Citations

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) encoding a variety of transgenes have been evaluated as therapeutic tools to increase the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)–modified T cells in the solid tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, using systemically delivered OVs and CAR T cells in immunocompetent mouse models, we have defined a mechanism by which OVs can potentiate CAR T cell efficacy against solid tumor models of melanoma and glioma. We show that stimulation of the native T cell receptor (TCR) with viral or virally encoded epitopes gives rise to enhanced proliferation, CAR-directed antitumor function, and distinct memory phenotypes. In vivo expansion of dual-specific (DS) CAR T cells was leveraged by in vitro preloading with oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) or reovirus, allowing for a further in vivo expansion and reactivation of T cells by homologous boosting. This treatment led to prolonged survival of mice with subcutaneous melanoma and intracranial glioma tumors. Human CD19 CAR T cells could also be expanded in vitro with TCR reactivity against viral or virally encoded antigens and was associated with greater CAR-directed cytokine production. Our data highlight the utility of combining OV and CAR T cell therapy and show that stimulation of the native TCR can be exploited to enhance CAR T cell activity and efficacy in mice.

Background Combination herpes simplex virus (HSV) oncolytic virotherapy and BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) represent promising immunogenic treatments for BRAF mutant melanoma, but an improved understanding of the immunobiology of combinations is needed to improve on the benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Methods Using a BRAFV600E-driven murine melanoma model, we tested the immunogenicity of HSV/BRAFi in immunocompetent C57BL mice. In addition to standard FACS analysis, we used the ‘Timer of Cell Kinetics and Activity’ system, which can analyze the temporal dynamics of different T cell subsets. This immune data was used to inform the selection of ICI for triple combination therapy, the effects of which were then further characterized using transcriptomics. Results Adding BRAFi treatment to HSV improved anti-tumor effects in vivo but not in vitro. Immune characterization showed HSV or dual therapy led to fewer intratumoral Treg, although with a more activated phenotype, together with more effector CD8 +T cells. Tocky analysis further showed that HSV/BRAFi dual treatment reduced the Tocky signal (reflecting engagement with cognate antigen), in both Treg and conventional subsets of CD4+, but not in CD8 +cells. However, a higher percentage of Treg than of conventional CD4 +maintained frequent engagement with antigens on treatment, reflecting a predominance of suppressive over effector function within the CD4 +compartment. The only T cell subset which correlated with a reduction in tumor growth was within Tocky signal positive conventional CD4+, supporting their therapeutic role. Targeting CD25 high, antigen-engaged Treg with a depleting anti-CD25 ICI, achieved complete cures in 100% of mice with triple therapy. Transcriptomic analysis confirmed reduction in Foxp3 on addition of anti-CD25 to HSV/BRAFi, as well as increases in expression of genes reflecting interferon signaling and cytotoxic activity. Conclusions Combination HSV/BRAFi is an immunogenic therapy for BRAF mutant melanoma, but cannot fully control tumors. Dual therapy results in changes in T cell dynamics within tumors, with relatively maintained antigen signaling in Treg compared with conv CD4+. Antigen-engaged CD4 +effectors correlate with tumor growth control, and depletion of Treg by addition of an anti-CD25 ICI, releasing suppression of conventional CD4 +effectors by Treg, enhances survival and activates immune signaling within tumors.

Recognizing immune responses to oncolytic virotherapy opens the way for new combinations

Background Oncolytic reovirus therapy for cancer induces a typical antiviral response to this RNA virus, including neutralizing antibodies. Concomitant treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapies has been hypothesized to improve the therapeutic potential of the virus. Chemotherapy side effects can include immunosuppression, which may slow the rate of the antiviral antibody response, as well as potentially make the patient more vulnerable to viral infection. Method Reovirus neutralizing antibody data were aggregated from separate phase I clinical trials of reovirus administered as a single agent or in combination with gemcitabine, docetaxel, carboplatin and paclitaxel doublet or cyclophosphamide. In addition, the kinetics of individual antibody isotypes were profiled in sera collected in these trials. Results These data demonstrate preserved antiviral antibody responses, with only moderately reduced kinetics with some drugs, most notably gemcitabine. All patients ultimately produced an effective neutralizing antibody response. Conclusion Patients’ responses to infection by reovirus are largely unaffected by the concomitant drug treatments tested, providing confidence that RNA viral treatment or infection is compatible with standard of care treatments.

PURPOSEMutations in the HRAS (m HRAS) proto-oncogene occur in 4%-8% of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Tipifarnib is a farnesyltransferase inhibitor that disrupts HRAS function. We evaluated the efficacy of tipifarnib in patients with R/M m HRAS HNSCC.METHODSWe enrolled 30 patients with R/M HNSCC in a single-arm, open-label phase II trial of tipifarnib for m HRAS malignancies; one additional patient was treated on an expanded access program. After an ad hoc analysis of the first 16 patients with HNSCC with m HRAS variant allele frequency (VAF) data, enrollment was limited to those with a m HRAS VAF of ≥ 20% (high VAF). The primary end point was objective response rate. Secondary end points included assessing safety and tolerability. Patients received tipifarnib 600 or 900 mg orally twice daily on days 1-7 and 15-21 of 28-day cycles.RESULTSOf the 22 patients with HNSCC with high VAF, 20 were evaluable for response at the time of data cutoff. Objective response rate for evaluable patients with high-VAF HNSCC was 55% (95% CI, 31.5 to 76.9). Median progression-free survival on tipifarnib was 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 16.4) versus 3.6 months (95% CI, 1.3 to 5.2) on last prior therapy. Median overall survival was 15.4 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 29.7). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events among the 30 patients with HNSCC were anemia (37%) and lymphopenia (13%).CONCLUSIONTipifarnib demonstrated encouraging efficacy in patients with R/M HNSCC with HRAS mutations for whom limited therapeutic options exist ( NCT02383927 ).

AbstractThe apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide (APOBEC) family protects against infection by degrading incoming viral genomes through cytosine deamination. Here, we review how the potential to unleash these potent DNA mutagens comes at a price as APOBEC DNA mutagenesis can contribute to development of multiple types of cancer. In addition, because viral infection induces its expression, APOBEC is seen as the enemy of oncolytic virotherapy through mutation of the viral genome and by generating virotherapy-resistant tumors. Therefore, overall APOBEC in cancer has received very poor press. However, we also speculate how there may be silver linings to the storm clouds (kataegis) associated with APOBEC activity. Thus, although mutagenic genomic chaos promotes emergence of ever more aggressive subclones, it also provides significant opportunity for cytotoxic and immune therapies. In particular, the superpower of cancer immunotherapy derives in part from mutation, wherein generation of tumor neoantigens—neoantigenesis—exposes tumor cells to functional T-cell repertoires, and susceptibility to immune checkpoint blockade. Moreover, APOBECs may be able to induce suprathreshold levels of cellular mutation leading to mitotic catastrophe and direct tumor cell killing. Finally, we discuss the possibility that linking predictable APOBEC-induced mutation with escape from specific frontline therapies could identify mutated molecules/pathways that can be targeted with small molecules and/or immunotherapies in a Trap and Ambush strategy. Together, these considerations lead to the counterintuitive hypothesis that, instead of attempting to expunge and excoriate APOBEC activity in cancer therapy, it might be exploited—and even, counterintuitively, encouraged.

Abstract Background: Oncolytic viruses selectively infect tumors and activate antitumor immune responses via innate and adaptive pathways, which may potentiate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. MEDI5395 is a recombinant Newcastle disease virus incorporating a granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) transgene that exhibits tumor cell-specific viral replication, stimulates PD-L1 expression, and induces tumor regression in murine and patient-derived xenograft models. Increased T cell recruitment and expression of IFNγ-inducible genes observed in vitro suggest immune activation in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Antitumor activity is enhanced by concurrent PD-L1 blockade. This clinical study is evaluating IV MEDI5395 in combination with the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This is a Phase 1, first-in-human, multicenter, open-label trial (NCT03889275) enrolling patients with breast cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer or melanoma. Eligibility criteria include relapsed/refractory disease or intolerance to standard therapy after ≥1 prior line of treatment for recurrent/metastatic disease, and ≥1 tumor measurable by RECIST v1.1. Exclusion criteria include rapidly progressing disease precluding a break of ≥8 weeks from systemic therapy, life expectancy ≥12 weeks by GRIm Score, uncontrolled metastatic central nervous system disease, and concomitant immunosuppressive therapy. The initial dose escalation phase will enroll up to 84 patients across all eligible tumor types. Three sequentially ascending dose levels of MEDI5395 will be evaluated. Durvalumab is administered either sequentially or concurrently with MEDI5395, for up to 2 years or until radiologically confirmed disease progression, clinical deterioration, withdrawal of consent, or unacceptable toxicity. The subsequent dose expansion phase will include 2 cohorts of ~40 patients, each enrolling a single tumor type. The tumor types, MEDI5395 dose level and schedule will be selected based on dose escalation data. On-treatment biopsies of the primary tumor or a metastatic site are required in the dose escalation phase and optional in the dose expansion phase. Primary objectives are evaluating the safety, tolerability and incidence of dose-limiting toxicities of MEDI5395, and identifying the optimal dose/schedule in combination with durvalumab. Secondary objectives include assessing MEDI5395 pharmacokinetics (viremia and GM-CSF transgene expression), pharmacodynamics in the TME, immunogenicity, and initial efficacy in combination with durvalumab. The trial is actively accruing. Citation Format: Grace K. Dy, Diwakar Davar, Evanthia Galanis, Danielle Townsley, Djuro Karanovic, Maria Schwaederle, Beth Kelly, Dmitriy Zamarin, Mitesh Borad, Kevin Harrington. A phase 1 study of IV MEDI5395, an oncolytic virus, in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT244.

Background The aggressive clinical behavior of poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancers (PDTC and ATC) has proven challenging to treat, and survival beyond a few months from diagnosis is rare. Although 30%–60% of these tumors contain mutations in the BRAF gene, inhibitors designed specifically to target oncogenic BRAF have shown limited and only short-lasting therapeutic benefits as single agents, thus highlighting the need for improved treatment strategies, including novel combinations. Methods Using a BRAFV600E-driven mouse model of ATC, we investigated the therapeutic efficacy of the combination of BRAF inhibition and oncolytic herpes simplex virus (oHSV). Analyses of samples from tumor-bearing mice were performed to immunologically characterize the effects of different treatments. These immune data were used to inform the incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors into triple combination therapies. Results We characterized the immune landscape in vivo following BRAF inhibitor treatment and detected only modest immune changes. We, therefore, hypothesized that the addition of oncolytic virotherapy to BRAF inhibition in thyroid cancer would create a more favorable tumor immune microenvironment, boost the inflammatory status of tumors and improve BRAF inhibitor therapy. First, we showed that thyroid cancer cells were susceptible to infection with oHSV and that this process was associated with activation of the immune tumor microenvironment in vivo. Next, we showed improved therapeutic responses when combining oHSV and BRAF inhibition in vivo, although no synergistic effects were seen in vitro, further confirming that the dominant effect of oHSV in this context was likely immune-mediated. Importantly, both gene and protein expression data revealed an increase in activation of T cells and natural killer (NK) cells in the tumor in combination-treated samples. The benefit of combination oHSV and BRAF inhibitor therapy was abrogated when T cells or NK cells were depleted in vivo. In addition, we showed upregulation of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 following combined treatment and demonstrated that blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis or CTLA-4 further improved combination therapy. Conclusions The combination of oHSV and BRAF inhibition significantly improved survival in a mouse model of ATC by enhancing immune-mediated antitumor effects, and triple combination therapies, including either PD-1 or CTLA-4 blockade, further improved therapy.

Abstract Background: This Phase 2 study (NCT02383927) is a multi-institutional, open-label trial to determine the efficacy and safety of tipifarnib in patients (pts) with locally advanced/unresectable and/or metastatic solid tumors that carry HRAS missense mutations. HRAS is a proto-oncogene that is overexpressed and mutated in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) and other SCCs. Tipifarnib is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of farnesyltransferase, a critical enzyme for HRAS activity. Methods: Pts received tipifarnib at a starting dose of 600 – 900 mg orally twice daily on days 1-7 and 15-21 of 28-day cycles. Disease assessments were conducted according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. Null hypothesis and objective response of interest were respectively 10% and 30%. Prior to its completion, this study met its primary objective and, based on preliminary efficacy results (Ho, et. al, ESMO 2018), was amended to continue enrolling only pts with HNSCC (Cohort 2) and other SCC tumors (Cohort 3) carrying HRAS missense mutations at a high variant allele frequency (VAF >35% or ≥20% if baseline serum albumin is >3.5 g/dL). Results: As of May 1, 2019, 23 pts with HNSCC and 10 pts with tumors with other SCC histologies have been treated with tipifarnib. Pts had relapsed/refractory disease with a median of 2 prior regimens. Of note, no objective partial responses were observed on their last therapy prior to study entry, including platinum, immunotherapy and cetuximab +/- chemotherapy. In 15 HNSCC pts meeting the HRAS mutation high VAF inclusion criteria, a 53% overall response rate (ORR) was observed, with 8 confirmed partial responses (PR) and 5 disease stabilizations (SD). Two pts await first on-study tumor response assessment. Overall median progression free survival (PFS) was 5.4 mos (95% CI 4.5 to 19.5 mos, N=15); 19 mos (95% CI 5.3 to 19.5 mos) for pts experiencing a PR and 4.5 mos (95% CI 1.6 to 5.4 mos) for those experiencing SD. Median PFS on last prior therapy was 3.2 mos. All pts had at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). The most frequently observed drug-related Grade >3 TEAEs occurring in ≥10% pts were blood and lymphatic system disorders, gastrointestinal disorders and renal disorders. Conclusions: Encouraging activity of tipifarnib was observed in HRAS mutant HNSCC. Based on these data, a pivotal study (AIM-HN and SEQ-HN Study, NCT03719690) evaluating the efficacy of this agent in HRAS mutant HNSCC (AIM-HN) and the impact of HRAS mutations on first line therapy of HNSCC (SEQ-HN) has been initiated. Citation Format: Alan Ho, Irene Brana, Robert Haddad, Jessica Bauman, Keith Bible, Laurence Faugeras, Sjoukje Oosting, Deborah J Wong, Myung-Ju Ahn, Valentina Boni, Caroline Even, Jerome Fayette, Maria Jose Flor, Kevin Harrington, Sung-Bae Kim, Lisa Licitra, Ioanna Nixon, Nabil F Saba, Cyrus Sayehli, Pol Specenier, Francis Worden, Binaifer Balsara, Jeanne Britt, Vishnu Mishra, Catherine Scholz, Antonio Gualberto. Preliminary results from a phase 2 trial of tipifarnib in squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) with HRAS mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PR08. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-PR08

Abstract Purpose: The CANON [CAVATAK in NON–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)] study evaluated a novel ICAM-1–targeted immunotherapeutic-coxsackievirus A21 as a novel oncolytic agent against bladder cancer. Patients and Methods: Fifteen patients enrolled in this “window of opportunity” phase I study, exposing primary bladder cancers to CAVATAK prior to surgery. The first 9 patients received intravesical administration of monotherapy CAVATAK; in the second stage, 6 patients received CAVATAK with a subtherapeutic dose of mitomycin C, known to enhance expression of ICAM-1 on bladder cancer cells. The primary endpoint was to determine patient safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary endpoints were evidence of viral replication, induction of inflammatory cytokines, antitumor activity, and viral-induced changes in resected tissue. Results: Clinical activity of CAVATAK was demonstrated by induction of tumor inflammation and hemorrhage following either single or multiple administrations of CAVATAK in multiple patients, and a complete resolution of tumor in 1 patient. Whether used alone or in combination with mitomycin C, CAVATAK caused marked inflammatory changes within NMIBC tissue biopsies by upregulating IFN-inducible genes, including both immune checkpoint inhibitory genes (PD-L1 and LAG3) and Th1-associated chemokines, as well as the induction of the innate activator RIG-I, compared with bladder cancer tissue from untreated patients. No significant toxicities were reported in any patient, from either virus or combination therapy. Conclusions: The acceptable safety profile of CAVATAK, proof of viral targeting, replication, and tumor cell death together with the virus-mediated increases in “immunological heat” within the tumor microenvironment all indicate that CAVATAK may be potentially considered as a novel therapeutic for NMIBC.