Citations

10010 Background: Cabozantinib is an inhibitor of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) including MET, VEGFR2, RET, and AXL. Preclinical and clinical data support these RTKs as potential therapeutic targets; Safety, tolerability, and responses were demonstrated in a COG phase 1 trial. We conducted a multi-center open label phase 2 trial to determine the activity of cabozantinib in select pediatric solid tumors (NCT02867592). Methods: Patients age 2-30 years old with selected relapsed or refractory cancer that was measurable (RECISTv.1.1) were eligible. Using a Simon minimax design, patients were enrolled to six strata: Osteosarcoma (OS), Ewing sarcoma (EWS), rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS), Wilms tumor (WT), and rare tumor (a non-statistical stratum including tumors of specific histologies or molecular features). Cabozantinib (40 mg/m2/day) was administered on a continuous schedule (1 cycle = 28 days). For the OS stratum, activity was determined based on objective response rate (ORR, complete response (CR) + Partial response (PR)) or disease control success defined as at least stable disease (SD) for ≥ 4 months. For all other strata, the primary endpoint was ORR. Pharmacokinetics were performed in patients < 19 years. Results: Between May 2017- Oct 2020, 109 patients enrolled (105 eligible, 104 evaluable for response and toxicity). Median age was 15.8 (range 5.6-27.1) years; 55 were male. In the OS stratum, 10/29 (34%) patients had central review confirmed disease control ≥ 4 months (2 PR, 8 SD), exceeding the protocol-defined criteria for activity of cabozantinib in OS. Median duration of therapy was 3 cycles (range 1-28+). In EWS, RMS, NRSTS, and WT strata (n = 13 evaluable patients each) no PR or CR were observed. In the rare tumor stratum (n = 23), 1/4 patients with renal cell carcinoma, 1/1 patients with RET fusion positive papillary thyroid cancer had a PR, and 1 patient with medullary thyroid cancer had a delayed PR. SD ≥ 6 cycles was seen in patients with EWS (n = 2), NRSTS (n = 5), WT (n = 3), and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1). At data cutoff (12/31/2020), 430 treatment cycles were administered; two patients remain on therapy. Cycle 1 and later cycle dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were seen in 20 (19%) and 39 (38%) patients, respectively. Common DLT were elevated liver enzymes, bilirubin, and lipase, hyponatremia, weight loss, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, wound dehiscence, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and pneumothorax. Day 1 pharmacokinetics (mean ± SD, n = 16) demonstrated a maximum plasma concentration of 556 ± 376 ng/ml, half-life 106 ± 102 hours, and area under the curve (AUC0-24h) 8093 ± 4368 ng•h/mL. Conclusions: Cabozantinib is active in patients with relapsed refractory OS and deserves further study in this disease. PRs were also seen in select carcinomas. Activity is limited in other sarcomas and WT. Clinical trial information: NCT02867592.

Eosinophils protect against liver injury during orthotopic liver transplantation and other conditions of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice.

Background Lorvotuzumab mertansine (IMGN901) is an antibody‐drug conjugate linking an antimitotic agent (DM1) to an anti‐CD56 antibody (lorvotuzumab). Preclinical efficacy has been noted in Wilms tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, and neuroblastoma. Synovial sarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), and pleuropulmonary blastoma also express CD56. A phase 2 trial of lorvotuzumab mertansine was conducted to assess its efficacy, recommended phase 2 dose, and toxicities. Methods Eligible patients had relapsed after or progressed on standard therapy for their tumor type. Lorvotuzumab mertansine (110 mg/m 2 per dose) was administered at the adult recommended phase 2 dose intravenously on days 1 and 8 of 21‐day cycles. Dexamethasone premedication was used. Pharmacokinetic samples, peripheral blood CD56‐positive cell counts, and tumor CD56 expression were assessed. Results Sixty‐two patients enrolled. The median age was 14.3 years (range, 2.8‐29.9 years); 35 were male. Diagnoses included Wilms tumor (n = 17), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 17), neuroblastoma (n = 12), synovial sarcoma (n = 10), MPNST (n = 5), and pleuropulmonary blastoma (n = 1). Five patients experienced 9 dose‐limiting toxicities: hyperglycemia (n = 1), colonic fistula (n = 1) with perforation (n = 1), nausea (n = 1) with vomiting (n = 1), increased alanine aminotransferase in cycle 1 (n = 2), and increased alanine aminotransferase in cycle 2 (n = 1) with increased aspartate aminotransferase (n = 1). Non–dose‐limiting toxicities (grade 3 or higher) attributed to lorvotuzumab mertansine were rare. The median values of the maximum concentration, half‐life, and area under the curve from zero to infinity for DM1 were 0.87 µg/mL, 35 hours, and 27.9 µg/mL h, respectively. Peripheral blood CD56+ leukocytes decreased by 71.9% on day 8. One patient with rhabdomyosarcoma had a partial response, and 1 patient with synovial sarcoma achieved a delayed complete response. Conclusions Lorvotuzumab mertansine (110 mg/m 2 ) is tolerated in children at the adult recommended phase 2 dose; clinical activity is limited.

Abstract Purpose: Aurora A kinase (AAK) plays an integral role in mitotic entry, DNA damage checkpoint recovery, and centrosome and spindle maturation. Alisertib (MLN8237) is a potent and selective AAK inhibitor. In pediatric preclinical models, antitumor activity was observed in neuroblastoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and sarcoma xenografts. We conducted a phase 2 trial of alisertib in pediatric patients with refractory or recurrent solid tumors or acute leukemias (NCT01154816). Patients and Methods: Alisertib (80 mg/m2/dose) was administered orally, daily for 7 days every 21 days. Pharmacogenomic (PG) evaluation for polymorphisms in the AURK gene and drug metabolizing enzymes (UGT1A1*28), and plasma pharmacokinetic studies (PK) were performed. Using a 2-stage design, patients were enrolled to 12 disease strata (10 solid tumor and 2 acute leukemia). Response was assessed after cycle 1, then every other cycle. Results: A total of 139 children and adolescents (median age, 10 years) were enrolled, 137 were evaluable for response. Five objective responses were observed (2 complete responses and 3 partial responses). The most frequent toxicity was myelosuppression. The median alisertib trough concentration on day 4 was 1.3 μmol/L, exceeding the 1 μmol/L target trough concentration in 67% of patients. No correlations between PG or PK and toxicity were observed. Conclusions: Despite alisertib activity in pediatric xenograft models and cogent pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in preclinical models and adults, the objective response rate in children and adolescents receiving single-agent alisertib was less than 5%.

10537 Background: Lorvotuzumab mertansine (IMGN901; LM) is an antibody-drug conjugate, linking anti-mitotic agent (DM1) to an anti-CD56 antibody. Preclinical data show effects in Wilms tumor (WT), rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), and neuroblastoma (NBL). Synovial sarcoma (SS), MPNST and pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) also express CD56. A phase 2 trial assessing the efficacy and tolerability of LM administered at the adult recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was conducted in children with relapsed tumors. Methods: LM (110 mg/m2/dose) was administered IV on days (d) 1 and 8 of 21 d cycles, with dexamethasone pre-medication. The tolerability of LM was assessed in 6 patients prior to trial activation group-wide. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed using CTCAE. Response was assessed by RECIST. Pharmacokinetics (PK) were obtained during cycle 1. Peripheral blood CD56-positive cells were measured d1 and d8 pre-dose. Tumor CD56 expression by immunohistochemistry in archival tissue was scored (0-3+). Results: Sixty-two patients were enrolled. The median (range) age was 14.3 y (2.8–29.9); 35 were male. Diagnoses included WT (17), RMS (17), NBL (12), SS (10), MPNST (5) and PPB (1). One patient was ineligible due to lack of measurable disease. Of 61 eligible patients, 47 were evaluable for toxicity, 50 for response, 50 for tumor CD56 expression; and 18 consented to optional PK. Five patients experienced 9 DLTs: hyperglycemia (1), colonic fistula (1) with perforation (1), nausea (1) with vomiting (1), increased ALT (2 in cycle 1; 1 in cycle 2 with increased AST (1)). Non-dose limiting toxicities (Grade ≥3) attributed to LM included lymphopenia, anemia, vomiting, dehydration, hypokalemia, hyperuricemia, hypophosphatemia. Mean DM1 Cmax, t1/2 and AUC0-∞values were 922 ng/ml, 33 h and 27400 ng/ml*h, respectively. Tumor CD56 expression was 0 (8%), 1+(4%), 2+(12%), 3+(76%). LM and CD56 antibody PK, and response, will be reported. Conclusions: LM (110 mg/m2) is tolerated in children at the adult RP2D. Clinical trial information: NCT 02452554.

A 17-year-old male was transferred to the pediatric intensive care unit for evaluation of acute liver failure. He was recently released from an alcohol treatment center with acute onset of chest pain. Cardiac workup was negative but he was found to have abnormal coagulation studies and elevated liver transaminases. Other evaluations included a normal toxicology screen and negative acetaminophen level. Autoimmune and infectious workups were normal providing no identifiable cause of his acute liver failure. He initially denied any ingestions or illicit drug use but on further query he admitted taking niacin in an attempt to obscure the results of an upcoming drug test. Niacin has been touted on the Internet as an aid to help pass urine drug tests though there is no evidence to support this practice. Niacin toxicity has been associated with serious multisystem organ failure and fulminant hepatic failure requiring liver transplantation. Pediatric providers should be aware of the risks associated with niacin toxicity and other experimental medical therapies that may be described on the Internet or other nonreputable sources.

Abstract Background: Family studies have served as a cornerstone of genetic research on colorectal cancer. Materials and Methods: The Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (Colon CFR) is an international consortium of six centers in North America and Australia formed as a resource to support studies on the etiology, prevention, and clinical management of colorectal cancer. Differences in design and sampling schemes ensures a resource that covers the continuum of disease risk. Two separate recruitment strategies identified colorectal cancer cases: population-based (incident case probands identified by cancer registries; all six centers) and clinic-based (families with multiple cases of colorectal cancer presenting at cancer family clinics; three centers). At this time, the Colon CFR is in year 10 with the second phase of enrollment nearly complete. In phase I recruitment (1998-2002), population-based sampling ranged from all incident cases of colorectal cancer to a subsample based on age at diagnosis and/or family cancer history. During phase II (2002-2007), population-based recruitment targeted cases diagnosed before the age of 50 years are more likely attributable to genetic factors. Standardized protocols were used to collect information regarding family cancer history and colorectal cancer risk factors, and biospecimens were obtained to assess microsatellite instability (MSI) status, expression of mismatch repair proteins, and other molecular and genetic processes. Results: Of the 8,369 case probands enrolled to date, 2,602 reported having one or more colorectal cancer–affected relatives and 799 met the Amsterdam I criteria for Lynch syndrome. A large number of affected (1,324) and unaffected (19,816) relatives were enrolled, as were population-based (4,108) and spouse (983) controls. To date, 91% of case probands provided blood (or, for a few, buccal cell) samples and 75% provided tumor tissue. For a selected sample of high-risk subjects, lymphocytes have been immortalized. Nearly 600 case probands had more than two affected colorectal cancer relatives, and 800 meeting the Amsterdam I criteria and 128, the Amsterdam II criteria. MSI testing for 10 markers was attempted on all obtained tumors. Of the 4,011 tumors collected in phase I that were successfully tested, 16% were MSI-high, 12% were MSI-low, and 72% were microsatellite stable. Tumor tissues from clinic-based cases were twice as likely as population-based cases to be MSI-high (34% versus 17%). Seventeen percent of phase I proband tumors and 24% of phase II proband tumors had some loss of mismatch repair protein, with the prevalence depending on sampling. Active follow-up to update personal and family histories, new neoplasms, and deaths in probands and relatives is nearly complete. Conclusions: The Colon CFR supports an evolving research program that is broad and interdisciplinary. The greater scientific community has access to this large and well-characterized resource for studies of colorectal cancer. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(11):2331–43)