Citations

AbstractInfantile myofibromatosis (IM) is characterized by solitary musculoskeletal nodules presenting during infancy but can manifest as multiple lesions with visceral involvement. Multicentric IM with visceral involvement carries a high risk of mortality and there is no consensus on treatment. We present a case of a patient with multicentric IM and pulmonary involvement who progressed on several chemotherapeutic regimens and subsequently had a complete response to sorafenib and later imatinib. This report describes the novel use of sorafenib and imatinib to treat generalized IM and the role of continued tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy to maintain remission.

10012 Background: The prognostic significance of response to induction therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) by anatomic imaging (computerized tomographic [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] scan) is controversial. We previously reported no relationship between early response and failure-free survival (FFS) for patients on IRS-IV. We repeated the same analysis using an independent cohort of patients with non-metastatic, initially unresected RMS treated on a more recent clinical trial. Methods: A total of 338 patients enrolled in Children’s Oncology Group study D9803 met the following inclusion criteria for this analysis: 1) non-metastatic, initially unresected (Group III); 2) embryonal (ERMS) or alveolar (ARMS) histology; 3) documented response to induction chemotherapy (excluding progressive disease) based on anatomic imaging; and 4) documented therapy beyond week 12. Response at week 12 was determined by the treating institution as complete response (CR, complete resolution), partial response (PR, decrease of >= 50% of the sum of the products of maximum perpendicular diameters), or no response (NR, between 50% reduction and 25% increase in the sum of the products of maximum perpendicular diameters). FFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons between groups were made using the log-rank test. Results: Overall objective response rate (CR+PR) at week 12 of therapy was 85%, with similar responses for ERMS and ARMS. FFS was similar among all patients with CR, PR, or NR (p=0.49). Restricting the analysis to either ERMS or ARMS, there was no difference in FFS by histology (p=0.20 and p=0.45, respectively). Conclusions: These findings provide additional evidence that anatomic imaging assessment of early response to therapy among RMS patients does not predict outcome and should not be used to tailor subsequent therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT00003958. [Table: see text]

10554 Background: Age at diagnosis is a prognostic factor in patients with RMS. We sought to determine whether AYA with metastatic alveolar (ARMS) or embryonal (ERMS) RMS had a different failure-free survival (FFS) compared to younger patients, and to identify treatment related factors that may be associated with outcome. Methods: COG ARST0431 patients were reviewed. The incidence of toxicities (AE, grade3/4 using CTCAEv3) by age was determined in 4 reporting periods (RP: wks 1-6; RP2:7-19; RP3: 20-34; RP4: 35-54). The AEs in younger patients (<=13 years) were compared with those in AYA. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare differences between the groups. Results: Of 109 patients, 60 (55%) were AYA. In RP1, they were more likely to have nausea/vomiting (4.1 vs. 16.9%, p=0.06), pain (6.1 vs. 20.3%, p=0.05), and metabolic disturbances (4.1 vs. 20.3%, p=0.02) compared to younger patients. In RP4, older patients trended to have less infection (15.8 vs. 30.1, p=0.07). All other toxicities were similar between the two age cohorts in the other RPs. AYA were less likely to complete therapy (52 vs. 73%, p=0.03) and more likely (in RP 4) to have unplanned dose modifications (outside of protocol guidelines) (23 vs. 2.7%). Of patients that completed therapy, there was no age-related difference in the time to completion. As shown in the table, younger patients had better 3-yr FFS, driven by a lower FFS for AYA with ARMS. Conclusions: This evaluation suggests that AYA with RMS were less likely to complete therapy and experienced a higher prevalence of pain and nausea compared to younger patients; the role of reporting bias and reasons for treatment discontinuation need further study. Children were more likely than AYA to have infection. Inferior FFS was only seen in AYA with ARMS suggesting a clear need for novel therapies for these patients. This study may be underpowered to demonstrate significant differences in other toxicities or in FFS among ERMS patients. [Table: see text]

11570 Background: Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) protocols included treatment modifications, which may have ameliorated late health outcomes for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) survivors treated in more recent era. Methods: We evaluated chronic health conditions (CHCs) and late mortality ( > 5 years from diagnosis) among survivors treated 1970-1990 (IRSG I-III) and 1991-1999 (IRSG IV), and associations with specific treatments to identify treatment-related factors for adverse outcomes. Associations between treatments and CHCs and mortality were evaluated using Fine and Gray’s proportional hazards method accounting for competing risks. Results: 856 survivors treated 1970-90 (median diagnosis age 5.4 years [0- 20]) and 306 treated 1991-99 (median diagnosis age 5.5 years [0-20]) were included. Significant exposure differences between eras included higher percentage (53% vs. 17%, p < 0.01) receiving ≥ 20gm/m2 cumulative alkylators in 1991-99, but more receiving platinums (13% vs 5%, p < 0.01) and abdomen/ pelvis radiation (29% vs. 23%, p = 0.04) in 1970-90. 20-year cumulative incidence for any (40% vs. 28%, p < 0.01), ≥2 (16% vs. 7%, p < 0.01), and endocrine (8% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.01) grade 3-5 CHCs was higher in 1970-90 compared to 1991-99. The hazard ratio (HR) for any (HR 0.7, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.55-0.9), ≥2 (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.22-0.66) and endocrine (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.67) grade 3-5 CHC was lower for 1991-99 survivors than 1970-90. The effect of era (1991-99 vs 1970-90, HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59-0.91) on CHC was not attenuated when treatment variables were added to multivariable model. Exposures with increased risk of grade 3-5 CHC included platinums (hearing, HR 2, 95% CI 1.07-3.8), anthracycline ≥250mg/m2 (cardiovascular, HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6) and abdomen/ pelvis radiation (second malignant neoplasms, HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4, gastrointestinal, HR 7.4, 95% CI 3.5-16 and endocrine, HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.4). Gonadal dysfunction was the most common endocrine CHC. There was no difference in all cause or cause-specific mortality between the two cohorts. Conclusions: RMS survivors from the IRSG IV era are at reduced risk for late onset chronic health conditions compared to previous era.

Overview: The role of doxorubicin in treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) has been controversial for 30 years. Despite its known activity in RMS, because of its risk of cardiotoxicity, its use is not justified in low-risk patients who have an excellent chance of cure with vincristine, actinomycin with or without cyclophosphamide, and primary tumor treatment. For patients with intermediate and high risks, the risk/benefit ratio must be carefully considered. In addition, the peak incidence of RMS is in toddlers, with whom the risk of cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines is higher. A number of trials both in North America and Europe, which are reviewed in this article, have investigated the role of doxorubicin in RMS, with no conclusive outcomes. In addition, differences in risk-group assignment on two sides of the Atlantic further complicate comparisons and analyses. The current European EpSSG 2005 study for high-risk RMS (by the European definition) may come closest to giving an answer to the role of doxorubicin in RMS.

Known prognostic factors for rhabdomyosarcoma include primary site, stage, group (amount of tumor remaining after initial surgery before chemotherapy), lymph node involvement, age, and histology. These factors are taken into account when determining risk stratification for treatment allocation, with some differences between the European and U.S. approaches. The relationship of fusion status for PAX-3 of PAX-7 FOXO1 to outcome has been analyzed by a number of groups, but many of the studies are troubled by problems inherent in the use of convenience cohorts and the fact that patients in the analyzed groups are not always treated in a uniform fashion. One recent study analyzed outcome of patients treated in a similar fashion on the same protocol and found that patients with alveolar histology who were fusion negative had an outcome similar to those with embryonal histology. This article reviews many of the studies surrounding fusion status and outcome, risk stratification issues, and outcome of risk groups. The time is rapidly approaching in which fusion status will be used to allocate therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma.

Abstract Introduction: Slow rate of myeloid recovery at the end of induction chemotherapy reflected by a low absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is highly predictive of relapse in children with ALL (Laughton et al, 2005). Whether rate of myeloid recovery is predictive of outcome post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children and young adults has not been studied. Objective: To explore the association between early ANC recovery and survival in children and young adults undergoing allogeneic and autologous HSCT for leukemia or lymphoma. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed for all consecutive patients (age 6 months to 21 years) undergoing first HSCT for hematologic malignancies and lymphomas at Mayo Clinic, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology from 1995 to 2004. Day 15 and day 28 ANC were calculated for all patients. The primary end point was 1-year relapse free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). To explore the association between ANC and primary outcome, patients were stratified in 2 groups: ≥ or < than median ANC and Kaplan Meier survival curves were generated for both the groups and compared with the log-rank test. Matched related donor (MRD), matched unrelated donor (MUD) and haploidentical (as one group) and autologous transplantations were analyzed separately. Results: There were a total of 50 patients. 28 received MRD, 2 MUD, 10 haploidentical and 10 autologous. The underlying malignancies were (AML n =25, Biphenotypic Leukemia n=1, ALL n =7, NHL n=3, HD n=7, JMML n=5, CML n=2, CLL n=1). No patient was lost to follow up during that time and data was available for all except (day 28 ANC) for one patient. The 1-year RFS and OS rate was the same; 81% for the MRD, 50% for MUD and haploidentical and 70% for autologous transplant populations, respectively. In patients receiving MRD transplants, higher ANC at either day 15 or day 28 post transplantation was associated with better, albeit statistically non-significant, RFS/OS rates at 1 year (86% for ≥ median (0.68) vs. 76% for < median p=0.44 and 92% for ≥ median (2.2) vs. 72% for < median p= 0.18 respectively). Opposite results were observed for MUD and Haploidentical transplantation group (33% for ANC ≥ median (0.47) at day 15 vs. 66% for < median p=0.28, 43% for ANC ≥ median (1.9) at day 28 vs. 60% for < median p=0.48). For autologous transplant group, higher ANC at day 15 was associated with better, albeit statistically non-significant, RFS/OS rates at 1 year (80% for ANC ≥ median (0.42) vs. 60% for < median p=0.60) while opposite results were observed on day 28 (60% for ANC ≥ median (0.46) vs. 75% for < median p=0.54). Conclusions: Our data generated conflicting findings of the association between ANC and RFS/OS in different patient populations undergoing HSCT. However, our results are limited by the small sample size. Further collaborative studies are needed to explore this association.

Abstract Abstract 1517 Purpose: Decitabine, a deoxycytidine nucleoside derivative, is an inhibitor of DNA-methyltransferases indicated for treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) including previously treated and untreated, de novo or secondary MDS of all French-American-British (FAB) subtypes, Intermediate-1, Intermediate-2, and High-Risk International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) groups. Laboratory evidence shows that pretreatment of AML cell lines can sensitize leukemia cells to chemotherapy as well as inhibit clonogenic potential. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of decitabine when used as priming before induction therapy in children with newly diagnosed AML. Exploratory analyses of genomic methylation and RNA expression patterns and minimal residual disease (MRD) are embedded correlative studies. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, two-arm, open-label study enrolls pediatric pts ages 1–16 with newly diagnosed AML to either Arm A: daunorubicin, cytarabine, etoposide (D-ADE) preceded by a 5-day course of decitabine (experimental arm) or Arm B: daunorubicin, cytarabine, etoposide (ADE; control arm). Following completion of induction on study, post-induction therapy is at the treating physician's discretion. To date, 20 pts, 10 in each arm (1–16 yrs, median 9.4 yrs in both arms) have been enrolled. Results: At the protocol-specified bone marrow sampling time 3 weeks post-induction, there were 2 CRs, 6 CRi (CR with incomplete hematopoietic recovery), 1 leukemia not in remission and 1 pt who discontinued due to an AE in Arm A. In Arm B, 6 CRs, 2CRi, 1 PR and 1 pt with marrow aplasia have been confirmed. Decitabine PK in all arm A pts (100%) were characterized by mean+SD Cmax, 297+109 ng/mL, AUC0-t, 216+73.7 ng*h/mL, CL, 136+93.9L/h, Vdss 93.1+70.7 L, t1/2 0.456+0.073 h, and median tmax0.925 h. All pts had at least one AE. Grade 3 and 4 non-hematologic AEs in Arm A that were not seen in Arm B were caecitis in 2 (20%), anorexia in 3 (30%), and hypophosphatemia in 2 (20%) of pts. All pts experienced neutropenia and thrombocytopenia as expected. One pt in Arm A had appendicitis and colon perforation on Day 6 that led to study discontinuation, later determined to have been leukemic infiltrate. Two pts have died to date (both in Arm A), one of necrotic bowel, Pseudomonas sepsis and multisystem organ failure 6 months after completing study induction therapy. One pt died 5 months following study treatment from multisystem organ failure after stem cell transplant. Epigenetic changes associated with decitabine pretreatment were analyzed and will be presented. Conclusions: Decitabine in combination with ADE chemotherapy is well tolerated in children with newly diagnosed AML. There were no AEs that had not been previously identified in adults with MDS or AML. No differences have been observed between treatment arms in hematologic toxicities based on the current sample size. To date, the decitabine-treated pts in this study may have more gastrointestinal toxicity and hypophosphatemia. Decitabine-treated pts achieved PK exposures that were similar to those observed in adults treated with decitabine. Preliminary responses by CR/CRi were similar between treatment arms; expected adverse events of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were similar between both Arms. Molecular changes associated with decitabine pretreatment may be important in the sensitization of clonogenic AML cells. Total accrual of 40 subjects is planned. Disclosures: Off Label Use: AC220 in relapsed/refractory pediatric acute leukemia. Tarassoff:Eisai, Inc.: Employment. Jones:Eisai Inc: Employment.

Abstract Introduction: Early lymphocyte recovery predicts outcome in adults undergoing high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation for a variety of malignancies (Porrata et al; 2001, 2002, 2005). Whether rate of lymphoid recovery is predictive of outcome post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children and young adults has not been studied. Objective: To explore the association between early ALC recovery and survival in children and young adults undergoing allogeneic and autologous (HSCT) for leukemia or lymphoma. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed for all consecutive patients (age 6 months to 21 years) undergoing first HSCT for hematologic malignancies and lymphomas at Mayo Clinic, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology from 1995 to 2004. Day 15 and day 28 ALC were calculated for all patients. The primary end point was 1-year relapse free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). To explore the association between ALC and primary outcome, patients were stratified in 2 groups: ≥ or < than median ALC and Kaplan Meier survival curves were generated for both the groups and compared with the log-rank test. Matched related donor (MRD), matched unrelated donor (MUD) and haploidentical (as one group) and autologous transplantations were analyzed separately. Results: There were a total of 50 patients. 28 received MRD, 2 MUD, 10 haploidentical and 10 autologous transplant. The underlying malignancies were AML n =25, Biphenotypic Leukemia n=1, ALL n =7, NHL n=3, HD n=7, JMML n=5, CML n=2, CLL n=1). No patient was lost to follow up during that time and data was available for all except (day 28 ALC) for one patient. The 1-year RFS and OS rate was the same; 81% for the MRD, 50% for MUD and haploidentical and 70% for autologous transplant populations, respectively. In patients receiving MRD transplants, higher ALC at either day 15 or day 28 post transplantation was associated with better, albeit statistically non-significant, RFS/OS rates at 1 year (85% for ≥ median (0.23) vs. 78% for < median p=0.69 and 86% for ≥ median (0.47) vs. 77% for < median p= 0.59 respectively). Opposite results were observed for MUD and Haploidentical transplantation group (33% for ALC ≥ median (0.05) at day 15 vs. 67% for < median p=0.2, 33% for ALC ≥ median (0.35) at day 28 vs. 66% for < median p=0.28) and for autologous transplantations (67% for ALC ≥ median (0.23) at day 15 vs. 75% for < median p=0.68, 40% for ALC ≥ median (0.48) at day 28 vs. 100% for < median p=0.07). Conclusions: Our data generated conflicting findings of the association between ALC and RFS/OS in different patient populations undergoing HSCT. However, our results are limited by the small sample size. Further collaborative studies are needed to explore this association.

Abstract Background Previous studies of the prognostic importance of FOXO1 fusion status in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) have had conflicting results. We re‐examined risk stratification by adding FOXO1 status to traditional clinical prognostic factors in children with localized or metastatic RMS. Methods Data from six COG clinical trials (D9602, D9802, D9803, ARST0331, ARTS0431, ARST0531; two studies each for low‐, intermediate‐ and high‐risk patients) accruing previously untreated patients with RMS from 1997 to 2013 yielded 1727 evaluable patients. Survival tree regression for event‐free survival (EFS) was conducted to recursively select prognostic factors for branching and split. Factors included were age, FOXO1, clinical group, histology, nodal status, number of metastatic sites, primary site, sex, tumor size, and presence of metastases in bone/bone marrow, soft tissue, effusions, lung, distant lymph nodes, and other sites. Definition and outcome of the proposed risk groups were compared to existing systems and cross‐validated results. Results The 5‐year EFS and overall survival (OS) for evaluable patients were 69% and 79%, respectively. Extent of disease (localized versus metastatic) was the first split (EFS 73% vs 30%; OS 84% vs. 42%). FOXO1 status (positive vs negative) was significant in the second split both for localized (EFS 52% vs 78%; OS 65% vs 88%) and metastatic disease (EFS 6% vs 46%; OS 19% vs 58%). Conclusions After metastatic status, FOXO1 status is the most important prognostic factor in patients with RMS and improves risk stratification of patients with localized RMS. Our findings support incorporation of FOXO1 status in risk stratified clinical trials.