Citations

Clear

34 citation(s) found for "Baz, Rachid".

Predictors of early relapse following ciltacabtagene autoleucel: Informing risk-adapted therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
Peres, Lauren C. , Zanwar, Saurabh , Richards, Alicia, Gaballa, Mahmoud , Afrough, Aimaz , Reid, Brett M. , Goel, Utkarsh , Sannareddy, Aishwarya , Ferreri, Christopher J. , Varga, Cindy , Hosoya, Hitomi , Mikkilineni, Lekha , Kalariya, Nilesh, Mikulski, Damian , Cahoon, Christopher, Cheng, Peter K.C. , Gordillo, Christian , Bhurtel, Jenny , Cassano, Raffaella Cassano , Midha, Shonali , Gonzalez, Rebecca , Purvey, Sneha , Green, Kimberly , Liu, Hien , Khouri, Jack , Bal, Susan, Freeman, Ciara L. , Shune, Leyla , Shain, Kenneth H. , Alsina, Melissa , Sborov, Douglas W. , Voorhees, Peter M. , Costa, Luciano da Fontoura , Biran, Noa , Kumar, Shaji , Lin, Yi, Sidana, Surbhi , Patel, Krina K. , Davis, James A. , Sidana, Surbhi , Davis, James A , Hosoya, Hitomi , Hansen, Doris K. , Dima, Danai , Puglianini, Omar Castañeda , Pasvolsky, Oren , Grajales‐Cruz, Ariel , Xie, Zhuoer , Dillard, Christen , Atrash, Shebli , Portuguese, Andrew J. , Wagner, Charlotte B , Zolotov, Eli , Kort, Jeries , Davis, James, Herr, Megan M. , Hassan, Hamza , Geer, Marcus , Green, Kimberly, Perna, Fabiana , Nishihori, Taiga , Raza, Shahzad , Anwer, Faiz , Bal, Susan , Nadeem, Omar , Banerjee, Rahul , Reshef, Ran , Baz, Rachid , Anderson, Larry D. , Costa, Luciano, Biran, Noa , Locke, Frederick L.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 4, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 93-93

10.1182/blood-2025-93 Get It

Abstract Introduction Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) has demonstrated unprecedented response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), but a proportion of patients experience early relapse. Identifying these patients is essential to guide future therapeutic strategies, such as enhanced bridging therapy or consolidation, while avoiding overtreatment in those likely to achieve durable disease control. Methods We conducted a multi-center study of patients treated with cilta-cel at 15 U.S. academic centers. Outcomes were evaluated based on high-risk (HR) features, including functional HR disease (FHR; relapse within 18 months of first-line therapy initiation), true extramedullary disease (EMD), traditional HR cytogenetics as defined in CARTITUDE-1 [deletion 17p, t(4;14), t(14;16)], and a 2024 IMS-IMWG-adapted HR definition (deletion 17p; t(4;14) or t(14;16) with gain 1q or deletion 1p; and gain 1q with deletion 1p). Multivariable Cox regression was used to examine the association of HR features (FHR, adapted IMS-IMWG HR, and EMD, individually and collectively) with PFS while adjusting for baseline ferritin, prior BCMA, and ECOG performance status (PS ≥2). Among patients with ≥18 months of follow-up, we evaluated predictors of early relapse (≤18 months post infusion) using logistic regression. Results Our cohort included 598 patients treated with cilta-cel between 5/2022 and 12/2024 who had available data on all HR features. The median age was 65 years (range 33-83), and the median prior lines of therapy (pLOT) was 5 (range: 1-18, 84% with >3 pLOT); 8% had received prior BCMA-directed therapy, and 27% were penta-refractory. Most patients (88%) received bridging therapy and 30% achieved ≥ partial response. In our cohort, 33% (n=195) had FHR, 43% (n=258) had traditional HR cytogenetics, 42% (n=253) had adapted IMS-IMWG HR disease, and 11% (n=64) had EMD. Median follow up was 10.6 months (range 0.4-34.1). Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates were lower in patients with vs without HR features: FHR (ORR: 89% vs 94%, CR: 61% vs 75%), traditional HR (ORR: 90% vs 94%, CR: 65% vs 74%), adapted IMS-IMWG HR (ORR: 91% vs 94%, CR: 64% vs 75%) and EMD (ORR: 77% vs 94%, CR: 61% vs 71%). Corresponding 12-month PFS was also lower in patients with vs without HR features: FHR (55% vs 79%), traditional HR (63% vs 78%), adapted IMS-IMWG HR (61% vs 80%) and EMD (59% vs 73%). ORR, CR rate, and 12-month PFS in patients without any HR features compared to those with ≥1 HR feature were 96% vs 90%, 81% vs 64%, and 83% vs 65%, respectively. In multivariable models, each HR feature (FHR, adapted IMS-IMWG HR, and EMD) was independently associated with inferior PFS after adjusting for baseline ferritin, prior BCMA, and ECOG PS ≥ 2. However, because early relapse cannot always be identified a priori based on traditional risk factors, we sought to identify predictors of relapse within 18 months of cilta-cel in a subset of patients with ≥18 months of follow-up (N=247; infused by 12/2023). Notably, while FHR (OR=3.04, 95% CI=1.59-5.89) and adapted IMS-IMWG HR (OR=2.07, 95% CI=1.10-3.89) were independently associated with odds of relapse within 18 months, EMD was not (OR=0.90, 95% CI=0.32, 2.40) when accounting for prior BCMA, ECOG PS ≥ 2, and baseline ferritin. We also used a time-varying Cox model to examine each HR feature associated with PFS at two time periods, <18 and ≥18 months, while adjusting for baseline ferritin, ECOG PS, and prior BCMA. We confirmed that FHR and adapted IMS-IMWG HR were both associated with relapse <18 months (HR=2.05, 95% CI=1.48-2.83 and HR=1.56, 95% CI=1.11-2.19) but not in the ≥18-month time period (HR=0.70, 95% CI=0.19-2.59 and HR=0.76, 95% CI=0.24-2.40). The magnitude of the association for EMD with PFS was similar across both time periods (<18 months HR=1.67, 95% CI=1.09-2.57 and ≥18 months HR=2.17, 95% CI=0.45-10.40). Conclusion While cilta-cel leads to high response rates and durable PFS in RRMM, a subset of patients with FHR and adapted IMS-IMWG HR remains at increased risk for early relapse. In this large multi-center cohort, we describe PFS outcomes across high-risk subgroups and identify key predictors of relapse within 18 months of cilta-cel. These findings inform risk-adapted therapeutic strategies and interventional trials, including bridging, consolidation, or maintenance approaches, to improve outcomes in the highest-risk RRMM patients.
Talquetamab outcomes in relapsed/refractory myeloma with extramedullary and paraskeletal soft tissue plasmacytomas
Afrough, Aimaz, Pasvolsky, Oren, Zanwar, Saurabh, Gaballa, Mahmoud, Sannareddy, Aishwarya, Dima, Danai, Goel, Utkarsh, Ali, Hossam M., Julian, Kelley, Corraes, Andre, Cassano, Raffaella, Janakiram, Murali, Goldsmith, Scott, Davis, James, Green, Kimberly, Biran, Noa, Fogel, Lindsay, Zolotov, Eli, Herr, Megan, Hassan, Hamza, Shune, Leyla, Kort, Jeries, Bal, Susan, Costa, Luciano, Ye, J Christine, Joiner, Laura, Raza, Shahzad, Anwer, Faiz, Khouri, Jack, Banerjee, Rahul, Portuguese, Andrew, Sidana, Surbhi, Rana, Masooma, Mikkilineni, Lekha, Hosoya, Hitomi, Atrash, Shebli, Ferreri, Christopher, Varga, Cindy, Sborov, Douglas, Midha, Shonali, Nadeem, Omar, Grajales-Cruz, Ariel, Baz, Rachid, Blue, Brandon, Freeman, Ciara Louise, Locke, Frederick, Patel, Krina, Lin, Yi, Kumar, Shaji, Hansen, Doris, Anderson, Larry, Voorhees, Peter, Puglianini, Omar Alexis Castaneda, Sidana, Surbhi , Hosoya, Hitomi , Davis, James A. , Ali, Hossam M. , Sidana, Surbhi , Davis, James A , Hosoya, Hitomi , Ali, Hossam M , Sannareddy, Aishwarya , Afrough, Aimaz, Pasvolsky, Oren, Zanwar, Saurabh, Gaballa, Mahmoud, Dima, Danai, Goel, Utkarsh, Ali, Hossam M., Julian, Kelley, Corraes, Andre, Cassano, Raffaella, Janakiram, Murali, Goldsmith, Scott, Davis, James, Green, Kimberly, Biran, Noa, Fogel, Lindsay, Zolotov, Eli, Herr, Megan, Hassan, Hamza, Shune, Leyla, Kort, Jeries, Bal, Susan, Costa, Luciano, Ye, J Christine, Joiner, Laura, Raza, Shahzad, Anwer, Faiz, Khouri, Jack, Banerjee, Rahul, Portuguese, Andrew, Rana, Masooma, Mikkilineni, Lekha, Atrash, Shebli, Ferreri, Christopher, Varga, Cindy, Sborov, Douglas, Midha, Shonali, Nadeem, Omar, Grajales-Cruz, Ariel, Baz, Rachid, Blue, Brandon, Freeman, Ciara Louise, Locke, Frederick, Patel, Krina, Lin, Yi, Kumar, Shaji, Hansen, Doris, Anderson, Larry, Voorhees, Peter, Puglianini, Omar Alexis Castaneda

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 4, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 825-825

10.1182/blood-2025-825 Get It

Abstract Background: Talquetamab (Talq), a GPRC5D-targeting bispecific antibody, shows promising activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, outcomes in patients (pts) with soft tissue plasmacytoma (STP) remain poorly characterized. Method: We retrospectively analyzed 463 RRMM pts treated with Talq at 15 U.S. centers by Dec 2024. Pts were grouped by presence of STP at Talq start: (1) extramedullary disease (EMD; lesions not contiguous with bone), (2) paraskeletal disease (PSK; bone-contiguous), (3) EMD + PSK, and (4) No-STP. Those receiving Talq as a bridge-to-CAR T (n=103, 22%) were censored at CAR T infusion if progression had not occurred. Time-to-event endpoints were calculated from Talq step-up, using Kaplan-Meier/Cox models. Result: Median age was 66 years (y) (35–89); 54 (11.7%) had EMD, 26 (5.6%) PSK, 60 (13%) EMD+PSK, and 320 (69%) No-STP. EMD pts were younger than No-STP (62 vs 66 y, p=.009), while PSK (66.5) and EMD+PSK (64.5) were similar to No-STP. Median prior lines were higher in PSK (7) vs EMD (5), EMD+PSK (6) and No-STP (6) (p=.035). Median time from diagnosis to Talq was shortest in EMD (3.8 y), followed by EMD+PSK (4.6 y), vs PSK (6.4 y), and No-STP (5.9 y) (p=.015). Among pts with any EMD (EMD or EMD+PSK), 81 (69%) had visceral involvement and 85 (73%) had multiple lesions. Rates of prior BCMA- or GPRC5D-directed therapy, plasma cell leukemia (≥5% circulating plasma cells at the time of Talq), and penta-refractoriness were similar across groups. ECOG ≥ 2 at Talq was more common in EMD (42%), PSK (39%), EMD+ PSK (37%) than in No-STP (23%) (p = .002). Other baseline features were similar. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) rate/severity were similar across groups. The immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was more frequent in PSK (38%) vs EMD (11%), EMD + PSK (18%), and No-STP (11%), with the most PSK cases (60%, 6/10) being grade ≥2 (p=.006). No difference in CRS/ICANS onset or duration. Infection rates were lower in No-STP (36%) vs EMD (55%), PSK (46%), and EMD+ PSK (48%) (p=.025). Best overall response rates (ORR) were 71% in EMD, 68% in PSK, 67% in EMD+PSK, and 71% in No-STP (p=.9). Complete response (CR) rates were 14% in EMD, 20% in PSK, 13% in EMD+ PSK, and 25% in No-STP (p=.1) [CRs were not required to be confirmatory, which may not meet full IMWG criteria]. Radiographic response was evaluable in 41 EMD (86%), 16 PSK (61.5%), and 48 EMD+PSK (80%) pts, with partial response (PR) or better observed in 48%, 27%, and 38%, respectively. Among pts with any STP, 34% received radiation (XRT) (4 as bridge-to-CAR T), 24 (51%) were evaluable, and 71% (n=17) achieved ≥PR. The median follow-up from Talq initiation was 10.1 months (mo) (95% CI: 8.8–11.4) and was longest in EMD (13.9 mo) compared with PSK (10.8 mo), EMD+PSK (12.4 mo), and No-STP (9.8 mo) (p = .040). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.3 mo (95% CI: 3.6–5.06) in EMD, 4.8 mo (95% CI: 2.2–7.3) in PSK, 3.8 mo (95% CI: 3.1-4.5) in EMD+ PSK, and 8.3 mo (95% CI: 7.0–9.6) in No-STP (p <.001). Among pts receiving XRT for any STP (within 4 weeks prior to or during Talq), responders had longer PFS vs non-responders (15.4 vs. 2.4 mo; p=.009). Multivariable analysis (MVA) showed inferior PFS with EMD (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.58; 95% CI, 1.04-2.3; p=.029), EMD+PSK (HR 1.91; 95% CI, 1.2–2.8; p = .001), ECOG ≥ 2 (HR 1.4; 95% CI, 1.04–1.9; p = .024), and del(17p) at any timepoint (HR 1.99; 95% CI, 1.1–3.5; p=.017), while longer time from diagnosis to Talq was modestly protective (HR 0.95 per year; p = .016), likely reflecting less aggressive biology in those reaching 5th+ line later. PSK alone showed a non-significant trend toward inferior PFS (HR 1.5; p = .1). Median overall survival (OS) was 13.0 mo (95% CI: not reached [NR]–NR) in EMD, 12.9 mo (95% CI: 6.9–18.9) in PSK, 10.9 mo (95% CI: NR–NR) in EMD+PSK, and NR (95% CI: NR–NR) in No-STP (p = .017). The primary cause of death was disease-related across all groups (p = .6). MVA for OS showed worse outcomes with EMD+PSK (HR 1.7; p=.033), ECOG ≥ 2 (HR 1.98; p <.001), and active PCL at Talq (HR 2.1; p =.010). Conclusion: Soft tissue plasmacytoma, particularly EMD and EMD+PSK, remain strong adverse prognostic factors in Talq-treated patients, with significantly shorter PFS and OS despite similar response rates. Radiation to STP sites was associated with improved outcomes in select cases. Prospective strategies are needed to optimize management for this high-risk population.
Genomics Define Malignant Transformation in Myeloma Precursor Conditions
Maura, Francesco , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Kumar, Shaji , Maclachlan, Kylee , Derkach, Andriy , Garcés, Juan‐José , Firestone, Ross , Braggio, Esteban , Asmann, Yan W. , Papadimitriou, Marios , Hultcrantz, Malin , Marella, Alessio , Castellano, Giancarlo , Lionetti, Marta , Matera, Antonio , Pioggia, Stefania, Vià, Matteo Da , Magistris, Claudio De, Siegel, Erin M. , Agius, Phaedra , Teer, Jamie K. , Yamashita, Yusuke , Silva, Ariosto S. , Blaney, Patrick , Patel, Krina K. , Campbell, Peter J. , Morgan, Gareth , Orlowski, Robert Z. , Shain, Kenneth H. , Bolli, Niccolò , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Kumar, Shaji K , Maclachlan, Kylee , Derkach, Andriy , Garces, Juan-Jose , Firestone, Ross , Braggio, Esteban , Asmann, Yan, Durante, Michael , Diamond, Benjamin T , Hultcrantz, Malin , Marella, Alessio , Castellano, Giancarlo , Maeda, Akihiro , Lionetti, Marta , Matera, Antonio , Da Vià, Matteo C , de Magistris, Claudio , DeAvila, Danny , Sudalagunta, Praneeth Reddy , Canevarolo, Rafael Renatino , Siegel, Erin M , Teer, Jamie K , McPherson, Andrew , Yamashita, Yusuke , Blaney, Patrick , Baz, Rachid , Patel, Krina , Fonseca, Rafael , Landgren, C Ola , Orlowski, Robert Z. , Shain, Kenneth H , Bolli, Niccolo' , Usmani, Saad , Rajkumar, S Vincent , Maura, Francesco , Ziccheddu, Bachisio , Durante, Michael , Diamond, Benjamin , Leongamornlert, Daniel , Fonseca, Rafaël , Landgren, Ola , Usmani, Saad Z. , Rajkumar, S. Vincent

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 8, 2025 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 188-199

10.1200/jco-25-01733 | PMID 41061199 Get It

Multiple myeloma (MM) is consistently preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). While these precursor conditions are asymptomatic, they are not entirely benign and carry a lifelong risk of progression to MM. Unlike other cancers defined by pathology, malignant transformation from MGUS or SMM to MM has so far relied on demonstration of clinical end-organ damage as morphology and cytogenetics cannot reliably distinguish them. In this study, using genomic data from 374 patients with MGUS or SMM (277 training, 97 validation), to our knowledge, we demonstrate for the first time the ability to identify malignant transformation in MGUS and SMM. We introduce the concept of genomic MM and genomic MGUS to differentiate the subsets of MGUS and SMM that are biologically malignant with genomic features indistinguishable from MM from the subset that is premalignant and unlikely to progress to malignancy. Importantly, we find that most SMM has biological features of malignant transformation indistinguishable from MM. As expected, this subset that we consider having genomic MM is associated with a high risk of progression to MM although some patients remained progression-free beyond 5 years. Conversely, 60% of MGUS and 10% of SMM have no evidence of malignant transformation (genomic MGUS), with no progression during follow-up. Integration of genomic features with the 2/20/20 International Myeloma Working Group model significantly improved the prediction of progression among genomic MM. These findings support the use of genomic criteria to refine the classification and the risk stratification in myeloma precursor conditions.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Multiple Myeloma, Version 1.2025
Kumar, Shaji , Adekola, Kehinde , Anderson, Larry , Costello, Caitlin , D’Angelo, Christopher R. , Derman, Benjamin A. , Elsedawy, Noura, Godara, Amandeep , Godby, Kelly, Hillengaß, Jens , Holmberg, Leona , Htut, Myo , Huff, Carol Ann , Hultcrantz, Malin , Larson, Sarah , Liedtke, Michaela , Omel, James, Robinson, Timothy, Valent, Jason , Varshavsky‐Yanovsky, Asya, Kovách, E, Holmberg, Leona , Anderson, Larry D. , Anderson, Larry D , Derman, Benjamin A , Callander, Natalie S. , Baljević, Muhamed , Baz, Rachid , Campagnaro, Erica , Devarakonda, Srinivas , Kang, Yubin , Lee, Hans C. , Martin, Thomas G. , Rosenberg, Aaron , Schroeder, Mark A. , Sherbenou, Daniel W , Suvannasankha, Attaya , Valent, Jason Neil , Vogl, Dan T. , Kovach, Emily, Kumar, Rashmi

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | May 8, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 132-140

10.6004/jnccn.2025.0023 | PMID 40340857 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Multiple Myeloma (MM) provide recommendations for diagnosis, initial workup, treatment, follow-up, and supportive care for patients with MM. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight the important updates and changes specific to systemic therapy for patients with newly diagnosed as well as previously treated MM included in Version 1.2025 of the NCCN Guidelines for MM.
Teclistamab for patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and renal impairment
Dima, Danai , Afrough, Aimaz , Goel, Utkarsh , Grajales‐Cruz, Ariel , Khouri, Jack , Julian, Kelley , Banerjee, Rahul , Razzo, Beatrice M. , Ferreri, Christopher J. , Martinez, Mariola Alejandra Vazquez, Davis, James A. , Sannareddy, Aishwarya , Raza, Shahzad , Portuguese, Andrew J. , Gaballa, Mahmoud , Rana, Masooma , DeJarnette, Shaun, Gonzalez, Rebecca , Mikkilineni, Lekha , Hosoya, Hitomi , Ouchveridze, Evguenia, Shune, Leyla , Lin, Yi , Sborov, Douglas W. , Anderson, Larry D. , Cowan, Andrew J., Patel, Krina K. , Voorhees, Peter M. , Sidana, Surbhi , Hansen, Doris K., Susanibar-Adaniya, Sandra P. , Grajales-Cruz, Ariel F , Banerjee, Rahul , Vazquez-Martinez, Mariola A , Davis, James A , Portuguese, Andrew J , Rana, Masooma S , Lieberman-Cribbin, Alex , Chen, Anna , Herr, Megan M. , Anwer, Faiz , Sborov, Douglas W , Garfall, Alfred L , Lee, Hans C , Anderson, Larry D , Patel, Krina , Voorhees, Peter , Sidana, Surbhi , Dima, Danai , Raza, Shahzad , Hosoya, Hitomi , Julian, Kelley L , Susanibar-Adaniya, Sandra P , Pasvolsky, Oren , Vazquez‐Martinez, Mariola , Puglianini, Omar Castañeda , Ouchveridze, Evguenia, Kaur, Gurbakhash , Rossi, Adriana , Anwer, Faiz , Richard, Shambavi , Baz, Rachid , Garfall, Alfred L. , Lee, Hans C. , Hansen, Doris K. , Atrash, Shebli

Mayo Clinic

Blood Advances | April 8, 2025 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 14 | Pages: 3408-3417

10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016059 | PMID 40198766 Get It

Abstract Outcomes of bispecific antibodies in patients with renal impairment (RI) are not well characterized, given the exclusion of these patients from clinical trials. Herein, we evaluated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and RI treated with standard-of-care teclistamab. RI was defined as creatinine clearance (CrCl) <40 mL/min. CrCl <30 mL/min or dialysis dependence was defined as severe RI. Of the 384 included patients, 81 (21%) had RI, including 45 (18%) with severe RI, and 18 (5%) on dialysis. Patients with RI were more likely to be older (median age, 71 vs 67 years; P = .002) and have a higher median number of previous lines of therapy (7 vs 6; P = .04). Rates and severity of cytokine release syndrome (51% vs 59%; grade ≥3: 1.2% vs 1%) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (16% vs 13%; grade ≥3: 2.5% vs 2.6%) were similar in patients with and without RI, respectively. Patients with RI had higher baseline and day 30 post-teclistamab grade ≥3 anemia and grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. Renal function did not worsen after teclistamab initiation in most patients with RI outside of the context of disease progression. Overall response rate (52% vs 56%; P = .61) and survival outcomes (median progression-free survival, 4.6 vs 6.5 months; P = .62) were comparable in patients with and without RI, respectively, after a median follow-up of 9.9 months. No differences in overall survival or non-relapse mortality were noted. Our findings suggest that treatment with teclistamab is feasible in patients with RI, including those on dialysis, with a similar safety and efficacy profile to patients without RI.
Glucarpidase for treatment of high-dose methotrexate toxicity
Gupta, Shruti , Kaunfer, Sarah Allison , Chen, Kevin L. , Dias, Julie‐Alexia , Rajasekaran, Arun , Prosek, Jason, Truong, Huong L. , Wood, Anthony C., Bassil, Claude , Renaghan, Amanda D., Carlos, Christopher A., Kelly, Katherine J. , Passero, Christopher J., Abudayyeh, Ala , Shin, Daniel Sanghoon , Yelvington, Bradley, Kanduri, Swetha Rani , Neyra, Javier A. , Shirali, Anushree C. , Bansal, Anip, Geara, Abdallah Sassine , Mithani, Zain, Ziolkowski, Susan , Rashidi, Arash, Jakubowski, Jonathan, Pujari, Ashwini, Dotson, Emily, Wall, Sarah , Patton, John T. , Barreto, Jason N. , Sheikh, M. Salman , Lee, Jamie, Lucchesi, Nicholas, Kolman, Michael David, Rasheed, Muhammad Ahsan, Afzal, Afsheen, Mahesh, Amrita, Hsu, Raymond K. , Nicolaysen, Anthony, Tefera, Kibrewessen, Schretlen, Claire F. , Miller, Ryan M. , Velez, Juan Carlos Q. , Chandrasekhara, Soniya, Donley, Vicki, Patel, Ashka , Krishnamurthy, Shobana, Ali, Rafia, Yilmam, Osman A , Wells, Sophia L., Ortega, Jessica L. , Green‐Lingren, Olivia, Leaf, Rebecca Karp , Sise, Meghan E. , Nayak, Lakshmi , LaCasce, Ann S. , Leaf, David E. , Kaunfer, Sarah A , Rajasekaran, Arun , Shah, Chintan V , Glezerman, Ilya G , Kelly, Katherine , Abudayyeh, Ala , Neyra, Javier A , Edmonston, Daniel , Ziolkowski, Susan L , Bond, David A , Patton, John , Barreto, Jason N , Herrmann, Sandra M , Sheikh, Mohammad S , Hsu, Raymond K , Aklilu, Abinet M , Krishnamurthy, Shobana , Yilmam, Osman A , Ortega, Jessica L , LaCasce, Ann Steward , Leung, Nelson , Leaf, David E , Gupta, Shruti , Dias, Julie-Alexia , Vijayan, Anitha , Zhang, Jingjing , Drappatz, Jan , Sperati, Christopher John , Rashidi, Arash , Bond, David A. , Patton, John T. , Herrmann, Sandra M. , Baz, Rachid , Lee, Jamie, Kolman, M F , Afzal, Afsheen, Kang, Dasol, Mahesh, Amrita, Miller, Ryan M., Flannery, Alexander H , Aklilu, Abinet M. , Anand, Shuchi , Ni, Jian, Wells, Sophia L., Leung, Nelson

Mayo Clinic

Blood | January 6, 2025 | Volume: 145 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 1858-1869

10.1182/blood.2024026211 | PMID 39760780 Get It

Abstract High-dose methotrexate (MTX) results in high rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), neutropenia, and hepatotoxicity. Glucarpidase is a recombinant enzyme that cleaves MTX, but clinical data supporting its use are scarce. We examined the association between glucarpidase administration and outcomes in adults with MTX-AKI from 28 cancer centers across the United States using a sequential target trial emulation framework. The primary end point was kidney recovery at hospital discharge, defined as survival to discharge with serum creatinine <1.5-fold baseline and without dialysis dependence. Key secondary end points were time to kidney recovery, neutropenia, and transaminitis on day 7, and time to death. Using multivariable logistic and Cox regression models, we compared outcomes in patients who received glucarpidase within 4 days following MTX initiation with those in patients who did not. Among 708 patients with MTX-AKI, 209 (29.5%) received glucarpidase. Overall, 183 (25.8%) had a primary end point event. Glucarpidase receipt was associated with a 2.70-fold higher adjusted odds of kidney recovery (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69–4.31) compared with no glucarpidase receipt. Patients treated with glucarpidase also had faster time to kidney recovery (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.18–3.33) and lower risks of grade ≥2 neutropenia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28–0.91) and grade ≥2 transaminitis (aOR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28–0.91) on day 7. There was no difference in time to death (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.49–1.18). These data suggest glucarpidase may improve both renal and extrarenal outcomes in patients with MTX-AKI.
Ide-cel vs standard regimens in triple-class–exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: updated KarMMa-3 analyses
Arnulf, Bertrand , Patel, Krina K. , Manier, Salomon , Callander, Natalie S. , Vij, Ravi, Bahlis, Nizar J. , Solomon, Scott R. , Abrahamsen, Ingerid Weum , Broijl, Annemiek , Chen, Christine , Delforge, Michel , Benjamin, Reuben , Iida, Shinsuke , Truppel-Hartmann, Anna, Zhong, Xiaobo , Piasecki, Julia , Eliason, Laurie , Dhanda, Devender , Felten, Jasper, Caia, Andrea, Popa-McKiver, Mihaela, Patel, Krina , Manier, Salomon , Callander, Natalie , Costa, Luciano J , Bahlis, Nizar Jacques , Abrahamsen, Ingerid Weum , Jagannath, Sundar , Pabst, Thomas , Iida, Shinsuke , Berdeja, Jesús G , Giralt, Sergio , Rodriguez-Otero, Paula , Ailawadhi, Sikander , Cavo, Michèle , Nooka, Ajay K. , Costa, Luciano J. , Moreau, Philippe , Baz, Rachid , Jagannath, Sundar , Raje, Noopur , Scheid, Christof , Berdeja, Jesús G. , Giralt, Sergio , Chen, Yanping , Wu, Fan , Cook, Mark , Rodríguez‐Otero, Paula

Mayo Clinic

Blood | August 28, 2024 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 2389-2401

10.1182/blood.2024024582 | PMID 39197072 Get It

Abstract Outcomes are poor in triple-class–exposed (TCE) relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM). In the phase 3 KarMMa-3 trial, patients with TCE R/RMM and 2 to 4 prior regimens were randomized 2:1 to idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) or standard regimens (SRs). An interim analysis (IA) demonstrated significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS; primary end point; 13.3 vs 4.4 months; P < .0001) and higher overall response rate (ORR) with ide-cel vs SRs. At final PFS analysis (median follow-up, 30.9 months), ide-cel further improved median PFS vs SRs (13.8 vs 4.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.63). PFS benefit with ide-cel vs SRs was observed regardless of number of prior lines of therapy, with greatest benefit after 2 prior lines (16.2 vs 4.8 months, respectively). ORR benefit was maintained with ide-cel vs SRs (71% vs 42%; complete response, 44% vs 5%). Patient-centric design allowed crossover from SRs (56%) to ide-cel upon progressive disease, confounding overall survival (OS) interpretation. At IA of OS, median was 41.4 (95% CI, 30.9 to not reached [NR]) vs 37.9 (95% CI, 23.4 to NR) months with ide-cel and SRs, respectively (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.73-1.40); median OS in both arms was longer than historical data (9-22 months). Two prespecified analyses adjusting for crossover showed OS favoring ide-cel. This trial highlighted the importance of individualized bridging therapy to ensure adequate disease control during ide-cel manufacturing. Ide-cel improved patient-reported outcomes vs SRs. No new safety signals were reported. These results demonstrate the continued favorable benefit-risk profile of ide-cel in early-line and TCE R/RMM. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03651128.
Immune Effector Cell-Associated Enterocolitis following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy in Multiple Myeloma
Song, Jinming , Lekakis, Lazaros J. , Samraj, Annie N. , Naresh, Kikkeri N. , Vazquez‐Martinez, Mariola , Mikkilineni, Lekha , Corraes, Andre De Menezes Silva , Kalariya, Nilesh, Patel, Krina K. , Ferreri, Christopher J. , Voorhees, Peter M. , Valdes, Cesar Rodriguez , Cowan, Andrew J., Sborov, Douglas W. , Lin, Yi, Naresh, Kikkeri N , Fortuna, Gliceida Galarza , Banerjee, Rahul , Fernandez‐Pol, Sebastian , Baz, Rachid , Spiegel, Jay Y. , Gubatan, John , Sidana, Surbhi , Shim, Kevin G. , Fonseca, Rafaël , Richard, Shambavi , Hansen, Doris K. , Wang, Yinghong

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | August 10, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-4727434/v1 Get It

Abstract Background: Several immune effector cell (IEC) therapies have been approved for multiple myeloma (MM), including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies such as idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel). We report 14 cases of IEC-associated enterocolitis, in five cases fatal, following CAR-T therapy in MM. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of cases of diarrhea, enterocolitis, or colitis following commercial ide-cel or cilta-cel (including out-of-specification products) at 10 centers within the United States Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. Patients were treated according to the local standard of care at each participating center. Results: We identified 14 cases of IEC-associated enterocolitis out of 1159 CAR-T infusions, corresponding to a 1.2% incidence (0.2% for ide-cel and 2.3% for cilta-cel). This proportion excludes 3 cases of potential or confirmed T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders of the bowel. Patients developed acute-onset symptoms (typically non-bloody Grade 3+ diarrhea) with negative infectious workup beginning a median of 79 days (range: 22-210 days) after CAR-T therapy and a median of 74 days after cytokine release syndrome resolution (range: 2-202 days). Biopsies uniformly demonstrated inflammation, with specific findings including intra-epithelial lymphocytosis, crypt dropout on colon biopsies, and villous blunting on duodenal biopsies. Systemic corticosteroids were initiated in 10 patients (71%) a median of 26 days (range: 1-80 days) following symptom onset. Only 40% of steroid-treated patients had symptomatic improvement; subsequent infliximab or vedolizumab led to improvement in 50% and 33% of corticosteroid-refractory patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 224 days, n = 4 have had diarrhea resolution, n = 5 have had improved or stable symptoms, and n = 5 (36%) have died from IEC-associated enterocolitis or treatment-emergent infections. Conclusions: IEC-associated enterocolitis is a distinct but rare complication of CAR-T therapy characterized by non-bloody diarrhea typically beginning 1-3 months after infusion. Thorough diagnostic workup (including evaluation for potential T-cell malignancies) and appropriate management with an expert gastroenterologist are essential. Further research is critical to understand the pathogenesis of this novel toxicity. In the interim, the early use of infliximab or vedolizumab may potentially hasten symptom resolution and lower reliance on high-dose corticosteroids during the post-CAR-T period.
Validation of prototype biomarkers to identify risk factors of inflammatory adverse events (iAEs) following idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) infusion in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in KarMMa-3.
Sengupta, Sanhita , Amorosi, Clara J. , Takhar, Mandeep, Manier, Salomon , Juluri, Krishna R. , Kaeding, Allison, Piasecki, Julia , Campbell, Timothy , Kaiser, Shari M. , Shamsuzzaman, Md, Martin, Nathan , Lin, Yi , Baz, Rachid , Mashadi-Hossein, Afshin , Rytlewski, Julie

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 10, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 7529-7529

10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.7529 Get It

7529 Background: iAEs, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), can occur after infusion of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies such as ide-cel, but are typically low-grade and manageable with tocilizumab and corticosteroids. Although high-grade iAEs are rare with ide-cel, identification of patients at increased risk may improve management and remains an unmet need. Three composite biomarkers (multivariate models) of iAE risk were previously developed in a discovery cohort from the KarMMa and KarMMa-2 studies of ide-cel in RRMM (Mashadi-Hossein A, et al. J Clin Oncol 2023;41(16_suppl):e20005). Here, we validate these 3 prototype models for risk of developing high-grade iAEs after ide-cel infusion. Methods: Two models used pretreatment patient and routine clinical laboratory parameters; the third model also included change in 6 exploratory cytokines from baseline to 1 day following ide-cel infusion. To validate, each model was retrospectively applied to KarMMa-3 (NCT03651128) data in a blinded fashion, and sensitivity and specificity to identify grade ≥3 CRS and any-grade MAS were determined. Model performance thresholds used for sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 50%, respectively. Performance for identifying grade 2 CRS was also analyzed post hoc. Results: The first and simplest model comprised a manual algorithm with 7 features; it identified patients with grade ≥3 CRS or MAS with 85% sensitivity and 60% specificity. The second model comprised 19 routinely measured pretreatment features; it identified grade ≥3 CRS with 91% sensitivity and 59% specificity, and any-grade MAS with 60% sensitivity and 88% specificity. The third and most complex model comprised 7 pretreatment clinical features and 6 exploratory cytokines; it identified grade ≥3 CRS with 100% sensitivity and 51% specificity, and any-grade MAS with 100% sensitivity and 81% specificity. None of the models identified grade ≥2 CRS with passable sensitivity or specificity. Clustering analyses across all features showed that only a subset of grade 2 CRS cases was within the previously identified high-risk iAE cluster while the remaining grade 2 CRS cases were spread across other clusters. Conclusions: Two of the 3 composite biomarkers met validation criteria for grade ≥3 CRS risk. Criteria were not met for grade 2 CRS, suggesting these models are specific to higher-grade events and that grade 2 CRS represents a more heterogeneous group of patients. While high-grade iAEs are rare with ide-cel, these models may further optimize the robust benefit–risk profile that ide-cel has demonstrated by helping identify, prior to or shortly after infusion, patients most at risk for severe events. Clinical trial information: NCT03651128 .