Citations

Abstract Background The majority of human antimicrobial utilization occurs in the outpatient setting. Despite being mainly viral in etiology, upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) were the most common indication for outpatient antimicrobial prescriptions at our institution. Methods Through our electronic health record (EHR), we were able to determine our rate of antibiotic prescriptions for inappropriate URI diagnosis at our primary care practice sites. We selected staff volunteers from each our primary care practice sites to serve as stewardship champions. They were given training in stewardship best practices, and an URI stewardship toolkit which included viral URI prescription pad, EHR order panel, and patient education signage. They were tasked with providing education and feedback to their practice sites. We meet with them on a monthly basis to disseminate prescribing data and education. They also provided feedback from practice sites to the stewardship committee. Results Our decentralized model was put in place in November 2020. In the 6 months prior to the intervention, the average prescribing rate was 29.1%. In the 6 months after the intervention, the average prescribing rate decreased by 15% to 24.8%. During the intervention phase, there was an increase in number of non-COVID URIs diagnosed at our primary care sites. Temporal Trend in Inappropriate Antibiotics Prescribing Rates for Viral URIs Pre- and Post- Intervention Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing rate for viral upper respiratory tract infections from May 2020 until May 2021. Intervention started in December 2021 (arrow). Pre-intervention average was 29.1%. Post-intervention age was 24.8% which is a 15% decline in prescribing rate. Viral Upper Respiratory Infections Visits The total number of visits for presumed viral upper respiratory infections to primary care sites from May 2020 until May 2021. The majority of COVID-19 precautions in the area expired at the end of March 2021. Conclusion We have been able to lower our inappropriate prescriptions for URIs utilizing a decentralized model of stewardship champions. This result was especially notable as the intervention phase corresponded with the end of COVID-19 precautions and an increase in non-COVID URIs diagnosed. The advantage of this approach includes an advocate embedded at each practice site who is familiar with the opportunities and challenges of the site, and a two-way flow of information from practice sites to the stewardship committee. This model provided additional benefit during the COVID-19 pandemic as the ability of centralized staff to travel to off campus clinic sites was curtailed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

AbstractAcute pulmonary exacerbations are complications of cystic fibrosis (CF) and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Aspergillus fumigatus are organisms that have been detected in the lungs of CF patients. The focus of this review is to provide an overview of the classes of antimicrobials used for MRSA and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), a hypersensitivity reaction caused by A. fumigatus. The current anti‐MRSA antibiotics and medications for ABPA dosing recommendations are discussed. This article also reviews the findings from the MRSA utilization surveys and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between CF and non‐CF patients. Antimethicillin S. aureus antibiotics include ceftaroline, clindamycin, fluoroquinolone derivatives (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin), glycopeptide derivatives (telavancin, vancomycin), linezolid, rifampin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, and tetracycline derivatives (doxycycline, minocycline, tigecycline). Medications used for ABPA include corticosteroids, amphotericin B, azole antifungals (isavuconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole), and a monoclonal antibody, omalizumab.

AbstractThis review is the second article in the State‐of‐the‐Art series and aims to evaluate medications used in the treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) in pediatric and adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). ABPA is one of several organisms that are found in the airways of CF patients. This review provides an evidence‐based summary of pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD), tolerability, and efficacy studies of medications including corticosteroids, amphotericin B, azole antifungals (isavuconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole), and a monoclonal antibody omalizumab in the treatment of ABPA and identifies areas where further study is warranted.

AbstractAcute pulmonary exacerbations (APE) are a complication of cystic fibrosis (CF) and are associated with morbidity and mortality. Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of many organisms that has been detected in the airways of patients with CF. This review provides an evidence‐based summary of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD), tolerability, and efficacy studies utilizing anti‐MRSA antibiotics (ie, ceftaroline, clindamycin, fluoroquinolone derivatives (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin), glycopeptide derivatives (telavancin, vancomycin), linezolid, rifampin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMZ/TMP), and tetracycline derivatives (doxycycline, minocycline, tigecycline) in the treatment of APE and identifies areas where further study is warranted. A recent utilization study of antimicrobials for anti‐MRSA has shown some CF Foundation accredited care centers and affiliate programs are using doses higher than the FDA‐approved doses. Further studies are needed to determine the PK/PD properties in CF patients with clindamycin, minocycline, rifampin, SMZ/TMP, telavancin, and tigecycline; as well as, efficacy and tolerability studies with ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, doxycycline, levofloxacin, minocycline, rifampin, SMZ/TMP, in CF patients with MRSA.