Citations

AbstractBackgroundBehavioral interventions are often recommended for persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The Healthy Action to Benefit Independence & Thinking® Program (HABIT) has been shown to benefit activities of daily living (ADL) and self‐efficacy in patients at 6‐ and 12‐months post intervention. However, to date, the findings have been limited by comparison to a relatively small, untreated control group. This study attempted to explore HABIT ADL outcomes compared to a large, presumably untreated Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) MCI cohort.MethodA total of 767 participants with MCI were selected from the ADNI database, whereas 478 participants with MCI were recruited from the HABIT IRB approved research registry. Functional outcomes were assessed with informant‐based measures ‐ Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) and Everyday Cognition scale (ECOG) memory and total scores – at both 6‐month‐ and 12‐month‐follow‐ups. After near‐neighbor propensity score matching with a caliper of 0.2, 288 participants from each group were matched for the FAQ, and 333 were matched for the ECOG scores. Latent growth curve models were used to test the hypothesis that the HABIT program might delay functional decline in patients with MCI.ResultAfter matching HABIT group continued to show higher initial scores on FAQ (b=.849, p=.013), and ECOG memory (b=.200, p=.004) and total scores (b=1.115, p<.001) compared to the ADNI group. Although an increase in scores was observed in both groups for each functional outcome, the slopes were steeper for the HABIT group for FAQ (b=1.194, p<.001), ECOG memory (b=.073, p=.019) and ECOG total (b=.383, p=.007).ConclusionContrary to our hypothesis, in this non‐randomized study, partners of HABIT participants with MCI reported more rapid functional decline compared to those in an imaging study. This discrepancy could be due to the HABIT group’s higher baseline impairment level even after matching. Furthermore, patients with perceived more rapid decline may be more likely to seek interventions relative to those who elect to participate in a non‐interventional imaging study. In addition, the intervention sessions could prime the partners to be more scrupulous and aware when rating functional assessments. Additional randomized research may help add clarity to these findings.

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is prevalent in the general population, particularly among Hispanic adults. SCD increases the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. While non-pharmacologic interventions are recommended to mitigate cognitive decline and preserve daily function in SCD and MCI, such interventions are not readily available for Spanish-speaking Hispanic adults with SCD. This pilot study, preregistered at clinicialtrials.gov, aimed to develop a linguistically and culturally appropriate adaptation of an existing memory compensation intervention, the Memory Support System (MSS), from English to Spanish, and to gather data to assess its impact in this population. Twenty Spanish-speaking Hispanic adults with SCD and 16 support partners were recruited. Measures of treatment adherence, daily function, self-efficacy for memory, quality of life, mood, anxiety, and caregiver burden were assessed at baseline, treatment end, and 8-week follow-up. By treatment end, participants with SCD improved their general functional status, daily activities requiring organizational skills, and depression and anxiety symptoms. Partners reported improvement in anxiety by treatment end and in caregiver burden at follow-up. The MSS was successfully translated into Spanish and readily learned by participants with SCD and their partners. The MSS in Spanish may help with daily functioning and aspects of patient and family well-being.

Background: In Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders (ADRD) research, common outcome measures include cognitive and functional impairment, as well as persons with mild cognitive impairment (pwMCI) and care partner self-reported mood and quality of life. Studies commonly analyze these measures separately, which potentially leads to issues of multiple comparisons and/or multicollinearity among measures while ignoring the latent constructs they may be measuring. Objective: This study sought to examine the latent factor structure of a battery of 12-13 measures of domains mentioned above, used in a multicomponent behavioral intervention (The HABIT® program) for pwMCI and their partners. Methods: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) involved 214 pwMCI-partner pairs. Subsequent Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) used 730 pairs in both pre- and post-intervention conditions. Results: EFA generated a three-factor model. Factors could be characterized as partner adjustment (29.9%), pwMCI adjustment (18.1%), and pwMCI impairment (12.8%). The subsequent CFA confirmed our findings, and the goodness-of-fit for this model was adequate in both the pre- (CFI = 0.937; RMSEA = 0.057, p = 0.089) and post-intervention (CFI = 0.942; RMSEA = 0.051, p = 0.430) groups. Conclusion: Results demonstrated a stable factor structure across cohorts and intervention conditions suggesting that three broad factors may provide a straightforward and meaningful model to assess intervention outcome, at least during the MCI phase of ADRD.

There is currently limited and mixed evidence for the cognitive benefits of Computerized Cognitive Training (CCT) and yoga in persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment (pwMCI). The objective of this study was to investigate the benefit of computerized cognitive training (CCT) vs. physical (yoga) intervention on cognitive abilities. Participants in this study were part of the larger Mayo Clinic’s Healthy Action to Benefit Independence and Thinking (HABIT) program comparative effectiveness trial. The HABIT program is designed for pwMCI and their care partner and consists of five behavioral interventions: CCT, Memory Support System-Calendar (MSS-Calendar), wellness education, support groups, and yoga. The subtractive study design randomly withheld one of the interventions for a total of five study arms. Longitudinal mixed-effects regression models were used to investigate the hypothesis that CCT and yoga has a greater positive impact on psychomotor and basic attention abilities at 12 months post-intervention as compared to the other HABIT interventions. Findings showed CCT had a positive impact compared to yoga on the Cogstate psychomotor/attention composite at 12 months post-intervention (ES = 0.54; unadjusted p value = 0.007, adjusted p value = 0.021). The impact of yoga or combining CCT with yoga did not show statistically significant improvement. Continued CCT practice at home showed further benefit on psychomotor/attention at 12 months post-intervention. There was no significant benefit of CCT or yoga on Cogstate learning/working memory composite.

AbstractBackgroundThe American Academy of Neurology Practice Guidelines recommends physical exercise to help maintain cognition in people with Mild Cognitive Impairment (pwMCI). We previously demonstrated yoga’s benefit in maintenance of memory related activities of daily living at one year follow‐up in pwMCI (Chandler et al., 2019), and yoga may be beneficial in offsetting a sense of burden in care partners at 12 months (Amofa et al., submitted). In this analysis, we sought to examine the impact of yoga training on physical performance in pwMCI and their care partners.MethodIn this multisite, randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 272 patients meeting National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association criteria for MCI and a care partner. The intervention program was modeled on the 10 day Mayo Clinic HABIT Healthy Action to Benefit Independence and Thinking® program. Of 5 possible interventions (memory compensation training, computerized cognitive training, yoga, patient and partner support groups, and wellness education), 1 of 5 interventions was randomly selected to be withheld for each intervention group, thus allowing us to examine comparative effectiveness. Participants and their partners had 1‐day booster sessions at 6 and 12 months after intervention. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), a measure of balance, gait speed, and repeated chair stands was used to assess physical function outcomes.ResultThere was a general pattern of physical decline on the SPPB over the year in pwMCI, regardless of yoga training (d=‐0.04, p=0.78) (Figure 1, Panel A). Among care partners, those randomized to the no yoga group had a worse decline in physical function compared to those receiving yoga (d=‐0.31, p=0.034) (Figure 1, Panel B). While not reaching statistical significance in subgroup comparisons, yoga training tended to have a greater effect on SPPB than computerized cognitive training (d = 0.35, p = .06) or wellness education (d = 0.32, p =.09) (Table 1).ConclusionParticipation in yoga had a positive impact on physical performance outcomes at one year for care partners, but did not counteract general physical decline in pwMCI.

AbstractBackgroundOne nonpharmacological intervention for persons with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is development of a compensatory memory notebook/planner system. De Wit et al. (2019) showed that global cognitive status is the primary predictor of learning success with training on a memory notebook system and that learning success predicts ongoing adherence to the tool. The purpose of our work is to validate their analysis in a new sample and evaluate whether or not patient or partner personality traits predict learning success over and above that explained by cognitive status.MethodTraining in the Memory Support System (MSS) is one component of the multi‐disciplinary behavioral intervention program called Healthy Action to Benefit Independence and Thinking (HABIT) offered at Mayo Clinic. 183 patient and partner dyads completed the HABIT program and enrolled in our IRB approved ongoing research registry to allow use of their clinical data for research purposes. Personality traits were measured with the self‐report Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) based on the five‐factor model of personality (Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Openness, and Extraversion) completed by both the patient and the partner. For our analyses, we fit logistic regression models to predict full MSS mastery at the end of the two‐week program and dichotomized TIPI into “high” or “low” for each trait based on its median (low was the reference group).ResultConsistent with De Wit et al. (2019), global cognitive status again was the only significant predictor of MSS learning mastery when considering age, education, baseline depression score and baseline global cognitive status (Table 2). When adding patient personality traits, only openness significantly added to the model with higher openness predicting learning success (Table 3). Adding both patient and partner personality traits resulted in a significant interaction between patient and partner openness (Table 4). The direction of this interaction indicates that learning success is highest when either the partner or patient is high in openness (but not both).ConclusionHigh openness to experience in the patient with MCI or their partner (but not both) significantly improves learning success for a cognitive rehabilitation memory support tool in patients with MCI.

AbstractBackgroundSubjective cognitive decline (SCD) affects 1 in 9 Hispanics aged ≥45 in the U.S., including 1 in 3 who report that SCD interferes with instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) and 1 in 2 who give up IADLs or need help performing household tasks. A curriculum and calendar/note‐taking system [Memory Support System (MSS)] has proven effective to sustain independence in IADLs in patients with mild cognitive impairment, and protect mood among program partners compared to controls. Until recently, the MSS had only been utilized among English‐speaking, predominately Caucasian, samples.MethodThis study investigated the use of a translated and culturally‐adapted MSS in 20 Spanish‐speaking participants with SCD [80% female, age M = 66.8 (SD = 10.3), education M = 14.8 (SD = 3.6)] and their program partners. A within‐subject multiple baseline design in a 10‐session, 2 to 6‐week MSS training schedule was utilized. Outcome measures included treatment adherence and self‐ and informant‐report questionnaires of IADLs, anxiety, depression, self‐efficacy, caregiver burden, and quality of life.ResultMSS training significantly improved adherence to the MSS calendar by treatment completion (d = ‐3.75). Participants with SCD also showed significant improvement in overall functional status (d = 0.72), and in daily activities requiring organizational skills (d = 0.66). Symptoms of depression (d = 0.99) and anxiety (d = 0.84) also improved by treatment end, and program partners reported significant improvement in their own anxiety (d = 0.84). There was a significant association between MSS adherence and anxiety in participants with SCD (r = ‐.51).ConclusionOverall, preliminary findings suggest that with appropriate training, Spanish‐speaking participants with SCD can and will use a memory notebook system to help compensate in daily life for their SCD and decrease emotional distress. Future research should investigate the Spanish MSS efficacy over time in a randomized controlled trial.

ObjectivesWe adapted a self‐efficacy measure for managing chronic illness to be specific to persons with mild cognitive impairment (pwMCI). The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the scale, the self‐efficacy for managing MCI scale, for use in research.MethodsAnalyses involved data from pwMCI enrolled in a behavioral intervention study that completed the measure five times from intervention enrollment to 18‐month post‐intervention. Factor structure, construct validity, internal consistency, and test‐retest reliability were analyzed.ResultsFactor analysis identified two factors, related to self‐efficacy for daily activities and managing MCI, which corresponded with domains from the original chronic illness self‐efficacy scale. Consistent with prior research, construct validity analysis suggested an association between memory‐loss self‐efficacy and psychosocial distress, but not cognitive or functional ability. Further analyses supported the scale's internal and test‐retest reliability.ConclusionsCurrently, no “gold standard” scale of memory‐loss self‐efficacy for pwMCI exists, despite the positive impact self‐efficacy may have on modifiable health behaviors. Overall, results supported the notion that the scale is a valid and reliable measure of memory‐loss self‐efficacy for pwMCI.