Citations

BackgroundWe report results of a phase I trial designed to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), describe dose‐limiting toxicities (DLT), and characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of MK‐2206, an AKT inhibitor, in children with refractory or recurrent malignancies.ProcedureMK‐2206 was administered either every other day (Schedule 1), or once a week (Schedule 2) in a 28‐day cycle. Dose escalations in increments of ∼30% were independently made in each part using the rolling‐six design. Serial pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were obtained. Biological studies include analysis of PI3K/PTEN/AKT‐cell signaling pathway in pre and post‐therapy in PBMC and in tumors at diagnosis or recurrence.ResultsFifty patients (26 males, median age 12.6 years [range, 3.1–21.9]) with malignant glioma (16), ependymoma (4), hepatocellular carcinoma (3), gliomatosis cereberi (2), or other tumors (22) were enrolled; 40 were fully evaluable for toxicity (Schedule 1, n = 23; Schedule 2, n = 17). Schedule 1 DLTs included: grade 3 dehydration in 1/6 patients at 28 mg/m2; grade 4 hyperglycemia and neutropenia in 1/6 patients at 45 mg/m2; and grade 3 rash in 3/6 patients at dose level 4 (58 mg/m2). Schedule 2 DLTs included: grade 3 alkaline phosphatase in 1/6 patients at 90 mg/m2; grade 3 rash in 1/6 patients at 120 mg/m2; and grade 3 rash in 2/6 patients at 155 mg/m2.ConclusionsThe recommended pediatric phase 2 dose of MK‐2206 is 45 mg/m2/dose every other day or 120 mg/m2/dose weekly. PK appeared linear over the dose range studied. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014;61:1246–1251. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Abstract Purpose: This phase I study was conducted to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of alvocidib when combined with vorinostat in patients with relapsed, refractory, or poor prognosis acute leukemia, or refractory anemia with excess blasts-2. Secondary objectives included investigating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of the combination. Experimental Design: Patients received vorinostat (200 mg orally, three times a day, for 14 days) on a 21-day cycle, combined with 2 different alvocidib administration schedules: a 1-hour intravenous infusion, daily × 5; or a 30-minute loading infusion followed by a 4-hour maintenance infusion, weekly × 2. The alvocidib dose was escalated using a standard 3+3 design. Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled and treated. The alvocidib MTD was 20 mg/m2 (30-minute loading infusion) followed by 20 mg/m2 (4-hour maintenance infusion) on days one and eight, in combination with vorinostat. The most frequently encountered toxicities were cytopenias, fatigue, hyperglycemia, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, and QT prolongation. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were cardiac arrhythmia-atrial fibrillation and QT prolongation. No objective responses were achieved although 13 of 26 evaluable patients exhibited stable disease. Alvocidib seemed to alter vorinostat pharmacokinetics, whereas alvocidib pharmacokinetics were unaffected by vorinostat. Ex vivo exposure of leukemia cells to plasma obtained from patients after alvocidib treatment blocked vorinostat-mediated p21CIP1 induction and downregulated Mcl-1 and p-RNA Pol II for some specimens, although parallel in vivo bone marrow responses were infrequent. Conclusions: Alvocidib combined with vorinostat is well tolerated. Although disease stabilization occurred in some heavily pretreated patients, objective responses were not obtained with these schedules. Clin Cancer Res; 19(7); 1873–83. ©2013 AACR.

Abstract Background: Based upon preclinical synergy and prior phase 1 study results, the clinical efficacy of flavopiridol combined with cisplatin was assessed in patients with recurrent ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers. Methods: A two cohort phase 2 trial of cisplatin (60 mg/m2 IV) followed by flavopiridol (100 mg/m2 IV, 24 h continuous infusion; 21 day cycles) was undertaken in patients with recurrent platin-sensitive or platin-resistant ovarian/primary peritoneal cancers (defined by disease progression > vs. <6 months following platin-based therapy). Measurable disease (RECIST criteria) – or evaluable disease plus CA125 >2X the post-treatment nadir – was required, as was ECOG performance <2 and exposure to only one prior treatment regimen. Results: Forty-five patients were enrolled between April 20, 2004 and March 4, 2010 – 40 platin-resistant patients (Group 1), and 5 platin-sensitive patients (Group 2). In Group 1, the median number of treatment cycles was 3 (range 2-12); 39 of the 40 eligible patients have now discontinued treatment. While only 10% of all patients incurred grade 4 toxicities, grade 3 toxicities were seen in the majority (65%). The most frequent grade 3 and 4 toxicities were neutropenia (all grade 3, 17.5%); nausea (12.5%); vomiting, fatigue, thrombosis, anemia (10% each). Sensory neuropathy, grade 1 or 2, was observed in 75% of all patients – with grade 3 and 4 neuropathy not observed primarily due to pre-specified aggressive dose reductions. Six patients (15%) in Group 1 achieved a confirmed response (1 CR, 5 PR), with a median response duration of 119 days (range 84-212). Ten additional Group 1 patients (32.5%) experienced maintained stable disease. Median Group 1 overall time to progression was 3.7 months; overall survival was 17.2 months. Pilot assessment of attained ascites flavopiridol level and sensitivity of patient ascitic tumor cells to flavopiridol confirmed that patient flavopiridol levels were consistent with observed clinical antitumor efficacy. In Group 2, although 2 of 5 patients also responded (40%; 2 PR), the cohort was closed due to poor accrual. Conclusions: The combination of flavopiridol and cisplatin has promising clinical activity in both platin-sensitive and platin-resistant ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers. Supported in part by NCI CA097129, CA15083 and CM62205; clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00083122 Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4712. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4712

Abstract Purpose: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) functions within the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway as a critical modulator of cell survival. Methods: The mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus (CCI-779) was combined with chemoradiotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients in a dose-escalation phase I trial. The first 12 patients were treated with CCI-779 combined with radiation/temozolomide and adjuvant temozolomide. A second cohort of 13 patients was treated with concurrent CCI-779/radiation/temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide monotherapy. Results: Concomitant and adjuvant CCI-779 was associated with a high rate (3 of 12 patients) of grade 4/5 infections. By limiting CCI-779 treatment to the radiation/temozolomide phase and using antibiotic prophylaxis, the rate of infections was reduced, although 2 of 13 patients developed exacerbation of pre-existing fungal or viral infections. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 2 of 13 patients with this modified schedule. Weekly CCI-779 (50 mg/week) combined with radiation/temozolomide is the recommended phase II dose and schedule. The immune profile of patients in the second cohort was assessed before, during, and after CCI-779 therapy. There was robust suppression of helper and cytotoxic T cells, B cells, natural killer, cells and elevation of regulatory T cells during CCI-779/radiation/temozolomide therapy with recovery to baseline levels during adjuvant temozolomide of cytotoxic T cells, natural killer cells, and regulatory T cells. Conclusions: The increased infection rate observed with CCI-779 combined with chemoradiotherapy in GBM was reduced with antibiotic prophylaxis and by limiting the duration of CCI-779 therapy. The combined suppressive effects of CCI-779 and temozolomide therapy on discrete immune compartments likely contributed to the increased infectious risks observed. Clin Cancer Res; 16(22); 5573–80. ©2010 AACR.