Citations

Background: Migraine is associated with neuroimaging differences in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). However, it is unknown if migraine-related disability (MRD) or if calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a vasoactive peptide important in migraine pathology, have radiographic implications. The aims of this study were to identify whether MRD or interictal serum CGRP levels impacted neuroimaging findings for those with CADASIL. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed. The primary outcomes were neuroimaging differences associated with MRD among those with migraine or interictal serum CGRP levels of those with and without migraine. MRD was defined by 2 migraine disability scales (Migraine Disability Assessment, Headache Impact Test-6). Retrospective brain magnetic resonance imaging was reviewed (average 1.7 ± 2.0 y before enrollment). Rank-sum and χ2 tests were used. Results: Those with migraine (n=25, vs. n=14 without) were younger [median 49 (25 to 82) y vs. 60 (31 to 82) y, P<0.007], had fewer cerebral microbleeds (0 to 31 vs. 0 to 50, P=0.02) and less frequently had anterior temporal lobe T2 hyperintensities [68% (17/25) vs 100% (14/14), P=0.02]. MRD scale outcomes had no significant radiographic associations. Interictal serum CGRP did not differ (migraine: n=18, 27.0±9.6 pg/mL vs. no migraine: n=10, 26.8±15.7 pg/mL, P=0.965). Conclusions: Migraine may forestall microangiopathy in CADASIL, though possibly independent of severity as measured by MRD. Interictal serum CGRP did not differ in our cohort suggesting CGRP may not be vital to migraine pathophysiology in CADASIL. Larger studies are needed to account for age differences.

Introduction: Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is a genetic, progressive microangiopathy caused by mutations in the NOTCH3 gene. Patients often present with migraine and progressive subcortical infarcts resulting in vascular cognitive impairment and death. Currently, there are no disease modifying treatments. Limiting future trials is the lack of an objective construct to classify and monitor severity of disease. The purpose of this study was to gain experience with a novel CADASIL severity grading system. Methods: Neurologists at 5 academic centers retrospectively reviewed charts of those with confirmed CADASIL. Demographic and clinical data were recorded. The CADASIL severity grades were then assigned: 0 (asymptomatic), 1 (migraine alone), 2 (stroke or mild cognitive impairment), 3 (gait impairment or early dementia) and 4 (bedbound) based on available data. Standard descriptive statistical analyses were used. Results: We identified 138 patients; overall mean age of 50.9±13.1 years, 42.8% were men. 15 (10.9%) were grade 0, 50 (36.2%) were grade 1, 41 (44.2%) were grade 2, 12 (8.7%) were grade 3, and none were grade 4. Those with less severe disease tended to be younger, more likely men, had a lower rate of hypertension and diabetes mellitus and were less frequently tobacco users, Table 1. Increasing number of vascular risk factors was associated with higher severity grading. Conclusion: Our study highlights the ability of this severity scale to separate those with CADASIL into an ordinal system. As known in the literature, more advanced phenotypes of CADASIL tend to have more vascular risk factors. Future trials may consider utilizing this ordinal construct to monitor disease progression, response to therapy, or as a screening tool.

Background: Treatment of uncontrolled arterial hypertension reduces the risk of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) progression, although it is unclear whether this reduction occurs due to blood pressure control or class-specific pleiotropic effects, such as improved beat-to-beat arterial pressure variability with calcium channel blockers. The goal of this study was to investigate the influence of antihypertensive medication class, particularly with calcium channel blocker, on accumulation of white matter hyperintensities (WMH), a radiographic marker of CSVD, within a cohort with well-controlled hypertension. Methods: We completed an observational cohort analysis of the SPRINT-MIND trial (Systolic Blood Pressure Trial Memory and Cognition in Decreased Hypertension), a large randomized controlled trial of participants who completed a baseline and 4-year follow-up brain magnetic resonance image with volumetric WMH data. Antihypertensive medication data were recorded at follow-up visits between the magnetic resonance images. A percentage of follow-up time participants were prescribed each of the 11 classes of antihypertensive was then derived. Progression of CSVD was calculated as the difference in WMH volume between 2 scans and, to address skew, dichotomized into a top tertile of the distribution compared with the remaining. Results: Among 448 individuals, vascular risk profiles were similar across WMH progression subgroups except age (70.1±7.9 versus 65.7±7.3 years; P <0.001) and systolic blood pressure (128.3±11.0 versus 126.2±9.4 mm Hg; P =0.039). Seventy-two (48.3%) of the top tertile cohort and 177 (59.2%) of the remaining cohort were in the intensive blood pressure arm. Those within the top tertile of progression had a mean WMH progression of 4.7±4.3 mL compared with 0.13±1.0 mL ( P <0.001). Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (odds ratio, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.16–0.79]; P =0.011) and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (odds ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.19–0.80]; P =0.011) was associated with less WMH progression, although dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers lost significance when WMH was treated as a continuous variable. Conclusions: Among participants of SPRINT-MIND trial, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor was most consistently associated with less WMH progression independent of blood pressure control and age.

Objective: To characterize migraine in patients with cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). Background: CADASIL serves as a key model of a monoallelic stroke disease. A portion of patients have coexistent migraine with aura, yet the relationship between migraine and the pathophysiology of CADASIL is poorly understood. Design/Methods: We performed a prospective study of adults with a confirmed genetic diagnosis of CADASIL, age-matched controls with migraine with aura (MA), and headache-free controls. The Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire (MIDAS) and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) were used to quantify migraine-related disability. Subjects were followed for one year after enrollment. Results: We enrolled 88 subjects, which included 33 subjects with CADASIL, 32 subjects without CADASIL but with MA, and 23 control subjects without CADASIL or MA. Mean age was 53.6 (range, 22-86), 64.8% (57/88) were females, and 83% (73/88) were white. Of the CADASIL subjects, 61% (20/33) suffered from MA (CAD/+MA). Aura semiology amongst the CAD/+MA and MA patients were as follows: visual (80% vs 81%), sensory (75% vs 81%), speech (75% vs 50%), motor (30% vs 50%), brain stem (60% vs 81%) and retinal (30% vs 25%). Mean MIDAS scores at enrollment were comparable between the CAD/+MA and MA populations (32.3 vs 33.5), as were mean HIT-6 scores (56.3 vs 56.9). Discussion: These preliminary results do not show a significant difference in migraine disability between CADASIL migraineurs and chronic migraineurs. Minor differences were observed in aura distribution between the two groups, although further investigations are needed to better understand the underlying pathology of CADASIL and migraine.

Objectives: Cerebral autosomal-dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is inherited microangiopathy characterized by recurrent subcortical infarcts. A majority of those with CADASIL report coexistent migraine with aura. The authors aim to quantitatively describe migraine-related disability within a CADASIL cohort. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed in a cohort of CADASIL. The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) quantified migraine-related disability. Further metrics obtained include first and last migraine, aura semiology, and therapeutic measures. Results: Twenty-four individuals were included [63% (15/24) female individuals; mean age, 56 y; range, 34 to 81 y]. Fifty-four percent (13/24) reported migraine, whereas 46% (11/24) reporting varying degrees of migraine-related disability. MIDAS Questionnaire scores appeared bimodal: 58% (14/24) scored 0 to 5, 7% (1/24) scored 6 to 10, 7% (1/24) scored 11 to 20 and 33% (8/24) scored over 20. Severe disability was associated with the multiplicity of aura semiologies and poor response to pharmacologic prophylaxis. Conclusions: A bimodal distribution of migraine-related disability was observed. A third of individuals had a severe disability and appeared medically refractory to medical migraine prophylactic measures. This study may serve as a reference point for future trials quantitatively gauging response of novel migraine treatment strategies within this unique population.