Citations

Abstract Background: In the treatment of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC), randomized phase II/III trials testing selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), complete estrogen receptor antagonists (CERANs) and selective ER modulators (SERMs) (mostly compared to fulvestrant) have demonstrated modest (1-2 months) improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), mainly limited to patients with ESR1-mutated MBC. In these studies, the median PFS (mPFS) ranges from 3 to 6 months, with shorter mPFS in patients with prior progression on CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i). Here we report the final results of a randomized phase II study that compared Z-endoxifen (Endx) 80 mg/day with tamoxifen (Tam) 20 mg/day in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)- positive/ HER2-negative MBC, and report outcomes according to ESR1, PIK3CA, PTEN and AKT alterations (Alliance A011203; NCT02311933). Methods: Postmenopausal women with unlimited prior endocrine regimens (including CDK 4/6i) and up to two chemotherapy regimens for MBC, with tumor biopsy confirmation of ER+ (>10% nuclear staining) and negative for HER2 amplification/overexpression were eligible. Prior adjuvant Tam was allowed if relapse was > 1 year following Tam completion. Patients randomized to Tam could cross over to Endx at progression. The primary end point was PFS analyzed by the interval censored data analytic approach. ctDNA was analyzed for ESR1 and PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT alterations using Guardant360 CDx 74-gene next-generation sequencing-based assay (Guardant Health). Results: Among 108 women who preregistered, 76 (Endx: 40; Tam: 36) were randomized and eligible. Patients were heavily pretreated; all patients had prior exposure to an aromatase inhibitor (AI), 50% had ≥ 2 AI based regimens in the metastatic setting and 50% in each arm had received fulvestrant. Approximately half on each arm received at least one chemotherapy regimen in the metastatic setting. Prior CDK 4/6i therapy was imbalanced (48% on Endx and 28% on Tam). Endx did not significantly prolong PFS compared to Tam (median PFS [mPFS] 4.3 vs 1.7 months; HR 0.72, p=0.168). Because arms were imbalanced according to prior CDK 4/6i exposure, we performed an unplanned analysis demonstrating that Endx improved PFS relative to Tam in CDK 4/6i-naïve patients (mPFS 8.3 vs 2.1 months; HR 0.39, p=0.0097) but not in patients treated with prior CDK 4/6i (mPFS 3.0 vs 1.5 months). In the subset of patients who consented for ctDNA testing (n=28), the mPFS for those with either an activating alteration in the PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT pathway or with an ESR1 mutation was similar as the overall trial. For the 24 patients who progressed on Tam and crossed-over to Endx, the median PFS was 3.5 months (range 1.5-15.0 months) with a 6-month clinical benefit rate of 33.3% (8/24; 90% CI: 17.8-52.1%). Conclusions: Endx did not meet the prespecified threshold for concluding that it significantly improved PFS relative to Tam in a cohort of heavily pretreated MBC. However, the observations of a > 6-month improvement in mPFS in CDK 4/6i-naïve patients, anti-tumor activity following crossover to Tam, and mPFS estimates similar to other novel endocrine agents in development all support the ongoing development of Endx. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN) and 5P50CA116201. Clinicaltrials.gov Id: NCT02311933. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Citation Format: M. P. Goetz, V. Suman, J. Reid, T. Dockter, C. Strand, W. F. Symmans, J. Hawse, A. Storniolo, J. Doroshow, J. M. Collins, H. Streicher, M. M. Ames, A. Tarnower, O. M. Hahn, J. N. Ingle, L. Carey, A. Partridge. Final results from the Randomized Phase II study of Z-Endoxifen and Tamoxifen in Endocrine Refractory, Estrogen Receptor Positive, HER2 negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (Alliance A011203) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-08-07.

Abstract Despite therapeutic advances, ovarian cancer (OC) recurrence remains common and outcomes for advanced disease are poor, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic targets. To this end, we identified CTPS1 as a highly expressed and essential gene for the survival of many OC cell lines, including models resistant to chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors. CTPS1 is one of two enzymes, alongside CTPS2, responsible for the de novo synthesis of cytidine triphosphate (CTP), a critical nucleotide required for DNA and phospholipid biosynthesis. We discovered that CTPS1 is the predominant isoform expressed in OC cells, with significantly higher levels of expression in advanced and resistant disease compared to normal tissue, benign lesions and treatment naïve cancers. Intriguingly, 25% of all OC samples were found to completely lack CTPS2 protein expression suggesting their near complete reliance on CTPS1 for survival. Using CTPS1 siRNAs and genetically engineered OC cells with a degradation tag (dTAG) fused to the C-terminus of endogenous CTPS1 alleles, we showed that CTPS1 knockdown or proteasomal degradation induces an S-phase cell cycle arrest followed by apoptosis. Leveraging a first-in-class, highly selective, and orally bioavailable CTPS1 inhibitor (STP938) developed by Step Pharma, we identified nanomolar-range IC50 values across a panel of over 20 OC cell lines and validated its anti-neoplastic activity in ex vivo patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. STP938 synergized with standard-of-care chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors, even in resistant models, further supporting its clinical potential. To elucidate STP938’s mechanism of action, we performed multi-omic profiling (bulk RNAseq, phospho- and total proteomics) on sensitive and isogenic resistant OC lines, as well as single-cell RNAseq of an OC PDX tumor following in vivo treatment with vehicle or STP938, revealed dysregulation of DNA replication, cell cycle, and metabolic pathways. As expected, STP938 rapidly depleted CTP levels, which remain suppressed for 72 hours, suggesting insufficient salvage pathway compensation which ultimately compromised cancer cell viability. As CTP is also a direct precursor for activated intermediates in phospholipid biosynthesis. Mass-spectrometry based lipidomics and metabolomics were employed to interrogate the impact of STP938 in these processes where numerous changes were found. To uncover mechanisms of resistance to STP938 and reveal therapeutic vulnerabilities, we conducted genome-wide CRISPR knockout screens in multiple treatment naïve and STP938 resistant models and analysis of results are ongoing. In collaboration with Step Pharma, a Phase 1a/b clinical trial of STP938 is currently enrolling patients with advanced solid tumors, including an expansion cohort for CTPS2 null OC patients (NCT06297525). These laboratory discoveries and ongoing clinical efforts aim to enable broader uptake of this novel therapeutic approach to improve long-term outcomes in patients with CTPS1-dependent disease. Citation Format: Xiyin Wang, Michael J. Emch, Lauren A. Voll, Rebecca Epp, Esther P. Rodman, Noa Odell, Nicole A. Pearson, Xiaonan Hou, Matthew P. Goetz, Scott H. Kaufmann, S. John Weroha, Philip Beer, John R. Hawse. Exploiting CTPS1 dependency for the treatment of ovarian cancerPR005: Exploiting CTPS1 dependency for the treatment of ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2025 Sep 19-21; Denver, CO. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl):Abstract nr PR005.

Background: Targeted therapies, such as endocrine agents, have significantly improved outcomes for patients with estrogen receptor alpha-positive (ERα+) breast cancer. Unfortunately, for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which lack expression of ERα and HER2, there remains a dearth of targeted adjuvant agents. We discovered that estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) is expressed in approximately 20% of TNBC cases, and its activation has been shown to inhibit proliferation, invasion, and migration in preclinical models. However, it remains unclear whether ERβ-targeted therapies maintain efficacy following the development of chemoresistance. Methods: To address this question, we generated ERβ+ TNBC cell line models with acquired resistance to paclitaxel or doxorubicin. We then assessed their response to ERβ-targeted therapies and analyzed transcriptomic changes associated with chemoresistance and ERβ ligand treatment. Results: Chemotherapy-resistant ERβ+ TNBC cells retained sensitivity to ERβ-targeted therapies and, in some cases, exhibited enhanced responsiveness. ERβ expression did not compromise chemotherapy efficacy in treatment-naïve cells. Chemotherapy-resistant cells had a vastly altered transcriptome and surprisingly, a heavily reduced ERβ transcriptome, compared to sensitive cells despite the maintenance of ERβ-driven anti-neoplastic activity. Conclusions: These findings suggest that ERβ remains a relevant drug target in chemotherapy-refractory disease and has aided in the refinement of a minimal ERβ transcriptomic signature associated with response to ERβ-targeting agents, further informing the primary mechanisms through which ERβ elicits its tumor suppressive effects.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a major global health problem with no disease-modifying therapies. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) is a critical cytokine associated with the pathophysiology of OA and can be inhibited by IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra). Here, we tested the delivery of a gene therapeutic encoding the human IL-1Ra to the knee in a phase 1, open-label clinical trial that enrolled nine patients with radiographic knee OA. The IL-1Ra gene was delivered by a self-complementary (sc)–recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) serotype 2.5 (sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra) by intra-articular injection into an index knee at one of three doses: low [1 × 10 11 viral genomes (vg)], mid (1 × 10 12 vg), or high (1 × 10 13 vg). The primary outcome was safety. There were no serious adverse events (AEs) related to sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra. Two AEs occurred that were possibly related to the vector. Both were effusions with increased pain and resolved with conservative treatment. sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra did not cause changes in vital signs, physical findings, or clinical laboratory measures. Less than 1% of the injected dose of sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra vg was detected in circulation after 1 day and was cleared within a week. Titers of neutralizing antibodies to AAV2.5 rose in serum and synovial fluid. In all cases, IL-1Ra concentration increased in the synovial fluid, and IL-1Ra concentrations remained elevated after 1 year. Baseline pain and function scores improved during the study. Therefore, we found that intra-articular gene therapy with sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra was safe. The sustained increase in local IL-1Ra in human knee joints supports the further clinical examination of this therapy to provide therapeutic benefit in OA.

Abstract Introduction: Heme-binding biguanides inhibit cytochrome P450 monooxygenase-mediated biosynthesis of the epoxy fatty acid (EpFA) (±)14,15-EET, which promotes progression of ER+HER2- breast cancer as well as regulatory T cell (Treg) proliferation. However, there are no known strategies to exploit this vulnerability. Metformin has shown promise but lacks sufficient potency and clinical utility. Through structure-based design, heme binding hexyl cubane derivatives of metformin were identified, which potently inhibited (±)14,15-EET biosynthesis. Fluorination of the hexyl moiety improved pharmacokinetics (PK) and reduced toxicity. Among the fluorinated derivatives, C5F2-HCB potently inhibited (±)14,15-EET biosynthesis (IC50=3.1 uM for C5F2-HCB vs. 5 mM for metformin). C5F2-HCB and metformin are candidate agents for TME activation from “cold” to “hot” due to their inhibition of EETs biosynthesis and EET-driven oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) which promotes tumor hypoxia. We then tested whether C5F2-HCB or metformin could inhibit immune exclusion in the immunologically “cold” ovarian dependent STAT1 KO SSM2ucd mammary carcinoma model, in part, by reducing Tregs and/or increasing CD8 or CD4 tumor infiltrating T cells (TIL). We hypothesized that biguanides, by reducing EETs, would suppress Tregs and promote effector T cells in the TME. We also hypothesized that C5F2-HCB would be more effective than metformin in modulating the TME, based on greater potency for inhibition of (±)14,15-EET biosynthesis. Both biguanides were tested at their maximum tolerated dose (C5F2-HCB; 18 mg/kg daily and metformin; 50 mg/kg every other day). Results: In the SSM2ucd allograft, all combination treatment groups with biguanides reduced tumor growth relative to the IgG control at the endpoint (day 63) : metformin + IgG (51.5±9.8% of control), C5F2-HCB + IgG (53.3±12.8%), metformin + anti-PD-1 (50.4±11.5%), and C5F2-HCB + anti-PD-1 (49.6±12.8%) [(P < 0.05) for all comparisons]. In contrast, anti-PD-1 antibody alone failed to reduce tumor growth at the endpoint. Flow cytometry analysis of the TME revealed that only C5F2-HCB + IgG treatment increased CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) compared to all other treatment groups (>2-fold; P < 0.05). Additionally, only C5F2-HCB + anti-PD-1 reduced intratumoral Tregs (>3-fold; P < 0.05). C5F2-HCB in combination with IgG or anti-PD-1 reduced intratumoral macrophages by >50% (P < 0.001) and reduced the M2/M1 macrophage ratio by 32-61% (P < 0.05) relative to other groups. No effects on CD4+ T cells were observed. Furthermore, C5F2-HCB and IgG or anti-PD-1 increased intratumoral neutrophils by 75- 120% compared to the anti-PD-1 or IgG (P < 0.05). (Multiple comparisons tested by ANOVA). Conclusion: Relative to IgG alone, C5F2-HCB and metformin inhibited growth of the SSM2ucd allograft in combination with either anti-PD1 or IgG. In contrast to metformin, only C5F2-HCB modulated the TME, including increased CD8+ TILs with IgG, reduced Tregs with anti-PD-1, and decreased M2/M1 macrophage ratio with IgG and anti-PD-1. C5F2-HCB, in contrast tometformin, was effective in modulating an immune excluded TME and may contribute to a strategy for clinical translation. Citation Format: Zhijun Guo, Jianxun Lei, Joshua McCarra, Qing Cao, Michael J. Pryzbilla, Brenda Koniar, Beverly Norris, Robert J. Schumacher, Swaathi Jayaraman, John R. Hawse, Antonino B. D'Assoro, Ilia G. Denisov, Stephen G. Sligar, Kathryn L. Schwertfeger, Michael A. Farrar, Dipak Panigrahy, Hammock D. Bruce, Elizabeth A. Ambrose, Gunda I. Georg, Goetz P. Matthew, David A. Potter. C5F2-hexyl-(cuban-1-yl-methyl)-biguanide (C5F2-HCB) overcomes an immune excluded tumor microenvironment (TME) and suppresses tumor growth in the ovarian dependent ER+HER2- SSM2ucd mammary carcinoma allograft model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr LB010.

Abstract Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) with aromatase inhibitors (AI) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) is standard for premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer. However, many premenopausal women are intolerant of AI + OFS, leaving tamoxifen (with or without OFS) as their only option. Extensive studies have demonstrated that premenopausal women treated with neoadjuvant ET whose tumors exhibit Ki-67 ≤ 10% following 4 weeks of therapy (defined as endocrine sensitive disease (ESD)) achieve 5-year distant disease-free survival > 96%. Problematically, only 41% of patients reach this ESD threshold with tamoxifen compared to 78% with AI+OFS (Nitz JCO 2022). (Z)-endoxifen (ENDX) is a potent selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that inhibits ERα at plasma concentrations of 3-5 ng/ml and dually targets PKCβ1, a suspected oncogene in breast tumors, at concentrations ≥ 500 ng/ml. We therefore developed the EVANGELINE study (NCT05607004) is an open label, randomized neoadjuvant phase II study that includes a pharmacokinetic (PK) Run-in, aiming to evaluate whether ENDX +/- goserelin is non-inferior to exemestane plus goserelin with respect to ESD rate. Following the completed PK run-in portion of the study, where 40mg/day or 80mg/day ENDX were assessed, the 40 mg/day dose was selected for further evaluation in the second part of the trial. The second part is comprised of a randomized treatment cohort, for patients with a Ki-67% >10% at preregistration randomized to either 40mg (Z)-endoxifen + goserelin or exemestane + goserelin neoadjuvant treatment and a Single Arm Treatment Cohort for patients who have a Ki-67 ≤ 10% at pre-registration assigned to 40mg/day (Z)-endoxifen monotherapy neoadjuvant treatment. Methods: To investigate ENDX further in premenopausal women, a multicenter study in the United States, was designed(EVANGELINE; NCT05607004). This phase 2, open-label, randomized, neoadjuvant trial includes a PK run-in phase designed to assess whether the 4-week ESD rate with (Z)-endoxifen + goserelin is non-inferior to that of exemestane + goserelin in premenopausal women with Stage IIA or IIB ER+/HER2- breast cancer with diagnostic Ki67 > 10%. Additionally, a single arm Phase 2, open-label neoadjuvant Cohort was designed to assess the 4-week ESD rate with ENDX monotherapy in premenopausal women with Stage IIA or IIB ER+/HER2- BC with diagnostic Ki67 ≤10%. Subjects will undergo neoadjuvant treatment for six months before receiving surgical treatment in the involved breast. This study will additionally assess safety, tolerability, response rates, surgical outcomes, and monitor disease progression. Comprehensive biomarker evaluations will be conducted using paired tumor biopsies and blood samples collected at baseline and week four, as well as 6 month surgical specimens. Enrollment in the PK run-in phase (n-22) was completed in Fall 2024 with the second portion of the trial slated to begin early in 2025. Citation Format: Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Claudia Lopez, Hayley Erickson, Lonnissa Nguyen, Sandra S. Hammer, Lida Mina, Pooja Advani, Roberto Leon-Ferre, Karthik Giridhar, Felipe Batalini, Daniel Flora, Jason M. Jones, Nusayba A. Bagegni, Katie N. Hunt, Mara Piltin, Amy Degnim, James N. Ingle, Judy C. Boughey, Sarah A. Buhrow, Joel M. Reid, Matthew Schellenberg, John R. Hawse, Steven C. Quay. A randomized phase 2 non-inferiority trial of (Z)-endoxifen + goserelin and exemestane + goserelin as neoadjuvant treatment for premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer (EVANGELINE) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT237.

Abstract Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-positive breast cancer accounts for up to 80% of cases. Despite advances in CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapies, recurrence and late relapse remain significant challenges. Recurrence often arises from disseminated cancer cells that persist despite 5-10 years of systemic adjuvant treatment. While CDK4/6i and endocrine therapies induce prolonged growth arrest resembling senescence, they do not significantly kill cancer cells. Senescent/pseudo-senescent cancer cells are implicated in aggressive variant formation, recurrence, and metastasis. We explored eliminating breast cancer cells via senolysis while they are in therapy-induced senescent state to prevent their potential to escape, repopulate, or cause long-term adverse effects. Live-cell imaging of MCF7 and T47D cells treated with abemaciclib and endocrine therapies (endoxifen or estrogen deprivation to mimic aromatase inhibition) at clinically relevant concentrations for eight days demonstrated prolonged growth cessation and G1 cell cycle arrest even two weeks post-drug withdrawal. These cells displayed a senescence-like gene expression profile, with increased CDKN2B (p15), CDKN1A (p21), BCL2, reduced KI67, and increased TGFβ expression, a known Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype (SASP) factor linked to deep senescence. These results confirm effective senescence induction by various CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy combinations. Further analysis using established senescence markers (e.g., nuclear size, telomere-associated foci, satellite distension, and loss of nuclear HMGB1 and LaminB1) revealed unique senescence phenotypes across therapy combinations. Cell viability assays and live imaging of Caspase 3/7 activation demonstrated differential vulnerabilities of senescent/senescent-like ERα+ cancer cells (MCF7, T47D, UCD4, UCD12) to 13 senolytics (1 μM), including natural flavonoids and inhibitors targeting pro-survival factors, tyrosine kinases, and the Notch pathway. For example, MCF7 and UCD4 cells responded to MCL1i and RSL3, T47D to BCLXLi and RSL3, and UCD12 to BCLXLi and Navitoclax. Notably, senolytic cocktails (e.g., RSL3, GNF7, Venetoclax, Dasatinib) at reduced concentrations (0.25 μM each) effectively eliminated senescent/senescent-like ERα+ cancer cells across all cancer cell lines, achieving 100% elimination in T47D cells. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that despite variability in therapy-induced senescence, senolytic combinations effectively target senescent ERα+ cancer cells. This provides preliminary evidence for the potential integration of this strategy into standard breast cancer therapy with a goal to improve recurrence-free survival and increase the cure rates for ERα+ breast cancer patients. In vivo studies are underway to evaluate this strategy in preclinical models. Citation Format: Lena Batoon, Angelo J. Guilatco, Anna Detry, Xiyin Wang, Megan M. Weivoda, John R. Hawse. CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapies induce senescence with drug- and cell line-specific vulnerabilities in ERα+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 519.

Abstract Approximately 80% of breast cancers express estrogen receptor alpha (ERα, ESR1), which drives cancer progression. Despite the array of targeted therapies, ERα+ breast cancer exhibits the highest recurrence and late distant relapse rates among subtypes. (Z)-Endoxifen (ENDX), an active metabolite of tamoxifen, is a potent, orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor modulator with a favorable safety profile now under development for breast health applications. Its synthesis yields endoxifen-related byproducts that are new chemical entities (NCEs), including AT416E, AT416Z, AT402E and AT402Z. This study compared the anti-estrogenic effects of these compounds to ENDX in ERα+ breast cancer cell lines (MCF7, T47D, UCD12), including those with ESR1 mutations (Y537S, D538G) linked to endocrine resistance. In 2D cultures with estrogen (E2), ENDX and all NCEs showed significant anti-proliferative effects across all lines, achieving 20-90% inhibition at 0.02-5 μM (p<0.0001). ENDX was the most effective in MCF7; ENDX, AT416Z, and AT402Z in T47D; and ENDX, AT416E, and AT416Z in UCD12. Under E2-deficient conditions, all NCEs had lower IC50 values than ENDX in MCF7 cells, while AT416Z and AT402Z outperformed ENDX in UCD12. In T47D D538G mutants, ENDX, AT416E, and AT402Z exhibited the highest potency, while all NCEs showed comparable efficacy in Y537S mutants. In MCF7 cells, ENDX, AT402E, and AT402Z demonstrated similar activity against Y537S mutants, while AT402Z was the most potent in D538G mutants. In 3D cultures at a clinically relevant concentration (∼1 μM), all compounds significantly reduced proliferation (∼75-90%; p<0.0001), with ENDX and AT402Z showing superior potency. AT416E outperformed ENDX in wound-healing assays (p<0.0001). All NCEs induced comparable G1 cell cycle arrest in MCF7 (p<0.0001), while AT402E and AT402Z showed stronger promotion of G1-to-S phase arrest and S/G2/M inhibition compared to ENDX in T47D cells (p<0.05). These NCEs also significantly induced apoptosis in MCF7 cells at 1-5 μM (p<0.0001), with AT416Z, AT402E, and AT402Z surpassing ENDX (p<0.0001). In T47D cells, apoptosis was significantly induced by ENDX, AT416E, and AT416Z (p<0.0001 vs. vehicle), with ENDX showing superior activity. RT-qPCR analysis at 0.1 μM revealed ENDX and AT416Z as the most potent inhibitors of E2-induced ERα target gene expression in MCF7 cells, with ENDX surpassing all NCEs in T47D cells. Synergy assays indicated that the NCEs do not synergize with ENDX, supporting their potential use as stand-alone agents. These findings highlight four NCEs with notable anti-cancer activity, with some matching or surpassing ENDX in several cancer-relevant cellular readouts, marking them as novel candidates for ERα+ breast cancer therapy. Further studies will advance one or more of these NCEs into in vivo models to confirm their therapeutic efficacy and potential for clinical application. Citation Format: Lena Batoon, Rajeev S. Muthyala, Sandra S. Hammer, Natalie Farris, Steven C. Quay, John R. Hawse. Novel (Z)-endoxifen-related new chemical entities exhibit potent anti-cancer activity in ERα+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4742.

Breast and ovarian cancer represent the most common and lethal cancers in women. Despite chemotherapy and targeted agents, recurrence is frequent and outcomes for patients with advanced disease are dismal, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic strategies. Using an unbiased approach with DepMap CRISPR screens across more than 1000 cancer cell lines, we identified six genes (CTPS1, RHOA, PRKRA, RAD9A, HUS1, and RAD1) that were essential for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells, but not ERα+ breast cancer cells, that were also associated with poor outcomes. Validation of these effects by siRNA knockdown studies revealed that suppression of CTPS1 elicited the most potent inhibitory effects, characterized by S phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Similar effects were also found in ovarian cancer cells which share many molecular features. CTPS1, along with CTPS2, is responsible for enzymatic conversion of UTP to CTP, an essential nucleoside triphosphate required for multiple cellular processes including DNA/RNA synthesis, phospholipid synthesis and glycosylation. CTPS1 was found to be highly expressed in tumor tissues, for both breast and ovarian cancer. RT-PCR assessment of CTPS1 expression in a panel of over 40 breast and ovarian cancer lines confirmed variable, but elevated expression relative to normal models. Notably, chemotherapy-resistant and PARP inhibitor (PARPi)-resistant models exhibited the highest levels of CTPS1 expression among all cells analyzed. In partnership with Step Pharma, which has developed a first-in-class highly selective CTPS1 inhibitor (STP938), we have demonstrated that STP938 elicits potent anti-proliferative effects at nM concentrations across many cell line and patient derived models, both in 2D and 3D culture systems. Furthermore, STP938 exhibited strong anti-cancer activity in chemotherapy- and PARPi-resistant ovarian cancer models, both as a monotherapy and in combination with standard-of-care treatments. RNA-seq analysis in cell models following STP938 treatment or CTPS1 knockdown/knockout showed significant dysregulation of DNA replication and cell cycle related genes, suggesting potential synergy with drugs targeting replication stress or DNA damage response pathways. Single-cell sequencing further revealed specific cell-cell interactions/cross talk/pathways that are disrupted by STP938 in vivo using ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft. The first-in-human clinical trial for STP938 began in 2022 for relapsed/refractory B- and T-cell lymphomas (NCT05463263). In August 2024, a second phase I trial opened for advanced solid tumors, including an expansion cohort for CTPS2-null ovarian cancer (NCT06297525) at Mayo Clinic. These laboratory discoveries, and ongoing clinical studies, are expected to pave the way for a broader uptake of this novel therapeutic approach aimed at improving outcomes in patients with highly aggressive forms of these diseases. Citation Format: Xiyin Wang, Michael Emch, Lauren Voll, Rebecca Epp, Esther Rodman, Noa Odell, Nicole Pearson, Xiaonan Hou, Matthew Goetz, Scott Kaufmann, John Weroha, Philip Beer, John Hawse. Exploiting CTPS1 dependency for the treatment of breast and ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 6388.

Abstract Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer diagnosed in American women. The majority of breast cancers express estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). However, 15-20% lack expression of all three and are called triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TNBC accounts for a disproportionately large amount of morbidity and mortality due to its aggressive nature and the paucity of effective adjuvant maintenance therapy, driving an urgent need for novel therapeutics. Z-endoxifen (ENDX) is a potent tamoxifen metabolite that dually targets ERα and protein kinase C beta I (PKCβI). We recently described next-generation molecules, the first-in-class endoxifen-PROTAC (ENDX-PROTAC) compounds which incorporate ENDX as the warhead and cereblon (CRBN) as the E3 ubiquitin ligase recruitment moiety (Jayaraman 2024, SABCS). We used the PRISM screen of over 900 cancer cell lines to determine that ENDX-PROTACs have broad antitumor activity in both TNBC and ER+ breast cancer in addition to, leukemia, pancreatic, lymphoma, lung, melanoma, and ovarian cancer cells, among others. ENDX-PROTACs primarily target a key translation termination factor, G to S phase transition 1 (GSPT1). Here, we demonstrate for the first time that these compounds also cause marked DNA damage. The lead compounds of this series, EPrC-007 and EPrC-009 demonstrated potent anti-proliferative effects in MDA-MB-231, BT549, and MDA-MB-436 TNBC cell lines. EPrC-007 induced substantial DNA double strand breaks in MDA-MB-231 cells as assessed by γ-H2AX Western blotting. Interrogation of DNA repair pathways revealed activation of ATM/CHK2 and downregulation of ATR/CHK1, suggesting inhibition of DNA repair as a potential mechanism. Additionally, EPrC-007 also induced γ-H2AX foci in MDA-MB-231 and BT549 cells, but not in the MCF10A normal breast tissue cell line, suggesting selective anti-tumor activity. Since we suspect that EPrC-007 blocks DNA repair machinery, we next sought to determine if these molecules would synergize with DNA damaging agents or other DNA repair inhibitors. Promisingly, EPrC-007 demonstrated remarkable synergy with olaparib (poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor), hydroxyurea (ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor), and cisplatin (direct DNA damaging agent), but not camptothecin (topoisomerase I inhibitor). Importantly, only olaparib co-treatment demonstrated synergy in the PARP- and PROTAC-resistant HCC1143 TNBC cell line. Furthermore, the combination of EPrC-007 with olaparib induced markedly more γ-H2AX foci than either agent alone, confirming synergy at the DNA damage level. Taken together, our studies demonstrate the remarkable potential of ENDX-PROTACs in the single-agent setting as well as in combination with PARP inhibitors. Citation Format: Aamod S. Dekhne, Swaathi Jayaraman, Lucy Rai Thulung, Becky Bruinsma, Baustin M. Welch, Samuel Wyatt, Esther P. Rodman, Sayantani Bhattacharya, Thomas R. Caulfield, John R. Hawse, Matthew J. Schellenberg, Matthew P. Goetz. Novel endoxifen-based proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) small molecules synergize with olaparib and exhibit potent antitumor activity in triple negative breast cancer through induction of DNA damage [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 1666.