Citations

Background and Objectives: It is unclear whether induced hypertension in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) may improve long-term outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of induced hypertension vs standard medical care in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke within 72 hours of symptom onset. Methods: Two reviewers systematically searched PubMed using the prespecified terms “induced hypertension” or “blood pressure augmentation” plus “ischemic stroke” for clinical trials that reported functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. The safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI across trials were synthesized using fixed-effect model based on Mantel-Haenszel methods. Forest plots were constructed. Results: Three clinical trials with 270 AIS patients treated with induced hypertension (n=126) or standard medical care (n= 144) were included. Mean age was 66.6 years, 35.2% were women, and the mean initial NIHSS was 7.5. The rate of functional independence at 90 days was higher in patients treated with induced hypertension (70.6%) versus control (54.9%) (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.13-3.11; p=0.01). sICH did not differ between patients treated with induced hypertension (<1%) versus control (<1%) (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.14-7.45; p=0.98). Discussion: Among patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke with 72 hours of symptoms onset, induced hypertension resulted in better functional outcome at 90 days than standard medical care and did not increase risk of sICH. Large RCTs to test this observation are ongoing and needed to guide clinical practice.

Introduction: Recent studies report similar outcomes with antiplatelet drugs and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with minor nondisabling ischemic stroke. These patients still meet emergent triage criteria and can increase the burden on stroke systems through prehospital stroke activation. Prehospital large vessel occlusion (LVO) scales can improve triage of LVO patients but have not been evaluated as tools to predict IVT administration. We sought to determine if common LVO scales can predict IVT use in a large academic telestroke practice. Methods: This retrospective study included all video telestroke consults performed in a large academic telestroke network from 2019-2020. Patients were excluded if they were on anticoagulation, presented beyond 4.5 hours from last known well, or family declined IVT due to goals of care. We recorded presenting NIHSS and IVT recommendations. NIHSS was used to calculate 7 LVO scales (RACE, G-FAST, FAST-ED, VAN, PASS, 3I-SS, and C-STAT). Scale performance was assessed by calculating area under curve (AUC) and compared to NIHSS total score using the DeLong test. Youden cutpoint was established for each scale and subsequently used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy. Results: A total of 513 patients were included; 205/513 (40%) were recommended IVT. Median (IQR) NIHSS was 1 (0-3) in non-IVT patients and 6 (4-11) in IVT patients. The RACE and G-FAST scales were noninferior to the NIHSS in predicting IVT recommendation (Table 1). Conclusion: The RACE and G-FAST scales may be useful triage tools to identify patients needing emergent stroke evaluation for consideration of IVT.

Introduction: Telestroke enables timely and remote evaluation of patients with acute stroke syndromes. However, stroke mimics represent more than 30% of this population. Given the resources required for management of suspected acute ischemic stroke, several scales have been developed to help identify stroke mimics. Our objective was to externally validate four mimic scales (Khan Score [KS], TeleStroke Mimic Score [TS], simplified FABS [sFABS], and FABS) in a large, academic telestroke network. Methods: This is a retrospective, IRB exempt study of all patients who presented with suspected acute stroke syndromes and underwent video evaluation between 2019-2020 at a large academic telestroke network. Detailed chart review was conducted to extract both the variables needed to apply the mimic scales the final diagnosis confirmed by final imaging and discharge diagnosis (cerebral ischemic vs stroke mimic). Overall score performance was assessed by calculating area under curve (AUC). Youden cutpoint was established for each scale and used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy. Results: A total of 1043 patients were included in the final analysis. Final diagnosis of cerebral ischemia was made in 662/1043 patients (63.5%) and stroke mimic was diagnosed in 381/1043 patients (36.5%). To predict stroke mimic, TS had the highest AUC (68.3) and PPV (73%); KS had the highest accuracy (68.6%), sensitivity (86.6%) and NPV (61.5%); and FABS had the highest specificity (54.8%) (Table 1). Conclusions: While each scale offers unique strengths, none was able to identify stroke mimics effectively enough to confidently apply in clinical practice. There remains need for significant clinical judgment to determine the likelihood of stroke mimic at presentation.