Citations

Most genetic variants associated with complex traits are hypothesized to regulate gene expression. To understand the genetics underlying gene expression variability, we characterized 14,324 RNA-sequencing samples from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine program and performed expression and splicing quantitative trait locus (e/sQTL) analyses in six tissues and cell types, including whole blood ( n = 6454) and lung ( n = 1291). We detected tens of thousands of secondary cis-e/sQTLs, showing that secondary cis-e/sQTL discovery remains unsaturated. We fine-mapped UK Biobank–derived genome-wide association study (GWAS) signals from 164 traits and identified e/sQTL colocalizations for 10,611 GWAS signals, including 7096 that colocalize with secondary e/sQTLs. Our results suggest that even larger e/sQTL analyses will uncover additional secondary e/sQTLs, further benefiting GWAS interpretation.

Abstract Background: Antigen receptor stimulation induces assembly of the CARMA1-BCL10-MALT1 (CBM) signaling complex, which leads to activation of downstream transcriptional regulators including NF-κB and subsequent lymphocyte activation. Gain-of-function mutations in B-cell receptor subunits, CARMA1, or BCL10 which lead to constitutive activation of MALT1 underly the pathogenesis of multiple lymphoid malignancies, including activated B-cell–type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (ABC-DLBCL). During previous efforts to identify regulators of MALT1 activity in lymphocytes, we discovered that G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) binds to MALT1, inhibits MALT1 scaffolding and proteolytic activities, and functions as a tumor suppressor in MALT1-dependent lymphomas. Notably, GRK2 mRNA expression is markedly lower in a subset of DLBCL tumors in comparison to normal B cells and lower GRK2 is associated with decreased patient survival in ABC-DLBCL. In light of these findings, we investigated the molecular mechanisms regulating GRK2 expression and then characterized the roles of specific GRK2-targeting miRNAs in ABC-DLBCL. Methods and Results: After finding that global impairment of miRNA processing through DICER1 depletion leads to increased GRK2 protein, we conducted bioinformatic analyses of patient tumor samples and microRNA Data Integration Portal screening to identify candidate microRNAs that target GRK2 in ABC-DLBCL. Direct targeting of GRK2 by candidate miRNAs was then confirmed by GRK2 3’UTR reporter assay. We tested for expression of three candidate microRNAs in ABC-DLBCL cells and observed elevated expression in both OCI-LY3 and TMD8 cells, which exhibited reduced GRK2 mRNA expression compared with primary B cells. Inhibition of candidate miRNAs in ABC-DLBCL cells, using anti-miRNA Locked Nucleic Acids (LNA) inhibitors, led to enhanced GRK2 expression, reduced MALT1 activity and decreased cell proliferation. Conversely, stable overexpression of candidate microRNAs led to reduced GRK2 expression, enhanced MALT1 activity and increased cell proliferation. In vivo, treatment of mice with inhibitors of candidate microRNAs abrogates the growth of ABC-DLBCL xenograft tumors. Conclusion: We have identified three miRNAs that negatively regulate GRK2 expression in ABC-DLBCL. By targeting GRK2 for downregulation, these miRNAs promote MALT1 oncoprotein scaffold and protease activities. Furthermore, inhibitors of these miRNAs enhance GRK2 expression and thereby suppress MALT1 activity and MALT1-dependent tumor cell proliferation in vitro and inhibit MALT1-dependent tumor growth in vivo. MicroRNA inhibitors that enhance GRK2 expression could represent a new approach for restraining MALT1-dependent lymphoma. Citation Format: Jing Cheng, Mei Smyers, Matt Trotta, Neil M. Carleton, Lisa M. Maurer, Uma R. Chandran, Min Xia, Ari M. Melnick, Peter C. Lucas, Linda M. McAllister-Lucas. Inhibitors of GRK2-targeting-microRNAs: New therapeutic strategies for MALT1-dependent lymphomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fifth AACR International Meeting on Advances in Malignant Lymphoma: From Discovery to Clinical Impact; 2026 Jun 24-27; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Blood Cancer Discov 2026;7(3_Suppl):Abstract nr A033.

ABSTRACT Background: Anal fistulas remain challenging in colorectal surgery, with recurrence and postoperative incontinence common despite advances in treatment. Multiple classification systems exist, but their predictive value for surgical and functional outcomes is unclear. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare Parks, American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), and St. James’s University Hospital (SJUH) MRI-based classifications in predicting surgical outcomes, including continence preservation. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 89 patients undergoing definitive surgical treatment for anorectal fistulas at a single referral center (2012–2019). Exclusions included rectovaginal fistulas, Crohn’s disease, or prior pelvic radiotherapy. Fistulas were classified using Parks, ASCRS, and, when available, SJUH (n=49). Outcomes included the number of procedures, type of initial procedure, fistula closure, and closure without continence deterioration. Continence was assessed using the Cleveland Clinic Jorge-Wexner score. Results: Most fistulas were transsphincteric (Parks Type 2, 62%) and complex (ASCRS, 65%). Overall, 86.5% achieved fistula closure, and 73% achieved closure without continence deterioration. Parks and ASCRS were significantly associated with fistula closure with continence preservation (p=0.008 and 0.007, respectively) and type of initial procedure. Parks remained significant when considering closure alone (p=0.005), while ASCRS showed a borderline association (p=0.051). SJUH classification was associated only with procedure selection. Conclusions: Parks and ASCRS classifications were associated with fistula closure with continence preservation and type of initial procedure. Considering closure alone, only Parks remained significant. SJUH was limited to procedure selection. Overall, Parks and ASCRS guide surgical planning and prediction of functional outcomes, with Parks slightly more sensitive.

Articles published in Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging in 2025 highlight advances in cardiothoracic imaging through technical innovation, quantitative biomarkers, and artificial intelligence applications that support improved diagnosis, risk stratification, and patient-centered management across cardiac, vascular, and thoracic disease.

TPS3686 Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA–) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage IIB, IIC, and III CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA– (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP)+oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines v serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively, or with serial monitoring (Cohort B), will be randomized to FP+Ox v more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. One cycle of chemotherapy is allowed while awaiting ctDNA testing results for cohort assignment. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate v delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox v FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June 2022 with CCTG sites joining in August 2023. Accrual is 1,123/1,912 (as of 1/20/2026). *Drs. Dasari and Lieu contributed equally to the development of this trial. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

e13076 Background: Progression-free survival (PFS) is frequently used as a primary endpoint in contemporary oncology trials, including antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) studies in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) settings, despite uncertainty regarding its validity as a surrogate for overall survival (OS). A meta-epidemiological analysis was performed to quantify the systematic differences between the treatment effects on PFS and OS in ADC randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Methods: Phase II–III ADC RCTs with MBC patients reporting hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were included. Differences in treatment effects within each trial were quantified using the ratio of hazard ratios (rHR = HR_PFS/HR_OS). Random-effects models were used to pool the rHRs across the trials. Prespecified subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to evaluate the trial characteristics, clinical context, and regulatory status. Sensitivity analyses assessed the robustness across varying assumptions of the within-trial correlation between the endpoints. Results: Twenty-one RCTs evaluating nine ADCs in patients with MBC were included, comprising three phase II (14%) and 18 phase III (86%) studies. The pooled rHR demonstrated significantly larger treatment effects for PFS than for OS (rHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73–0.86), with no between-trial heterogeneity (I² = 0%, τ² = 0). Sensitivity analyses assuming within-trial correlations between PFS and OS ranging from 0 to 0.95 yielded consistent results. Greater divergence between endpoints was observed in trials enrolling patients with triple-negative breast cancer (rHR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61–0.85) and HER2-low disease (rHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62–0.96). Phase III trials showed larger differences than phase II trials (rHR, 0.79 vs. 0.89). When OS was a secondary endpoint, divergence was greater than when OS was primary (rHR, 0.77 vs. 0.87). Across trials, 16 of 21 studies (76%) demonstrated concordant effect directions between PFS and OS: 11 (52%) with a statistically significant benefit for both endpoints and 5 (24%) with neither endpoint significant. Discordance occurred in five trials (24%), all characterized by a statistically significant PFS benefit without a corresponding OS improvement. No trial demonstrated an OS benefit in the absence of a PFS benefit. Conclusions: Across ADC trials, PFS systematically overestimated OS treatment effects, underscoring the limitations of PFS as a standalone surrogate endpoint. These findings support the cautious interpretation of PFS-driven efficacy and reinforce the need for endpoint validation frameworks tailored to the mechanism, disease context, and trial design.

Introduction Geriatric distal femur fractures are associated with mortality rates exceeding 20%, comparable to hip fractures. Traditional single implant fixation often requires weight-bearing restrictions that delay recovery. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing dual vs single implant fixation for geriatric distal femur fractures. Methods and analysis This multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled pilot trial will enrol 80 participants aged 60 years or older with displaced distal femur fractures at five US level 1 trauma centres. Patients will be randomly allocated 1:1 to receive either single implant (lateral plate or retrograde nail) or dual implant (nail-plate or dual plate) fixation. All patients will be permitted immediate weight-bearing. The primary outcome is feasibility assessed through enrolment rate (80 patients in 12 months), protocol adherence (≥90%) and follow-up retention (≥85% at 12 months). Secondary outcomes include post-surgical mobility (AM-PAC, TUG), patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS-PF, PROMIS-29), mortality (90-day and 1 year) and complication rates. Analyses will be on an intention-to-treat basis. Ethics and dissemination The protocol was approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board (IRB_00149119) and IRBs at all participating centres. Written informed consent will be obtained from participants or legally authorised representatives. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Trial registration number NCT05292313 .