Citations

Clear

68 citation(s) found for "Atri, Alireza".

Olfactory decline in aging: longitudinal trajectories and associations with cognitive decline and postmortem neuropathology
Tremblay, Cécilia , Driver-Dunckley, Erika, Alasmar, Zaki , Serrano, Geidy E, Shill, Holly A. , Mehta, SH, Ho, Andrew, Fereshtehnejad, Seyed-Mohammad , Shprecher, David, Lorenzini, Ileana , Belden, Christine M. , Atri, Alireza, Adler, Charles H, Beach, Thomas G, Dadar, Mahsa, Zeighami, Yashar, Choudhury, Parichita , Driver‐Dunckley, Erika , Serrano, Geidy E. , Mehta, Shyamal H. , Ho, Andrew H, Shprecher, David , Atri, A., Adler, Charles H. , Beach, Thomas G. , Dadar, Mahsa , Zeighami, Yashar

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | April 28, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.04.27.26351817 | PMID 42094133 Get It

Abstract Importance Decline in olfactory function may be used as a predictor of cognitive decline, to enhance early detection models, improve risk stratification, and enable early intervention. Objective To assess the longitudinal association between olfactory decline, cognitive decline, and postmortem neuropathology. Design, setting and participants Retrospective longitudinal analysis with clinicopathological correlations of a prospective population-based cohort study using data from the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (AZSAND) and its Brain and Body Donation Program. Participants included cognitively unimpaired individuals without parkinsonism that converted to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and/or dementia or remained cognitively stable. Main Outcomes and Measures longitudinal change in olfaction, neuropsychiatric symptoms, motor function and memory, conversion to MCI/dementia, postmortem neuropathology Results Over a mean follow-up period of 7.7 ± 5.4 years, out of 922 participants who were cognitively unimpaired at the first cognitive conference, 643 remained cognitively unimpaired, 279 converted to MCI, and 82 developed dementia. Of these, 633 individuals had at least 2 olfactory tests. Converters showed reduced olfactory function (t=-12.6, p <0.0001), faster progression in neuropsychiatric symptom burden (t=3.42, p < 0.001), and faster decline in memory (t= -7.33, p <0.0001) prior to conversion while no significant differences were observed in motor scores between converters and non-converters. Using ROC analysis, olfactory decline, increased neuropsychiatric symptom burden, as well as motor and memory decline predicted conversion to MCI with a consistent accuracy of ∼ 70% up to 5 years before conversion, while UPSIT alone had an accuracy of ∼ 60%. Longitudinal decline in olfaction was associated with a higher burden of a-synuclein (t= -8.21, p <0.0005), tau tangle (t= -2.66, p < 0.01) and amyloid plaque burden (t= -2.85, p < 0.005) and a faster decline over time was associated with a higher burden of tau (t=5.66, p<0.0001). Conclusions and Relevance A reduction in olfactory identification ability is observed up to a decade prior to conversion to MCI and is associated with underlying burden of neuropathology markers, underscoring the value of incorporating olfactory testing in cognitively unimpaired individuals to identify those at-risk of future cognitive decline.
Amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) in anti‐amyloid therapies for Alzheimer's disease: An update from the Alzheimer's Association ARIA workgroup
Grill, Joshua D., Salloway, Stephen, Atri, Alireza, Cogswell, Petrice M., Benzinger, Tammie L. S., Iwatsubo, Takeshi, Greenberg, Steven M., Carrillo, Maria C., Jack, Clifford R., Sperling, Reisa A., Carrillo, María C. , Etten, Ellis S. van , Mahinrad, Simin , Grill, Joshua D. , Salloway, Stephen , Atri, Alireza , Cogswell, Petrice M. , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Iwatsubo, Takeshi , Iadecola, Costantino , Lemere, Cynthia Ann , Nicoll, James A. R. , Greenberg, Steven M. , Jack, Clifford R. , Sperling, Reisa Anne

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | April 22, 2026 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71361 | PMID 42015334 Get It

Abstract In 2011, a workgroup of the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable introduced recommendations for detecting and monitoring amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials. Since then, anti‐amyloid immunotherapies have received regulatory approval for AD treatment and are beginning to enter clinical practice, underscoring the importance of informing healthcare providers, researchers, and patients about ARIA's implications in real‐world settings. In response, the Alzheimer's Association convened a new workgroup to review current knowledge of ARIA, including underlying mechanisms, clinical presentations, associated risk factors, mitigation strategies, radiologic detection methods, patients’ perspectives in treatment decision‐making, and outstanding challenges. Here, we outline key insights from this workgroup, highlighting that effective ARIA detection and monitoring in clinical practice requires adherence to robust protocols to mitigate risks and enhance patient safety. Limited availability of clinical and pathologic data on predictors of symptomatic and severe ARIA underscores the importance of continued real‐world data collection.
Multisite study: Predicting Lewy body disease using skin biopsy α-synuclein seed amplification assays
Janarthanam, Chelva, Hughson, Andrew G, Holzinger, David, Taylor, Keenan, Caughey, Byron, Adler, Charles H, Shill, Holly A, Mehta, SH, Driver-Dunckley, Erika, Ho, Andrew H, Shprecher, David R, Belden, Christine M. , Atri, Alireza, Zhang, Nan, Chen, Kewei, Serrano, Geidy E, Beach, T, Beach, Thomas G , Orru, Christina Doriana , Hughson, Andrew G. , Kanthasamy, Anumantha G. , Caughey, Byron W. , Heym, Roland G. , Adler, Charles H. , Shill, Holly A. , Mehta, Shyamal H. , Driver‐Dunckley, Erika , Choudhury, Parichita , Shprecher, David , Atri, A., Serrano, Geidy E. , Beach, Thomas G.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology | April 21, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jnen/nlag048 | PMID 42223057 Get It

Abstract Skin biopsies analyzed with α-synuclein seed amplification assays (SAAs) are a simple way to clinically interrogate the presence of α-synuclein aggregates. We determined the accuracy of skin biopsy SAA in predicting the clinical diagnoses of Parkinson disease (PD), PD with dementia (PDD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Blinded SAAs were performed in 3 independent laboratories. Subjects diagnosed with PD, PDD and DLB were analyzed together as group 1, clinically unaffected subjects as group 2 and those with risk factors for LBD as group 3. Punch biopsies were taken from the posterior neck and analyzed by the 3 labs in 6 separate SAAs. Pairwise agreement between labs and assays ranged from excellent (kappa 0.82) to moderate (kappa 0.40-0.68). Sensitivity across assays ranged between 50.0% and 61.3%; specificity ranged between 68.6% and 100%. Comparisons of group 1 vs group 2 produced the greatest specificities, between 77.3% and 100%. In 17 cases that subsequently came to autopsy, 93% of SAAs were positive in those at the neocortical LBD stage but in only &lt;10% of those at lower stages. Skin biopsy α-synuclein SAA may be useful as a diagnostic and progression biomarker in Lewy body dementia clinical trials.
Brain-Only Versus GI-Only Synucleinopathy: A Comprehensive Autopsy Study With Both IHC and SAA
Orru, Christina D., Beach, Thomas G., Adler, Charles H., Shill, Holly A., Driver-Dunckley, Erika, Mehta, Shyamal H. , Atri, Alireza, Lorenzini, Ileana , Qiji, Sanaria H., Intorcia, Anthony J., Hughson, Andrew G., Groveman, Bradley R. , King, Samantha, Parveen, Sabiha , Caughey, Byron, Serrano, Geidy E , Orru, Christina Doriana , Beach, Thomas G. , Adler, Charles H. , Shill, Holly A. , Driver‐Dunckley, Erika , Atri, Alireza , Hughson, Andrew G. , Alam, Parvez , Vascellari, Sarah , Caughey, Byron W. , Serrano, Geidy E.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | March 24, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.03.18.26348355 | PMID 41929295 Get It

ABSTRACT Braak and others have proposed that Lewy body pathology (LBP) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) may arise not only in the brain but alternatively from an initial site in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract with subsequent passage to the central nervous system CNS through the vagus nerve or other routes. We tested this hypothesis by using both immunohistochemistry (IHC) and RT QuIC a form of alpha synuclein seed amplification assay (SAA) to detect alpha synuclein LBP in samples from selected brain regions and 10 GI tract sites taken from autopsies of 50 PD subjects and 128 elderly subjects without parkinsonism or dementia including 34 with IHC identified CNS incidental Lewy body disease (ILBD) and 94 with no Lewy body IHC pathology detected (NLB). A positive SAA or IHC result was restricted to the GI tract in only 2 subjects while LBP by either SAA or IHC was restricted to the brain in 11 subjects. To fairly compare GI-only with brain-only synucleinopathy, however, we would have to do SAA on brain samples from all ILBD and NLB cases in at least 4 critical brain regions: olfactory bulb, medulla, pons, and amygdala. Further SAA of brain regions is estimated, based on the proportional results to date, to potentially identify 21 additional brain-only LBP subjects, for a total of 32, if it were done on all of the NLB subjects. From this brain-only LBP is estimated to be 16 times more common than GI-only LBP. To assess the clinical impact of SAA-positive GI sites we found that the number of positive sites per subject is significantly correlated with UPDRS motor score and SCOPA-AUT GI related scores including those for salivation, straining, constipation, and bowel movement.
Relationship between age and severity of cognitive impairment at diagnosis for early‐onset and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease: Comparison of LEADS and ADNI
Hammers, Dustin B., Eloyan, Ani, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Taurone, Alexander, Gao, Sujuan, Beckett, Laurel, Kirby, Kala, Dage, Jeffrey L., Nudelman, Kelly, Aisen, Paul, Reman, Rema, Vemuri, Prashanthi, Joie, Renaud La, Touroutoglou, Alexandra, Atri, Alireza, Clark, David, Day, Gregory S., Duara, Ranjan, Graff‐Radford, Neill R., Honig, Lawrence S., Jones, D., Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F., Womack, Kyle, Musiek, Erik, Onyike, Chiadi U., Riddle, Meghan, Grant, Ian, Rogalski, Emily, Johnson, Erik C. B., Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott, Wingo, Thomas S., Wolk, David A., Carrillo, Marı́a C., Dickerson, Bradford C., Rabinovici, Gil D., Apostolova, Liana G., Initiative, for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging, Carrillo, María C. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La , Day, Gregory S. , Day, Gregory S , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Hammers, Dustin B , Eloyan, Ani , Taurone, Alexander, Gao, Sujuan , Beckett, Laurel , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Nudelman, Kelly , Aisen, Paul , Reman, Rema, Vemuri, Prashanthi , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Atri, Alireza , Clark, David, Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Mendez, Mario F. , Musiek, Erik , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Salloway, Steve , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wolk, David A. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Apostolova, Liana G. , Initiative, for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 30, 2026 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71160 | PMID 41614286 Get It

INTRODUCTION Recent work has identified unique cognitive profiles for early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) relative to late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD), however, examination has been limited in determining whether the association between age and cognitive severity at presentation also differs across conditions. METHODS A series of linear spline regression models was conducted across baseline cognitive data from 325 EOAD and 314 LOAD participants, after accounting for education, sex, and apolipoprotein ε4 status. RESULTS Significant differences existed in the relationship between baseline age and cognitive performance between EOAD and LOAD samples for Processing Speed/Attention, Executive Functioning, and Episodic Immediate Memory. Younger participants from both EOAD and LOAD groups performed disproportionately worse on non‐amnestic cognitive domains, with this occurring to a greater extent in EOAD than LOAD. DISCUSSION In the age of disease‐modifying treatments, results highlight the importance of assessing for cognitive declines in individuals starting much earlier than age 65. Highlights Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) participants each displayed cognitive impairments relative to same‐aged peers across most domains. Both groups displayed positive relationships between impairment among non‐amnestic cognitive domains and baseline age. This relationship displayed a significantly greater effect in EOAD than LOAD, with domains of Processing Speed/Attention and Executive Functioning skills being the most pronounced. Of those participants developing AD, age displayed a disproportionate impact on their symptom onset.
Distinct Tau PET Dynamics in Early vs. Late Age-of-Onset Alzheimer’s disease
Chiotis, Konstantinos, Soleimani-Meigooni, David N, Aisen, Paul S, Amuiri, Alinda, Atri, Alireza, Beckett, Laurel, Brickhouse, Michael , Clark, David G, Dage, Jeffrey L, Day, Gregory S, Duara, Ranjan, Eloyan, Ani , Foroud, Tatiana, Graff-Radford, Neill R, Grant, Ian M, Hammers, Dustin B, Honig, Lawrence S, Johnson, Erik C. B., Jones, D. Richard, Kirby, Kala, Koeppe, Robert, Kramer, Joel H, Kukull, Walter A, Leuzy, Antoine , Masdeu, Joseph C., Mendez, Mario F., Musiek, Erik, Nudelman, Kelly N., Onyike, Chiadi U., Riddle, Meghan, Rocha, Salma, Rogalski, Emily, Salloway, Stephen, Schonhaut, Daniel R., Sha, Sharon, Shankar, Ranjani, Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Toga, Arthur W., Touroutoglou, Alexandra, Turner, Raymond Scott, Vemuri, Prashanthi, Wingo, Thomas S., Wolk, David A., Womack, Kyle, Zhang, J. , Carrillo, Maria C., Dickerson, Bradford C., Apostolova, Liana G., Joie, Renaud La, Rabinovici, Gil D., Chiotis, Konstantinos , Blazhenets, Ganna , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Aisen, Paul , Atri, Alireza , Beckett, Laurel , Clark, David G., Dage, Jeffrey L. , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Foroud, Tatiana , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Hammers, Dustin B , Honig, Lawrence S. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Jones, David T. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Kramer, Joel H. , Kukull, Walter A. , Lagarde, Julien , Maiti, Piyush , Masdeu, Joseph C , Mendez, Mario F. , Musiek, Erik , Nudelman, Kelly , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Stephen, Schonhaut, Daniel R. , Sha, Sharon J. , Shankar, Ranjani , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Toga, Arthur W. , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Turner, Raymond Scott , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Wingo, Thomas S , Wolk, David A. , Womack, Kyle , Carrillo, María C. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Apostolova, Liana G. , Joie, Renaud La , Rabinovici, Gil D.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | January 26, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.01.25.26344738 | PMID 41646765 Get It

Abstract Early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) and Late-onset AD (LOAD) differ in clinical presentations and rates of progression. We aimed to compare baseline and longitudinal tau PET burden, and their relationship with clinical variables in amyloid-PET positive, cognitively impaired participants from the Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (EOAD; n=390) and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (LOAD; n=211). Patients with EOAD showed higher baseline tau PET retention, broader neuroanatomical involvement and faster accumulation rates over time compared to LOAD, after adjusting for amyloid load and clinical stage. Tau PET showed stronger correlations with baseline amyloid burden and clinical measures of global cognition and function in EOAD than LOAD. We conclude that earlier age of onset in AD is linked to a more aggressive tauopathy, which in turn is a primary driver of clinical decline. These findings suggest that optimal therapeutic targets and strategies may differ between EOAD and LOAD. One Sentence Summary Younger patients with Alzheimer’s disease show more aggressive tau spread, suggesting age of onset defines distinct disease pathways with key clinical implications.
Alzheimer's disease polygenic risk in early‐ and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease
Pentchev, Julian V., Jackson, Trever, Khan, Naazneen , Rosewood, Thea , Huang, Yen‐Ning, Nho, Kwangslk, Saykin, Andrew J., Eloyan, Ani, Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Riddle, Meghan, Salloway, Steven, Atri, Alireza, Honig, Lawrence S., Johnson, Erik C. B., Turner, Raymond Scott, Masdeu, Joseph C. , Foroud, Tatiana M., Clark, David, Hammers, Dustin B., Dage, Jeffrey L., Kirby, Kala, Ghetti, Bernardino, Newell, Kathy, Onyike, Chiadi U., Day, Gregory S., Graff‐Radford, Neill R., Murray, Melissa E., Jones, D. Richard, Jack, Clifford R., Vemuri, Prashanthi, Touroutoglou, Alexandra, Duara, Ranjan, Grant, Ian, Sha, Sharon, Wingo, Thomas S., Beckett, Laurel A., Rogalski, Emily J, Mendez, Mario F., Kramer, Joel, Joie, Renaud La, Grinberg, Lea T., Koeppe, Robert, Wolk, David A., Aisen, Paul, RAMAN, REMA , Toga, Arthur, Kukull, Walter A., Musiek, Erik, Womack, Kyle, Carrillo, Maria C., Rabinovici, Gil D., Dickerson, Bradford C., Apostolova, Liana G., Nudelman, Kelly N. H., Murray, Melissa E. , Carrillo, María C. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La , Day, Gregory S. , Day, Gregory S , Murray, Melissa E , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Huang, Yen‐Ning, Nho, Kwangsik T. , Saykin, Andrew J. , Eloyan, Ani , Taurone, Alexander, Riddle, Meghan , Salloway, Steve , Atri, Alireza , Honig, Lawrence S. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Foroud, Tatiana , Clark, David, Hammers, Dustin B , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Ghetti, Bernardino , Newell, Kathy L. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Jones, David T. , Jack, Clifford R. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Duara, Ranjan , Sha, Sharon J. , Beckett, Laurel , Rogalskı, Emily , Mendez, Mario F. , Kramer, Joel, Blazhenets, Ganna , Grinberg, Lea T. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Wolk, David A. , Aisen, Paul , Toga, Arthur W. , Kukull, Walter A. , Musiek, Erik , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Apostolova, Liana G. , Nudelman, Kelly

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 14, 2026 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71066 | PMID 41532810 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION The genetic basis of sporadic early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) remains largely unknown, prompting evaluation of late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) polygenic risk in EOAD. METHODS A LOAD polygenic score (PGS) was calculated in the Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study and tested for associations with AD risk, cognitive performance, and imaging and fluid biomarkers. RESULTS Though PGS was elevated in LOAD and EOAD, it was not a significant predictor of EOAD adjusting for APOE ε4 carrier status and was not associated with age of EOAD onset ( p = 0.106) or with cognitive performance ( p = 0.417). In LEADS, greater LOAD PGS was associated with differences in neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers, including elevated synaptosomal‐associated protein 25 (SNAP‐25) ( p = 2.3 × 10 −5 ). DISCUSSION While LOAD polygenic risk contributed minimally to EOAD onset and cognitive dysfunction, PGS association with fluid biomarkers in LEADS suggests a role for LOAD polygenic risk in EOAD pathophysiology. Highlights LOAD PGSs were elevated in both LOAD and EOAD compared to controls; however, LOAD PGS did not significantly predict EOAD risk, age at onset, or cognitive performance independent of APOE ε4 in the LEADS. Higher LOAD PGS was associated with lower amyloid PET Centiloids (less brain amyloid deposition) as well as lower CSF biomarker Aβ42 in LEADS (proxy marker suggesting higher brain amyloid deposition) in LEADS; these contradictory findings support the need for larger studies to further investigate whether LOAD PGS is associated with increased amyloid deposition in EOAD. Higher LOAD PGS was also associated with higher levels of CSF synaptosomal‐associated protein 25 (SNAP‐25), a key component of the SNARE complex, suggesting that LOAD genetic factors may contribute to dysregulation of synaptic transmission and/or pathological protein aggregation in EOAD.
Imaging‐neuropathology evaluation of Amyloid Related Imaging Abnormality sulcal effusion in a DIAN‐TU‐001 participant treated with gantenerumab
Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly, Chen, Charles D., Hobbs, Diana A, Flores, Shaney, Scott, Jalen, Anand, Sanjana, Franklin, Erin E., Lu, Ruijin , Gordon, Brian A., Jack, Clifford R., Cruchaga, Carlos, Hassenstab, Jason J., Ibanez, Laura, Li, Yan, Wang, Guoqiao, Renton, Alan E., Xiong, Chengjie, Atri, Alireza, Snider, B. Joy, Llibre‐Guerra, Jorge J., Clifford, David B., McDade, DO Eric, Bateman, Randall J., Wang, Qing, Perrin, Richard J., Benzinger, Tammie L.S., team, DIAN‐TU study, Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly , Jiang, Meng, Flores, Shaney , Franklin, Erin , Gordon, Brian A. , Jack, Clifford R. , Cruchaga, Carlos , Hassenstab, Jason , Ibanez, Laura , Li, Yan, Wang, Guoqiao , Renton, Alan , Xiong, Chengjie , Atri, Alireza , Snider, B. Joy, Llibre‐Guerra, Jorge J. , Clifford, David B. , McDade, Eric , Bateman, Randall J. , Wang, Qing , Perrin, Richard J. , Benzinger, Tammie L.S.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 10, 2026 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70856_107139 Get It

Abstract Background Amyloid related imaging abnormality edema (ARIA‐E) occurs in about 19% of individuals with autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD) treated with an anti‐amyloid‐b monoclonal antibody (Salloway et al., 2021). In a previously reported case, ARIA‐E appeared to colocalize with decreases in PiB‐PET uptake (Joseph‐Mathurin, Llibre‐Guerra, et al, 2022), suggesting an association between amyloid‐b (Aβ) removal and ARIA‐E. Here, we compare longitudinal neuroimaging and corresponding neuropathology in an ADAD individual treated with gantenerumab, who experienced multiple ARIA‐E episodes as sulcal effusions that resolved by the end of the four‐year trial. Methods PiB‐PET and MRI were collected pre‐ and post‐randomization (2 and 4 years). The participant consented to brain donation, which was received a year after trial completion. Four tissue samples were taken from the location of the ARIA‐E in the parieto‐occipital left hemibrain as identified by MRI (one block contained the sulcus affected by ARIA‐E; the rest of the coronal section was captured in the remaining three blocks). Area fractions (AFs) of Aβ (10D5 immunohistochemistry (IHC)), tauopathy (PHF1), microglia (Iba1), and astrocytes (GFAP) in one sulcal region of interest (ROI) from each block and PiB‐PET SUVRs of corresponding ROIs were extracted ( n = 4, Figure 1). Additionally, we included PiB‐PET SUVRs corresponding to ARIA‐E findings observed in the right hemisphere at baseline, two‐year, and four‐year visits ( n = 6). Results Overall PiB‐PET uptake increased during the first two years (before ARIA‐E) and decreased during the last two years (including ARIA‐E episodes) (0.03±0.05 vs. ‐0.04±0.04 SUVR/year, p ‐value=0.01, Figure 2). The decrease seemed more pronounced in ARIA‐E ROIs versus normal‐appearing sulcus ROIs (‐0.05±0.04 vs. ‐0.02±0.03 SUVR/year). Lower PiB uptake at last visit appeared associated with lower Aβ AF (estimates=0.03±0.01, p ‐value=0.07). The ARIA‐E ROI had an Aβ AF of 0.009 while normal‐appearing sulcus ROIs had a mean of 0.02+0.003 (Figure 3). AFs for tauopathy, microglia, and astrocytes were within the range of those of normal‐appearing sulcus ROIs, suggesting an Aβ‐specific effect, although unexamined markers may play a role. Conclusions Our preliminary findings indicated that ARIA‐E is associated with longitudinal PiB‐PET decrease and Aβ AF, supporting the link between ARIA‐E, changes in PiB‐PET, and local Aβ removal observed at autopsy. Funding : K01AG080123; U01AG042791; R01AG046179; R01AG053267
Tablet‐based Cognitive Assessment Tool (TabCAT) in a multisite study of early‐onset Alzheimer's disease
Njamnshi, Wepnyu Yembe , Chiotis, Konstantinos , Tsoy, Elena , Blazhenets, Ganna , Maiti, Piyush , Zhang, J. , Allen, Isabel Elaine , Rocha, Salma, Shankar, Ranjani , Amuiri, Alinda, Lawson, Mawuli, Aisen, Paul , Eloyan, Ani , Hammers, Dustin B. , Kirby, Kala, Koeppe, Robert, Toga, Arthur W., Clark, David A. , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R., Grant, Ian , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Kramer, Joel H. , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Brickhouse, Michael , Jack, Clifford R. , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Carrillo, Marı́a C., Apostolova, Liana G. , Possin, Katherine L. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La , Carrillo, María C. , Zhang, Jiaxiuxiu , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , La Joie, Renaud , Jack, Clifford R , Day, Gregory S , Rabinovici, Gil D , Blazhenets, Ganna , Wingo, Thomas S , Chiotis, Konstantinos , Rocha, Salma, Lawson, Mawuli, Beckett, Laurel , Hammers, Dustin B , Kirby, Kala, Kukull, Walter A. , Toga, Arthur W. , Atri, Alireza , Clark, David, Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Wolk, David A. , Womack, Kyle , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Nudelman, Kelly

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 15, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71012 | PMID 41395729 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Brief digital cognitive measures may be a valuable and scalable alternative to traditional tests for improving early detection and disease monitoring in patients with early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD). METHODS We examined the convergent, diagnostic, and neuroanatomical validity of Tablet‐based Cognitive Assessment Tool (TabCAT) tests in the multisite Longitudinal Early‐Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study. Four hundred seventy‐five participants from 16 sites (83 cognitively unimpaired participants, 146 individuals diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and 246 with mild dementia) underwent TabCAT testing, including two executive/attentional tasks (Match and Flanker) and two visuospatial tasks (Line Length and Line Orientation). RESULTS TabCAT tests showed good convergent validity with traditional pen‐and‐paper tests. Match was the most accurate TabCAT test in differentiating among clinical groups (controls vs. MCI vs. dementia) and predicting amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) positivity in clinically impaired participants. TabCAT tests were associated with regional tau PET patterns. DISCUSSION TabCAT digital measures have promise for frontline identification of patients with EOAD. Highlights Four hundred seventy‐five participants from 16 US sites underwent tablet‐based cognitive assessment. Digital tests assessed executive function and visuospatial abilities. Digital tests correlated with traditional pen‐and‐paper cognitive tests. Match (test of executive function) differentiated clinical groups. Digital tests were associated with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) status and regional tau PET patterns.
Frequency and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Tau Positron Emission Tomography Positivity
Raghavan, Sheelakumari, Costoya‐Sánchez, Alejandro , Mainta, Ismini , Rodríguez-Fonseca, Omar Darío, Perissinotti, Andrés , Gu, Yuna , Yun, Jihwan, Peretti, Débora Elisa , Aguiar, Pablo , Bischof, Gérard N. , Seo, Sang Won , Villeneuve, Sylvia , O’Brien, John T. , Jagust, William, Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Carrillo, Marı́a C., Joie, Renaud La , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Pontecorvo, Michael J. , Johnson, Keith A. , Weiner, Michael W. , Petersen, Ronald C., Jack, Clifford R. , Schöll, Michael , Labonté, Anne , Faubert, Anne‐Marie, Mathieu, Axel, Madjar, Cécile , Carrier, Charles Edouard, Kazazian, Christina, Lepage, Claude, Maillet, David , Michaud, Diane, Couture, Doris, Dea, Doris, Courcot, Blandine, Debacker, Clément , Fontaine, David, Knopman, David S. , Multhaup, Gerhard, Maltais, Jean‐Robert, Breitner, John C.S. , Poirier, Judes, Cheewakriengkrai, Laksanun, Sager, Mark A., Dauar‐Tedeschi, Marina, Rajah, Natasha, Aisen, Paul, Toussaint, Paule‐Joanne , Pierre, Bellec, Kostopoulos, Penelope, Étienne, Pierre , Tariot, Pierre N. , Orban, Pierre , Hoge, Rick, Thomas, Ronald J. , Gauthier, Serge , Craft, Suzanne , Montine, Thomas J. , Nair, Vasavan, Bohbot, Véronique D. , Venugopalan, Vinod, Ituria‐Medina, Yasser, Khachaturian, Zaven S., Teigner, Eduard, Anthal, Elena, Yu, Elsa, Ferdinand, Fabiola, Pogossova, Galina, Mayrand, Ginette, Duclair, Guerda, Gagné, Guylaine, Newbold‐Fox, Holly, Leppert, Illana, Tremblay‐Mercier, Jennifer , Frenette, Joanne, Frappier, Josée, Kat, Justin, Miron, Justin , Wan, Karen, Mahar, Laura, Carmo, Leopoldina, Théroux, Louise, Dufour, Marianne, Lafaille‐Magnan, Marie‐Élyse, Savard, Mélissa, Tuwaig, Miranda, Petkova, Mirela, Rioux, Pierre, Meyer, P.T., El‐Khoury, Rana, Gordon, Renee, Giles, Renuka, Das, Samir, Wang, Seqian, Tabrizi, Shirin , Mathotaarachchi, Sulantha , Dubuc, Sylvie, Lee, Tanya , Beaudry, Thomas, Gervais, Valérie, Pagé, Véronique, Desautels, René, Benbouhoud, Fatiha, Saint‐Fort, Eunice Farah, Verfaillie, Sander C.J. , Farzin, Sarah , Salaciak, Alyssa , Tullo, Stéphanie , Daoust, Leslie‐Ann, Köbe, Theresa , McSweeney, Melissa, Nilsson, Nathalie , Pishnamazi, Morteza, Bedetti, Christophe , Hudon, Louise, Greco, Claudia, Chapleau, Marianne , St‐Onge, Frédéric , Boutin, Sophie , Geddes, Maiya R. , Ducharme, Simon , Jean, Gabriel, Sylvain, Elisabeth, Élie, Marie‐Josee, Leblond‐Baccichet, Gloria, Soucy, Jean‐Paul , Ozlen, Hazal , Bailly, Julie, Mohammediyan, Béry, Chen, Yalin , Remz, Jordana, Rentz, Dorene M., Amariglio, Rebecca E. , Blacker, Deborah , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Dickerson, Brad C., Donovan, Nancy J. , Farrell, Michelle E. , Gómez, Cristina Lois, Marshall, Gad A. , Oaoo, Kate, Price, Julie, Prokopiou, Prokopis C. , Reynolds, Gretchen , Skylar-Scott, Irina A., Vila‐Castelar, Clara , Yang, Hyun‐Sik , Trojanowki, John Q., Green, Robert C, Perrin, Richard J. , Shaw, Leslie M. , Potter, William Z. , Bernard, Marie , Jackson, Jonathan, Masliah, Eliezer , Masterman, Donna, Okonkwo, Ozioma, Ryan, Laurie, Silverberg, Nina, Fleisher, Adam , Fockler, Juliet , Conti, Cat, Jin, Chengshi , Nosheny, Rachel L. , Ashford, Mariam, Flenniken, Derek , Kormos, Adrienne, Montine, Tom, Rafii, Michael, Raman, Rema , Gessert, Devon, Salazar, Jennifer, Zimmerman, Caileigh, Cabrera, Yuliana, Walter, Sarah , Miller, Garrett, Coker, Godfrey, Clanton, Taylor, Hergesheimer, Lindsey, Smith, Stephanie , Adegoke, Olusegun, Mahboubi, Payam, Moore, Shelley, Pizzola, Jeremy, Shaffer, Elizabeth , Harvey, Danielle, Forghanian-Arani, Arvin, Borowski, Bret, Ward, Chad, Gunter, Jeff, Kantarci, Kejal, Thompson, Paul , Jahanshad, Neda , DeCarli, Charles , Knaack, Alexander , Fletcher, Evan, Chen, Stephanie R, Choe, Mark, Crawford, Karen , Yuschkevich, Paul A, Reiman, Eric M. , Mathis, Chet, Landau, Susan , Cairns, Nigel J. , Householder, Erin, Franklin, Erin , Bernhardt, Haley, Taylor‐Reinwald, Lisa, Korecka, Magdalena , Figurski, Michal, Neu, Scott, Nho, Kwangsik, Foroud, Tatiana M., Faber, Kelley , Wilmes, Kristi, Thal, Leon J., Dage, Jeffrey L. , Eloyan, Ani , Hammers, Dustin B. , Kirby, Kala, Kramer, Joel, Legarde, Julien, Murray, Melissa E., Newell, Kathy L. , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Clark, David , Day, Gregory S, Duara, Ranjan , Graff-Radford, Neill R, Grant, Ian , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Carrillo, María C. , O'Brien, John Tiernan , Jack, Clifford R , Schöll, Michael , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Dage, Jeffrey L , Rial, Alexis Moscoso , Heeman, Fiona , Raghavan, Sheelakumari , Essen, Martijn van , Camacho, Valle , Silva‐Rodríguez, Jesús , Ribaldi, Federica , Coomans, Emma M. , Brum, Wagner Scheeren , Grothe, Michel J. , Drzezga, Alexander E. , Malpetti, Maura , Rowe, James B. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Ossenkoppele, Rik , Smith, Ruben , Hansson, Oskar , Garibotto, Valentina , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , LaMontagne, Pamela , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Tam, Angela , Binette, Alexa Pichet , Dansereau, Christian , Picard, Cynthia , Michaud, Diane, Couture, Doris, Cuello, A. Claudio , Barkun, Alan , Evans, Alan Charles , Tardif, Christine Lucas , Knopman, David S. , Near, Jamie , Leoutsakos, Jeannie‐Marie , Brandt, Jason , Pruessner, Jens C. , Morris, John C. , Collins, D. Louis , Chakravarty, M. Mallar , Eisenberg, Mark Jeffrey , Rajah, Maria Natasha , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Bellec, Pierre , Thomas, Ronald, Fonov, Vladimir , Vallee, Isabelle, Vogel, Jacob W. , Dadar, Mahsa , Appleby, Melissa , Meyer, Pierre‐François, Gonneaud, Julie , Pascoal, Tharick Ali , Vachon‐Presseau, Étienne , Spreng, R. Nathan , Rentz, Dorene M. , Buckley, Rachel F. , Gagliardi, Geoffroy Pierre , Gatchel, Jennifer R. , Guzmán‐Vélez, Edmarie , Jacobs, Heidi I.L. , Jutten, Roos J. , Pardilla‐Delgado, Enmanuelle , Price, Julie C. , Quiroz, Yakeel T. , Schultz, Aaron P. , Schultz, Stephanie A. , Sepulcre, Jorge , Vannini, Patrizia , Toga, Arthur W. , Beckett, Laurel , Saykin, Andrew J. , Potter, William, Barnes, Lisa L. , Gonzalez, Hector, Ho, Carole , Hsiao, John , Jackson, Jonathan , Veitch, Dallas P. , Neuhaus, John M , Rafii, Michael S. , Jimenez‐Maggiora, Gustavo Adolfo , Donohue, Michael , Arani, Arvin , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Jones, David T. , Kantarci, Kejal , Senjem, Matthew L. , Reid, Robert I. , Fox, Nick C. , Malone, Ian B. , Thomopoulos, Sophia I. , Nir, Talia M. , Tosun, Duygu , Das, Sandhitsu R. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Chen, Kewei , Risacher, Shannon L. , Shen, Li , Nudelman, Kelly , Ghetti, Bernardino , Grinberg, Lea T. , Hammers, Dustin B , Kirby, Kala, Kukull, Walter A. , Murray, Melissa E. , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Atri, Alireza , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Honig, Lawrence S. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S , Wolk, S. J. , Womack, Kyle

Mayo Clinic

JAMA | June 16, 2025 | Volume: 334 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 229

10.1001/jama.2025.7817 | PMID 40522652 Get It

Importance Tau positron emission tomography (PET) allows in vivo detection of neurofibrillary tangles, a core neuropathologic feature of Alzheimer disease (AD). Objective To provide estimates of the frequency of tau PET positivity and its associated risk of clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants Longitudinal study using data pooled from 21 cohorts, comprising a convenience sample of 6514 participants from 13 countries, collected between January 2013 and June 2024. Cognitively unimpaired individuals and patients with a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), AD dementia, or other neurodegenerative disorders were included. Exposures Tau PET with flortaucipir F 18, amyloid-β (Aβ) PET, and clinical examinations. Tau PET scans were visually rated as positive according to a US Food and Drug Administration– and European Medicines Agency–approved method, designed to indicate the presence of advanced neurofibrillary tangle pathology (Braak stages V-VI). Main Outcomes and Measures Frequency of tau PET positivity and absolute risk of clinical progression (eg, progression to MCI or dementia). Results Among the 6514 participants (mean age, 69.5 years; 50.5% female), median follow-up time ranged from 1.5 to 4.0 years. Of 3487 cognitively unimpaired participants, 349 (9.8%) were tau PET positive; the estimated frequency of tau PET positivity was less than 1% in those aged younger than 50 years, and increased from 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) at 60 years to 19% (95% CI, 16%-24%) at 90 years. Tau PET positivity frequency estimates increased across MCI and AD dementia clinical diagnoses (43% [95% CI, 41%-46%] and 79% [95% CI, 77%-82%] at 75 years, respectively). Most tau PET–positive individuals (92%) were also Aβ PET positive. Cognitively unimpaired participants who were positive for both Aβ PET and tau PET had a higher absolute risk of progression to MCI or dementia over the following 5 years (57% [95% CI, 45%-71%]) compared with both Aβ PET–positive/tau PET–negative (17% [95% CI, 13%-22%]) and Aβ PET–negative/tau PET–negative (6% [95% CI, 5%-8%]) individuals. Among participants with MCI at the time of the tau PET scan, an Aβ PET–positive/tau PET–positive profile was associated with a 5-year absolute risk of progression to dementia of 70% (95% CI, 59%-81%). Conclusions and Relevance In a large convenience sample, a positive tau PET scan occurred at a nonnegligible rate among cognitively unimpaired individuals, and the combination of Aβ PET positivity and tau PET positivity was associated with a high risk of clinical progression in both preclinical and symptomatic stages of AD. These findings underscore the potential of tau PET as a biomarker for staging AD pathology.