Citations

PURPOSE Tumor treating fields (TTFields) use alternating electric fields to disrupt cancer cell proliferation. Feasibility of TTFields therapy with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel was previously demonstrated in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PANOVA-3 was designed to confirm safety and efficacy of TTFields in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LA-PAC). METHODS In this global phase III trial, 571 patients with newly diagnosed LA-PAC were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m 2 by intravenous infusion once a day on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle with or without TTFields. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS, pain-free survival, and overall response rate (ORR). Distant PFS was analyzed post hoc. RESULTS OS was significantly prolonged using TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (median, 16.2 months [95% CI, 15.0 to 18.0] v 14.2 months [95% CI, 12.8 to 15.4]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.68 to 0.99]; P = .039). PFS, local PFS, and ORR were not improved. Pain-free survival was significantly prolonged with TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (median, 15.2 months [95% CI, 10.3 to 22.8] v 9.1 months [95% CI, 7.4 to 12.7]; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56 to 0.97]; P = .027), as was distant PFS (median, 13.9 months [95% CI, 12.2 to 16.8] v 11.5 months [95% CI, 10.4 to 12.9]; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.96]; P = .022). Device-related skin adverse events (AEs) were experienced by 76.3% of patients. Most device-related skin AEs were mild to moderate, with 7.7% of patients reporting a grade 3 AE. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated significant OS, pain-free survival, and distant PFS benefits for TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients with unresectable LA-PAC, with no additive systemic toxicity.

Background Most patients with advanced melanomas relapse after checkpoint blockade therapy. Thus, immunotherapies are needed that can be applied safely early, in the adjuvant setting. Seviprotimut-L is a vaccine containing human melanoma antigens, plus alum. To assess the efficacy of seviprotimut-L, the Melanoma Antigen Vaccine Immunotherapy Study (MAVIS) was initiated as a three-part multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Results from part B1 are reported here. Methods Patients with AJCC V.7 stage IIB-III cutaneous melanoma after resection were randomized 2:1, with stage stratification (IIB/C, IIIA, IIIB/C), to seviprotimut-L 40 mcg or placebo. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was the primary endpoint. For an hypothesized HR of 0.625, one-sided alpha of 0.10, and power 80%, target enrollment was 325 patients. Results For randomized patients (n=347), arms were well-balanced, and treatment-emergent adverse events were similar for seviprotimut-L and placebo. For the primary intent-to-treat endpoint of RFS, the estimated HR was 0.881 (95% CI: 0.629 to 1.233), with stratified logrank p=0.46. However, estimated HRs were not uniform over the stage randomized strata, with HRs (95% CIs) for stages IIB/IIC, IIIA, IIIB/IIIC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.37 to 1.19), 0.72 (95% CI: 0.35 to 1.50), and 1.19 (95% CI: 0.72 to 1.97), respectively. In the stage IIB/IIC stratum, the effect on RFS was greatest for patients <60 years old (HR=0.324 (95% CI: 0.121 to 0.864)) and those with ulcerated primary melanomas (HR=0.493 (95% CI: 0.255 to 0.952)). Conclusions Seviprotimut-L is very well tolerated. Exploratory efficacy model estimation supports further study in stage IIB/IIC patients, especially younger patients and those with ulcerated melanomas. Trial registration number NCT01546571.

7586 Background: The immunologic mechanisms of action of rituximab have been described as complement mediated lysis, vaccine like effect, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and the cellular microenvironment. We hypothesized that in the treatment of follicular grade 1 lymphoma (FL), the presence of a stronger host immune status prior to rituximab therapy would result in a prolonged time to progression (TTP). As a surrogate marker for immune status, we evaluated the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) prior to rituximab treatment. Methods: Between 1996 and 2002, 1,104 consecutive FL patients were evaluated at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Of these patients, we retrospectively analyzed a group of all FL patients who received rituximab (375 mg/m2 once a week for four weeks) alone at any time during their lymphoma treatment at the Mayo Clinic (n=79). The primary end-point was to assess the impact of ALC just prior to rituximab therapy on TTP for FL. Results: The median age of the cohort was 56.6 years (range: 25–98 years). The median follow-up was 12.5 months (range: 1–76 months). An ALC count of ≥ 890 cells/μL prior to rituximab therapy predicted a longer TTP compared with an ALC < 890 cells/μl (25 months versus 8 months, respectively, p < 0.0124). A higher complete response rate was observed in the ALC ≥ 890 cells/μL group compared with the ALC < 890 cells/μL group [15/40 (38%) vs 5/39 (13%), p < 0.035]. The groups were balanced regarding the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) (p = 0.794). Multivariate analysis demonstrated ALC ≥ 890 cells/μL prior to rituximab therapy as an independent prognostic factor for TTP when compared to hemoglobin, LDH, and Ann Arbor stage. The ALC was independent of the FLIPI in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: This data supports the hypothesis that a higher lymphocyte count, as a marker of the immune status of the patient, predicts for a longer TTP following rituximab therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Background: Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) recovery is an independent prognostic factor for survival for different hematological malignancies treated with autologous stem cell transplantation. Recently, we reported superior overall survival (OS) in patients with follicular lymphomas that presented with a higher ALC (ALC ≥ 1 x 109/L) at diagnosis. The role of ALC at diagnosis on survival in T cell lymphomas is not known. Methods: All patients evaluated at the Mayo Clinic for T cell lymphomas from October 1984 until April 2005 were analyzed in the study. The primary objective of the study was to assess the role of ALC at diagnosis and survival in T cell lymphomas. ALC at diagnosis was obtained from the standard complete blood cell count (CBC). Results: 223 patients with T cell lymphomas were included in the study. The histology included: peripheral T-cell lymphoma-unspecified (40%), anaplastic large cell (13%), angioimmunoblastic (10%), angiocentric (4%), intestinal T-cell (2%), and other (31%). The median follow-up was 18.6 months (range: 1 month – 229 months [19 years]). The sample population included 60% male and 40% females with a median age of 60 years (15–90 years). The median ALC at diagnosis was 1.2 x 109/L (range: 0.04–6.7 x 109/L). ALC as a continuous variable was identified as predictor for OS in the univariate analysis (HR= 0.690, 95%CI: 0.542–0.862, p < 0.0006). ALC ≥ 1 x 109/L was selected as the dichotomized value because it yielded the maximum difference in survival by c2 analysis looking at different cut-point from 0.6 to 1.7 x 109/L that were included between the 25% and 75% quartiles. Univariately, ALC ≥ 1 x 109/L was also identified as a predictor for OS (HR = 0.682, 95%CL= 0.578–0.804, p < 0.0001). Patients (N = 122) with an ALC ≥ 1 x 109/L experienced superior survival compared to patients (N = 101) with an ALC < 1 x 109/L [median OS: 76.3 vs 10.6 months, respectively; and 5 years OS estimates of 53% vs 23%, respectively, p < 0.0001]. When ALC ≥ 1 x 109/L was compared to the international prognostic index (IPI), ALC ≥ 1 x 109/L remained an independent predictor for survival in the multivariate analysis (HR = 0.779, 95%CL: 0.655–0.925, p < 0.004). Conclusion: This study demonstrates ALC as an independent predictor for OS in T cell lymphomas, suggesting that the host immune system affects survival in this group of patients.

PURPOSE Pegylated recombinant human hyaluronidase (PEGPH20) degrades hyaluronan (HA) and, in combination with chemotherapy, prolongs survival in preclinical models. The activity of PEGPH20 with modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) was evaluated in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients had untreated mPC, a performance status of 0 to 1, and adequate organ function. Tumor HA status was not required for eligibility. After a phase Ib dose-finding study of mFOLFIRINOX plus PEGPH20, the phase II open-label study randomly assigned patients (1:1) to the combination arm or to mFOLFIRINOX alone (n = 138). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS PEGPH20 dosages of 3 µg/kg every 2 weeks were more tolerable than twice-weekly dosages used in the phase I study, so 3 µg/kg every 2 weeks was the phase II dosage. An amendment instituted enoxaparin prophylaxis in the PEGPH20 combination arm as a result of increased thromboembolic (TE) events. The planned interim futility analysis when 35 deaths (of 103 analyzable patients) occurred resulted in an OS hazard ratio (HR) of 2.07 that favored the control arm, and the study was closed to accrual. The treatment-related grade 3 to 4 toxicity was significantly increased in the PEGPH20 combination arm relative to control (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 7.1). The median OS in the mFOLFIRINOX arm was 14.4 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 15.7 months) versus 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 9.3 months) in the PEGPH20 combination arm. CONCLUSION Addition of PEGPH20 to mFOLFIRINOX seems to be detrimental in patients unselected for tumor HA status. This combination caused increased toxicity (mostly GI and TE events) and resulted in decreased treatment duration compared with mFOLFIRINOX alone. The median OS in the mFOLFIRINOX control arm (14.4 months) is, to our knowledge, the longest yet reported and can be considered for patients with good PS.

208 Background: PEGPH20 degrades hyaluronan (HA), a major component of the stroma, increases delivery of gemcitabine and prolongs survival in preclinical models. We evaluated the activity of PEGPH20 in combination with mFFOX in mPC , unselected for tumor HA. Methods: Pertinent eligibility: untreated mPC, PS of 0-1 and adequate organ function. Standard FFOX was modified to add prophylactic growth factor support and omit bolus 5FU. Due to increased thromboembolic (TE) events with PEGPH20, an amendment instituted LMWH prophylaxis in the PEGPH20 arm only. Following a dose finding cohort of mFFOX + PEGPH20, the Phase II study randomized patients (1:1) to the combination arm or mFFOX alone (n = 138). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with a null median OS of 10 mo and an alternative of 15 mo (1-sided type 1 error 0.1, 80% power). Results: PEGPH20 at 3 mcg/kg, q2 weeks was more tolerable than twice weekly dosing. The randomized phase II study began May 2015. The planned interim futility analysis when 35 deaths occurred gave a HR of 0.44 favoring the standard arm, thus the study was closed to accrual (March 2017). As of August 22, 2017 (n = 111), the estimated median OS in the mFFOX arm was 15.1 mo (95% CI 10.1-15.7) vs 7.6 mo (95% CI 4.6-9.2) in the PEGPH20 arm. Conclusions: OS in the mFFOX control arm (15.1 mo) is longest yet reported. Addition of PEGPH20 to mFFOX is not recommended for further study and appears to be detrimental (HR = 0.48). The impact of PEGPH20 on OS was unexpected and in contrast to favorable results reported for the combination of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel + PEGPH20 especially in the HA high cohort (Hingorani S et al. A 4008, ASCO 2017). PEGPH20 with mFFOX caused increased toxicity (mostly GI and TE events) and decreased treatment duration compared to mFFOX alone. Tumor HA content will be analyzed. Funding: NIH/NCI grants CA180888, CA180819; and in part by Halozyme Inc. Clinical trial information: 01959139. [Table: see text]