG during direct electrical stimulation than the circular grid (80%, p < 0.001) and strip electrodes (69%, p < 0.001). Sporadic interictal epileptiform activity was better detected with circular (45%, p < 0.001) and HD (40%, p = 0.006) grids compared with strip electrodes (16%). Spontaneous seizures were recorded more frequently with the circular grid (16%, p = 0.018) compared with the strip electrode (9.4%) and HD grid (1.8%). Afterdischarges were more frequently detected by the circular grid (69%, p = 0.031) and with circular and HD grids (combined) compared with strip electrodes (67% vs 48%, p = 0.024), at lower median intensity (3 mA vs 5 mA, p < 0.001). Multivariable analyses demonstrated circular grids (p < 0.001) to be more sensitive in detecting spontaneous epileptiform activity than strip and HD grid electrodes, and grids (circular and HD) to be better in recording stimulus-induced epileptiform activity (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates a higher rate of detection of epileptiform activity with circular and standard grids when compared with strip electrodes. The standard HD grid was used less during electrical stimulation, demonstrating the importance of both the number of contacts and design array when considering optimal conditions for ECoG and functional brain mapping.

This Viewpoint describes the benefits and challenges of integrating genomic information with disease-modifying therapies for epilepsy.