Citations

Clear

43 citation(s) found for "Hendrix, An".

Sacral fracture risk after stereotactic spinal radiosurgery: a multi-institution, retrospective analysis
Goethe, Eric A. , Almeida, Romulo Augusto Andrade de, Mikula, Anthony L. , Merrell, Kenneth W. , Rose, Peter S. , Karim, S. Mohammed, Linzey, Joseph R. , Szerlip, Nicholas J. , Ghia, Amol J. , Li, Jing , McAleer, Mary Frances, Perni, Subha , Yeboa, D.N. , Rhines, Laurence D. , North, Robert Y. , Almeida, Rômulo Augusto Andrade de , Call-Orellana, Francisco Alfredo , Clarke, Michelle J. , Amini, Behrang , Beckham, Thomas Hendrix , Tom, Martin C. , McAleer, Mary Frances , Wang, Chenyang , Price, Anthony, Alvarez‐Breckenridge, Christopher , Tatsui, Claudio Esteves

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine | June 20, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 305-312

10.3171/2025.2.spine24770 | PMID 40540799 Get It

OBJECTIVE Spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) is an established treatment modality for spinal metastatic disease. A common complication of SSRS is postradiation pathologic fracture. The authors evaluated the risk of pathologic fracture in sacral SSRS. METHODS All patients receiving SSRS in 1 to 5 fractions to 1 or more sacral levels between 2011 and 2020 at participating institutions were included. Demographic, histological, anatomical, and outcome data were obtained from electronic medical records. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 28. RESULTS Of 67 total patients, 50 (74.6%) were men and 17 (25.4%) were women. The most common tumor histologies were prostate adenocarcinoma (n = 16 [23.9%]) and renal cell carcinoma (n = 12 [17.9%]). Median (range) age at treatment was 63 (8–87) years. The mean ± SD (range) number of levels treated was 1.5 ± 0.7 (1–4) levels. Mean ± SD (range) bone density at S1 was 208.0 ± 74.4 (−3.0 to 443.3) Hounsfield units (HUs). Median (range) follow-up was 16.6 (1.5–132) months, median ± SD (range) overall survival was 24 ± 21.0 (1.7–83.3) months, and the 1-year local control rate was 83.6%. Fourteen patients (20.9%) experienced fracture within the radiation field. There was no association between fracture and patient sex (p = 0.32), age (p = 0.40), S1 HU (p = 0.28), tumor location according to Denis classification (p = 0.87), presence of pain (p = 0.66), single versus multifraction radiation (p = 0.44), or number of levels treated (p = 0.52). Patients experiencing in-field progression were more likely to experience fracture (61.5% vs 10.2%, p < 0.001), and patients experiencing fracture had a higher average Spine Instability Neoplastic Score than patients without fracture (5.7 vs 4.3, p = 0.049). Only local control remained as a factor associated with sacral fracture in the multivariate analysis. Of the patients experiencing fracture, 10 (71.4%) were symptomatic and 3 of those (30.0%) underwent post-SSRS surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS Pathologic fracture may occur after sacral SSRS in a significant number of patients and is significantly associated with failure of local control.
CSF biomarkers of immune activation and Alzheimer’s disease for predicting cognitive impairment risk in the elderly
White, Launia J. , Hendrix, Rachel , Ulrich, Jason D. , Henson, Rachel L. , Knight, William C. , Martens, Yuka A. , Wang, Ni , Starling, Skylar C , Ren, Yingxue , Asmann, Yan W. , Syrjanen, Jeremy A. , Vassilaki, Maria , Petersen, Ronald C. , Kanekiyo, Takahisa , Shue, Francis , Roy, Bhaskar, Xiong, Chengjie , Mielke, Michelle M. , Cruchaga, Carlos , Holtzman, David M. , Bu, Guojun , Heckman, Michael G.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.087693 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThe immune system is substantially involved in the development and progression of age‐related cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease (AD).MethodAs genetic and environmental factors interactively impact these conditions, we investigated how risk factors such as APOE genotype, age, and sex influence immune activation markers and AD biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in elderly individuals enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging cohort. Among cognitively unimpaired individuals aged over 65 at the baseline visit (N=298), we measured 365 CSF immune activation markers using the proximity extension assay.ResultWe found that age, sex, and diabetes status are associated with altered CSF levels of immune activation markers independently of other factors. For CSF AD biomarkers, we observed significant positive correlations between age and total tau, phosphorylated tau‐181 (p‐tau181), neurofilament light (NfL), and YKL40. APOE4 was also associated with lower Aβ42 and higher SNAP25 in CSF. We further examined whether baseline visit variables can predict cognitive decline, represented by the conversion from CDR=0 to CDR>0. We found that age, Aβ42, NfL, and REG4 were independently correlated with CDR conversion risk. When the cohort was dichotomized by their median values, older participants with lower Aβ42, higher NfL, and higher REG4 at baseline developed cognitive impairment during the follow up with a c‐index of 0.762 while age alone had a c‐index of 0.699.ConclusionTogether, our results suggest that assessing CSF immune activation markers and AD biomarkers can improve the prediction of cognitive impairment risk in the elderly.
CSF biomarkers of immune activation and Alzheimer's disease for predicting cognitive impairment risk in the elderly
White, Launia J. , Hendrix, Rachel , Ulrich, Jason D. , Henson, Rachel L. , Knight, William C. , Martens, Yuka A. , Wang, Ni , Starling, Skylar C , Ren, Yingxue , Asmann, Yan W. , Syrjanen, Jeremy A. , Vassilaki, Maria , Petersen, Ronald C. , Kanekiyo, Takahisa , Shue, Francis , Roy, Bhaskar, Xiong, Chengjie , Mielke, Michelle M. , Cruchaga, Carlos , Holtzman, David M. , Bu, Guojun , Heckman, Michael G.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S9 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.093743 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThe immune system is substantially involved in the development and progression of age‐related cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease (AD).MethodAs genetic and environmental factors interactively impact these conditions, we investigated how risk factors such as APOE genotype, age, and sex influence immune activation markers and AD biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in elderly individuals enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging cohort. Among cognitively unimpaired individuals aged over 65 at the baseline visit (N=298), we measured 365 CSF immune activation markers using the proximity extension assay.ResultWe found that age, sex, and diabetes status are associated with altered CSF levels of immune activation markers independently of other factors. For CSF AD biomarkers, we observed significant positive correlations between age and total tau, phosphorylated tau‐181 (p‐tau181), neurofilament light (NfL), and YKL40. APOE4 was also associated with lower Aß42 and higher SNAP25 in CSF. We further examined whether baseline visit variables can predict cognitive decline, represented by the conversion from CDR=0 to CDR>0. We found that age, Aß42, NfL, and REG4 were independently correlated with CDR conversion risk. When the cohort was dichotomized by their median values, older participants with lower Aß42, higher NfL, and higher REG4 at baseline developed cognitive impairment during the follow up with a c‐index of 0.762 while age alone had a c‐index of 0.699.ConclusionTogether, our results suggest that assessing CSF immune activation markers and AD biomarkers can improve the prediction of cognitive impairment risk in the elderly.
CSF biomarkers of immune activation and Alzheimer’s disease for predicting cognitive impairment risk in the elderly
Shue, Francis , White, Launia J. , Hendrix, Rachel , Ulrich, Jason D. , Henson, Rachel L. , Knight, William D., Martens, Yuka A. , Wang, Ni , Starling, Skylar C , Ren, Yingxue , Asmann, Yan W. , Syrjanen, Jeremy A. , Vassilaki, Maria , Sung, Yun Ju , Petersen, Ronald C. , Kanekiyo, Takahisa , Ulrich, Jason , Asmann, Yan W , Syrjanen, Jeremy A , Vassilaki, Maria , Mielke, Michelle M , Timsina, Jigyasha , Sung, Yun Ju , Cruchaga, Carlos , Holtzman, David M , Bu, Guojun , Petersen, Ronald C , Kanekiyo, Takahisa , Shue, Francis , Roy, Bhaskar, Xiong, Chengjie , Mielke, Michelle M. , Holtzman, David M. , Bu, Guojun , Heckman, Michael G.

Mayo Clinic

Science Advances | April 3, 2024 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 14 | Pages: No page available

10.1126/sciadv.adk3674 | PMID 38569027 Get It

The immune system substantially influences age-related cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) progression, affected by genetic and environmental factors. In a Mayo Clinic Study of Aging cohort, we examined how risk factors like APOE genotype, age, and sex affect inflammatory molecules and AD biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Among cognitively unimpaired individuals over 65 ( N = 298), we measured 365 CSF inflammatory molecules, finding age, sex, and diabetes status predominantly influencing their levels. We observed age-related correlations with AD biomarkers such as total tau, phosphorylated tau-181, neurofilament light chain (NfL), and YKL40. APOE4 was associated with lower Aβ42 and higher SNAP25 in CSF. We explored baseline variables predicting cognitive decline risk, finding age, CSF Aβ42, NfL, and REG4 to be independently correlated. Subjects with older age, lower Aβ42, higher NfL, and higher REG4 at baseline had increased cognitive impairment risk during follow-up. This suggests that assessing CSF inflammatory molecules and AD biomarkers could predict cognitive impairment risk in the elderly.
MIBlood‐EV: Minimal information to enhance the quality and reproducibility of blood extracellular vesicle research
Lenassi, Metka , Teske, Jacob J. , Boilard, Éric , Hohenberg, Katharina Clemm von , Falcón‐Pérez, Juan Manuel , Gualerzi, Alice , Jones, Jennifer , Lawson, Charlotte, Nazarenko, Irina , Pink, Ryan , Siljander, Pia , Hendrix, An , Witwer, Kenneth W. , Lucien, Fabrice , Lenassi, Metka , Falcón-Perez, Juan Manual , Gualerzi, Alice , Nazarenko, Irina , Pink, Ryan , Siljander, Pia R-M , Welsh, Joshua A , Witwer, Kenneth W , Nieuwland, Rienk , Teske, Jacob J , Jones, Jennifer C , Lucien, Fabrice , Gustafson, Dakota , Li, Bo , Reale, Antonia , Lässer, Cecilia , O’Driscoll, Lorraine , Soekmadji, Carolina , Welsh, Joshua A , Nieuwland, Rienk

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Extracellular Vesicles | December 8, 2023 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jev2.12385 | PMID 38063210 Get It

Abstract Blood is the most commonly used body fluid for extracellular vesicle (EV) research. The composition of a blood sample and its derivatives (i.e., plasma and serum) are not only donor‐dependent but also influenced by collection and preparation protocols. Since there are hundreds of pre‐analytical protocols and over forty variables, the development of standard operating procedures for EV research is very challenging. To improve the reproducibility of blood EV research, the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) Blood EV Task Force proposes standardized reporting of (i) the applied blood collection and preparation protocol and (ii) the quality of the prepared plasma and serum samples. Gathering detailed information will provide insight into the performance of the protocols and more effectively identify potential confounders in the prepared plasma and serum samples. To collect this information, the ISEV Blood EV Task Force created the Minimal Information for Blood EV research (MIBlood‐EV), a tool to record and report information about pre‐analytical protocols used for plasma and serum preparation as well as assays used to assess the quality of these preparations. This tool does not require modifications of established local pre‐analytical protocols and can be easily implemented to enhance existing databases thereby enabling evidence‐based optimization of pre‐analytical protocols through meta‐analysis. Taken together, insight into the quality of prepared plasma and serum samples will (i) improve the quality of biobanks for EV research, (ii) guide the exchange of plasma and serum samples between biobanks and laboratories, (iii) facilitate inter‐laboratory comparative EV studies, and (iv) improve the peer review process.
CTNI-01. LONG-TERM RESULTS FROM A PHASE 1 TRIAL OF SPINE SBRT IN INOPERABLE PATIENTS WITH CORD COMPRESSION
Ghia, Amol J. , McAleer, Mary Frances , Briere, Tina M. , Brown, Paul D. , Wang, Chenyang , Chang, Eric , Rhines, Laurence D. , Guha‐Thakurta, Nandita , Li, Jing , Tatsui, Claudio Esteves , Beckham, Thomas Hendrix , Yeboa, D.N.

Mayo Clinic

Neuro-Oncology | November 11, 2023 | Volume: 25 | Issue: Supplement_5 | Pages: v72-v73

10.1093/neuonc/noad179.0283 Get It

Abstract PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE We seek to establish the feasibility of using spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) allowing for spinal cord dose constraint relaxation as the primary management of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) in inoperable patients monitoring for radiation myelopathy (RM) and radiographic local control (LC). MATERIAL/METHODS Patients with radiation naïve MESCC were enrolled on this prospective Phase 1 trial. Single fraction SSRS was delivered to a dose of 18 or 24 Gy. Spinal cord constraint relaxation was performed in sequential cohorts from an initial allowable Dmax cohort of 10 Gy up to 16 Gy only if tumor progression occurred without RM. RESULTS Thirty two patients enrolled on the trial of which 4, 12, 8 and 8 were in the 10 Gy, 12 Gy, 14 Gy and 16 Gy cord Dmax cohorts, respectively. At baseline, there were 10 sites with MESCC Grade 1B, 10 sites with Grade 1C, 9 sites with Grade 2, 2 sites with Grade 1A, and 1 site with Grade 3 disease. Of the 28 evaluable patients, the median overall survival was 32.3 months (range 5.8-122.6 mo). The 1-year and 5-year LC was 84.5% and 79.5%. The 2-year LC did not statistically differ between the 14-16 Gy cord Dmax combined cohorts and the 10-12 Gy cord Dmax combined cohorts (92.9% vs. 62.9%, p = 0.15). With a median clinical follow-up of 22.7 months (range 3-122.3 mo), there were no cases of RM including in the 13 patients who survived at least 3 years. In the cohort receiving a cord Dmax of 16 Gy, there were no cases of RM with a median follow-up of 18.6 mo (range 9.0-97.1 mo). CONCLUSION With long-term follow-up, these data demonstrate that SSRS is a safe and effective tool in patients with MESCC. Cord constraint relaxation may be considered in inoperable patients with MESCC.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2024
Churpek, Jane , Kohlmann, Wendy , Al‐Hilli, Zahraa , Friedman, Susan , Hagemann, Andrea R. , Hendrix, Ashley, Hutton, Mollie L., Kassem, Nawal , Khan, Seema, Khoury, Katia , Kurian, Allison W. , Laronga, Christine , Mak, Julie , Mansour, John C. , McDonnell, Kevin , Menendez, Carolyn S. , Merajver, Sofía D. , Norquist, Barbara S., Offit, Kenneth , Rash, Dominique , Reiser, Gwen , Senter-Jamieson, Leigha, Shannon, Kristen M. , Visvanathan, Kala , Welborn, Jeanna, Wick, Myra , Wood, Marie , Yurgelun, Matthew B. , Dwyer, Mary A., Darlow, Susan, Norquist, Barbara M. , Churpek, Jane E. , Visvanathan, Kala , Kurian, Allison W , Norquist, Barbara , Churpek, Jane E , Daly, Mary Beryl , Pal, Tuya , Maxwell, Kara N. , Arun, Banu , Buys, Saundra S. , Cheng, Heather H. , Domchek, Susan M. , Giri, Veda N. , Goggins, Michael , Karlan, Beth Y.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | October 12, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1000-1010

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0051 | PMID 37856201 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer, including BRCA1 , BRCA2 , CDH1 , PALB2 , PTEN , and TP53 , and recommended approaches to genetic counseling/testing and care strategies in individuals with these P/LP variants. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize important updates regarding: (1) a new section for transgender, nonbinary and gender diverse people who have a hereditary predisposition to cancer focused on risk reduction strategies for ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, prostate cancer, and breast cancer; and (2) testing criteria and management associated with TP53 P/LP variants and Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
A-189 Volume Matters: Continuous Improvement to Reduce Blood Collection Volumes and Collection Tube Utilization
Hain, Erin A, Hendrix, B K, Stelpflug, Amy J., Elliott, Eileen A., Boedecker, S A, Faber, Tracy L., Block, Darci R , Baumann, N, Elliott, E A, Faber, T L

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Chemistry | September 27, 2023 | Volume: 69 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/clinchem/hvad097.170 Get It

Abstract Background Clinical laboratories are constantly changing with automated analyzers and total lab automation (TLA) implemented and replaced over time. Some benefits of newer technologies include decreased specimen volume requirements, less need for repeat testing, and greater throughput. Recent implementation of new analyzers and replacement of TLA in the Central Clinical Laboratory (CCL) at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, prompted the laboratory to reassess blood collection volumes for commonly ordered tests. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate whether updating the blood collection volumes for clinical chemistry and immunoassay tests performed in the CCL could reduce the volume of blood collected from patients and the number of blood collection tubes utilized. Methods Nearly 100 different serum assays from the CCL test menu were reviewed including the basic and comprehensive metabolic, hepatic function, renal function, electrolyte, and lipid panels as well as thyroid function tests, enzymes, hormones, electrolytes, and iron status tests. Cortisol, ferritin, folate, and Vitamin B12 testing were performed on the Beckman DxI800; all other testing was on Roche Diagnostics Cobas 8000 chemistry (ISE, c701, c502) and immunoassay (e801) analyzers. Updated blood volumes for each assay were calculated utilizing manufacturer’s analytical volumes and “dead volume” requirements. Baseline data retrieved from the laboratory information system (LIS) included blood collection volumes and number of tubes collected for 128 patients with physician-orders for laboratory testing on 5/2/21. The collection logic was then updated in the test LIS environment using the new blood volumes requirements and applied to the same 128 orders. Blood volumes and number of tubes collected per order were compared before and after the volume updates. Results Baseline data from 128 unique orders showed that 414 total tubes were collected with a median(range) of 3 (2–6) tubes per order and 5 (1–18) tests per tube. The total volume of blood requested at baseline was 2065 mL. Post-intervention, 197 tubes were needed with a median(range) of 2 (1–3) tubes per order and 13 (1–30) tests per tube. The total volume of blood requested after updating volumes was 851 mL. Conclusions The practice of reviewing and updating specimen volume requirements when replacing or implementing new analyzers or TLA can greatly reduce the volume of blood collected from patients and the number of blood collection tubes per order. In this study of 128 physician orders for common laboratory tests, updating blood collection information in the LIS reduced the requested blood collection volumes by 59% and decreased the number of blood collection tubes required by 52%. This not only benefits patients because less blood is collected but also conserves blood collection tubes and reduces supply chain demands. Additionally, fewer tubes on the TLA system has the potential to improve throughput and test turnaround time.
An interdisciplinary consensus on the management of brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma
Hasanov, Elshad , Yeboa, D.N. , Tucker, Mathew D., Swanson, Todd A. , Ene, Chibawanye , Hasanov, Merve , Derks, Sophie H. A. E. , Smits, Marion , Dudani, Shaan , Heng, Daniel Y.C., Bex, Axel , Hanalıoğlu, Şahin , Weinberg, Jeffrey S. , Hirsch, Laure , Carlo, Maria I. , Aizer, Ayal A. , Brown, Paul D. , Bilen, Mehmet Asım , Chang, Eric L. , Jaboin, Jerry J. , Choueiri, Toni K. , Halasz, Lia M. , Patel, Toral , Soltys, Scott G. , Elder, J. Bradley , Başkaya, Mustafa K. , Timmerman, Robert , Kim, Michelle Miran, Mut, Melike , Beal, Kathryn , Lang, Frederick F. , Giles, Rachel , Patel, Toral , Brown, Paul David, Choueiri, Toni K , Smits, Marion , Hanalioglu, Sahin , Patel, Toral R , Beckham, Thomas Hendrix , Rini, Brian I. , Brastianos, Priscilla K. , Brugarolas, James , Atkins, Michael B. , McGregor, Bradley A. , McDermott, David F. , Yu, James B. , Kim, Michelle H. , Markert, James M. , Tannir, Nizar , Samandouras, George , Jonasch, Eric W.

Mayo Clinic

CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | June 16, 2022 | Volume: 72 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 454-489

10.3322/caac.21729 | PMID 35708940 Get It

Abstract Brain metastases are a challenging manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. We have a limited understanding of brain metastasis tumor and immune biology, drivers of resistance to systemic treatment, and their overall poor prognosis. Current data support a multimodal treatment strategy with radiation treatment and/or surgery. Nonetheless, the optimal approach for the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. To improve patient care, the authors sought to standardize practical management strategies. They performed an unstructured literature review and elaborated on the current management strategies through an international group of experts from different disciplines assembled via the network of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Experts from different disciplines were administered a survey to answer questions related to current challenges and unmet patient needs. On the basis of the integrated approach of literature review and survey study results, the authors built algorithms for the management of single and multiple brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The literature review, consensus statements, and algorithms presented in this report can serve as a framework guiding treatment decisions for patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:454‐489.