Citations

Clear

32 citation(s) found for "Chen, David".

Deep Neural Network for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Image Segmentation
Chen, David , Bhopalwala, Huzefa , Dewaswala, Nakeya , Arunachalam, Shivaram P. , Enayati, Moein , Farahani, Nasibeh Zanjirani , Lokineni, Sravani, Bos, J. Martijn , Geske, Jeffrey B. , Ackerman, Michael J. , Araoz, Philip A. , Arruda‐Olson, Adelaide M. , Arunachalam, S P , Bos, Johan M , Geske, Jeffrey B , Pasupathy, Kalyan S. , Noseworthy, Peter A. , Arsanjani, Reza , Erickson, Bradley J.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Imaging | May 23, 2022 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 149

10.3390/jimaging8050149 | PMID 35621913 Get It

The analysis and interpretation of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images are often time-consuming. The automated segmentation of cardiac structures can reduce the time required for image analysis. Spatial similarities between different CMR image types were leveraged to jointly segment multiple sequences using a segmentation model termed a multi-image type UNet (MI-UNet). This model was developed from 72 exams (46% female, mean age 63 ± 11 years) performed on patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The MI-UNet for steady-state free precession (SSFP) images achieved a superior Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.92 ± 0.06 compared to 0.87 ± 0.08 for a single-image type UNet (p < 0.001). The MI-UNet for late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images also had a superior DSC of 0.86 ± 0.11 compared to 0.78 ± 0.11 for a single-image type UNet (p = 0.001). The difference across image types was most evident for the left ventricular myocardium in SSFP images and for both the left ventricular cavity and the left ventricular myocardium in LGE images. For the right ventricle, there were no differences in DCS when comparing the MI-UNet with single-image type UNets. The joint segmentation of multiple image types increases segmentation accuracy for CMR images of the left ventricle compared to single-image models. In clinical practice, the MI-UNet model may expedite the analysis and interpretation of CMR images of multiple types.
Survival and Incidence Patterns of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Over the Last 2 Decades: A SEER Database Analysis
Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam , Mazza, Gina L. , Mi, Lanyu , Oliver, Thomas , Starr, Jason S. , Gudmundsdottir, Hallbera , Hobday, Timothy J. , Hobday, Timothy, Sonbol, Mohamad B , Mazza, Gina L , Gudmundsdottir, Hallbera , Oliver, Thomas, Cleary, Sean P. , Hálfdánarson, Þorvarður R.

Mayo Clinic

The Oncologist | February 18, 2022 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 573-578

10.1093/oncolo/oyac049 | PMID 35348774 Get It

Abstract Background Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are rare cancers with outcomes determined by multiple factors including grade, stage, and clinical presentation. In this study, we aimed to determine the prognosis of patients with pNETs using a large population-based database. Materials and Methods In this population-based study, we identified patients with pNETs from the SEER 18 registry (2000-2016) using a combination of ICD-O-3 and histology codes. We calculated age-adjusted incidence rates using SEER*Stat 8.3.5. In addition, we analyzed overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier method, and investigated prognostic factors using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Results A total of 8944 pNETs patients were identified. Annual incidence rates increased from 0.27 to 1.00 per 100 000. This was largely explained by an increase in number of patients diagnosed with localized disease in more recent years (2012-2016). Median OS was 68 months (95% CI [64, 73]) and 5-year OS rates in localized, regional, and metastatic disease were 83%, 67%, and 28%, respectively. There was a significant improvement in OS for patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2016 (median OS 85 months) compared with those diagnosed between 2000 and 2008 (median OS 46 months) (HR 0.66; 95% CI [0.62, 0.70]). This improvement in OS was consistent across all stages. Conclusions and Relevance This study shows a steady increase pNETs incidence with notable stage migration to earlier stages in recent years. This increase in incidence is accompanied by a significant improvement in survival across different disease stages.
The high-value pharmacy enterprise framework: Advancing pharmacy practice in health systems through a consensus-based, strategic approach
Rough, Steve, Shane, Rita , Armitstead, John A., Belford, Sylvia M , Brummond, Philip, Chen, David , Collins, Christine , Dalton, Heather , Dopp, Anna Legreid, Estevez, Michelle M, Hager, David , Halbach, Brooke, Knoer, Scott J., Kotis, Desi , Montgomery, Derek R, Plummer, Brooks, Schreier, Diana J., Simonson, Deborah, Siska, Mark H., Waier, Kelsey, Vermeulen, Lee C. , Hays, Ryan, Riester, Melissa R.

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy | February 8, 2021 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 498-510

10.1093/ajhp/zxaa431 | PMID 33539506 Get It

Abstract Purpose The high-value pharmacy enterprise (HVPE) framework and constituent best practice consensus statements are presented, and the methods used to develop the framework’s 8 domains are described. Summary A panel of pharmacy leaders used an evidence- and expert opinion–based approach to define core and aspirational elements of practice that should be established within contemporary health-system pharmacy enterprises by calendar year 2025. Eight domains of an HVPE were identified: Patient Care Services; Business Services; Ambulatory and Specialty Pharmacy Services; Inpatient Operations; Safety and Quality; Pharmacy Workforce; Information Technology, Data, and Information Management; and Leadership. Phase 1 of the project consisted of the development of draft practice statements, performance elements, and supporting evidence for each domain by panelists, followed by a phase 2 in-person meeting for review and development of consensus for statements and performance elements in each domain. During phase 3, the project cochairs and panelists finalized the domain drafts and incorporated them into a full technical report and this summary report. Conclusion The HVPE framework is a strategic roadmap to advance pharmacy practice by ensuring safe, effective, and patient-centered medication management and business practices throughout the health-system pharmacy enterprise. Grounded in evidence and expert recommendations, the statements and associated performance elements can be used to identify strategic priorities to improve patient outcomes and add value within health systems.
Video quality using outpatient smartphone videos in epilepsy: Results from the OSmartViE study
Tatum, William O. , Acton, Emily K. , LaFrance, W. Curt , Duckrow, Robert B., Blum, Andrew S. , Hixson, John , Drazkowski, Joe, Cascino, Gregory D. , Collaborators, The OSmartViE, Acton, Emily K , LaFrance, W Curt , Hirsch, Lawrence J. , Gelfand, Michael , Chen, David , Benbadis, Selim R. , Collaborators, The OSmartViE

Mayo Clinic

European Journal of Neurology | January 19, 2021 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1453-1462

10.1111/ene.14744 | PMID 33465822 Get It

Abstract Background and purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of smartphone videos (SVs) of neurologic events in adult epilepsy outpatients. The use of home video recording in patients with neurological disease states is increasing. Experts interpretation of outpatient smartphone videos of seizures and neurological events has demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy to inpatient video‐electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring. Methods A prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted to evaluate SV quality in patients with paroxysmal neurologic events from August 15, 2015 through August 31, 2018. Epileptic seizures (ESs), psychogenic nonepileptic attacks (PNEAs), and physiologic nonepileptic events (PhysNEEs) were confirmed by video‐EEG monitoring. Experts and senior neurology residents blindly viewed cloud‐based SVs without clinical information. Quality ratings with regard to technical and operator‐driven metrics were provided in responses to a survey. Results Forty‐four patients (31 women, age 45.1 years [ r = 20–82]) were included and 530 SVs were viewed by a mean of seven experts and six residents; one video per patient was reviewed for a mean of 133.8 s ( r = 9–543). In all, 30 patients had PNEAs, 11 had ESs, and three had PhysNEEs. Quality was suitable in 70.8% of SVs (375/530 total views), with 36/44 (81.8%) patient SVs rated as adequate by the majority of reviewers. Accuracy improved with the presence of convulsive features from 72.4% to 98.2% in ESs and from 71.1% to 95.7% in PNEAs. An accurate diagnosis was given by all reviewers (100%) in 11/44 SVs (all PNEAs). Audio was rated as good by 86.2% of reviewers for these SVs compared with 75.4% for the remaining SVs ( p = 0.01). Lighting was better in SVs associated with high accuracy ( p = 0.06), but clarity was not ( p = 0.59). Poor video quality yielded unknown diagnoses in 24.2% of the SVs reviewed. Features hindering diagnosis were limited interactivity, restricted field of view and short video duration. Conclusions Smartphone video quality is adequate for clinical interpretation in the majority of patients with paroxysmal neurologic events. Quality can be optimized by encouraging interactivity with the patient, adequate duration of the SV, and enlarged field of view during videography. Quality limitations were primarily operational though accuracy remained for SV review of ESs and PNEAs.
Image-to-image translation for automatic ink removal in whole slide images
Jiang, Jun , Prodduturi, Naresh, Chen, David , Gu, Qiangqiang , Flotte, Thomas J. , Feng, Qianjin , Flotte, Thomas, Hart, Steven N , Jiang, Jun , Hart, Steven N.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Medical Imaging | October 16, 2020 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 05 | Pages: No page available

10.1117/1.jmi.7.5.057502 | PMID 33102624 Get It

Development and Validation of a Risk Stratification Model Using Disease Severity Hierarchy for Mortality or Major Cardiovascular Event
O’Byrne, Thomas J., Chen, David , Shah, Nilay D. , Steinbach, Michael , Simon, György , Caraballo, Pedro J. , O'Byrne, Thomas J, Ngufor, Che , Pruinelli, Lisiane

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Network Open | July 17, 2020 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 7 | Pages: e208270

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8270 | PMID 32678448 Get It

Holistic review for hematology‐oncology fellowship applicants: A new paradigm?
Marshall, Ariela L. , Hálfdánarson, Þorvarður R. , Nowakowski, Grzegorz S. , Lacy, Martha Q. , Thompson, Carrie A. , Hobday, Timothy J. , Hobday, Timothy, Marshall, Ariela , Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Hematology | July 6, 2020 | Volume: 95 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1124-1126

10.1002/ajh.25930 | PMID 32628292 Get It

Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019
Kelly, William Kevin, Cheng, Heather H. , Cookson, Michael S. , Dahut, William L. , Weissman, Scott M., Soule, Howard R. , Petrylak, Daniel P. , Dicker, Adam P. , AlDubayan, Saud H. , Pettaway, Curtis A. , Daly, Mary B., Mohler, James L. , Parsons, J. Kellogg , Pilarski, Robert , Blanco, Amie , Woodson, Ashley, Taplin, Mary-Ellen, Polascik, Thomas J. , Hyatt, Colette, Feng, Felix Y. , Mullane, Michael P., Powers, Jacqueline, Concepcion, Raoul S. , Lin, Daniel W. , Wender, Richard C. , Mark, James Ryan , Costello, Anthony J. , Isaacs, William B. , Xu, Jianfeng , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Andriole, Gerald L. , Beltran, Himisha , Briganti, Alberto , Byrne, Lindsey , Calvaresi, Anne, Chandrasekar, Thenappan , Chen, David Y.T. , Dobi, Albert , Crawford, E. David , Eastham, James A., Eggener, Scott E. , Freedman, Matthew L. , Garnick, Marc B. , Gomella, Patrick T. , Handley, Nathan , Hurwitz, Mark , Izes, Joseph K. , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Lallas, Costas D. , Languino, Lucia R. , Loughlin, Kevin R. , Lu‐Yao, Grace , Malkowicz, S. Bruce, Mann, Mark, Mille, Patrick , Miner, Martin , Morgan, Todd M. , Mucci, Lorelei A. , Nielsen, Sarah M. , O’Neil, Brock , Pinover, Wayne H., Pinto, Peter A. , Poage, Wendy, Raj, Ganesh V. , Ryan, Charles J. , Schiewer, Matthew J. , Szymaniak, Brittany M. , Tester, William , Trabulsi, Edouard J. , Vapiwala, Neha , Gomella, Leonard G. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Morgan, Todd M , Cheng, Heather H , Dicker, Adam P , Giri, Veda N. , Knudsen, Karen E. , Cooney, Kathleen A. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Pritchard, Colin C. , Carroll, Peter R , Rahm, Alanna Kulchak , Taplin, Mary‐Ellen , Helfand, Brian T. , Morgans, Alicia K. , Burnett, Arthur L. “Bud” , Sartor, Oliver , Den, Robert B. , Loeb, Stacy , López, Ana María , Moreno, Jose, Myers, Ronald E. , Rebbeck, Timothy R. , Sandler, Howard M. , Scott, E. Michael D., Yu, Evan Y , Zeigler-Johnson, Charnita M

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 9, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 2798-2811

10.1200/jco.20.00046 | PMID 32516092 Get It

PURPOSE Germline testing (GT) is a central feature of prostate cancer (PCA) treatment, management, and hereditary cancer assessment. Critical needs include optimized multigene testing strategies that incorporate evolving genetic data, consistency in GT indications and management, and alternate genetic evaluation models that address the rising demand for genetic services. METHODS A multidisciplinary consensus conference that included experts, stakeholders, and national organization leaders was convened in response to current practice challenges and to develop a genetic implementation framework. Evidence review informed questions using the modified Delphi model. The final framework included criteria with strong (> 75%) agreement (Recommend) or moderate (50% to 74%) agreement (Consider). RESULTS Large germline panels and somatic testing were recommended for metastatic PCA. Reflex testing—initial testing of priority genes followed by expanded testing—was suggested for multiple scenarios. Metastatic disease or family history suggestive of hereditary PCA was recommended for GT. Additional family history and pathologic criteria garnered moderate consensus. Priority genes to test for metastatic disease treatment included BRCA2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes, with broader testing, such as ATM, for clinical trial eligibility. BRCA2 was recommended for active surveillance discussions. Screening starting at age 40 years or 10 years before the youngest PCA diagnosis in a family was recommended for BRCA2 carriers, with consideration in HOXB13, BRCA1, ATM, and mismatch repair carriers. Collaborative (point-of-care) evaluation models between health care and genetic providers was endorsed to address the genetic counseling shortage. The genetic evaluation framework included optimal pretest informed consent, post-test discussion, cascade testing, and technology-based approaches. CONCLUSION This multidisciplinary, consensus-driven PCA genetic implementation framework provides novel guidance to clinicians and patients tailored to the precision era. Multiple research, education, and policy needs remain of importance.