Citations

Abstract Background Interleukin 6 (IL-6) plays important roles in both innate and adaptive immunity, while dysregulated persistent production of IL-6 is involved in pathological development of various diseases associated with inflammation. Targeting the IL-6 pathway has led to many innovative treatment approaches. Siltuximab and Tocilizumab are monoclonal antibodies targeting IL-6 and IL-6 receptors respectively and have been FDA-approved for treatment of Castleman disease (Siltuximab), a rare lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by hyperproduction of IL-6 with an unknown prevalence, autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (Tocilizumab), and both shown potential as treatment for cytokine release syndrome in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. However, the presence of siltuximab can interfere with IL-6 assays, leading to the use of C-reactive protein (CRP) as a surrogate marker to monitor its efficacy. Aim To evaluate potential Siltuximab and Tocilizumab antibody interference on IL-6 measurements in three different IL-6 protein immunoassays. Method: Serum or EDTA plasma sample pools with different IL-6 concentrations ranging from low (2.3 – 11.1 pg/mL, around the reference interval cut-off for each assay) to high (18.5 – 1142 pg/mL), above reference interval cut-off for each assay) were utilized. Various concentrations of Siltuximab or Tocilizumab were spiked into the sample pools (at 10% of total volume) to achieve final concentrations up to 600 µg/mL and up to 300 µg/mL, respectively. Sample spiked with 10% saline were used as no-drug control. Three assays were used to measure IL-6 concentration: Beckman Access IL-6 assay on UniCel DxI 800 (Beckman Coulter), V-PLEX Plus human IL-6 assay on QuickPlex SQ120 (Meso Scale Diagnostics), and a Luminex cytokine panel assay developed in house (R&D systems) with upper reference interval limits of 6.4,1.8 and 5 pg/mL respectively. Results Siltuximab interfered with the measurement of IL-6 for all three assays. A significant interference (> 20% reduction) was observed at even a very low siltuximab concentrations in all three assays (0.05 µg/mL). In the presence of 5 µg/mL or greater Siltuximab, a maximum reduction of 93%, 83%, and 40% was observed for Beckman Access, R&D Luminex assay, and V-PLEX Plus Mesoscale assay, respectively. Tocilizumab did not interfere with the measurement of IL-6 in the three assays when serum was spiked with up to 300 µg/mL of the drug. Conclusion Siltuximab falsely reduce the measured IL-6 concentration on all three immunoassays tested in this study to differing degrees, whereas Tocilizumab does not. Consider the therapeutic range of Siltuximab (84 to 332 µg/mL) for treatment of Castleman disease, and a half-life of 20.6 days, measurement of IL-6 may not be useful in Siltuximab treated patients for an extended time-period.

Abstract Background Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), a potent vasodilator, is produced by neuronal cells located in the central nervous system, the digestive, respiratory, and urogenital tracts, and the exocrine, thyroid, and adrenal glands. Increased circulating VIP is clinically useful to detect VIP-producing tumors in patients with chronic diarrheal diseases. Objective Develop a sensitive replacement radioimmunoassay (RIA) for VIP quantitation in human plasma due to the diminished supply of the antibody used in the previous in-house method. Method Patient VIP in EDTA plasma competes with labeled (125I) VIP for a limited number of primary rabbit polyclonal antibody (BMA Biomedicals, Augst, Switzerland) binding sites. Antibody-bound VIP is then complexed with a goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody and precipitated out of the solution with the use of polyethylene glycol and centrifugation. After the supernatant is discarded, the 125I signal from the pellet is counted on the Wizard2 gamma counter (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA). The measured signal is inversely proportional to the amount of VIP present in the patient’s sample. Method validation of the new assay included determination of imprecision (pooled human EDTA plasma), limits of detection and quantification, analytical measurement range (AMR), accuracy by spike recovery, interferences, cross-reactivity, stability, reference interval determination, and agreement with the current Mayo laboratory-developed assay. Results Stability studies on freshly collected EDTA plasma showed VIP is stable for 3 days ambient, 7 days refrigerated, and 14 days frozen. Intra-assay imprecision studies showed 8.3, 2.3, and 1.3%CV for mean VIP concentrations of 41, 144, and 304 pg/mL. Inter-assay imprecision was 12.9, 7.6, 5.2, and 7.5%CV for mean VIP concentrations of 30, 81, 180, and 308 pg/mL. The assay limit of detection was 29 pg/mL. The limit of quantitation was 30 pg/mL (%CV = 13%) and was established via precision profile. The AMR was 30–500 pg/mL (slope of 0.98, intercept of 3.0 pg/mL, and R2 of 0.97). The mean % spike recovery using a different preparation lot of calibrator material was 89% (range 83%–93%). The assay was not affected by up to 1000 mg/dL hemoglobin, 1000 mg/dL triglycerides, or 10 mg/dL bilirubin. Peptide histidine methionine 27, neurotensin, gastric inhibitory peptide, motilin, secretin, and glucagon do not cross-react in the assay. The 97.5th reference limit was <86 pg/mL (95% CI 81–90, n = 127). Positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percent agreement (NPA), and overall percent agreement (OPA) with the current Mayo VIP assay were 97, 82, and 90% respectively. Conclusion We have developed a replacement VIP RIA. This assay has a lower limit of quantitation and a broader AMR than the current assay. Concordance with the current assay was acceptable.

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate the effect of CRYSVITA® (burosumab‐twza) on FGF23 measurements in an intact and a C‐terminal immunoassay.MethodsAn intact serum FGF23 (MedFrontier) and a C‐terminal plasma FGF23 assay (Immutopics) were used. Serum/plasma pools were spiked to span the burosumab therapeutic range (1.4–11.3 μg/ml) and FGF23 recovery was assessed. Patient serum and plasma samples obtained pre and post‐burosumab treatment were evaluated on both assays and compared with corresponding phosphorus measurementsResultsSpiking burosumab (1.4–11.3 μg/ml) into sample pools resulted in a dose‐dependent negative analytical interference on intact FGF23 measurements and no significant interference for C‐terminal FGF23 measurements. However, more than a 500‐fold median increase (post‐ vs. pre‐burosumab administration) in in vivo FGF23 concentrations were observed by both assays.ConclusionsTherapeutic concentrations of burosumab result in a negative analytical interference of the intact, but not the C‐terminal FGF23 immunoassay. Despite this in vitro analytical interference in the intact assay, relatively large elevations of both intact FGF23 and C‐terminal FGF23 measurements were observed in vivo following burosumab administration. Following burosumab administration, FGF23 measurements must be interpreted within the clinical context of the patient and other relevant biomarker results.SummaryThis article describes a negative analytical interference by burosumab in an intact FGF23 immunoassay. The recovery of C‐terminal FGF23 is not significantly affected by the presence of burosumab. In vivo, both assays demonstrate extreme FGF23 elevations in the presence of the drug. Furthermore, the measurement of FGF23 blocked by burosumab is not clinically useful regarding hypophosphataemia.

AbstractBackgroundDecreased amyloid β1‐42 (Aβ42) and increased tau (t‐Tau and p‐Tau) concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) reflect the pathological changes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and aid in the diagnosis of AD dementia. In the United States, the ADmark® assay has been almost exclusively used for the measurement of these biomarkers in clinical practice. Recently, our institution switched from the ADmark® assay to the Roche Elecsys assays. The goal of this study was to determine if differences exist between these methods in classification of patients as having changes indicative of AD pathology.MethodPatients undergoing ADMark® testing (n= 73) were recruited to participate in this IRB‐approved study. Two simultaneous CSF aliquots were obtained. For ADMark®, 2.0mL were collected into a 5mL polypropylene (PP) tube and shipped frozen to Athena Diagnostics per collection instructions for testing (Innotest® immunoassays for Aβ42, t‐Tau, and p‐Tau). For the Roche Elecsys assays (Aβ42, t‐Tau, and p‐Tau), 2.0mL were collected into a 2.5mL low bind PP tube, frozen, and then tested at Mayo Clinic Laboratories. Comparative analysis was performed between the two testing methodologies and to clinical findings.ResultOverall concordance between the ADMark® Aβ42/t‐Tau index (ATI) and Roche p‐Tau/Aβ42 was 89% with 8 (11%) discrepant cases. Four cases were classified as normal by the Roche p‐Tau/Aβ42 but borderline (n=3) or abnormal (n=1) by ADMark® ATI. Four cases were classified as abnormal by the Roche p‐Tau/Aβ42 and borderline by ADMark® ATI. In these cases, the normal Roche p‐Tau/Aβ42 result was most consistent with clinical diagnosis. When compared to clinical diagnosis, cases with clinical suspicion of AD dementia were abnormal in 84% and 92% of cases with the ADMark® ATI and the Roche p‐Tau/Aβ42, respectively. In cases without clinical suspicion of AD dementia, results were abnormal in 19% and 21% of cases with the ADMark® ATI and the Roche p‐Tau/Aβ42, respectively. There were 2 cases with clinical suspicion of AD dementia and 5 cases without suspicion of AD dementia that were classified as borderline by ADMark® ATI.ConclusionRoche p‐Tau/Aβ42 showed comparable performance to ADMark® ATI when correlating results to clinical diagnosis of AD dementia.

Abstract Objectives Assessment of surgical outcome in acromegaly is typically recommended at 3 to 6 months following surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine if insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) concentrations at 6 weeks were equally predictive of surgical outcomes compared with IGF-1 concentrations at 3 to 6 months postoperatively applying newer IGF-1 assays. Methods Retrospective review of patients with newly diagnosed acromegaly who had surgery between 2013 and 2020 and had postoperative IGF-1 measured by 6 weeks and 3 to 6 months. Results At 6 weeks, 20 (35%) of the total 57 had normal IGF-1 and became abnormal in 1 at 3 to 6 months, whereas 37 (65%) of 57 had abnormal IGF-1 concentrations at 6 weeks, which normalized in 1 patient by 3 to 6 months. In patients who changed clinical status, IGF-1 at 6 weeks was within ±0.1-fold of normal. Although a difference was seen between median IGF-1 concentrations (286 vs 267 ng/mL, P = .009) at 6 weeks and 3 to 6 months, the mean reduction was small (–19.9 ng/mL). Conclusions Compared with 3 to 6 months, use of IGF-1 at 6 weeks was associated with a change in clinical status in 3.5% of patients. Therefore, in most patients, IGF-1 at 6 weeks can be used to assess clinical outcome via newer assays.

Abstract Introduction Measurement of amyloid beta (Aβ40 and Aβ42) and tau (phosphorylated tau [p‐tau] and total tau [t‐tau]) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can be utilized to differentiate clinical and preclinical Alzheimer's disease dementia (AD) from other neurodegenerative processes. Methods CSF biomarkers were measured in 150 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and the Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. P‐tau/Aβ42 (Roche Elecsys, Fujirebio LUMIPULSE) and Aβ42/40 (Fujirebio LUMIPULSE) ratios were compared to one another and to amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) classification. Results Strong correlation was observed between LUMIPULSE p‐tau/Aβ42 and Aβ42/40, as well as Elecsys and LUMIPULSE p‐tau/Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 (Spearman's ρ = –0.827, –0.858, and 0.960, respectively). Concordance between LUMIPULSE p‐tau/Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 was 96% and between Elecsys p‐tau/Aβ42 and both LUMIPULSE ratios was 97%. All ratios had > 94% overall, positive, and negative percent agreement with amyloid PET classification. Discussion These data suggest that p‐tau/Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 ratios provide similar clinical information in the assessment of amyloid pathology.

Abstract Background: Measurement of parathyroid hormone related peptide (PTHrP) is helpful in the diagnosis and clinical management of patients suspected of humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy (HHM). In these patients uncontrolled release of PTHrP by tumor cells is responsible for the hypercalcemia and PTH concentrations are typically suppressed. Objective: Develop a sensitive and specific assay for quantitation of PTHrP in plasma. Method: Calibrators (PTHrP 1-86) and samples (50uL) were incubated with an anti-PTHrP goat polyclonal acridinium ester labeled antibody. Complexes were transferred and incubated in a microplate coated with an anti-PTHrP polyclonal rabbit antibody. After washing, the acridinium ester generated signal, which is directly proportional to the amount of PTHrP in sample, was quantified. Results: In this assay PTHrp was stable for 24 hours ambient, 3 days refrigerated, 34 days frozen and through 3 freeze/thaws. Intra and inter-assay imprecision in EDTA plasma (~0.16-35.0 pmol/L) ranged from 2.2-8.6% and 5-15%, respectively. The limit of detection was 0.04 pmol/L and the limit of quantitation was 0.16 pmol/L (15% CV). The analytical measuring range was 0.39-50.5 pmol/L (slope of 1.07 and r2 of 0.99). Average spike recovery was 98% (range 85-108%). The assay was not affected by hemoglobin of ≤500 mg/dL, triglycerides of ≤2000 mg/dL, or bilirubin of ≤50mg/dL. No hook effect was noted up to 500 pmol/L. PTH (1-84) did not cross-react in the assay. C-terminal PTHrP(107-139), and N-terminal PTHrP(1-36) had no significant cross-reactivity (≤1.1%). Mid-PTHrP(38-94) had 8.3% cross-reactivity. Comparison with an in-house PTHrP assay (n=267) showed an r2 of 0.96, and slope of 2.25 by Passing-Bablok regression fit. The 97.5% reference interval for PTHrP (n=114) was ≤0.7 pmol/L, however a higher concentration (≤4.2 pmol/L) was identified as a more specific clinical cut-off. A retrospective clinical validation study showed that using ≤4.2 pmol/L resulted in a 91% clinical sensitivity and a 98% clinical specificity. Conclusion: We have developed an analytically and clinically sensitive and specific PTHrP immunoassay. A cutoff of ≤4.2 pmol/L is clinically useful in the evaluation of patients suspected of hypercalcemia of malignancy.