Citations

The family B G protein-coupled glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor is an important drug target for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Like other family members, the GLP-1 receptor is a glycosylated membrane protein that contains three potential sites for N-linked glycosylation within the functionally important extracellular amino-terminal domain. However, the roles for each potential site of glycosylation in receptor biosynthesis, trafficking, and function are not known. In this work, we demonstrated that tunicamycin inhibition of glycosylation of the GLP-1 receptor expressed in CHO cells interfered with biosynthesis and intracellular trafficking, thereby eliminating natural ligand binding. To further investigate the roles of each of the glycosylation sites, site-directed mutagenesis was performed to eliminate these sites individually and in aggregate. Our results showed that mutation of each of the glycosylation sites individually did not interfere with receptor expression on the cell surface, ligand binding, and biological activity. However, simultaneous mutation of two or three glycosylation sites resulted in almost complete loss of GLP-1 binding and severely impaired biological activity. Immunostaining studies demonstrated receptor biosynthesis but aberrant trafficking, with most of the receptor trapped in the endoplasmic reticulum and golgi compartments and little of the receptor expressed on the cell surface. Interestingly, surface expression, ligand binding, and biological activity of these mutants improved significantly when biosynthesis was slowed using low temperature (30°C). These data suggest that N-linked glycosylation of the GLP-1 receptor is important for its normal folding and trafficking to the cell surface.

The secretin receptor is prototypic of Class II GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors), based on its structural and functional characteristics and those of its natural agonist ligand. Secretin represents a linear 27-residue peptide with diffuse pharmacophoric domain. The secretin receptor includes the typical signature sequences for this receptor family within its predicted transmembrane segments and the highly conserved six cysteine residues contributing to three intradomain disulfide bonds within its long N-terminus. This domain is critical for secretin binding based on receptor mutagenesis and photoaffinity labelling studies. Full agonist analogues of secretin incorporating a photolabile moiety at various positions throughout the pharmacophore covalently label residues within this region, while only N-terminal probes have labelled the core helical bundle domain. Combining insights coming from receptor structural studies, peptide structure–activity relationship considerations, photoaffinity labelling, and application of fluorescence techniques has resulted in the development of a working model of the secretin–receptor complex. This supports the initial docking of the peptide agonist within a cleft in the receptor N-terminus, providing the opportunity for an endogenous sequence within that domain to interact with the core of the receptor. This interaction is believed to be key in the molecular basis of conformational change associated with activation of this receptor. The site of action of this endogenous agonist could also provide a possible target for small molecule agonists to act.

AbstractUnderstanding of the conformational changes in G protein-coupled receptors associated with activation and inactivation is of great interest. We previously used photoaffinity labeling to elucidate spatial approximations between photolabile residues situated throughout the pharmacophore of secretin agonist probes and this receptor. The aim of the current work was to develop analogous photolabile secretin antagonist probes and to explore their spatial approximations. The most potent secretin antagonist reported is a pseudopeptide ([ψ4, 5]secretin) in which the peptide bond between residues 4 and 5 was replaced by a ψ(CH2-NH) peptide bond isostere. We have developed a series of [ψ4, 5]secretin analogs incorporating photolabile benzoyl phenylalanine residues in positions 6, 22, and 26. Each bound to the secretin receptor saturably and specifically, with affinity similar to their parental peptide. At concentrations with no measurable agonist activity, each probe covalently labeled the secretin receptor. Peptide mapping using proteolytic cleavage, immunoprecipitation, and radiochemical sequencing identified that each of these three probes labeled the amino terminus of the secretin receptor. Whereas the position 22 probe labeled the same residue as its analogous agonist probe and the position 6 probe labeled a residue within two residues of that labeled by its analogous agonist probe, the position 26 probe labeled a site 16 residues away from that labeled by its analogous agonist probe. Thus, whereas structurally related agonist and antagonist probes dock in the same general region of this receptor, conformational differences in active and inactive states result in substantial differences in spatial approximation at the carboxyl-terminal end of secretin analogs.