Citations

Abstract Background Complex perianal fistulas are a serious complication in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). Darvadstrocel (DVS), a suspension of expanded adult allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells, is approved in Europe and Japan for treatment of complex Crohn’s perianal fistulas (CPF). The global ADMIRE-CD II phase 3 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of DVS for treatment of complex CPF. Methods Patients aged 18–75 years with clinically controlled, inactive or mildly active CD and complex CPF (≤2 internal openings [IO] and ≤3 external openings [EOs]) who had an inadequate, or a loss of response to immunosuppressive agents or biologics were included. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive a local injection of DVS as a single dose (120 x 106 cells/24 mL) or placebo. In all patients, fistula preconditioning included vigorous curettage and seton placement 2–3 weeks before treatment, and seton removal, a further curettage and closure of IOs immediately before treatment. The primary endpoint was combined remission (closure of all treated EOs that were draining at baseline, despite gentle finger compression, and absence of collections >2 cm confirmed by MRI) at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included combined remission at 52 weeks, clinical remission (closure of all treated EOs without MRI confirmation) at 24 and 52 weeks, and time to clinical remission at 24 weeks. Safety was monitored up to 52 weeks. Results From 19 Oct 2017 to 26 Jul 2023, 568 patients received DVS (n = 283) or placebo (n = 285) with fistula preconditioning; 56.3% of patients enrolled in Europe and Israel, and 43.7% in North America. Mean (SD) age, sex and race were similar in the DVS and placebo arms (38.4 [11.9] vs 37.7 [10.8] years; 42.8% vs 45.6% female; 85.9% vs 89.1% White). Combined remission rates at 24 weeks did not statistically differ between treatments (48.8% DVS vs 46.3% placebo) and there were no differences in secondary endpoints (Table 1; Figure 1). Based on health authority guidelines, post hoc analyses of patients randomized before COVID-19 (11 March 2020; n = 141 DVS, n = 143 placebo) were performed: combined remission rates at 24 weeks were 46.8% (DVS) and 38.5% (placebo). The safety profile for DVS was consistent with prior studies with no new safety signals (Table 1). Conclusion The efficacy outcomes assessed did not statistically differ between DVS and placebo, and the placebo response rate (with fistula preconditioning) was higher than expected. Post hoc analyses revealed lower placebo response rates in patients randomized before COVID-19 (similar to the pivotal ADMIRE CD I study) than the overall placebo arm. DVS was well tolerated.

SummaryBackgroundUpadacitinib is an oral, selective Janus kinase inhibitor.AimTo assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate‐to‐severe ulcerative colitis following 16‐week extended induction therapy, and 52‐week maintenance therapy in patients achieving clinical response after 16‐week extended induction therapyMethodsPatients without clinical response to 8 weeks' upadacitinib 45 mg once daily induction therapy in two induction trials were eligible for an additional 8 weeks of therapy. Patients achieving clinical response at Week 16 were subsequently re‐randomised (1:1) to upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg once daily for 52‐week maintenance therapy. Efficacy was assessed at induction Week 16 (integrated) and maintenance Week 52; safety was assessed throughout.ResultsOverall, 127/663 (19.2%) patients did not achieve clinical response to upadacitinib 45 mg at Week 8 and received an additional 8 weeks of therapy; 75/127 (59.1%) subsequently achieved clinical response at Week 16 and entered the maintenance trial. At Week 52, 26.5% of patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg, and 43.6% receiving 30 mg, achieved clinical remission; efficacy was observed across all other endpoints with both doses. Herpes zoster rates increased with longer duration (16 weeks) of exposure to upadacitinib 45 mg during induction compared with the same population during the first 8 weeks. No other new safety signals were observed, and results are otherwise consistent with the known safety profile of upadacitinib.ConclusionsPatients without clinical response after 8 weeks' upadacitinib 45 mg induction therapy, may benefit from an additional 8 weeks of therapy.Clinical trial registration: NCT02819635; NCT03653026

Abstract Background and Aims Microscopic colitis [MC] is currently regarded as an inflammatory bowel disease that manifests as two subtypes: collagenous colitis [CC] and lymphocytic colitis [LC]. Whether these represent a clinical continuum or distinct entities is, however, an open question. Genetic investigations may contribute important insight into their respective pathophysiologies. Methods We conducted a genome-wide association study [GWAS] meta-analysis in 1498 CC, 373 LC patients, and 13 487 controls from Europe and the USA, combined with publicly available MC GWAS data from UK Biobank and FinnGen [2599 MC cases and 552 343 controls in total]. Human leukocyte antigen [HLA] alleles and polymorphic residues were imputed and tested for association, including conditional analyses for the identification of key causative variants and residues. Genetic correlations with other traits and diagnoses were also studied. Results We detected strong HLA association with CC, and conditional analyses highlighted the DRB1*03:01 allele and its residues Y26, N77, and R74 as key to this association (best p = 1.4 × 10-23, odds ratio [OR] = 1.96). Nominally significant genetic correlations were detected between CC and pneumonia [rg = 0.77; p = 0.048] and oesophageal diseases [rg = 0.45, p = 0.023]. An additional locus was identified in MC GWAS analyses near the CLEC16A and RMI2 genes on chromosome 16 [rs35099084, p = 2.0 × 10-8, OR = 1.31]. No significant association was detected for LC. Conclusion Our results suggest CC and LC have distinct pathophysiological underpinnings, characterised by an HLA predisposing role only in CC. This challenges existing classifications, eventually calling for a re-evaluation of the utility of MC umbrella definitions.

Abstract Background Biomarkers for predicting the development of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and disease-related complications are lacking. Anti-integrin αvβ6 IgG autoantibodies (anti-αvβ6) have been recently described in patients diagnosed with UC. Here, we sought to determine if anti-αvβ6 autoantibodies predate UC development and to study associations between anti-αvβ6 and disease outcomes in newly diagnosed UC patients. Methods In a unique pre-clinical IBD cohort from the PRoteomic Evaluation and Discovery in an IBD Cohort of Tri-service Subjects (PREDICTS), anti-αvβ6 were measured in longitudinal pre-diagnosis serum samples from 82 subjects who later developed UC as well as in 82 matched subjects that did not develop IBD (HC). Sample A was at the time of UC diagnosis, Sample B was at a median of 2 years before Sample A, Sample C was at a median of 4 years before Sample A and Sample D was at a median of 10 years before Sample A. In a distinct, external validation cohort (the Crohn’s and Colitis Canada Genetics Environment Microbial (GEM) Project), we tested samples from 12 subjects who later developed UC and compared those with 49 matched subjects who remained asymptomatic. Further, anti-αvβ6 were measured in 2 incident IBD cohorts (COMPASS, n=55 and OSCCAR, n=104 UC subjects) and associations between anti-αvβ6 and adverse UC-outcomes were defined using Cox proportional-hazards model. Results Anti-αvβ6 were significantly higher in the PREDICTS cohort among individuals who developed UC compared to HC up to 10 years prior to diagnosis (Figure 1A). The anti-αvβ6 seropositivity was 12.2% 10 years before diagnosis and increased to 52.4% at the time of diagnosis in subjects who developed UC compared with 2.7% in controls across the 4 timepoints. Additionally, the predictive performance of anti-αvβ6 autoantibodies as assessed via area under the receiver operator curves (AUROC) with 10-fold cross validation was at least 0.8 up to 10 years before diagnosis (Figure 1B). Elevated levels of anti-αvβ6 in pre-clinical UC samples were further validated in the GEM cohort (Figure 1C). Finally, high anti-αvβ6 were associated with a composite of adverse UC-outcomes including hospitalization, disease extension, colectomy, systemic steroid use and/or escalation to biologic therapy in both incident cohorts (Figure 1D). Conclusion Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies precede the clinical diagnosis of UC by up to 10 years and are associated with adverse UC-related outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab (UST) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: This study used a retrospective, multicenter, multinational consortium of UST-treated CD patients. Data included patient demographics, disease phenotype, disease activity, treatment history, and concomitant medications. Cumulative rates of clinical, steroid-free, endoscopic, and radiographic remissions were assessed using time-to-event analysis, and clinical predictors were assessed by using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. Serious infections and adverse events were defined as those requiring hospitalization or treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 1,113 patients (51.8% female, 90% prior antitumor necrosis factor exposure) were included, with a median follow-up of 386 days. Cumulative rates of clinical, steroid-free, endoscopic, and radiographic remissions at 12 months were 40%, 32%, 39%, and 30%, respectively. Biologic-naive patients achieved significantly higher rates of clinical and endoscopic remissions at 63% and 55%, respectively. On multivariable analyses, prior antitumor necrosis factor (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.49–0.99) and vedolizumab exposure (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.48–0.88) were independently associated with lower likelihoods of achieving endoscopic remission. In patients who experienced loss of remission, 77 of 102 (75%) underwent dose optimization, and 44 of 77 (57%) achieved clinical response. An additional 152 of 681 patients (22.3%) were dose-optimized because of primary nonresponse incomplete response to UST, of whom 40.1% (61 of 152) responded. Serious infections occurred in 3.4% of patients while other noninfectious adverse events (lymphoma [n = 1], arthralgia [n = 6], rash [n = 6], headache [n = 3], hepatitis [n = 3], hair loss [n = 3], neuropathy [n = 1], and vasculitis [n = 1]) occurred in 2.4% of patients. DISCUSSION: UST represents a safe and effective treatment option for CD, with 40% of patients from a highly refractory cohort achieving clinical remission by 12 months. The greatest treatment effect of UST was seen in biologic-naive patients, and dose escalation may recapture clinical response.

SummaryBackground and aimsExtra‐intestinal manifestations (EIMs) are a common complication of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), affecting up to half of the patients. Despite their high prevalence, information on standardised definitions, diagnostic strategies, and treatment targets is limited.MethodsAs a starting point for a national EIM study network, an interdisciplinary expert panel of 12 gastroenterologists, 4 rheumatologists, 3 ophthalmologists, 6 dermatologists, and 4 patient representatives was assembled. Modified Delphi consensus methodology was used. Fifty‐four candidate items were derived from the literature review and expert opinion focusing on five major EIMs (erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum, uveitis, peripheral arthritis, and axial arthritis) were rated in three voting rounds.ResultsFor use in a clinical practice setting and as part of the creation of a prospective registry of patients with EIMs, the panel developed definitions for erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum, uveitis, peripheral arthritis, and axial arthritis; identified the appropriate and optimal subspecialists to diagnose and manage each; provided methods to monitor disease course; offered guidance regarding monitoring intervals; and defined resolution and recurrence.ConclusionsConsensus criteria for appropriate and optimal means of diagnosing and monitoring five EIMs have been developed as a starting point to inform clinical practice and future trial design. Key findings include straightforward diagnostic criteria, guidance regarding who can appropriately and optimally diagnose each, and monitoring options that include patient and physician‐reported outcomes. These findings will be used in a national multicenter study network to optimise the management of EIMs.

Abstract Background Combining biologics and small molecules could potentially overcome the plateau of drug efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of dual biologic therapy (DBT), or small molecule combined with a biologic therapy (SBT) in IBD patients. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Clinical trials.gov until November 3, 2020, including studies with 2 or more IBD patients on DBT or SBT. Main outcome was safety assessed as pooled rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) for each combination. Effectiveness was reported as pooled rates of clinical, endoscopic, and/or radiographic response and remission. The certainty of evidence was rated according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results Of the 3688 publications identified, 13 studies (1 clinical trial, 12 observational studies) involving 266 patients on 7 different combinations were included. Median number of prior biologics ranged from 0 to 4, and median duration of follow-up was 16–68 weeks. Most common DBT and SBT were vedolizumab (VDZ) with anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF, n = 56) or tofacitinib (Tofa, n = 57), respectively. Pooled rates of SAE for these were 9.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5–21.4) for VDZ-aTNF and 1.0% (95% CI, 0.0–7.6) for Tofa-VDZ. The overall certainty of evidence was very low due to the observational nature of the studies, and very serious imprecision and inconsistency. Conclusions DBT or SBT appears to be generally safe and may be effective in IBD patients, but the evidence is very uncertain.